Skip to main content

Splitgate 2

Splitgate 2 is a decent successor to the original that expands on it, but never really surpasses it.
Splitgate 2 Game Cover
64%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
monetization, stability
61% User Score Based on 16,214 reviews
Critic Score 68%Based on 8 reviews

Platforms

LinuxXbox Series X|SPCXbox Game PassPlaystation 5CloudPlaystation 4Xbox OneXbox Cloud GamingWindowsPlayStation
Splitgate 2 Game Cover

About

Splitgate 2 is a multiplayer shooter game. It was developed by 1047 Games and was released on May 22, 2025. It received mostly positive reviews from both critics and players.

Splitgate 2 is the only free-to-play shooter with portals, delivering next-level gunplay, fluid movement, and a constantly evolving experience, featuring a new Battle Royale where you can portal between unique worlds. Welcome to the future of sport. Fluid Movement: Outsmart and outmaneuver with the power of portals. Chain your portals, dodge danger, and pull off plays impossible in any other game…

Skip User Reviews

61%
Audience ScoreBased on 16,214 reviews
gameplay963 positive mentions
monetization203 negative mentions

  • The gameplay is fast-paced and addictive, with smooth mechanics and innovative portal mechanics that add strategic depth.
  • The graphics have significantly improved, offering stunning visuals and immersive environments that enhance the overall experience.
  • The game boasts high replayability due to its diverse factions, unique modes, and community-driven map editor, making it fun for both new and returning players.
  • The introduction of hero shooter elements and loadouts has diluted the core gameplay experience, making it feel more generic compared to the original.
  • Many players find the grinding aspect tedious and unrewarding, leading to frustration over the lack of substantial rewards and meaningful progression.
  • The character designs are criticized as bland and generic, detracting from the overall experience and raising concerns about the game's longevity.
  • gameplay
    2,356 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of Splitgate 2 has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its fast-paced action, smooth mechanics, and the innovative use of portals that add strategic depth. However, some critics argue that the portal mechanics feel underutilized compared to the original game, and the introduction of hero shooter elements and loadouts has diluted the core gameplay experience. Overall, while the game offers enjoyable mechanics and a solid foundation, it faces challenges in balancing its unique features with player expectations and gameplay fluidity.

    • “The gameplay is fun, fast-paced, and the portal mechanics are still great.”
    • “The core gameplay loop is incredibly fun and addicting.”
    • “This game is unique, fun, has great gunplay, multiple modes for any type of gameplay you want, and has amazing devs.”
    • “Splitgate 2 feels devoid of this magic on account of how its signature gameplay takes a backseat to what is otherwise a generic shooter experience.”
    • “The map design is not great, as it doesn't appeal to the portal gameplay anywhere near like the original game did.”
    • “The gameplay quickly becomes repetitive, and instead of feeling exciting or fresh, matches drag on with the same old routines.”
  • monetization
    658 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of Splitgate 2 has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it a "cash grab" due to the aggressive pricing of microtransactions and the presence of a battle pass in a game still in beta. Despite being a free-to-play title, the high costs associated with cosmetic items and the perceived lack of meaningful progression have left a sour taste among the community, leading to concerns about the game's long-term viability and player retention. While some acknowledge that the game is enjoyable, the overwhelming focus on monetization has overshadowed its potential, prompting calls for a reevaluation of its pricing and content strategy.

    • “The monetization is a bit odd, but the game is free and it's all cosmetic, so I truly don't care.”
    • “The microtransactions are all cosmetic, not pay-to-win, so if you're just here for the gameplay like me, it's a great game.”
    • “Despite the controversy around the cost of the microtransactions, this game doesn't really shove them in your face besides cringy victory emotes that are actually fun to see, them being so cringe, even when you're on the losing side.”
    • “They deleted the Steam community post where they said their next game would have no microtransactions.”
    • “The devs were passionate with this at first, you could see it in the playable alphas and betas, but now, it feels like greed has consumed them, making this a glorified cash grab.”
    • “It just makes this game feel like a rushed cash grab where they tried to appeal to everyone and lost what made the original game so fun along the way.”
  • graphics
    537 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of Splitgate 2 have received mixed reviews, with many praising the significant improvements in visual fidelity and overall polish compared to the original game. While some players appreciate the vibrant and clean aesthetic, others criticize it for being generic and lacking unique character, feeling more like a corporate design than a distinctive art style. Performance issues have also been noted, particularly for players with lower-end hardware, leading to frustration despite the graphical enhancements.

    • “The graphics are stunning, and the split-second decision-making required in matches is both challenging and exhilarating.”
    • “The graphics look good, the weapons feel individual as do the factions.”
    • “With stunning graphics, immersive environments, and dynamic gameplay mechanics, it invites players to dive into a universe where strategy and skill reign supreme.”
    • “But this game completely lacks the visuals and art styles that make a game 'unique'; it feels like playing a random FPS Roblox game with portals.”
    • “The original Splitgate's visuals left a lot to be desired, but Splitgate 2 has abandoned any and all visual identity in exchange for a high fidelity, but squeaky clean, corporate aesthetic that's bereft of any character the original had.”
    • “This game has completely lost whatever unique art style the first game had, zero soul, and it's trying too hard to look like a streamlined sports tournament.”
  • optimization
    422 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players experiencing significant performance issues, including stuttering, frame drops, and lag, particularly in the battle royale mode. While some users report smooth gameplay on higher-end systems, others with mid-range or lower-spec PCs struggle to achieve stable frame rates, leading to frustration. Overall, while there are commendable aspects of optimization, particularly in comparison to other Unreal Engine 5 titles, the game still requires substantial improvements to meet player expectations.

