Energy Collector

About

Energy Collector is a single player action game. It was developed by Jens Roderus and was released on June 9, 2023. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Collect huge amounts of energies and buy upgrades to collect even more energy! Energy Collector is about automating collection and transferring energy between fields to manage resources. Each field is like an idle game in itself; play eight games simultaneously! No clicking! Just mouse hover over energies to collect! Offline progression. Automate collection with upgrades. Compare yourself …

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

70%

Audience ScoreBased on 23 reviews

gameplay4 positive mentions

grinding7 negative mentions

The game features cute graphics and satisfying sound effects, enhancing the overall experience.
It has a unique gameplay loop with interesting mechanics, making it stand out among incremental games.
The developer is responsive and actively updates the game, showing commitment to improving the player experience.

The game requires too much micromanagement, making it feel tedious and not truly idle.
Prestiging can be punishing, as it takes a long time to regain progress, which can be frustrating for players.
There are optimization issues, including high CPU/GPU usage, which can hinder performance during other tasks.

gameplay
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
37%
27%
The gameplay has received mixed feedback, with some players finding it tedious and difficult due to micromanagement mechanics and a timer in an idle game. However, others appreciate the fresh mechanics, good pacing, and the depth of content that keeps them engaged, highlighting a well-structured gameplay loop and a helpful in-game guide. Overall, while there are rough edges, the game offers a substantial amount of content and enjoyable learning experiences.
- “This game introduces some fresh mechanics, and I've found it fun to learn and play them.”
- “I've played more than my fair share of idle/incremental games, but there aren't many with an interesting gameplay loop and smooth polish.”
- “There's easily hundreds of hours of gameplay, but it's well paced so you always have something to aim for.”
- “It makes the gameplay tedious and painful.”
- “The gameplay is flat and quickly becomes tedious.”
- “It would be awesome if the rough edges were refined and someone could make it not feel so difficult for gameplay's sake.”
grinding
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and repetitive, often leading to a frustrating experience. While some appreciate the addictive nature of the gameplay, many feel that it quickly loses its appeal due to the need for constant micromanagement and the grindy nature of certain mechanics. Overall, the grinding can detract from the enjoyment, making the gameplay feel flat over time.
- “It makes the gameplay tedious and painful.”
- “It becomes tedious really fast.”
- “The gameplay is flat and quickly becomes tedious.”
story
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
20%
60%
The story aspect of the game is intertwined with a quest system that requires players to return at regular intervals, which some find restrictive and contrary to the idle gameplay experience. While the quests themselves are enjoyable, missing them does not significantly impact the overall experience, suggesting that the narrative may not be the primary focus for players.
- “The quest and exploration timers contribute to the feeling that you must come back at 15-minute intervals to properly progress.”
- “I would say that if I could change something, it would be how quests work.”
- “I keep missing quests or feeling tied to the game every 15 minutes, and that isn't an idle game to me.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is appreciated for its amusing art style and quirky elements, contributing to an overall enjoyable experience.
- “I loved the game for its hilarious art style and quirky elements.”
- “The humor in this game is top-notch, making every moment enjoyable.”
- “The witty dialogue and funny scenarios kept me laughing throughout.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics in the game are described as simple yet appealing, enhancing the overall enjoyment of the idle gameplay without overshadowing the progression mechanics. Users appreciate the distinct visual style and user interface, which elevate it above typical clicker games.
- “While most games are just a button-clicking simulator, the graphics, UI, and sound effects here are just worlds apart from the average clicker game.”
- “Cute graphics.”
- “Simple art is always nice in an idle game where I care more about enjoyable progression than fancy graphics.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features a monetization model that does not include any microtransactions, which has been positively received by users who appreciate the absence of additional costs during gameplay.
- “There are no microtransactions, which is a huge plus for me!”
- “I really appreciate that the game doesn't have any microtransactions.”
- “It's refreshing to see a game that avoids microtransactions entirely.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
100%
The game's optimization has been criticized for significantly impacting performance, particularly when running alongside GPU-intensive applications, which disrupts workflow. Users have noted a lack of settings, such as FPS limitations, that could help improve the experience. Overall, while the game concept is promising, its optimization issues detract from its usability.
- “The game and the idea are good, but there are some problems with optimization and a lack of settings, for example, FPS limitation.”
- “This game is not an option for idle play while using programs like After Effects or any other GPU-intensive applications, as it severely impacts performance and workflow.”
- “The game and its concept are good, but there are significant issues with optimization and a lack of settings, such as FPS limitations.”