World War Legion

About

World War Legion is a multiplayer action game. It was developed by Alfa Bravo Inc and was released on September 2, 2025. It received neutral reviews from players.

World War Legion is a fast-paced World War 2-themed FPS offering intense multiplayer gunfights with experimental weapons and modifications. Designed for extreme performance on low-end hardware, it delivers lightning-fast loading times and customizable settings. The game blends tactical shooter gameplay with innovative features and stylized WW2 aesthetics.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

57%

Audience ScoreBased on 560 reviews

gameplay11 positive mentions

monetization11 negative mentions

The game is surprisingly fun and addictive, reminiscent of older Call of Duty titles.
It runs smoothly on low-end systems, making it accessible for a wider audience.
The fast-paced gameplay and quick matchmaking provide an enjoyable experience for casual players.

The game is essentially a reskin of Combat Master, lacking originality and new content.
Many players report bugs, poor optimization, and a lack of updates since launch.
The monetization system feels predatory, with limited free content and a heavy emphasis on microtransactions.

gameplay
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
56%
14%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting its fast-paced and smooth mechanics reminiscent of *Combat Master*, but also criticizing it for being clunky, outdated, and heavily reliant on pay-to-win elements. While some appreciate the graphics and the simplicity of the core gameplay, others feel it lacks depth, originality, and polish, often describing it as a low-effort copy of its predecessor. Overall, the experience is seen as enjoyable for fans of fast FPS games, but it suffers from significant flaws that detract from its potential.
- “Core gameplay is still fun and simple.”
- “Super fast and smooth gameplay.”
- “Just like Combat Master, fast gameplay, smooth controls, light cheaters, lots of content, good combat, performance on ultra 1440p runs perfectly fine and also you can play this game offline without the internet.”
- “Unfortunately, its mechanics and gameplay are noticeably worse than its competitors and it feels outdated and very clunky.”
- “The gameplay relies heavily on pay-to-play mechanics, which only adds to the frustration.”
- “Players report that *World War Legion* feels clunky, with dated mechanics and poor balancing that make matches less enjoyable.”
graphics
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
68%
16%
The graphics of the game have received mixed to negative feedback, with many users describing them as outdated, clunky, and reminiscent of lower-quality mobile games. While some players appreciate the visuals as decent for a free title, others criticize the lack of originality and the overall poor sound design, suggesting that significant improvements are needed to enhance the visual experience. Overall, the consensus indicates that the graphics do not meet the expectations set by contemporary FPS games.
- “Easy gameplay, good graphics but no story, only shooting.”
- “Flying above 200 fps on ultra graphics.”
- “This game is pretty fun; I don't get what all the hate is about. With that being said, it could use an upgrade in the graphics department or at least some higher settings.”
- “The graphics feel outdated, the movement and animations are clunky, and the sound design is weak and low-quality.”
- “Misleading game description, atrocious bots, no real players, mobile game type graphics, barely saw any real players with some of the worst maps I have ever seen. It seems like they're trying to copy off of Call of Duty for some reason.”
- “Charging for the same packs, 4 primaries on release, most of the weapons being melee which were ported in from Combat Master, and graphics looking like they were dishwashed, even if the game is set on ultra.”
monetization
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
7%
73%
The monetization aspect of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it a "cash grab" that lacks originality and effort. While some appreciate that microtransactions are not pay-to-win and can be earned through gameplay, the overall sentiment is that the game feels rushed and derivative, reminiscent of other titles like Call of Duty, leading to disappointment among the community. Players express frustration over the lack of content and polish, suggesting that the monetization strategy detracts from the overall experience.
- “It was overall generally less insulting as a game than modern COD, given that it would allow me to play all of its modes against bots even if I lacked an internet connection, and the microtransactions didn't feel pay-to-win and could also be grinded for free for the most part.”
- “This game is pretty decent, a lot like COD back before microtransactions, but it does have those things. Just the feel of the game is old school shooter, like Counter-Strike in 1999.”
- “It was really fun, but the microtransactions remind me of COD.”
- “Not worth your time, this is a soulless cash grab just like their previous title.”
- “In the end, this game feels like a rushed cash grab with little effort or creativity behind it.”
- “This game did not need to exist, it is literally just a copy-paste of Combat Master but re-skinned with World War 2 elements and a battle pass specifically for this game, clearly a cash grab and nothing else because of the lack of effort actually put into making the game.”
optimization
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
Overall, the game's optimization is praised for its smooth performance, particularly at high resolutions, with quick load times and stable gameplay. However, there are significant criticisms regarding the poorly optimized menus and issues with movement mechanics that detract from the overall experience. While the core gameplay runs well, the lack of polish in certain areas and the presence of microtransaction prompts have led to mixed feelings among players.
- “Just like Combat Master, fast gameplay, smooth controls, light cheaters, lots of content, good combat, performance on ultra 1440p runs perfectly fine, and also you can play this game offline without the internet.”
- “The best optimized game ever.”
- “Performance is spotless, less than 15 seconds between launching the game and getting into an actual match.”
- “Outside of the gameplay, the menus are poorly optimized, cluttered with constant prompts for paid content, DLC, and microtransactions.”
