War Trigger 2

About War Trigger 2

War Trigger 2 is a single player and multiplayer open world shooter game. It was developed by Rocketeer Games Studio, LLC and was released on November 22, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

Destroy, smash and blast your way to victory. Use advanced weapons and vehicles to dominate the battlefield.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip Games Like War Trigger 2

Looking for games like War Trigger 2? Here are top open world shooter recommendations, selected from player-similarity data — start with Anti Terrorist Shooting Game, Paper Planes or Rocket Attack Missile Truck 3d.

65%34reviews

Anti Terrorist Shooting Game

2024

Shooter

Paper Planes

2025

Arcade Simulation

93%980reviews

Rocket Attack Missile Truck 3d

Casual Simulation

77%1.2kreviews

Warplanes: WW2 Dogfight

2019

Casual Shooter

47%15reviews

Alpha Point

2025

Tactical Shooter

Army Troop 2: Modern Guns

Tactical Shooter

War Trigger

2026

Casual Shooter

Last Shot

Action

80%956reviews

Modern Tanks・PvP War Machine

Action

Polyzone

Tactical Shooter

More games like War Trigger 2

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

51%Audience ScoreBased on 370 reviews

gameplay6 positive mentions

graphics12 negative mentions

Runs well on low-end or older computers, making it accessible for users with limited hardware.
Offers a nostalgic experience reminiscent of classic Battlefield 2 and older Red Crucible games.
Gameplay can be fun and engaging for casual players, with solid mechanics and enjoyable vehicle and infantry combat.

The game is heavily pay-to-win, with premium weapons and vehicles giving significant advantages to paying players.
Severe issues with hackers, cheats, and spawn camping degrade gameplay experience and frustrate players.
Poor developer support, with infrequent updates, unaddressed bugs, laggy servers, and unfair or abusive moderation.

graphics
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22% positive mentions, 45% neutral mentions, 33% negative mentions
The graphics in this game receive mixed to negative feedback, with many users describing them as outdated, basic, or comparable to games from the mid-2000s, while a few praise aspects of realism and advanced effects. Performance on low-end systems is a noted advantage, though lighting and visual quality often cause disorientation or dissatisfaction. Overall, graphics are seen as a weak point that lowers the appeal for many players despite some fun gameplay elements.
- “Game is super realistic and has the best graphics I've ever seen; the guns fire super realistically and it feels like WW3 America vs Iran, the war for oil 2.”
- “10 out of ten, would recommend, best graphics, so much fun.”
- “Stunning graphics, never before seen gameplay, and I'm not even gonna start on the multiplayer; sheesh, so much fun for the whole family to enjoy.”
- “The graphics are pretty bad so this game looks like it's from 2005.”
- “Graphics and lighting are disorienting.”
- “The graphics need a lot of work though.”
gameplay
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26% positive mentions, 52% neutral mentions, 22% negative mentions
The gameplay receives mixed reviews, with some players finding it fun and unique once the mechanics are mastered, while others criticize it for repetitive, low-quality mechanics, poor graphics, and motion sickness. Fans appreciate its old-school FPS style and enjoy new features like recoil animations and unlock systems, but many feel the game lacks polish and smoothness. Overall, it appeals mainly to dedicated fans of the series but may frustrate new or casual players.
- “Once the easy learning curve is mastered and you learn the game's mechanics, you will really enjoy the gameplay.”
- “Interesting to play Red Crucible with the new mechanics including different recoils, animations, higher ammo capacities, and a different unlock system.”
- “Love the absence of shotguns, and I generally enjoy the gameplay, but I would like raw mouse input to be enabled as well as disabled.”
- “The gameplay is mediocre, however it can be fun for a small amount of time.”
- “The game just throws high leveled players in with new players, and the game is just Red Crucible: Firestorm, but with pay to win mechanics.”
- “Low quality mechanics, low quality animations, low quality in general, a shame to the Red Crucible series.”
story
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33% positive mentions, 34% neutral mentions, 33% negative mentions
The story aspect has no single-player mission and primarily revolves around completing multiplayer missions, which can be frustrating due to mission resets if goals aren't met or if players leave matches. Progress feels rewarding for skilled players, but newer or less skilled players may struggle to unlock content without spending money, leading to a grind-heavy experience.
- “This time around you don't buy guns from unlock tab, now you have to do missions to unlock them for free which is better and helps save money.”
- “Overall, if you don't open your wallet and play it as a free-to-play game, you will find lots of fun and it will feel rewarding blazing through missions and unlocking guns.”
- “If you are super good, you will unlock your guns with an easy time; if you are bad, then you might never unlock a gun. Although if you stay in a match, you can complete your missions as long as the match stays open. If you leave, you lose your progress which sucks.”
- “- Missions reset if you don't achieve the mission goal during all the rounds of the match or if you leave, which can be very frustrating especially if you were close to completion (e.g., 19/20 headshots), forcing you to start the grind all over again.”
- “If you are bad, you might never unlock a gun because missions need to be completed within a match; leaving causes you to lose progress, which is a major drawback.”
- “To make the game better, players should be allowed to buy new guns with the unlock system as in the previous game, Firestorm, and Firestorm should add quests to unlock guns for free, giving players choices between skill-based unlocks or paying.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game suffers from frequent glitches and stability issues, including a problematic third-person mode that glitches into first-person when aiming. Despite these bugs and the presence of hackers and mods, it remains one of the better free-to-play shooters, though players express frustration with the lack of developer intervention and pay-to-win elements.
- “I used to like RC games back when they were playable via Facebook, even though it was pay-to-win, but this game is a mix of pay-to-win, glitches, and hackers. The moderators seem like they don't care to do anything about it.”
- “Weird third-person mode which glitches into first-person when you aim.”
- “You can tell by glitches and spending actual money to buy the best equipment, and still they laugh with a cocky, pitched voice.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 67% negative mentions
The monetization includes an integrated store for in-app purchases and the option to unlock items with honor points, but many users criticize it as a low-quality, cash-grab effort rather than a fair free-to-play experience.
- “Includes an integrated store for in-app purchases or use the honor points you earn to unlock additional weapons and gear.”
- “3) The game is very low quality, even for a free-to-play title. The developers are using this game as a quick cash grab for another project.”
- “It's a cash grab, plain and simple.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Users find the game's replayability low, primarily due to pay-to-win mechanics, glitches, and unchecked hackers or mods, which diminish the overall experience. The reported replay value is around 3/10.
- “I used to like RC games back when they were playable via Facebook even though it was pay-to-win, but this game is a mix of pay-to-win, glitches, and hackers, and the developers seem indifferent about addressing these issues.”
- “Replay value: 3/10”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The humor in the game is widely praised, with users describing it as genuinely funny and hilarious.
- “This game is hilarious”
- “It's funny”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Users criticize the music for being annoyingly loud and negatively impacting the overall experience.
- “Annoying loud background music.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game's optimization is poor by modern standards, resulting in frequent lag and a subpar experience, compounded by issues with hackers.
- “The game is not optimized for today's standards and lags too much, making it a poor experience.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 100% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
Users note that grinding requires extra effort, often needing an additional life or resource to progress effectively.
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
Users praise the game's atmosphere as beautiful and immersive, contributing to an exceptional overall experience enhanced by realistic physics and a vibrant, diverse community.
- “Best experience I have had with any game, beautiful atmosphere, great game physics, and just an amazing community.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
Users have mixed emotional responses, with some feeling nostalgic and youthful recalling similar games from the early 2000s, while others express dislike and negative feelings towards this type of shooter.