Dagger Directive

About

Dagger Directive is a multiplayer action game. It was developed by Arcane Alpacas LLC and was released on June 3, 2025. It received positive reviews from players.

Roadmap About the GameYou are a member of Task Force Dagger, an elite international special forces unit. Your missions take you across the globe—through frozen coasts, dense jungles, and war-torn cities. In Dagger Directive, tactical freedom is everything: pick your loadout, choose the time of day, and decide whether to strike hard and fast or move like a ghost. Every mission is yours to shap…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+23

Skip User Reviews

84%

Audience ScoreBased on 358 reviews

story20 positive mentions

optimization6 negative mentions

The game successfully captures the nostalgic feel of classic tactical shooters like Delta Force and Ghost Recon, providing a satisfying gameplay experience.
The weapon customization and loadout system is robust, allowing players to tailor their gear to their preferred playstyle.
The AI, while sometimes inconsistent, can create engaging firefights by using tactics like flanking and smoke cover, adding depth to the combat.

Performance issues are prevalent, with significant frame drops and optimization problems that hinder the overall experience.
The AI can be frustratingly inconsistent, often spotting players from unrealistic distances or failing to engage effectively in combat.
The game features long stretches of walking between objectives, which can feel tedious and disrupt the pacing of gameplay.

story
142 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
80%
6%
The game's story and mission design have received mixed reviews, with many players finding the missions repetitive and lacking in engagement, often feeling like a slog through empty environments. While some appreciate the nostalgic feel reminiscent of classic tactical shooters, others criticize the AI behavior and mission objectives for being too simplistic and predictable. Overall, the missions provide a basic framework for gameplay, but many players desire more dynamic elements and varied objectives to enhance replayability and immersion.
- “A true love letter to the OG Delta Force games where you tackle a set of objectives with a backstory for missions, etc. The game shines in bringing in that old school shooter visually and gameplay-wise, and it just does it damn well.”
- “Each mission seems relevant to the last, kind of like the cat and mouse of Splinter Cell missions but a lot more Arma-like in delivery; it's highly strategic or it can be Rambo-like or a mix.”
- “The gameplay loop is essentially the same every mission depending on your loadout, but damn man, it feels more like the OG Operation Flashpoint lone wolf missions mixed with a bit of Ghost Recon.”
- “Many of the missions are forgettable, not engaging, and not immersive.”
- “The game is pretty bland and gets boring fast, with generally only one approach to any mission - walk there, shoot that, repeat... over and over.”
- “My biggest issue so far has been waypoints/objectives not triggering properly, I frequently found myself having to restart missions in order for objectives to get checked off properly.”
graphics
63 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
70%
5%
The graphics of the game evoke a nostalgic, retro aesthetic reminiscent of early 2000s shooters, which many players appreciate for its charm and thematic fit. However, despite the low-res visuals, the game suffers from significant performance issues, with reports of poor optimization leading to frustrating frame rates even on high-end systems. While some players enjoy the blend of old-school graphics with modern gameplay mechanics, others find the pixelation and graininess detract from the overall experience.
- “I really appreciate the blend between the retro graphics and modern mechanics like the bullet drop in a 'function over form' sense.”
- “The graphics have a charming voxel-esque style with impressively large draw distances—even the grass!”
- “The game is beautiful, I love the art style and aesthetic.”
- “The game also runs terribly, like the worst performing game I have ever played, even though it obviously has low fidelity graphics.”
- “There's no reason this game with its visuals should drop down to single digit FPS on a 3090 Ti and 12900K; not even the worst optimized UE5 game runs this bad on my rig.”
- “The pixelated, unfiltered, overly low-poly graphics are a bit over the top, to the point of hurting the actual gameplay experience.”
gameplay
62 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
71%
5%
The gameplay is a blend of nostalgic tactical shooter elements with modern mechanics, offering a straightforward mission-driven experience that emphasizes simplicity and tactical freedom. While some players appreciate the retro visuals and the core mechanics, others criticize the lack of depth and dynamic gameplay, noting that the AI and mission structure can lead to repetitive and unengaging moments. Overall, the game is seen as a fun homage to classic titles, but it requires further refinement to fully realize its potential.
- “Peak milsim game, very promising roadmap, gameplay is fun, creative, and I have not encountered any bugs.”
- “Old school tactical shooter for modern systems, the nostalgia trip is real, but also has surprisingly deep mechanics and the ability to approach missions in your own way and style.”
- “There’s no hand-holding here — just clean, focused, tactical gameplay with modern enhancements and a nostalgic soul.”
- “While the 'modern mechanics in a retro style' kind of game would be nice, even to bring back the nostalgia of some of the older Rainbow 6 or SOCOM games, the way the guns handle is really missing the 'modern' part in modern mechanics.”
- “I have completed one of the campaigns and started the second; the gameplay consists of running across a typically open and empty map until you reach the objective, where you will need to kill some enemies. This is done very easily, and you don't have to think ahead; you can mostly just run and gun as every enemy is a one-hit kill and doesn't react intelligently to the way you move. Once this is done, you walk a couple of minutes to the next point and rinse and repeat.”
- “Currently, it's plagued with serious technical problems that significantly detract from the gameplay.”
optimization
35 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