- “A message to Alfa Bravo: I quit playing Combat Master for the same reason this game got this many negative reviews. The movement speed, sliding, jumping, auto vaulting, and ADS need to be fixed. The maps, animations, performance, and skins are all spot on, but the movement speed needs to slow down, at least for this game. Also, for a launch, this game barely has any guns, and the ones listed as 'coming soon' already look done. I understand wanting to delay them for updates, but you need a good first impression to keep players invested. It's a shame that we, as the community, have to point out what's wrong with this game despite it being identical to Combat Master. If you want to grab people's money, at least give them a game that shows effort.”
- “*World War Legion* is often considered worse than *Combat Master* because it lacks the same level of polish, fluid gameplay, and optimization.”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding the background tracks irritating and poorly integrated with the overall audio design, often overshadowing important sound effects like gunfire. However, the game offers modding options, allowing players to customize their audio experience with new music and sound effects. Overall, while the music can enhance the gameplay for some, it tends to detract from the experience for others.
- “Just make music on in the background and try to grind to the nuke; in some lobbies, you will be beaten hard, in others, there's a hacker, and in others, you're just spawnkilling them to death. I love it!”
- “It still features lightning-fast loading times and is mod-able as well, thanks to Gyro who released the Vanguard Modpack 1.0 for the game (at the time of this review), which features new lobby music, new victory and defeat music, hitmarker sounds, weapon sounds, and a new lobby background.”
- “The audio design is equally lackluster; when you first play, you can only hear music and no gun sounds without adjusting sound options and volume settings.”
- “The background music during matches is especially irritating and does more harm than good.”
- “The audio design is equally lacklustre; when you first play, you can only hear music and no gun sounds without adjusting sound options and volume settings.”
- “Cons: gets boring quickly, lack of guns, lack of game mods, lack of maps, no battle royale mode but they have parachutes, and the soundtrack is underwhelming.”
humor
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players finding it funny and enjoyable, especially when playing with friends. While some users note that the game can be noisy at first, they appreciate the comedic elements that emerge as they engage more seriously with the gameplay. Overall, the humor adds to the fun, despite some criticisms regarding game balance and content updates.
- “Really good game and really funny; I recommend you play with friends.”
- “It may be noisy at the start, but trust me, when you start playing seriously, it's really funny.”
- “Hilariously disappointing.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of the game has been criticized for retaining numerous bugs and glitches from its predecessor, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences such as buggy movement and frequent disconnections from matches. Players express disappointment over the lack of content and stability, suggesting that the game feels incomplete and is at risk of failing if these issues are not addressed. Overall, the game's stability is seen as a significant drawback that detracts from the overall enjoyment.
- “This game is doomed to fail for the simple fact they released CM 2.0 with the same bugs and glitches that CM had when it first launched, just in a WWII setting. If you're going to make a game, make it worth our time. We want a complete game with a lot of weapons and the ability to prestige. We want more to grind for and to make the game more fun, allowing people to play with friends in public matches. On CM, it kicks us out and separates us into different matches after the first game. All we want from you devs is to add more to your game before releasing it. That's why your game is falling apart. We all thought you would learn from the first game, but you didn't, adding just one weapon every season and it being past due. If you want your game to be somewhat popular, then add more guns, not just one every season like CM Master. Give people something that will keep them playing.”
- “Very buggy.”
- “A little less buggy and this is what COD should be.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's atmosphere is criticized for lacking a World War II feel during gameplay, with elements like skins and gun mechanics detracting from the overall experience.
- “Even this game lacks any 'WW2' atmosphere during gameplay; the skins, guns, and mechanics ruin the entire match experience.”
- “The overall atmosphere feels flat and uninspired, making it hard to immerse myself in the game world.”
- “Despite the setting, the game fails to capture the tension and mood of the era, leaving it feeling lifeless.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's story is criticized for being virtually nonexistent, with players noting a focus on shooting rather than narrative. Additionally, there are complaints about anachronistic design choices that detract from immersion.
- “Easy gameplay, good graphics but no story, only shooting.”
- “Just a word of note to the company making this game - computers and handheld tablets did not exist in the 1940s, so having your missions text displayed on one is frankly stupid and lazy design.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews on the aspect of "grinding" are mixed; some players find it enjoyable and fast-paced, reminiscent of classic grinding experiences, while others express frustration, labeling the game as tedious and unworthy of their time. Overall, the grinding experience can be seen as either a nostalgic challenge or a frustrating chore, depending on the player's perspective.
- “Ain't grinding anything on this dog crap game.”
- “It was grindy as hell, but enjoyable, fast-paced, and well-crafted.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express deep disappointment and frustration over the decision to release a separate game rather than updating the existing one, viewing it as a greedy move by the developers that undermines the loyalty of the fanbase. This sentiment highlights a sense of betrayal and emotional investment in the original game.