Fear The Wolves

About

"Fear the Wolves" is a competitive Battle Royale FPS set in a radiation-ravaged Chernobyl by Vostok Games. Players must survive not only other survivors, but also deadly anomalies, dynamically-changing weather, and mutated creatures. Protective gear allows exploration of dangerous radioactive zones for powerful loot. The game features unique elements inspired by classic FPS games, with the added twist of player-voted weather conditions.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

45%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,842 reviews

gameplay68 positive mentions

optimization40 negative mentions

Unique blend of PvE and PvP elements with a post-apocalyptic atmosphere reminiscent of S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
Dynamic weather system that affects gameplay and adds tension to matches.
Interesting mechanics like radiation zones and wolf encounters that differentiate it from other battle royale games.

Extremely low player base, making it difficult to find matches, often resulting in long wait times.
Poor optimization leading to lag, crashes, and inconsistent frame rates even on high-end systems.
Gameplay feels unpolished with issues like hit registration problems and clunky mechanics.

gameplay
202 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
34%
55%
11%
The gameplay of "Fear the Wolves" is characterized by a mix of solid shooting mechanics and unique environmental challenges, drawing inspiration from the "Stalker" franchise. However, many players report issues such as poor optimization, lag, and a lack of a substantial player base, which detracts from the overall experience. While the game shows potential with its innovative mechanics and immersive atmosphere, it requires significant improvements and content additions to fully realize its promise.
- “The gameplay is immersive and the gunplay is phenomenal, leading to some pretty adrenaline-inducing gun fights.”
- “The map and shooting mechanics are great, but right now I feel it lacks direction.”
- “The gameplay mechanics are solid!”
- “The game mechanics are also really poorly done, especially gun handling.”
- “The gameplay needs reworked.”
- “It has pretty unique mechanics but that's it; optimization is very bad, gunplay is very bad, it just feels like a very early access project.”
graphics
136 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
50%
7%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the beautiful visuals, weather effects, and overall aesthetic appeal, particularly when using the Unity engine. However, several users criticize the optimization, performance issues, and some aspects of map design, noting that distant rendering and certain environments can appear lackluster. While some players find the graphics impressive and immersive, others feel they fall short of expectations, especially compared to other titles in the genre.
- “The graphics are awesome, the grass moves under the wind, the rain and fog are one of the most realistic ever seen, besides the players can vote for the weather during the match!”
- “The graphics in this game are great, the weather effects are awesome, it runs smooth for me, I have noticed no glitches or issues of any kind in general.”
- “The graphics are among the best with beautiful design, the colors and lighting are appealing to the eye.”
- “The graphics are mediocre and the performance unacceptable (I had frame drops to 25 fps with a GTX 1060, AMD FX-8370 and 16 GB RAM).”
- “The graphics look bad, yet the FPS is still horrible somehow. The PvE aspect of the game is basically non-existent because the wolves get stuck in the ground, and you can't change your sensitivity to a place you're comfortable with because you get sliders that are broken.”
- “One of my biggest let-downs with this game was the quality of the graphics.”
optimization
118 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
52%
34%
The game's optimization has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including frequent crashes, frame drops, and stuttering, making it nearly unplayable for some. While there are occasional mentions of improvements in performance and graphics, the consensus is that significant optimization is still needed for a smoother experience. Overall, players express frustration with the current state of optimization, suggesting that the game is not worth purchasing until these issues are addressed.
- “Graphics are great, the game runs smoothly, a good variety of weapons, and different elements in the game that shift constantly so that every game doesn't feel the same.”
- “Just in the few large updates they've released, they have introduced so many new features, improved the visuals and the optimization, and added scaling to address gameplay concerns.”
- “The graphics have improved very much; the map is now well optimized which fixed the FPS drop problem. Also, the servers are improved now, you get a decent ping, and the gunplay is very realistic because of the recoil system.”
- “Buggy as hell, badly optimized, and basically unplayable.”
- “I'll put it bluntly, the game is not worth any amount of money in its current state, the optimization is piss poor and even my PC which has an i7 6700k and a GTX 1080 struggles to run it on medium settings, getting constant frame drops and only running in the mid 50s.”
- “Terrible optimization; I have stuttering all the time. I have an AMD Fury OC 2x, 6700k, and 16GB RAM. FPS drops and low FPS even on medium and lower settings, 35/40. Impossible to play; I will request a refund.”
atmosphere
80 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
63%
32%
5%
The atmosphere of the game is widely praised for its immersive design, reminiscent of the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series, with many players noting its beautiful graphics, audio design, and a sense of desolation and tension. However, some critiques mention inconsistencies in rendering and a lack of polish that detracts from the overall experience. Overall, the atmospheric elements are considered one of the game's strongest features, appealing particularly to fans of post-apocalyptic settings.
- “The atmosphere of the game is amazing, reminiscent of S.T.A.L.K.E.R. and Chernobyl.”
- “It also has a great atmosphere with the map and audio design, making the experience feel desolate and tense.”
- “Great S.T.A.L.K.E.R. post-apocalyptic atmosphere, attractive gameplay, various tactics, and dangerous anomalies.”
- “It adds no atmosphere and is a completely useless thing.”
- “But unfortunately it doesn't catch the atmosphere of S.T.A.L.K.E.R.”
- “That coupled with the choppy framerate, lack of actual stalkerish atmosphere and obvious lack of polish has me not very happy with the experience.”
stability
76 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
3%
92%
