Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator 2

About

Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator 2 is a sandbox-style simulation game that allows players to create and control large-scale battles with various units and environments. The sequel brings improved graphics, more detailed physics, and a wider range of units and customization options compared to the original game. Players can create their own scenarios or play through pre-made battles, testing their strategic skills and watching epic battles unfold.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator 2 screenshot

84%

Audience ScoreBased on 7,674 reviews

graphics134 positive mentions

stability120 negative mentions

graphics
410 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
59%
8%
The graphics in "Ultimate Battle Simulator 2" have received mixed reviews, with many praising the significant improvements over its predecessor, including detailed unit models and the ability to handle massive battles with high visual fidelity. However, some players report performance issues, crashes, and subpar graphics on lower-end systems, suggesting that the game demands a powerful graphics card to run smoothly. Overall, while the visuals can be impressive, they are inconsistent and can detract from the gameplay experience for those with less capable hardware.
- “The graphics in Ultimate Battle Simulator 2 are impressive, with detailed and lifelike unit models, beautifully rendered environments, and realistic physics effects.”
- “With its complex and realistic battles, stunning graphics, and immersive sound design, this game is a must-have for anyone who loves strategy games.”
- “I never thought I'd be able to see even 100,000 entities on a screen at once, but I have flawlessly run battles with up to 10 million units on high graphics.”
- “However, there are still tons of missing features and worse graphics compared to the first game.”
- “The graphical fidelity is pretty low and it looks pretty bad when you aren't zoomed in to the units.”
- “The graphics honestly ruin the game.”
gameplay
270 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
72%
7%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting its janky mechanics, lack of depth, and repetitive nature. While some appreciate the improved graphics and the potential for large-scale battles, others criticize the basic combat mechanics and the presence of bugs and glitches that detract from the overall experience. Overall, the game shows promise but requires significant improvements in gameplay mechanics and content to maintain player interest over time.
- “The sequel to the popular first installment presents itself with improved graphics, expanded features, enhanced AI, and superior gameplay mechanics, making the game smoother and more comprehensive, along with a plethora of options to stage the ultimate battle.”
- “With its captivating gameplay and stunning visuals, it has captivated the hearts of countless gamers in the country.”
- “Great gameplay, great units, great graphics, great music, and great campaigns.”
- “It's janky as all hell and has very little depth in the battle mechanics.”
- “Actual gameplay is a bit bland with limited character movements and motions.”
- “On the surface it looks really fun, but in the end you'll realize just how shallow the gameplay is and you'll become bored of it really fast.”
optimization
264 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
62%
7%
The optimization of the game has seen significant improvements compared to its predecessor, allowing players to run massive battles with hundreds of thousands to millions of units on screen without major performance issues. However, some users still report performance inconsistencies, particularly on lower-end systems, and express a desire for more optimization options in the settings. Overall, while many praise the game's ability to handle large-scale simulations smoothly, there are still concerns about stability and resource management that need to be addressed.
- “Seeing literally millions of units fighting each other without any performance hits is very impressive.”
- “The optimization is a million times better... I can now have about 300k troops on the field running a 1070 in ultra graphics.”
- “Incredible well optimized for millions.”
- “Unfortunately, the game is plagued by massive performance issues and instabilities.”
- “It's a poorly optimized, visually unappealing, and content-lacking game that fails to deliver on its promises.”
- “Same game as the last one but with less content, the game is said to have better performance but I just see worse performance on my side, plus a battle takes 20 minutes to initialize.”
stability
130 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
92%
The game's stability is a significant concern, with numerous users reporting persistent bugs, glitches, and performance issues that detract from the overall experience. Many players have experienced frequent crashes, broken AI, and problems with unit spawning, leading to frustration and extensive troubleshooting. While some find enjoyment in the gameplay despite these issues, the consensus is that the game feels unfinished and in need of substantial updates to address its instability.
- “Runs great even with millions of units on screen.”
- “Even runs great on my GTX 1060 6GB at medium settings... can't wait to see how it is when my 3060 comes in.”
- “So glad I didn't get that refund as it runs great and I am having a blast with it.”
- “Abandoned by devs, still a lot of glitches from early access; for example, if you move far away enough to a different spot on the battlefield, the units in RTS mode will forget their orders.”
- “There are more glitches and issues running it than at launch, and it has gotten noticeably less stable with mods over time.”
- “The game is so buggy and does not even spawn all your units; do not spend your money on this stupid game.”
story
122 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
72%
26%
The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of depth and content, featuring only a minimal campaign with just three short missions, which many players found unsatisfactory. While there is an option for players to create and share their own campaigns, the current offerings are seen as incomplete and lacking essential features. Overall, the narrative experience is considered weak, with many users expressing a desire for more substantial story elements and mission variety.
- “I've created the most traumatizing heart-breaking story ever created.”
- “Good game started a shrimp army created my own lore and story of the shrimp society being attacked by zombies, they fought valiantly with pride and honor.”
- “jump into multiple story and player driven campaigns or make your own and share them with your friends!”
- “The campaign is pathetic, with only 3 missions that I beat within 10-20 minutes each.”
- “It does have a campaign, but at the time of writing there are only two missions.”
- “This is 3 missions and a broken Nazi zombie emulator where the controls don't even work.”
humor
106 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
96%
