Skip to main content

Splitgate 2

61%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
monetization, stability
61% User Score Based on 25,528 reviews

Platforms

Xbox Series X|SPCPlaystation 5CloudPlaystation 4Xbox OneXbox Cloud GamingXboxPlayStationWindows

About

Portals Change Everything. Portal into the action as an elite Ace in Splitgate 2, the only free-to-play shooter where you can teleport across the map to outsmart your opponents. Team up, customize weapons, and master portaling skills as you compete for glory in epic showdowns. Evolution is Here: This is the future of Splitgate, bringing fast-paced portal gunplay with objective-based game modes, …

Splitgate 2 screenshot
Splitgate 2 screenshot
Splitgate 2 screenshot
Splitgate 2 screenshot
Splitgate 2 screenshot
Splitgate 2 screenshot
Splitgate 2 screenshot
Splitgate 2 screenshot
Skip User Reviews

61%
Audience ScoreBased on 25,528 reviews
gameplay1.5k positive mentions
monetization298 negative mentions

  • The graphics of Splitgate 2 are a significant improvement over its predecessor, featuring vibrant visuals and polished design that leverage Unreal Engine 5.
  • The gameplay is fast-paced and engaging, with smooth mechanics and an innovative portal system that adds strategic depth.
  • The game offers high replayability with community-driven content, such as a map editor, and ongoing updates that keep the experience fresh.
  • Many players report performance issues, including stuttering and low frame rates, even on high-end hardware, which detracts from the overall experience.
  • The monetization strategy has been criticized as aggressive and predatory, with high prices for microtransactions that some feel make the game feel like a cash grab.
  • The character designs are widely criticized for being bland and generic, lacking the uniqueness and depth that players desire.
  • gameplay
    3,724 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of Splitgate 2 has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its fast-paced action, smooth mechanics, and the innovative portal system that adds strategic depth. However, some critics argue that the portal mechanics feel less central to the experience compared to the first game, with many maps not effectively utilizing them, leading to a more generic shooter feel. Overall, while the core gameplay is considered fun and engaging, concerns about balance, monetization, and the introduction of hero shooter elements have left some fans disappointed.

    • “The portal mechanic + classic arena shooter = insanely fun.”
    • “Gameplay: very smooth hitscan, movement feels great.”
    • “The gameplay offers solid fun and shows a lot of potential.”
    • “The gameplay direction feels like they’re meat riding Call of Duty & it just doesn’t work for me.”
    • “The portal mechanic feels useless compared to Splitgate 1 as the maps are insanely tightly spaced, no point even trying to use portals; all you have to do is shoot for 1.5 seconds and the enemy just dies.”
    • “The gameplay is just downright boring, there are new perks and abilities!”
  • monetization
    1,002 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy in Splitgate 2 has drawn significant criticism, with many reviewers labeling it as aggressive and predatory, particularly for a game still in beta. Players express frustration over the high prices of microtransactions, including battle passes and cosmetic items, which some feel detract from the overall experience and make the game feel like a cash grab. While some acknowledge that the game is free-to-play and that microtransactions are optional, the overwhelming presence and cost of these purchases have left a sour impression on the community.

    • “Monetization aside, this game is fun and shooting feels good.”
    • “The abilities need some work but are fun to play around with and the microtransactions are all optional cosmetics; it's a free game, who cares?”
    • “The prices of the microtransactions apparently got lowered down and heaps of people got refunds, so this already shows a heap of growth and 1047 genuinely listens to their community.”
    • “Splitgate 2 is a cash grab depressive episode of a gaming experience that tried to ride the hype of the first.”
    • “The game is full of microtransactions, everything from player skins, to gun skins, to gun charms and even skins for the portals that you will barely place down in your game time.”
    • “The monetization is downright disgusting.”
  • graphics
    868 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of Splitgate 2 have received mixed reviews, with many players noting a significant improvement over its predecessor, featuring vibrant and polished visuals that leverage Unreal Engine 5. However, some users criticize the art style as generic and lacking character, while others report performance issues, including stuttering and low frame rates even on high-end hardware. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered better, they are often described as not enough to elevate the gameplay experience, which some feel has regressed compared to the original game.

    • “The graphics are stunning, and the split-second decision-making required in matches is both challenging and exhilarating.”
    • “Graphically, splitgate 2 is a step up from its predecessor, with sleek sci-fi aesthetics and vibrant arenas.”
    • “The gunplay is smooth, the graphics are sharp, and the maps are super well-designed.”
    • “Half the time the game doesn't launch, the other half I'm perpetually in play-doh graphics mode running at 12 fps.. wtf is this dogshit.”
    • “Graphics somehow look worse and run worse, even on low settings.”
    • “The graphics are poor and just an incomplete game.”
  • optimization
    676 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues such as stuttering, frame drops, and inconsistent FPS, even on high-end systems. While some users noted that the game runs well on lower-end hardware and praised its overall polish, the battle royale mode, in particular, has been criticized for being poorly optimized. Overall, there is a consensus that the game requires further optimization to enhance the gameplay experience.