74%
17%
The game's optimization has received significant criticism, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including frame drops, stuttering, and memory leaks, even on lower settings. While the retro graphics are appreciated, they do not compensate for the lack of optimization, which has led to a frustrating experience for users, particularly those with lower-end systems. Overall, players express hope for future updates to improve performance and address these critical issues.
- “I enjoy the retro look of the game, but the low-quality graphics should come with some sort of performance benefit.”
- “If you are gaming on an AMD graphics card and are getting choppy frames and/or weird performance issues, disabling anti-lag and frame generation literally made this game perform butter smooth at my 170Hz cap.”
- “Need some more work and optimization, but combat feels better than most games.”
- “My only issue is the performance is really bad. I don't have the best computer, so frame drops are expected, but what I don't think should be happening is the game becoming a slideshow because I alt-tabbed at the wrong time.”
- “For lower-end users, this is a death sentence because it essentially places a performance barrier on whether you get to play the game or not.”
- “Currently has terrible performance problems.”
stability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability at launch has been criticized for frequent freezes, disconnects, and various bugs, particularly in multiplayer mode, making it nearly unplayable for some users. While players acknowledge the humorous aspects of the glitches, many express frustration over mission restarts and AI issues, though there is optimism that ongoing updates will address these problems. Overall, the game requires significant improvements to enhance stability and gameplay experience.
- “Unfortunately, it’s borderline unplayable for me in co-op due to constant game freezes and disconnects.”
- “Multiplayer is very buggy on launch, though.”
- “The game also sometimes glitches, and you need to restart the whole mission, which takes around an hour to complete.”
replayability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
60%
The game offers high replayability due to its randomly generated missions, diverse weapon options, and various tactical approaches, allowing players to experiment with different builds and strategies. Users appreciate the depth and satisfaction of gameplay, suggesting that ongoing content updates could further enhance this aspect. Overall, the design encourages players to revisit missions with fresh experiences each time.
- “It adds a welcome layer of depth and replayability, letting you experiment with builds that feel distinctly your own.”
- “Simple yet satisfying gunplay, tons of replayability to go in and complete missions with different weapons, tactics, etc. If the devs keep producing quality content, this will be sure to be an absolute slam.”
- “Very replayable as well, since there are plenty of different weapons and ways to approach every mission, including setting the time of day.”
- “The randomly generated missions do little to enhance replayability.”
- “Despite the potential for depth, the lack of meaningful variation makes replaying the game feel tedious.”
- “Once you've completed the main story, there's not much incentive to dive back in.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers express a desire for a traditional aiming down sights (ADS) system, noting that the current zoom feature can hinder gameplay, particularly for younger players. While the monetization model is not seen as a deal breaker, there is a nostalgic appreciation for the simpler, tactical gameplay that avoids the pitfalls of pay-to-win mechanics and microtransactions.
- “The gameplay is simple and really echoes the sandbox tactical approach that games used to offer before paid-to-win and microtransactions destroyed any tactical aspect of a game.”
- “It's not a deal breaker for me, but I definitely would have liked this game better if it had traditional ads.”
- “Please add the option for regular ads for people who aren't 35+ years old.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Reviewers express a desire for a more engaging audio experience in military games, highlighting the need for a dynamic soundtrack during mission briefings and gameplay. The absence of music during long stretches of movement detracts from the overall immersion, with many feeling that an iconic soundtrack could significantly enhance the experience.
- “I like military games, but I don't love moving 500m in real-time with no music or much of anything to keep me company.”
- “I like military games, but I don't love moving 500m in real-time with no music or much of anything to keep you company.”
- “All it's missing is the iconic soundtrack.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be minimal, as there are few enemies to engage with during lengthy exploration, which can lead to tedium. While there is no need to grind for gear, some players express frustration with the clunky inventory system and tedious training missions. Overall, the lack of grinding is seen as a double-edged sword, offering convenience but also contributing to a slower-paced experience.
- “Like the old days, low and slow, pixel hunting, checking corners, using cover, etc. You get all the equipment up front, no grinding for gear.”
- “There's practically no enemies on those long walks too, which can make it kind of tedious.”
- “My only complaint is that the inventory system is a bit clunky and hard to get accustomed to, the training mission is way too tedious, the sound design disappoints in a few areas (mainly suppressed weapons), and the player's left arm looks weird.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized by its quirky mechanics, particularly the "scope mechanic," which adds a lighthearted and amusing element to the gameplay. Players find the overall tone of the game to be entertaining and enjoyable.
- “I think the scope mechanic is funny.”
- “It's a buggy, funny little game that I like a lot.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The atmosphere of the game is highly praised for its strong and immersive vibe, effectively capturing the essence and spirit of Delta Force.
- “The game has a very strong vibe and spirit, capturing the essence of Delta Force.”
- “Very strong vibe, spirit, atmosphere of Delta Force.”