4%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding it both hilarious and entertaining, particularly through the use of absurd characters and modding capabilities that allow for outrageous battle scenarios. However, some users express frustration with certain voice lines and the lack of content, suggesting that while the humor is strong, it could benefit from more refinement and additional features. Overall, the game is seen as a fun and funny experience, perfect for those looking to create and enjoy comedic battle moments.
- “Best money I've ever spent, I can't stop laughing.”
- “This battle simulator game is hilarious.”
- “You can mod this game to your content and make super funny battles like a million Barack Obamas vs another million ostriches.”
- “The voice lines should at least be optional so that the player doesn't have to listen to NPCs making unfunny comments during battles.”
- “Help someone on my account is making unfunny reviews.”
music
50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
44%
12%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many praising its epic quality and emotional depth, particularly during battles. However, some players have expressed frustration over repetitive tracks and issues with audio settings, such as volume sliders not functioning properly. Overall, while the soundtrack is considered a significant improvement over the previous game, there are calls for more customization options, including the ability to turn off music entirely.
- “The music is amazing; when the battle ends, it transitions to a really good track that captures a mix of loss, victory, death, and sadness, yet relief that the battle is over.”
- “The game's sound design is also top-notch, with immersive sound effects and a stirring musical score that brings the action to life.”
- “This game's soundtrack is incredible.”
- “Volume/music sliders don't work.”
- “Plz fix the audio, music if turned off is still playing in the scenarios!”
- “Half the time I place something it doesn't spawn in and the 'campaign' that the dev promised is just a few silly levels and some shitty zombie survival mode that blasts terrible music.”
grinding
50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
70%
24%
The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized, with many players expressing that it requires an excessive time commitment, likening it to needing "a second life." Users find the battle setup process tedious and frustrating, particularly due to a poorly designed UI and limitations in troop placement, which detracts from the overall experience and makes it feel repetitive. While some acknowledge that improvements may be on the horizon, the current state is seen as lacking innovation and enjoyment.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “A bit grindy sometimes.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The UI is bad, and planning battles on the map is very tedious and frustrating.”
- “It's a tedious and repetitive experience that offers nothing new or interesting.”
- “Even placing units using the map is tedious, and you can't even move units prior to starting the battle, meaning most of the time your soldiers are scattered over the map, stuck in hills or just in places they shouldn't be. I really think they should be looking towards the Total War franchise for inspiration.”
monetization
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization aspect of the game has been heavily criticized by users, who overwhelmingly describe it as a "cash grab." Many reviewers express disappointment in the developers for abandoning previous projects and accuse them of selling a sequel that lacks new features while rehashing old content, leading to a lack of value for the price paid. Overall, players advise caution, suggesting that the game feels exploitative rather than genuinely developed.
- “Buyer beware because this game reeks of a cash grab.”
- “These developers are liars and cash grabbers; they abandoned their recent project known as The Black Masses even though they promised to work on it once UEBs2 was released. So far, no updates, and that game and the 20 dollars we spent on it were wasted.”
- “I hope it improves over the years, but so far it looks like the cash grab idea to sell exactly the same game as before with fewer features and pretend to improve it by adding old units that were already there in UEBs1.”
replayability
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
60%
20%
The game's replayability is a mixed bag; while it offers significant freedom for creating epic battles and has potential for depth through customization and future updates, many players feel it currently lacks longevity once initial ideas are exhausted. Technical issues and a bare-bones experience at launch have also contributed to disappointment, though the promise of mods and ongoing improvements may enhance replay value over time. Overall, while there are elements that could foster replayability, the current state of the game leaves much to be desired.
- “The game's enormous replay value comes from the freedom to create epic battles according to one's own imagination.”
- “The depth of play and customization options offer tremendous replay value, while improvements in AI and game mechanics indicate potential for an even more challenging gaming experience.”
- “The graphics have been significantly improved, and the addition of new units and factions adds even more depth and replayability to the game.”
- “For example, there is a neat fluid system where you can create a lake of blood from fallen warriors or recreate the great flood with god powers and a new 'flash flood' weather option; however, this game still severely lacks replay value.”
- “No, but for massive battle simulation it is the best by far, though bare bones at the moment. I can see this game getting more and more updates and gaining even more replayability over the coming months, but as of right now, the price is a bit high for what the game offers.”
- “The trailer was also misleading - we saw Chuck Norris and John Wick, neither of which are playable characters in this game.”
emotional
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players highlight the game's ability to evoke deep emotions, describing it as a profoundly heart-wrenching and traumatic experience. The storytelling is praised for its extraordinary impact, leaving a lasting impression on those who engage with it.
- “Please accept my heartfelt appreciation and gratitude for creating such an extraordinary gaming experience.”
- “I've created the most traumatizing, heart-breaking story ever created.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The atmosphere is enhanced by well-executed sound design, particularly the impactful roars of charging warriors, which contribute to the epic feel of battles. However, some players find the dialogue of modern soldiers to be somewhat amusing rather than immersive.
- “The roar of massive bodies of warriors as they charge into battle is done well and adds to the atmosphere of epic clashes.”
- “The sound design enhances the experience, creating an immersive atmosphere that pulls you into the action.”
- “The combination of visuals and audio creates a captivating atmosphere that makes every moment feel intense and engaging.”

Buy Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator 2

Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator 2
$19.99
See offer on Steam

20h Median play time

214h Average play time

8-525h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 20 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

71%10.4kreviews