    • “The only plus I'll give this game is that it is a pretty fair size of 27GB when installed as opposed to the 100-200GB you usually see nowadays, and the game is pretty well optimized to run on even my potato PC.”
    • “A good dynamic arena shooter, the characters feel smooth, optimization is good (I play i5-7500 + RTX 3050), I haven't noticed any pay-to-win elements.”
    • “Overall, this game has pretty great performance compared to other Unreal Engine 5 games I have played in the past, so whatever the developers are doing, it's working and hopefully they'll get all the performance issues ironed out in time.”
    • “Stuttering with a 4090 on low graphics, plays and looks like a mobile game.”
    • “Game is poorly optimized, server-sided latency, crashing, shaders aren't well optimized, and I had 1 or 2 of my teammates disconnecting regularly because of crashing.”
    • “The performance is god awful.”
  • stability
    200 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability has received mixed feedback, with many players reporting a range of bugs and glitches, particularly in the battle royale mode and with the anti-cheat system. While some users have experienced smooth gameplay with minimal issues, others have encountered significant lag, crashes, and server problems. Overall, the game shows potential but requires further optimization and bug fixes to enhance the player experience.

    • “The game is releasing relatively bug free and I like how heavy lag is dealt with by removing the player early on to save from team feeding.”
    • “Most issues resolved now, the game runs great and is well optimized.”
    • “The game looks great, sounds great, runs great, animations are fantastic.”
    • “Proceeds to release the game in a broken and laggy state (many issues with game crashes and heavy lag spikes and freezes.)”
    • “Either the game or the anti-cheat is extremely buggy (probably both), this game will slowly make my computer inoperable and a force restart will be required.”
    • “The downside; the servers are slow, and the glitches are all over the place for a 'finished product.' Give it some time and see what happens.”
  • story
    168 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of depth and engagement, with many players expressing disappointment over the absence of a campaign or meaningful narrative. While some players hope for future story content or lore, the current experience feels hollow and generic, primarily focused on gameplay mechanics rather than character development or plot. Overall, the consensus is that the game would benefit significantly from a more robust storytelling element to enhance player investment and enjoyment.

    • “I’m the kind of player who usually sticks to deep RPGs with story, choice, and character building.”
    • “I actually would have loved a co-op campaign with a story compared to this.”
    • “But I hope they add a story mode or something different from what they did in the original game, to make it seem like a real Splitgate 2.”
    • “I know this because I accidentally clicked 'lore' on the main menu and was immediately subjected to a 4-minute story that feels tacked-on, like a rushed sci-fi short.”
    • “The decision to do a battle royale over a campaign (which would have fixed my earlier issue with the game lacking story and world development) was done because it was more marketable.”
    • “This is a game that has/had promise mechanically, has no soul or story, needs some work and some new ideas, but likely won't come to fruition and will peter out quickly.”
  • humor
    152 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with players appreciating its quirky elements, such as funny emotes, absurd situations, and the developers' self-aware marketing choices, like the "Make FPS Great Again" hat. While some find the humor refreshing and entertaining, others criticize it as out of touch or overly reliant on gimmicks, leading to a polarized reception. Overall, the game offers moments of genuine laughter amidst its gameplay, though opinions on its comedic value vary widely.

    • “The tea-bag mode was funny, and while only great a bit, it really showed the soul that was put into the game.”
    • “It's hilarious how many times throwing a portal behind someone and shooting their back works.”
    • “Modes are hilariously fun, and matches are so fast that if you get grouped with sweats, you are out of the match in no time.”
  • grinding
    130 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over the extensive time required to unlock weapons, attachments, and game modes, often feeling it detracts from overall enjoyment. While some appreciate the fast-paced matches and satisfying mechanics, the repetitive nature of grinding and the perceived lack of meaningful rewards have led to complaints about the progression system feeling tedious and unrewarding. Additionally, concerns about microtransactions and the need to grind for basic gameplay elements have left some players feeling that the game prioritizes monetization over player experience.

    • “Even playing field, fantastic maps, no class system, no grinding, just pure fun.”
    • “Free-to-play players' customization and progression is limited to grinding hundreds of hours to unlock what amounts to 4 different colors for your weapons or base skin.”
    • “The maps are a bit dull to play over and over again, with the game only having around 10 maps between the 3 main game modes; it does get a bit repetitive when grinding.”
    • “Grinding feels like a complete waste of time.”
  • music
    114 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing the use of Imagine Dragons in trailers and as background music, describing it as generic and uninspired. While some appreciate the soundtrack as fitting and enjoyable, others feel it lacks distinctiveness and immersion, often comparing it unfavorably to other titles. Overall, there is a call for more representative and engaging music in future updates to enhance the gaming experience.

