Ways of History

About

Hardcore real-time strategy with a long-term round. Development of your civilization from caves to space. Huge world. Thousands of players. 240+ sciences and technologies. About 100 troops. 4 races. 50+ resource deposits. War, trade, science, construction...

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+14

40%

Audience ScoreBased on 99 reviews

humor1 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game offers a complex and engaging strategy experience, appealing to fans of city-building and resource management.
Players can enjoy a social aspect, forming teams and alliances, which enhances the gameplay experience.
The game is free to play and allows for progression without mandatory spending, although spending can provide some advantages.

The game is heavily criticized for its slow pacing and long wait times for building and research, leading to a monotonous experience.
There are significant pay-to-win elements, with players who spend money gaining substantial advantages over free players.
The community can be toxic, with experienced players often bullying newcomers, making it difficult for them to enjoy the game.

gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
50%
30%
The gameplay is characterized as slow-paced and not overly demanding, allowing players to engage without constant attention. However, it suffers from a lack of catch-up and noob defense mechanics, leading to frustration for less experienced players as they may find themselves overwhelmed by stronger opponents. While the game offers various activities, its basic graphics and reliance on spending to enhance gameplay may limit its appeal for some users.
- “Gameplay was good, and the graphics were very basic. It was nice for a free game, but unless you intend to not leave the game for more than two days, the whole game is rather pointless.”
- “You can boost some of the gameplay aspects by spending, but no more than 30%.”
- “Uneven gameplay.”
- “Also, the game has zero catch-up mechanics and zero noob defense mechanics. Halfway through the game, which can take several months, you will realize you and your country have no opportunities and you are being bombed to death by greater countries, which makes the game enjoyable for only 20% of the people on the server.”
- “The gameplay is slow-paced, and while the graphics aren't anything fancy, there is still much to do.”
graphics
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The graphics of the game are widely criticized as mediocre and basic, which detracts from its overall appeal and may deter potential players. While some users acknowledge that the visuals are acceptable for a free game, the lack of polish and detail contributes to a perception of low effort, making the gameplay feel less engaging.
- “The gameplay is slow-paced, and while the graphics aren't anything fancy, there is still much to do.”
- “Just 'tribal wars' with graphics and animated battle.”
- “Gameplay was good, and the graphics were very basic; it was nice for a free game.”
- “This has some really mediocre looking graphics that will understandably be a turn off for a lot of gamers, and it's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost.”
- “The graphics are bad.”
- “The gameplay is slow paced and while the graphics aren't anything fancy, there is still much to do.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for its slow progression and reliance on real money transactions for completing tasks, which can create a frustrating experience for new players. While some see potential in the game's development and its similarities to the Civilization series, the community's unwelcoming nature and server issues detract from the overall narrative experience.
- “This game in a nutshell is based on the Civ series; sure, it's a work in progress and a little slow at first (unless you grind in all the quests to begin with). In my honest opinion, it has a lot of potential. You shouldn't judge a book by its cover, especially when the developers are updating this game whenever they can.”
- “The story is engaging and keeps you invested in the characters and their journeys, making each quest feel meaningful.”
- “The narrative is rich and immersive, with well-developed lore that enhances the overall gameplay experience.”
- “The game gives you tasks and quests that require you to spend money to buy gold to complete, and it has them before you're 20 minutes into the game.”
- “There are even more problems the game has that other people have listed, the community is heavily against new players and very few try to help them out, the systems are very unbalanced, and it takes a year just to finish one world.”
- “This game, in a nutshell, is based on the Civ series, but it feels like a work in progress and is a little slow at first unless you grind through all the quests.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability has received mixed feedback, with users noting that while it is enjoyable and nostalgic, it is also plagued by bugs that may require occasional restarts to resolve. Overall, players suggest that those who are patient and enjoy lengthy gameplay may still find it worthwhile despite the glitches.
- “This game is buggy!”
- “Buggy game (at least in Steam)”
- “It's a buggy cow clicker.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization of the game has been criticized as a cash grab, with many users noting that it heavily relies on mobile app store-style microtransactions, detracting from the overall experience.
- “Yeah, it looks like Civ, but it's a cash grab instead.”
- “This isn't really free, as the game is infested with mobile app store-like microtransactions.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Players appreciate the grinding aspect in city building, farming, and cultural games, but some feel it can be excessively time-consuming, suggesting that it may require a significant investment of time to progress effectively.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is polarizing, as some players find amusement in the overwhelming challenges and lack of catch-up mechanics, while others may feel frustrated by the relentless competition and inability to progress. This aspect appeals to about 20% of the player base, highlighting a niche enjoyment amidst broader dissatisfaction.
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users feel that while the game is enjoyable, it lacks sufficient music, suggesting that an improved soundtrack could enhance the overall experience.

Buy Ways of History

Ways of History
See offer on Steam

Videos

66%461reviews

Minds of Nations

2023

Strategy

This game contains adult content

64%2kreviews

Call of War

2017

Casual Strategy

78%311reviews

Outscape

2019

Strategy

58%109reviews

World Warfare

2015

Role Playing

This game contains adult content

69%1.1kreviews

Supremacy 1914

2020

Casual Strategy

This game contains adult content

79%2.2kreviews

Iron Order 1919

2022

Casual Strategy

62%1.6kreviews

Lords Mobile: Last Fighter

2019

Role Playing

79%10kreviews

War and Peace: Civil War

2017

Strategy

68%6.3kreviews

Supremacy 1914 - WW1 Strategy

Strategy

45%1.9kreviews

Total War Battles: KINGDOM

2015

Real-time Strategy

Ways of History

Platforms

About

Buy Ways of History

Ways of History

Videos

Games Like Ways of History

Minds of Nations

Call of War

Outscape

World Warfare

Supremacy 1914

Iron Order 1919

Lords Mobile: Last Fighter

War and Peace: Civil War

Supremacy 1914 - WW1 Strategy

Total War Battles: KINGDOM