"The Culling: Origins" is a free-to-play Battle Royale game, taking you back to the original island where you must scavenge, craft, and build to be the last one standing. All gameplay aspects are available to all players, with optional paid DLC and premium currency for exclusive items. The game is designed for cunning and skill, with no pay-to-win mechanics.
The game creates deep emotional connections, evoking a range of feelings from nostalgia to heartbreak, making it a standout in the multiplayer genre.
The atmosphere is immersive and engaging, blending a vibrant jungle setting with dark humor, reminiscent of 'The Hunger Games'.
The gameplay offers a unique blend of battle royale and survival mechanics, with enjoyable combat and crafting options that enhance replayability.
The game suffers from significant optimization issues, with many players experiencing lag, low FPS, and crashes, particularly on lower-end systems.
The monetization strategy has drawn criticism, with concerns over potential pay-to-win scenarios and a perception of being a cash grab.
Many players find the grinding aspect tedious and repetitive, detracting from the overall experience and leading to a sense of staleness over time.
gameplay
883 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
55%
12%
The gameplay of "The Culling" is characterized by its unique blend of battle royale and survival mechanics, heavily influenced by the "Hunger Games" concept. Players engage in fast-paced, skill-based melee combat with a rock-paper-scissors mechanic that emphasizes blocking, pushing, and attacking, although many reviews highlight issues with clunky mechanics and balance changes that have detracted from the experience over time. While the game offers a variety of crafting and combat options, it has faced criticism for bugs, optimization problems, and a steep learning curve that can frustrate new players.
“The gameplay revolves around the idea of a battle royale with survival aspects and a Hunger Games style.”
“All aspects of gameplay are available to all players, and the game does not include pay-to-win mechanics.”
“The combat system adds a fun randomness to every encounter, and the game mechanics are clever and well-integrated.”
“Unfortunately, the devs killed the game after making updates that made the overall gameplay worse every time.”
“The mechanics and balance were actually decent at one point, but the game has been ruined by the devs. Don't bother buying this game anymore.”
“The developers killed the game when they changed the combat mechanics to be less skillful and more bloated.”
optimization
454 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
52%
30%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues, especially on lower-end systems. While some updates have improved optimization and frame rates for certain users, others continue to experience lag, low FPS, and crashes, leading to frustration. Overall, the game is seen as needing further optimization to enhance playability and stability, particularly for those with mid-range or older hardware.
“Our goal is to provide a game that is as optimized, bug-free, and safe from cheaters as possible.”
“Its crazy well optimized, runs smooth, and is fun to play!”
“The new patch really optimized the game, which was nice, but the game is still broken.”
“It was a lot of fun, then the developers released an update that damaged optimization to the point that 75% of players couldn't play it anymore, and it took them over a month to fix this issue; by that time, the game had died.”
“The game is poorly optimized, and there is no reason my i7 4790k GTX 980 build should get less than 90fps (I get around 50ish, with the games I play I'm used to 100+).”
“What was once a fun hunger games simulator is now a buggy, lag fest that is completely unoptimized and unplayable.”
graphics
404 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
37%
51%
12%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the stunning visuals and improvements made over time, while others criticize the optimization issues and performance drops, particularly on lower-end hardware. Many users note that while the graphics can be appealing, they often struggle with lag and frame rate problems, making the gameplay experience frustrating. Overall, the graphics are considered decent for an early access title, but there is a consensus that further optimization is needed to enhance performance across various systems.
“Very great and stunning graphics! I love the amount of weapons, and the game is overall amazing!”
“The graphics are great, the combat and movement are super fluid and almost feel realistic, but surreal at the same time!”
“The graphics are pretty good, the depth of field is horrible though, but it's bearable.”
“Back before battle royale was all the rage, I romped around this game with potato graphics, getting executed by 3-pixel-tall enemies from 100 feet away.”
“The graphics are lacking.”
“This game is poorly optimized, stutters frequently, and has graphical problems abound.”
stability
207 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
1%
93%
The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous players reporting a plethora of bugs, glitches, and crashes that significantly hinder gameplay. Many users experienced issues such as freezing, connection problems, and unresponsive mechanics, leading to frustration and an overall lack of polish. While some acknowledge that the game is in early access and may improve over time, the current state is deemed too unstable for a satisfactory experience.
