Beast Battle Simulator

About

Beast Battle Simulator is a single player role playing game with a violence theme. It was developed by DOG HOGGLER and was released on February 22, 2018. It received positive reviews from players.

Beast Battle Simulator is a physics-based battle game where players arrange armies of creatures to fight against each other. With various animal species, upgrades, and environments, the possibilities for unique and exciting battles are endless. The game features a sandbox mode for open-ended combat, as well as a campaign mode with challenging missions to complete.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

86%

Audience ScoreBased on 663 reviews

humor46 positive mentions

stability8 negative mentions

The game is incredibly fun and chaotic, providing a unique experience with animals and dinosaurs battling each other.
The sandbox mode allows for creative gameplay, including hilarious scenarios like soccer matches with various creatures.
Despite its flaws, the game offers a good amount of content and potential for enjoyment, especially with friends.

The game suffers from a lack of updates and feels abandoned, leading to repetitive gameplay after a short time.
Graphics and animations are subpar, and the physics can be buggy, detracting from the overall experience.
Many players find the game overpriced for the limited content and replayability it offers.

humor
46 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding it consistently hilarious due to its wacky battles, funny unit interactions, and unpredictable physics. Many reviews highlight the game's ability to provide endless laughs, especially in sandbox modes where chaotic scenarios unfold. However, some users note that while the humor is strong initially, it can become repetitive over time.
- “All nonstop hilarious battles and tons of wacky units to choose from.”
- “This game is just flat out hilarious!”
- “The funny and unpredictable movements of the units paired with the silly physics keeps this game mode funny, unpredictable, and very entertaining, not to mention intense.”
graphics
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
22%
21%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players finding them subpar and reminiscent of older consoles, while others appreciate the decent visuals and fun physics. Despite some technical issues and a lack of polish, many users still enjoy the overall aesthetic and gameplay experience. Overall, the graphics are considered adequate but not groundbreaking, with some players noting that performance can vary based on hardware.
- “Amazing graphics, hilarious physics, and a whole lot more!”
- “It's lots of fun and the graphics look great.”
- “Amazing overall gameplay, good graphics, and fun modes.”
- “The game's graphics are awful; they didn't even make a logo for the Steam banner, and it gets boring quickly.”
- “Many other games deserve your money more, so do not give a dime to the talentless hacks who practically made a game with the graphics of a PS Vita title and the depth of a terrible PS1 title.”
- “Similarly, the visuals themselves are adequate rather than lovely, and the sounds and music are passable.”
gameplay
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The gameplay has been criticized for its clunky mechanics, bugs, and lack of essential features, making it feel incomplete and poorly optimized. While some users find the graphics appealing and consider the game worth its low price, the overall experience is marred by significant gameplay issues that hinder enjoyment.
- “Even with all the gameplay issues and glitches, this game is definitely worth the 10 or so dollars you pay for.”
- “The graphics are quite good and the gameplay is okay.”
- “The mechanics are clunky, the gameplay is very lacking, and the physics are bugged.”
- “It is missing vital game mechanics, such as the ability to swivel the camera when placing troops and an option to place troops facing in any direction other than straight forward.”
- “Beyond simple, inexcusable, and inexistent game mechanics that simply need to be present in this type of game, it is poorly optimized.”
stability
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is characterized by a significant number of bugs and glitches, which users find both amusing and frustrating. While these stability issues can detract from the experience, many players appreciate the humor they bring and still consider the game worth its price. Overall, the game's stability is inconsistent, with some recommending lower settings to improve performance.
- “Multiple key features are missing, and glitches happen a lot.”
- “Fun game that shouldn't be taken seriously; like many games of this nature, there are plenty of bugs and glitches, though at the same time these are what at times make the game amusing to play.”
- “Even with all the gameplay issues and glitches, this game is definitely worth the 10 or so dollars you pay for.”
optimization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game's optimization is highly inconsistent, with some users reporting smooth performance on older systems, while others experience severe issues that render it nearly unplayable. While there are hopes for improvements to handle larger creature spawns without framerate drops, many players find the overall optimization lacking and frustrating.
- “One thing I do hope for is some optimization to allow hundreds of creatures to be spawned with less of a drop in framerate.”
- “It's optimized incredibly well, as my Windows 7 is able to run it with little to no difficulty.”
- “No performance issues here, and the challenge mode is quite creative.”
- “This game is horribly optimized, boring as hell (there's like maybe 3 hours of content at most) and all you really do is just sit around and watch the funny animals battle.”
- “One thing I do hope for is for some optimization to allow hundreds of creatures to be spawned with less of a drop in framerate.”
- “Poorly optimized to the point of being unplayable.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The story aspect of the game is enhanced by a variety of missions that add depth beyond the sandbox mode, though some players found the difficulty inconsistent and the removal of flying dinosaurs and animals in quests disappointing. While the missions can be engaging, the overall experience may feel short-lived, as players can complete the game in under two hours, leading to a lack of motivation for continued play.
- “I like how they give you a bunch of missions to make it more interesting than just the sandbox mode.”
- “Loads of fun, whether in missions, onslaught, and especially sandbox.”
- “I struggled to get through the missions due to various complaints, and after beating the game in less than 2 hours, I could not find any reason to keep playing.”
- “I disliked that in the quests they removed flying dinosaurs and animals.”
- “I constantly found that missions I was having difficulty with in strategy, I passed easily if I took over direct control.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The music in the game features a mix of epic battle themes and varied soundtracks that are generally well-received, though some players note that it can become repetitive. Overall, while the sound design is considered passable, the quality of the music is appreciated as a pleasant surprise.
- “Music was a nice surprise; there are at least a few themes I've heard, and they all sound nice. They can get repetitive, but the quality is not bad at all.”
- “+ Varied soundtracks.”
- “> Insert epic battle music ”
- “The music is repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “While there are some good tracks, the overall soundtrack feels uninspired and forgettable.”
- “The sound design is disappointing; it doesn't enhance the gameplay experience at all.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
67%
The game offers significant replayability due to its sandbox features, though some users feel it lacks replay value overall. The addition of a more robust multiplayer or social mode could enhance replayability, which currently remains somewhat limited.
- “There is a lot of replayability, mostly because of the sandbox mode.”
- “A reasonable multiplayer/social mode would significantly enhance the replay value, which is currently quite limited.”
- “No replay value.”
- “A reasonable multiplayer/social mode of some form would allow for a lot of replay value, which is pretty limited now.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and unenjoyable, particularly in onslaught mode, which is described as boring and overly repetitive. The extremely limited camera control, especially the lack of z-axis movement, further exacerbates the grinding experience, making it feel more frustrating.
- “While I completed all of Challenge Mode, I found Onslaught Mode to be both tedious and boring, only finishing 1/6 of it.”
- “Extremely limited camera control (no control of the Z-axis at all) makes for tedious zooming.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game is widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, leading users to feel that the overall experience is compromised by its focus on profit over quality.
- “Easiest cash grab I've ever seen.”
- “Otherwise, the game feels like a cash grab.”