    • “The game is highly optimized if a bit dated looking.”
    • “It's also a well-optimized game that plays great even on slightly older hardware and even the Steam Deck.”
    • “The shooting and movement feels good, but bad performance, the game not working on Linux, and overall bugs with the rewards, really brought a worse experience than the open alpha.”
    • “The game is terribly unoptimized as it is, and the devs decide to spend their time creating a battle royale mode that no one asked for.”
    • “Terrible optimization for PC.”
    • “The performance is god awful.”
  • stability
    129 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant bugs, glitches, and freezing issues that hinder gameplay. While some users have experienced smooth performance and minimal issues, a substantial number have encountered crashes, matchmaking problems, and unresponsive features, particularly during the beta phase. Overall, the game is seen as fun but plagued by stability concerns that need addressing for a better experience.

    • “Performance-wise, the game runs great.”
    • “Game's been out less than a month and it runs really well, no glitches, good frames.”
    • “Overall though the game is fun, looks good, and runs great, so I'd definitely recommend this game to people.”
    • “Buggy unplayable shit, crashed two minutes into the round, had to reinstall my drivers because of this game, and the files got corrupted.”
    • “Proceeds to release the game in a broken and laggy state (many issues with game crashes and heavy lag spikes and freezes).”
    • “The downside; the servers are slow, and the glitches are all over the place for a 'finished product.' Give it some time and see what happens.”
  • story
    101 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its absence, with many players expressing disappointment over the lack of lore, character backstories, and a campaign mode. While the gameplay mechanics are praised, the overall experience feels hollow and uninspired due to the focus on battle passes and microtransactions instead of narrative depth. Players hope for future updates that could introduce a more engaging storyline or campaign to enhance the game's appeal.

    • “I wanted this game to succeed because I like the story of a new company succeeding with a new game that does things a bit differently, especially if it's an arena shooter.”
    • “I love this game and its sequel; I would love to see a story mode.”
    • “It genuinely does make me upset that this game had the potential for an amazing story as seen in comics and the announcement & 'something to fight for' trailers, but there's nothing like that in the game.”
    • “It definitely doesn't have the fun story of Overwatch or Marvel Rivals, but if what you are looking for is teamwork and tactical gameplay that's a bit faster paced than something like CS or Valorant, this is it.”
    • “Seems like there's only a few weapons and zero lore or storyline to the game, but that's besides the point.”
    • “The decision to do a battle royale over a campaign (which would have fixed my earlier issue with the game lacking story and world development) was done because it was more marketable.”
  • humor
    89 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with players finding amusement in its quirky mechanics, such as the portal system and humorous emotes, while also critiquing the developers' tone-deaf marketing choices, like the "Make FPS Great Again" hat. Many reviews highlight the game's potential for funny moments during gameplay, especially when playing with friends, but also point out the irony and absurdity in its monetization and design decisions. Overall, while the game can elicit laughter, it also raises eyebrows with its questionable choices, making for a uniquely entertaining yet frustrating experience.

    • “The gunplay feels solid: the TTK is fairly consistent, the guns are all pretty distinct and feel pretty good, there's some hilarious and fun options, like the baseball bat that pops up ever so often!”
    • “The portals add that much more of a layer to your tactical options and lead to very interesting and funny brawls.”
    • “It's a great game, there is little frustration, and most importantly, the ragdolls are funny.”
  • grinding
    88 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring hundreds of hours to unlock meaningful content or cosmetics. While some enjoy the social aspect of grinding with friends and find it fun, others criticize the lack of substantial rewards and the imbalance in weapon progression, leading to frustration. Overall, the grinding experience is seen as a significant barrier to enjoyment, with calls for a more rewarding and less grind-heavy progression system.

    • “I'm not grinding to a high level to play against real people.”
    • “Even playing field, fantastic maps, no class system, no grinding, just pure fun.”
    • “The experience system is really bad and promotes grinding to ridiculous lengths.”
    • “Progression and unlocks felt tedious and made unlocking new stuff just feel unrewarding with lackluster perks or like a chore.”
    • “After a few hours, there is nothing worth grinding for.”
  • music
    67 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing the choice of Imagine Dragons for the trailer and describing the overall soundtrack as bland or generic. While some appreciate the sound design and find it fitting for gameplay, others feel it lacks the energy and uniqueness that would enhance the gaming experience. Overall, there is a call for more distinctive and immersive music in future updates to better align with the game's aesthetic and gameplay dynamics.