“However, the game is pretty much bug-free; I have yet to experience any noticeable problems.”
“Runs great and feels optimized.”
“It's pretty bug-free considering early access; the only real issues I've had were spots of server lag and disconnects, but no real game-breaking bugs. A couple of crashes over like 50 matches is nothing.”
“This game was dead on arrival and probably the most buggy/unrefined launch of any game I've ever experienced.”
“Starting with the game being unable to connect to the game servers when launching (it also requires a constant reconnect after every match taking about 30s), over to a bug that 'freezes' the game entirely needing a forced shut down when opening loot crates (the loot crate fails to open, probably due to missing server response, leading to the game ignoring all input), not to mention desynced fighting animations and a poor netcode.”
“After a year this game is still glitchy and buggy, couldn't even get in a match with my friend.”
humor
164 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
97%
3%
The humor in "The Culling 2" is a mixed bag, with many players appreciating the dark, satirical commentary from the announcer and the amusing moments that arise during gameplay, particularly in melee combat. While some find the humor refreshing and entertaining, others feel it has become repetitive or less effective over time, especially following updates that altered the game's dynamics. Overall, the game offers a blend of intense action and comedic elements, making it enjoyable for those who play with friends, despite criticisms regarding its execution and community engagement.
“Goes through bad patches but overall an amazing battle royale with a ton of funny moments.”
“The humor is solid and the gameplay can be pretty intense.”
“The announcer is both hilarious and creepy, delivering quirky lines on how some opponents have just died.”
“The Culling 2 is just copying other games, not funny at all. I know this game has 0% chance to come back.”
“After the last three updates, The Culling is not funny to play and has a terrible fighting system (pre-patch).”
“The announcer is a really played out, unfunny joke that only a 15-year-old TF2 player would find funny.”
monetization
68 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
46%
50%
The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it as a cash grab that detracts from the overall experience. While some reviews note the introduction of cosmetic microtransactions in a free-to-play model, others express concern over potential future monetization tactics that could lead to pay-to-win scenarios. Overall, the sentiment is mixed, with a strong desire from the community for the developers to avoid exploitative practices and focus on delivering quality content.
“The game is pretty good right now, I enjoy it. I mean sure it has microtransactions, but it also became free to play, so I'll accept that.”
“Overall though, I definitely recommend this game, especially as it's only £10.99, and the only microtransactions are for cosmetic items (which are very easy to get, as you get 1 skin per game, as long as you don't die straight away).”
“This game has extremely active developers only looking to improve their game and not fork you for microtransactions like other games.”
“I cannot recommend this game in good faith (if it was still available for sale, anyway), since, while the game itself is still good, the devs planned to add a really bad monetization method into the game that would've killed all forward drive it had. Disassociate yourself with this game and its developers and save yourself a world of headache.”
“Total cash grab money motivated company with no interest in delivering quality.”
“Game over for this cash grab. The company should be required to refund after all the crap they have put the player base through with 'Culling 2' and this origins BS... companies/developers should be punished for creating products and requesting money when they clearly do not have the talent to develop it past a beta type phase.”
story
68 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
78%
7%
The reviews indicate that the game lacks a substantial narrative, with many players noting the absence of a traditional story or campaign mode. While some appreciate the unique gameplay mechanics and competitive nature reminiscent of survival themes, others express disappointment over the game's failure to deliver a compelling storyline. Overall, the consensus is that while the game offers engaging gameplay, it does not provide a meaningful or original story experience.
“Potentially it has the concept, the graphics, the storyline, and the humor in such a gory and raw and random game.”
“The storyline was simple: a major will fight until the bitter end, until just he and the teacher are left.”
“No story.”
“It's the same story over and over.”
“The game is focused entirely on multiplayer, so there's really no campaign mode or side quests available.”
replayability
64 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
55%
39%
6%
The game's replayability is a mixed bag, with some players praising its high replay value due to varied gameplay mechanics, random events, and enjoyable combat, while others criticize it for lacking depth and becoming stale over time. Many users appreciate the fun factor and potential for extended play, despite concerns about balance and optimization issues. Overall, while some find it endlessly replayable, others feel it could benefit from additional content and improvements to maintain long-term engagement.