The game's stability is widely criticized, with many users reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and performance issues that hinder gameplay. While some players experience smooth performance, the overall consensus is that the game is poorly optimized and often unplayable, especially during matches with higher player counts. Despite its potential, many reviewers suggest that significant improvements are needed before it can be considered stable or worth its current price.
- “The game runs great.”
- “The graphics in this game are great, the weather effects are awesome, it runs smoothly for me. I have noticed no glitches or issues of any kind in general.”
- “The game runs great.”
- “Buggy as hell, badly optimized, and basically unplayable.”
- “The game isn’t stable, lags and freezes so often!”
- “Very very buggy at the moment to the point where I finally land with my parachute, I start running and my screen freezes for about 10 seconds and now I'm randomly at the building where I was running to.”
monetization
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
22%
69%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized as a cash grab, with many users expressing disappointment over the lack of advertising and player engagement. Reviewers suggest that transitioning to a free-to-play model with in-game purchases could enhance the game's popularity and support ongoing development. Overall, the current monetization approach is seen as inadequate, hindering player growth and match availability.
- “Most battle royale games have been transitioning to the free-to-play arena because of how successful in-game purchases have become.”
- “Game would have benefited greatly from going the free-to-play route and adding in-game purchases.”
- “In-game purchases keep the income flowing and allow budget for continual development of the game.”
- “All around cash grab by shady developers; I wouldn't trust another Volstok game if they are even still around.”
- “If its current state/monetization is its final state, this would be a thumbs down.”
- “Just another mediocre, boring battle royale cash grab.”
story
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
76%
12%
The game's story is criticized for being minimal and lacking depth, with many players feeling that the reliance on PvP and other players as a substitute for traditional storytelling and level design was a significant misstep. While some acknowledge the existence of a basic narrative, they express a desire for a more developed single-player campaign that could enhance the experience and provide richer storytelling elements. Overall, the consensus is that the current story is insufficient and detracts from the game's potential enjoyment.
- “Maybe a future DLC which does a single-player campaign, explaining the story in its fullest and letting you get acquainted with everything in its finest detail?”
- “Imho, if Vostok would have made a single-player campaign on this map as a spiritual successor to Stalker with its own story but similar gameplay to the original trilogy, it would have been wonders for me and many fans.”
- “Side note: I have not played enough to have a firm grasp of the story, but there is one (which hopefully evolves to include more creatures, etc.).”
- “The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design, etc. to the game.”
- “No story, no exciting play, no fun weapons.”
- “Hardly a success story; gamers just weren't all that interested in the game.”
music
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
50%
10%
The music in the game is described as atmospheric and occasionally creepy, enhancing the overall experience and sense of isolation. While the soundtrack is considered decent, it doesn't stand out significantly, with some players expressing mixed feelings about its impact. The opening menu music, reminiscent of "Stalker," raised initial hopes for a more engaging auditory experience.
- “The game has other neat features like good graphics and good atmospheric sound/creepy music, making you feel less alone than you are.”
- “A song of silence as the night flies.”
- “I was hopeful with the opening menu music, where it sounded like Stalker.”
humor
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is derived from its quirky mechanics and animations, such as the janky movements of wolves and the choppy melee combat, which players find amusing. Additionally, the absurdity of having only one server located in Europe adds to the comedic experience. Overall, the combination of FPS, battle royale, and walking simulator elements contributes to a lighthearted and entertaining atmosphere.
- “I realized you can change the servers you play on, but the funny thing is there is only one server... and it's in Europe!!!!!”
- “The gunplay is terrible, the melee is choppy and laughable, and the wolves' janky animations jumping around are straight up hilarious.”
- “I'm no Shroud, but I don't completely suck =] and apparently I can be funny?”
grinding
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be somewhat tedious, with some noting that it can feel repetitive and drawn out, particularly in encounters with wolves. Overall, the grinding is described as a minor but noticeable drawback.
- “It can be a bit grindy sometimes, but it adds to the overall experience.”
- “The game feels a bit grindy at times, yet it keeps me engaged.”
- “While it can be a bit grindy, the rewards make it worthwhile.”
- “While you might think the wolves are the main attrition of the game, they are one of its most tedious features.”
- “A bit grindy sometimes.”
- “A bit grindy.”
emotional
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express a strong emotional connection to the game, highlighting a mix of excitement and apprehension regarding the developers' updates and content additions. This sentiment suggests that the game's evolution is closely tied to players' feelings, indicating a deep investment in both the gameplay and the developers' decisions.

Buy Fear The Wolves

Fear The Wolves
See offer on Steam

20h Median play time

25h Average play time

8-50h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 14 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

59%10.9kreviews

Battalion Legacy

2019

Shooter

This game contains adult content

56%10.8kreviews

The Culling

2017

Survival Shooter

53%4.5kreviews

Islands of Nyne: Battle Royale

2018

Survival Shooter

60%29kreviews

World War 3

2022

Shooter

51%7.8kreviews

Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade

2016

Role Playing Shooter

71%8.5kreviews

Contagion

2013

Open World Shooter

This game contains adult content

52%14.8kreviews

Survarium

2015

Open World Role Playing Shooter

This game contains adult content

56%38kreviews

Just Survive

2015

Survival Role Playing Shooter

64%2.9kreviews

Survive the Nights

2017

Open World Shooter

This game contains adult content

55%181.9kreviews

Battlefield 2042

2021

Casual Shooter

Fear The Wolves Tweets

Fear The Wolves

Platforms

About

Buy Fear The Wolves

Fear The Wolves

Videos

Games Like Fear The Wolves

Battalion Legacy

The Culling

Islands of Nyne: Battle Royale

World War 3

Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade

Contagion

Survarium

Just Survive

Survive the Nights

Battlefield 2042