    • “Graphics and music are amazing.”
    • “The soundtrack is great and visuals are a huge upgrade.”
    • “Fast paced gameplay, great music, interesting art design, good (if predictable) game modes.”
    • “This second version seems to lack the soul the first one had, music track-wise and sound effect-wise as well.”
    • “Players are thrown into an arena to duke it out and see who wins, with tacky, uninspiring music.”
    • “Music feels like if you could make royalty-free music royalty-free, and using Imagine Dragons in the trailer for the battle royale mode is just embarrassing.”
  • emotional
    27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional responses to the game range from nostalgic reflections on personal memories and life lessons to feelings of joy and frustration with gameplay mechanics. Players express a deep connection to their past experiences, highlighting how the game evokes both positive emotions and painful memories, ultimately emphasizing the game's ability to resonate on a personal level despite technical issues and gameplay criticisms.

    • “Reminds me of the time I was cooking with my dad. He could make the best soup on this side of the Mississippi. He used to say to me, 'Son, does this soup look funny?' I would chuckle to myself and say to him, 'The soup looks fine' because it really did look fine. I miss that laugh; it made me feel brighter on even the baddest of days. It taught me a powerful lesson that maybe life isn't so bad sometimes because you and the others around you could make it that way.”
    • “I want to cry.”
    • “This game made me feel joy again.”
  • character development
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in the game has received largely negative feedback, with many reviewers criticizing the character designs as bland, generic, and overly complex, often comparing them unfavorably to other titles like Warframe and Destiny. The art style is described as unappealing and lacking uniqueness, which detracts from the overall experience and raises concerns about the game's longevity and cosmetic sales. While some acknowledge the gameplay mechanics, the consensus is that the character aesthetics fail to resonate with players, making them feel uninspired and unoriginal.

    • “I do wish the character designs were a little more unique and that there were more modes, but overall the core gameplay is great.”
    • “The character designs still aren’t perfect, but the overall aesthetic blends elements from Halo, Portal, and even The Finals, giving it a fresh new vibe that sets it apart from typical arena shooters.”
    • “Even the character designs look repugnant (in the sense of it clearly being marketed towards eunuch zoomers that love broccoli hair and genderless CalArts blobs), and generic compared to the first game.”
    • “Character designs are bland and over-designed simultaneously, which does raise a question towards the longevity of the game, as selling cosmetics that aren't amazing is that much harder.”
    • “The character design is painfully generic, vaguely futuristic combat armor in nice shiny gradients.”
  • replayability
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game boasts high replayability due to its diverse factions, carefully designed maps, and unique modes that enhance strategic gameplay. Players appreciate the smooth mechanics, engaging art style, and community-driven map editor, which collectively contribute to its longevity and replay value. Overall, it offers a fun and accessible experience for both new and returning players, with a high skill ceiling that encourages repeated play.

    • “The factions add a new and unparalleled amount of depth to the gameplay, which helps make SG2 far more replayable than the first game. The maps are designed much more carefully and encourage more fun movement than just chain portaling everywhere. The modes unique to SG2, as opposed to just being ripped from Halo, are more tense, more strategic, and more fun.”
    • “Smooth gameplay, amazing art style, awesome UI and HUD, perfect pacing, fun weapons, and great replayability.”
    • “It’s smart, stylish, and endlessly replayable.”
    • “A few more sandbox-style arenas or creative layouts would really push the replayability through the roof.”
    • “Plus, with a map editor open to the community, I think that adds a whole bunch of replayability on top of future updates.”
    • “[i] Replay value - longevity and replayability”
  • atmosphere
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere in the game is a point of contention among users, with some praising the unique and immersive environments of the original game, while others criticize the sequel for its lack of character and reliance on generic, overly bright aesthetics. The competitive energy from crowds adds to the excitement, but many feel that the sequel has lost the distinctive charm that made the first game stand out. Overall, opinions vary widely, highlighting a divide between those who appreciate the vibrant atmosphere and those who find it lacking.

    • “The competitive atmosphere from the crowds watching our games was exhilarating.”
    • “At first glance, Splitgate 2 is stunning: the graphics are beautiful, and the map design has a great atmosphere.”
    • “[i] Immersive atmosphere - captivating environment.”
    • “There is no atmosphere, no character, no soul.”
    • “Sg2 looks and feels like every other modern AAA game I've seen with its over-saturated color palette, plastic aesthetics, and overly cheery sporty atmosphere.”
Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy Splitgate 2

9h Median play time
55h Average play time
3-30h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 58 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Splitgate 2

Games Like Splitgate 2

Spectre Divide Image
FragPunk Image
Splitgate Image
Halo Infinite Image
Quake Champions Image
Skip Game News
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Splitgate 2 is a shooter game.

Splitgate 2 is available on Xbox Series X|S, PC, PlayStation 5, PlayStation 4 and others.

On average players spend around 55 hours playing Splitgate 2.

Splitgate 2 was released on May 22, 2025.

Splitgate 2 was developed by 1047 Games.

Splitgate 2 has received mostly positive reviews from both players and critics. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its monetization.

Splitgate 2 is a multiplayer game with local co-op support.

Similar games include Spectre Divide, FragPunk, Splitgate, Halo Infinite, Quake Champions and others.