“There's excellent variety and replayability in the games; the combat is rewarding and enjoyable, and it runs on my fairly old PC.”
“The game is very fun to play and has a lot of replayability, even though it may not look like that at first glance.”
“The game runs smoothly, has unique qualities such as its perk system and crafting system, and offers a ton of replayability through its customization unlock system, random events/loot during the games, and its fast-paced action with 20-minute rounds.”
“Terrible optimization and the developers have ruined the fun and replayability of the game.”
“The developers don't know what they want this game to be, and have mangled this game's corpse to an unplayable mess with even less skill, replayability, and reason to play than Starforge.”
“I'd say a lot of decent players already stopped playing regularly since there's a lack of replay value, despite the existence of RNG, because of the really stale meta in the current patch.”
grinding
27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
3%
93%
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and repetitive, often feeling that it detracts from the overall experience. Many express frustration with the time required to gather resources and the lack of excitement in combat, leading to a sense of staleness after extended play. While some enjoy the grind as a means to improve their skills, others feel it overshadows the competitive nature of the game, with calls for developers to minimize grind and avoid pay-to-win mechanics.
“If you're looking for an exciting, competitive, nuanced multiplayer experience with no grinding whatsoever, then look no further!”
“You'll need a second life for grinding.”
“The game is very tedious.”
“It is very grindy to make weapons and the gameplay wasn't really fun at all.”
atmosphere
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
58%
29%
13%
The game's atmosphere is a standout feature, blending a vibrant jungle setting with a darkly humorous, gameshow-like vibe that enhances the survival experience. Players appreciate the intense tension and immersive design, which evokes feelings reminiscent of "The Hunger Games," while the engaging mechanics and crafting systems contribute to a dynamic and enjoyable environment. Overall, the atmosphere is described as both fun and thrilling, making it a key element of the gameplay experience.
“The jungle map was also done quite well and enabled players to explore quite a bit, creating a nice survival atmosphere.”
“The atmosphere of the island, along with the announcer, makes you feel like you are on a game show from the future, fighting for the cameras and viewers.”
“The presentation is awesome; black humor and macabre comments on almost anything really add a lot of atmosphere to this brutal game of life and death.”
“The atmosphere of the island along with the announcer makes you feel like you are on a game show from the future fighting for the cameras and viewers.”
“The whole atmosphere has a 'Hunger Games' vibe and I haven't left a match without feeling on the edge of my seat the whole time.”
“Any game attempting to create a battle royale atmosphere could learn a lot from The Culling.”
emotional
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a deep emotional connection to the game, highlighting its ability to evoke feelings of nostalgia, frustration, and heartbreak. Many describe intense experiences that range from excitement and pride to sadness and anger, particularly in relation to gameplay mechanics and narrative elements. Overall, the game is recognized for its capacity to create emotionally charged moments, making it a standout in the multiplayer genre.
“It is by far the most emotionally tense multiplayer game I've ever played!”
“We exchanged blows and I cried as he kept breaking through my block.”
“Renegade let out a roar of pride... and shed a tear for the loss of his brother in arms.”
music
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
58%
21%
The music in the game is minimal, primarily featuring an eerie main menu theme and ambient sounds that enhance immersion, such as crickets and birds. While some players appreciate the lack of distracting music during intense gameplay, others find the limited soundtrack disappointing, with a desire for more engaging audio elements. Overall, the focus on sound effects over music is seen as a double-edged sword, contributing to the game's atmosphere but leaving some players wanting more.
“So when they announced that, for origins, they would place a special emphasis on opening a dialogue with the players, it was like music to my ears.”
“The music is enjoyable, and the sound effects while playing are done well (hearing footsteps and doors opening is really helpful for identifying others around you).”
“There isn't much music in this game, but the ambient noises of crickets and birds make it very immersive at times.”
“The only music I have noticed is the eerie one from the main menu; during the game, there is little more than ambient noises, explosions, and screams, which is good!”
“It gets irritating as well when you have to listen to the menu music for that long, which is a horrid experience.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
While the character designs are visually appealing, there is little mention of depth or growth in character development, suggesting that the focus may be more on aesthetics than on meaningful narrative progression.