Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator

About

Here is a sandbox like no other. Create massive battles with absolutely no limits. Want to see 10,000 chickens fight an army of Romans?? Sure, why not. Want to see a company of WW2 U.S soldiers fight 11,000 Medieval soldiers?? There are simply no limits to the carnage you can achieve in UEBS.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator screenshot

77%

Audience ScoreBased on 10,407 reviews

graphics149 positive mentions

stability159 negative mentions

graphics
446 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
58%
8%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the impressive scale and detail, while others criticize the overall quality and optimization. Many users note that the game can be demanding on hardware, often requiring powerful PCs to run smoothly, especially during large battles. Overall, while the graphics are considered decent or good by some, they are often described as needing improvement and refinement, particularly in terms of animations and texture quality.
- “This game has awesome graphics and amazing characters, but can you add Bruce Lee or some characters from animes.”
- “The graphics are great, and the workshop is full of downloadable content.”
- “Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator can handle so many entities that it would only have been a dream only 1 year ago, and the graphics are absolutely amazing.”
- “The game works, but the graphics are so flawed I can barely play.”
- “This is an ultimate disappointment with epically terrible graphics.”
- “The graphics haven't been improved at all, the AI is only slightly better, and the UI is still terrible.”
gameplay
288 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
66%
11%
The gameplay of this game is described as a mixed experience, with some players enjoying the fun and chaotic nature of battles and the freedom to customize scenarios, while others find it repetitive and lacking depth. Many reviews highlight issues such as poor AI, clunky mechanics, and a lack of engaging content, leading to boredom after a short period of play. Overall, while there are moments of enjoyment, the gameplay often feels limited and unpolished, suggesting it may be better suited for casual play rather than long-term engagement.
- “With its vast arsenal of units, realistic physics, and the freedom to customize battles, uebs offers a thrilling and unique gameplay experience that allows players to unleash their imagination and create epic warfare scenarios.”
- “The level of detail and the realistic behavior of the units elevate the gameplay, making battles feel visceral and intense.”
- “Great game, very free gameplay, epic battles, definitely would recommend.”
- “Controlling a character during gameplay wasn't all that fun, and the survival zombie game wasn't very dynamic; it was pretty much just a test of my personal endurance, and I got bored after playing it a few times.”
- “This game gets very boring very fast; the mechanics and characters get repetitive, the whole game feels clunky and poorly made with no real replayability.”
- “The animations are very poor, the AI is very poor, character models are very bad, the textures suck, the unit setup is bad, not many different types of units that are cool and fun; gameplay is also poor. I mean, why can't you attack while walking?”
optimization
230 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
52%
18%
The game's optimization has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including lag and crashes, especially on lower-end systems. While some users noted that the game can handle large battles with decent hardware, the overall consensus is that it is poorly optimized and requires significant improvements to be playable for a wider audience. Frequent updates are expected to address these issues, but many recommend waiting for better optimization before purchasing.
- “The graphics optimization allows for massive battles even on 2nd and 3rd tier computers.”
- “Very well optimized, considering you can spawn 10,000 units without the game crashing!”
- “With some optimization and mods, the game has serious potential and that's why I say it's definitely worth your purchase if you've got $15 laying around collecting dust.”
- “The game is badly optimized and unfinished.”
- “I have a $1,200 PC and can't run this horribly optimized game.”
- “The optimization is really bad, the new update that was supposed to fix the lag actually worsened it.”
humor
204 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in "Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator" is widely praised, with players finding the absurdity of large-scale battles—such as chickens fighting zombies or Chuck Norris taking on heavy knights—hilariously entertaining. The game’s sandbox nature allows for creative and funny scenarios, enhanced by quirky character models and amusing voice lines, making it a source of laughter for many. While some players note that the humor can become repetitive over time, the overall consensus is that the game delivers a lighthearted and enjoyable experience filled with comedic moments.
- “Major battles, huge scales, hilariously self-aware character models, and a ton of great mods: Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator is the perfect battle simulation package that brings lighthearted fun into a world of war and massacre.”
- “This game will make you bust out laughing when a horde of thousands of kangaroos overwhelms a squad of Thompson-equipped WWII soldiers.”
- “Let me start off by just saying that this game is completely and totally hilarious.”
stability
169 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
2%
94%
The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent crashes, freezes, and various glitches that disrupt gameplay. Despite some players finding enjoyment in the game, the overwhelming consensus is that it remains in a buggy and unfinished state, requiring substantial updates to improve performance and fix persistent issues. Overall, players recommend waiting for further development before fully engaging with the game.
- “Runs great on just about any system (with the option of potato mode) for really low-end systems.”
- “Runs great :)”
- “Few bugs/glitches.”
- “When the game freezes, task manager never works, even the desktop trick used for Fortnite doesn't work. My computer has been able to run for 2 years straight without a single shutdown.”
- “Updates take months or years to finish off, so any bugs or glitches you encounter are going to stay there for a while, and oh boy does this game have quite a few of them; units going off map, unit selections not working, units flying away, there seems to be more that come to the surface the longer you play.”
- “It was fun initially and held great promise, but has been left in a buggy state and is unfinished.”
story
