United Assault: Normandy '44

About

"United Assault: Normandy '44" is an open-world warfare rogue lite FPS set in 1944's Normandy, where you play as a US army paratrooper on a mission to prepare for D-Day. With over 15 authentic weapons, dynamic mission generation, and detailed progression, the game offers a realistic and immersive experience. The recent free Content Update #01 has doubled the size of the open world, added 4 new towns and made Utah Beach accessible, along with improved AI.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+15

40%

Audience ScoreBased on 48 reviews

stability3 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game has a fun concept and offers a free roam aspect that players enjoy.
The graphics quality and weapon models are decent, providing a satisfying shooting experience.
The developers are actively working on updates and improvements, showing commitment to enhancing the game.

The AI is poorly designed, often failing to react to player actions and behaving in a predictable manner.
The game suffers from significant performance issues, including low frame rates and unresponsive gameplay.
Many players feel the game lacks content and polish, making it feel unfinished and not worth the price.

story
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
50%
38%
The game's story aspect is criticized for its lack of engaging narrative and mission structure, with players expressing a desire for more story-driven content. The missions feel repetitive and unchallenging, leading to frustration rather than immersion. Overall, the absence of a compelling storyline detracts from the gameplay experience, leaving players wanting more depth and variety in missions.
- “XP is only awarded after finishing a mission, which can take you 10-15 minutes wandering around sparse maps being constantly pestered by enemies that never really feel like a threat.”
- “Also, the missions are just awful along with AI respawning on top of an area you just cleared, so you get shot in the back constantly.”
- “Would be much better if story missions would be added.”
graphics
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some users criticizing them as reminiscent of PlayStation 1 quality, describing them as janky and lacking detail. Others find the visuals decent, noting accurate weapon models but pointing out stiff animations and unrealistic object destruction. Overall, while some appreciate the graphics as a reasonable aspect of the game, many feel they fall short of modern standards.
- “What I really like about this game is the graphics quality.”
- “The graphics are decent enough, but the animations are very stiff and unnatural.”
- “Reasonably priced, good time killer with random missions, decent visuals and accurate weapon models.”
- “This game has basically PlayStation 1 graphics, and the AI is awful.”
- “Super janky, gameplay is crap, graphics are crap, AI is crap... there is seriously nothing redeeming about this game.”
- “The graphics are decent enough but the animations are very stiff and unnatural, and the destroyed state of objects looks like a light coating of rust applied to an otherwise unscathed model.”
gameplay
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The gameplay has been criticized for its janky mechanics, poor AI, and lackluster gunplay, leading to a repetitive experience that feels more like a prototype than a polished release. While there is potential in the game's concept, the execution currently falls short, with drawn-out progression and minimal variety in gameplay.
- “Super janky, gameplay is terrible, graphics are poor, and the AI is awful... there is seriously nothing redeeming about this game.”
- “Horrible AI, bad gun mechanics, and needlessly drawn-out progression.”
- “There's potential in the concept, and the execution is better than many on Steam, but currently (Nov 3, 2021) this feels much more like a prototype for workshop mechanics than a public release worth asking money for.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's optimization has been widely criticized, with users expressing frustration over its poor performance, especially in light of a paid DLC release. Many players report experiencing significant issues, contrasting sharply with their experiences in other well-optimized titles.
- “The audacity to release a paid DLC for a game that is so poorly optimized is beyond me.”
- “I have almost every Call of Duty game, and probably 50 other PC games that I play on Steam without any performance issues at all.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players report that Fallout 4 runs smoothly despite its detailed environments, indicating a high level of stability in gameplay.
- “I play Fallout 4, and it is full of details; I mean, rooms full of objects, and the game runs great.”
- “The stability of the game is impressive, allowing for a seamless experience even in the most complex environments.”
- “I've encountered very few bugs, and the game runs smoothly, which enhances my overall enjoyment.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game engaging and reminiscent of classic titles, evoking a sense of nostalgia; however, some express disappointment due to early access issues that detract from the overall emotional experience.
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Reviewers find the humor in the contrast between the game's high-quality details and the lackluster execution of elements like the menu and AI, suggesting a comedic inconsistency that adds to the overall experience.
- “The humor in this game is spot-on, with clever writing that keeps me laughing throughout.”
- “I love how the game uses absurd situations to create hilarious moments that catch me off guard.”
- “The witty dialogue and playful character interactions add a delightful layer of humor to the gameplay.”