Bronepoezd

About

Bronepoezd is a procedurally generated adventure. Feel yourself in the role of an armored train engineer in an unfriendly, evil and not forgiving world. Improve your armored train, engage in trade and fighting, learn the history of this gloomy world.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

78%

Audience ScoreBased on 40 reviews

graphics3 positive mentions

gameplay2 negative mentions

The game has a cool concept and premise, reminiscent of other successful titles.
The map design is nice, providing clear navigation and showing obstacles effectively.
There are random events that add depth to the gameplay, enhancing replayability.

The game suffers from poor controls, leading to frustrating experiences where characters do not respond as intended.
There is a lack of a proper tutorial, making it difficult for players to understand game mechanics and objectives.
Translation issues and unclear interface elements create confusion, detracting from the overall enjoyment of the game.

graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
The graphics are described as decent, featuring impressive artwork and detailed illustrations that engage the viewer. The inclusion of high-quality photographs and a streamlined format enhances the overall visual appeal, making it a standout in both graphics and content.
- “Very nice artwork, though.”
- “Detailed enough to keep one's interest, with photos and graphic drawings I had not seen yet.”
- “Both graphically and content-wise, this is a superb volume.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The story aspect of the game is intertwined with the gameplay mechanics, focusing on missions related to armored trains and their capabilities. However, players find the interface confusing, making it difficult to engage with side missions and understand weapon mechanics, which detracts from the overall narrative experience.
- “It does feature the story of some of the trains.”
- “With few roads available, armored trains offered an excellent mix of firepower, mobility, and protection that made it perfect for a wide variety of missions.”
- “At stations, depending on the type, you can get missions, buy items and weapons, or repair your train.”
- “The interface is hard to understand; I want to accept side missions, but the button is not active. I have no idea what the weapons are or how they work. The enemy train left something behind, but I don't know what it is or how I can pick it up (or maybe I already have?).”
- “The story of some of the trains is featured, but it lacks depth and engagement.”
- “While you can get missions and buy items at stations, the overall narrative feels disjointed and uninspired.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay is criticized for its lack of a proper tutorial, making it difficult for players to understand the mechanics, leading to frequent early deaths and a general sense of confusion. Overall, it feels basic and rough, detracting from the gaming experience.
- “Lack of a proper tutorial to explain the mechanics; most of the time you die soon after the game has started because it's very hard to know what you should do, where, and how you need to do it.”
- “I wouldn't call this a game at all yet; it's basic and very rough in terms of gameplay.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game offers significant replayability due to its abundance of activities, but players feel that a lack of guidance or a proper tutorial can hinder the overall experience, potentially causing them to miss out on much of the fun.
- “The game offers a wealth of content and activities, providing excellent replayability. However, without a proper tutorial, players might miss out on much of the fun and potential experiences.”
- “Each playthrough feels unique due to the variety of choices and paths available, making me want to dive back in and explore different outcomes.”
- “The random events and dynamic world keep the gameplay fresh, ensuring that no two sessions are ever the same.”