    • “The soundtrack is great and visuals are a huge upgrade.”
    • “Fast paced gameplay, great music, interesting art design, good (if predictable) game modes.”
    • “I’m especially enraptured with the music and sound design.”
    • “Music feels like if you could make royalty free music royalty free, and using Imagine Dragons in the trailer for the battle royale mode is just embarrassing.”
    • “The whole theme and design of UI, music, and character classes feels almost exactly like The Finals but not as good.”
    • “The UI, the theme, the music, even the announcer are all so bland that it makes the whole experience a little tiring and boring after a while.”
  • emotional
    48 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional responses to the game are mixed, with some players expressing joy and nostalgia for the gameplay reminiscent of classic arena shooters, while others feel disappointment and frustration due to technical issues and gameplay changes. Many reviewers highlight a sense of community and care from the developers, but there are also strong negative reactions, including feelings of betrayal and emotional distress related to the game's direction and performance. Overall, the emotional landscape is characterized by a blend of hope for improvement and deep-seated frustration.

    • “I want to cry.”
    • “I have long since been annoyed with AAA studios taking the fun out of FPS games to chase the 'money' and not the 'fun' aspect of gaming, and as I previously stated, this one made me feel joy again.”
    • “It is a heartfelt love letter to that era of arena shooter gaming, whether or not that letter is for you being a different question I guess, but I suppose I am endorsing giving it a go to find out.”
  • character development
    30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in the game has been widely criticized for its bland and generic designs, often described as a mix of over-designed and uninteresting elements reminiscent of other titles like Warframe and Destiny. While some reviewers acknowledge the game's visual clarity and unique gameplay mechanics, the overall aesthetic fails to impress, leading to concerns about the longevity and appeal of character customization options. Despite a few positive notes on the blending of various influences, the consensus is that character design significantly detracts from the overall experience.

    • “I do wish the character designs were a little more unique and that there were more modes, but overall the core gameplay is great.”
    • “The character designs still aren’t perfect, but the overall aesthetic blends elements from Halo, Portal, and even The Finals, giving it a fresh new vibe that sets it apart from typical arena shooters.”
    • “Warframe for character design.”
    • “The character design is painfully generic, vaguely futuristic combat armor in nice shiny gradients.”
    • “While the gunplay is pretty good with a simple to understand class system, and the portals bring in a unique twist on the arena shooter formula, it is brought down by the game's boring art style, especially in the character design which is just Warframe + Destiny but worse.”
    • “Character designs are bland and over-designed simultaneously, which does raise a question towards the longevity of the game, as selling cosmetics that aren't amazing is that much harder.”
  • replayability
    24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game is praised for its high replayability, with many reviewers highlighting the smooth gameplay, engaging art style, and well-balanced mechanics. The inclusion of community-driven content, such as a map editor, and ongoing updates further enhance its longevity and replay value. Players find it to be an enjoyable shooter that remains fresh and fun over time.

    • “Smooth gameplay, amazing art style, awesome UI and HUD, perfect pacing, fun weapons, and great replayability.”
    • “It’s smart, stylish, and endlessly replayable.”
    • “That would’ve added replayability and depth.”
    • “The developers have clearly prioritized balance and replayability.”
    • “Plus, with a map editor open to the community, I think that adds a whole bunch of replayability on top of future updates.”
  • atmosphere
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of Splitgate 2 is described as bright and energetic, with beautiful graphics and captivating map design that initially impresses players. However, some critics feel that it lacks the unique character and soul of its predecessor, instead resembling a generic hero shooter with an over-saturated color palette and a plastic aesthetic. Overall, opinions are divided between those who enjoy the vibrant atmosphere and those who find it lacking depth.

    • “At first glance, Splitgate 2 is stunning: the graphics are beautiful, and the map design has a great atmosphere.”
    • “[i] Immersive atmosphere - captivating environment.”
    • “Meaning, everyone absolutely fell for the gameplay, the fun atmosphere, and the fact that it was free.”
    • “There is no atmosphere, no character, no soul.”
    • “Sg2 looks and feels like every other modern game I've played with its over-saturated color palette, plastic aesthetics, and overly cheery sporty atmosphere.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Splitgate 2

9h Median play time
33h Average play time
4-30h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 94 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Splitgate 2

Games Like Splitgate 2

Spectre Divide Image
Halo Infinite Image
Shatterline Image
FragPunk Image
Splitgate Image
Skip Game News