148 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
80%
12%
The game lacks a traditional story, campaign, or missions, with many users describing it as a sandbox simulator focused on action rather than narrative. While some players enjoy creating their own stories or scenarios, the absence of structured gameplay and objectives leads to a repetitive experience for others. Overall, those seeking a rich storyline or character-driven content may find this game unsatisfactory.
- “The story then begins to branch from reality as this last battle sets in motion a chain of events that ends with the unraveling of the fabric of reality.”
- “This story is why I must give this game a hearty 10/10 for its amazing story arc, well done devs.”
- “For me, it's a bit more than just a game but a tool for storytelling.”
- “There isn't really a game/story here, it's just a simulator sandbox for action.”
- “No campaign or achievements, no mission or anything else to target at.”
- “There's no purpose, no story, no intent... there's no goals, and no measure for learning or progress.”
replayability
68 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
66%
4%
The game's replayability is highly debated among users, with some praising its potential for infinite replayability through creative setups and modding, while others criticize it for lacking content and becoming stale quickly. Many reviews highlight the need for more diverse maps and units to enhance replay value, suggesting that the current limitations significantly hinder long-term engagement. Overall, the consensus indicates that while there are opportunities for replayability, they are not fully realized without additional content and features.
- “Definitely a high replay value once you begin to understand the ultimate endless possibilities within this game.”
- “The replay value is pretty substantial and each fight can have a different outcome.”
- “This game has infinite replayability once you add an astonishing amount of models, maps, terrains, and just a few event triggers per map.”
- “There is absolutely zero replay value; it gets stale after 30 minutes of playing. It almost feels like a free-to-play game, but instead, you actually have to pay for it. The trailer made it seem cool, but the fights are stale and all end the same way.”
- “Also, there is zero replayability; I ran out of things to do after only 3 hours.”
- “Low replayability; once the 'wow factor' wears off, you notice there's not a whole lot more to do or see.”
music
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
70%
8%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the battle themes and epic soundtracks that enhance gameplay, while others criticize the overall audio quality, including sound effects and glitches. Many users express frustration over the lack of customizable audio settings, particularly regarding the volume of the music, which some find excessively loud or annoying. Overall, while the music can create an engaging atmosphere, technical issues and poor sound design detract from the experience for many players.
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes to this music long enough to realize that I was going to be okay.”
- “Add in the hilarious voices of the various units, the appropriately epic music, and the majesty of watching tens of thousands of units attack each other with the beauty of one of those moving sand art sculptures... and you have UEBs.”
- “~but you can make beautiful fights with beautiful visuals and the most epic music ever :D”
- “0/10, needs louder intro music.”
- “-turn on the audio (omg the sfx is complete cancer and the music is just annoying)”
- “I was also plagued by musical and sound glitches, and when I attempted to return to the menu, my computer nearly crashed.”
grinding
34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
35%
59%
Players frequently describe the grinding aspect of the game as excessively tedious, often requiring a significant time investment that feels overwhelming. Many reviewers note that the gameplay becomes monotonous, particularly due to cumbersome troop placement and frequent loading screens, leading to a decline in enjoyment after a short period. Overall, while some find moments of fun, the grinding nature of the game is a common point of frustration.
- “A bit grindy sometimes.”
- “A bit grindy.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “But the more I played, the more boring and even tedious it got.”
- “Not to mention you have to go through 3 tedious loading screens to get to the gameplay.”
monetization
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with many users feeling that the developers prioritized profit over quality and player experience. Reviewers express frustration over the perceived abandonment of the original game in favor of a sequel that lacks meaningful content, reinforcing the sentiment that the game is primarily designed to generate revenue rather than provide a fulfilling gaming experience.
- “I can't wrap my mind around why the devs would choose to create a sequel other than it being a simple cash grab.”
- “It is very clear that this was a cash grab.”
- “Tl;dr this is a cash grab, not a game.”
emotional
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a nostalgic emotional connection to the game, likening their experience to childhood memories of creating imaginative battle scenarios. The enjoyment derived from setting up these situations highlights a sense of creativity and playfulness, although there are concerns about the game's longevity and potential for innovation in future releases.
- “Spent several hours making battle situations on a few of the maps and really enjoyed it; it made me feel like a kid setting up a battlefield on the living room floor and imagining the fight that would ensue.”
character development
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Character development in the game is generally viewed as lacking depth, with players noting that the focus is more on impressive character designs rather than a tightly woven narrative or well-executed character arcs.
- “Awesome character designs”
- “You don't buy this game because you are expecting to have a tightly written plot or well-developed characters.”
- “You don't buy this game because you are expecting to have a tightly written plot or well-developed characters.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's atmosphere is characterized by a whimsical and fun environment, brought to life by a diverse cast of characters, including Romans, chickens, and even Santa, despite the limited differentiation among units. This eclectic mix contributes to an engaging and lighthearted experience for players.
- “While unit differentiation is currently small, the characters they do have create a fun atmosphere with a diverse cast including Romans, chickens, spearmen, archers, T-Rexes, penguins, Santa, ogres, and more.”