Rising Front

Starting at €14.79Buy now

"Rising Front" is a groundbreaking WW1 shooter that combines FPS, RTS, and combat simulation for epic, large-scale battles with 1000+ units. Command AI troops, utilize artillery, and build defenses, all with realistic WW1 tactics and smooth performance. Experience dynamic combat with procedural cover and rag-doll physics in this immersive trenches recreation. Welcome to the front line.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Reviews

90%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,965 reviews

gameplay29 positive mentions

stability30 negative mentions

The game offers a unique blend of FPS and RTS gameplay, allowing players to command troops while also participating in battles.
It has a lot of potential for future updates, with promises of new content like tanks, planes, and improved AI.
The ability to spawn large numbers of units and the engaging sandbox mode provide endless fun and creativity.

The game currently lacks content and can become repetitive after a short period of play.
There are numerous bugs and performance issues, particularly with AI behavior and unit commands.
The price point may be considered high for the amount of content available at launch, leading some players to feel it's not worth the investment yet.

gameplay
72 mentions
40 % positive mentions
50 % neutral mentions
10 % negative mentions
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it repetitive and lacking depth, often revolving around basic shooting mechanics and unit commands that feel clunky. However, others appreciate the solid foundation and potential for future development, highlighting enjoyable building mechanics and a vibrant community. Overall, while the game shows promise, many users feel it requires significant improvements in mechanics, UI, and content to enhance the overall experience.
- “Great game, lots of love, still has some issues and crashes but great gameplay and a vibrant workshop community.”
- “This game already has a solid foundation with its mechanics, and I certainly believe that it will only get better as the graphics, UI, and mechanics are better fleshed out, alongside a growing workshop community.”
- “It is a great game despite being in early access; it has very good mechanics and fun gameplay. 100% recommended.”
- “The gameplay is pretty boring; you just shoot the bad AI (which the game advertises as being great and very intelligent), and that's pretty much it. Commanding the units does not feel nice, and you can't even select multiple armies at once.”
- “Game is not worth how much you pay for it; the gameplay gets boring after 5 minutes, and there are a variety of bugs that caused me to have to restart the game multiple times.”
- “Gameplay repetition: the core gameplay loop can feel formulaic: deploy squads, find an MG, mow down enemies, rinse, repeat.”
graphics
59 mentions
29 % positive mentions
56 % neutral mentions
15 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the simple yet charming art style and smooth performance even on lower-end systems, while others criticize the simplistic textures and lack of detail. Many users suggest that improvements could enhance the overall experience, particularly in terms of character models and environmental detail. Overall, while the graphics may not be cutting-edge, they are deemed adequate for the gameplay, with potential for future enhancements.
- “Absolutely love this game, awesome graphics, the weapons feel smooth and the ragdoll animations are amazing.”
- “Simple yet charming graphics: the graphical style is simple but effective, with enough detail to give the 3D environments some character without overwhelming the player.”
- “Stunning graphics and VFX, enormous scale battles the likes of which I have never seen, weapon models are clear and reloads look good, has mod support day 1 of release, runs very smoothly and takes up virtually no space.”
- “The graphics look like crap.”
- “This game looked really cool in the screenshots but it felt like shooting NPCs in Garry's Mod. The AI bots don't make any sound, not just that they don't talk, they don't even make walking sounds and the graphics were below what I expect from a Unity game.”
- “The optimization of this game is not good. I barely get 45 fps when the fight starts and I have an RTX 3060 Ti that can run RDR2 on ultra above 60+ fps. I tried lowering the graphics settings to minimum and it's still getting the same fps no matter what, so I know it's an optimization problem.”
optimization
41 mentions
27 % positive mentions
61 % neutral mentions
12 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its smooth performance and ability to run well even on lower-end systems, while others report significant performance issues, particularly during large battles. Many users highlight the need for further optimization, especially regarding AI and physics, to enhance the overall experience. Overall, while some find it well-optimized, others experience frustrating lag and bugs that detract from gameplay.
- “The game runs smoothly for me and I have no issues, would recommend.”
- “Extremely well optimized while still having core game mechanics work almost seamlessly.”
- “Honestly, the game is really good; it is amazingly optimized and I barely experience any lag.”
- “Poorly optimized; even with a good rig, it is hard to simulate a battle that would be fun.”
- “The optimization of this game is not good. I barely get 45 fps when the fight starts, and I have an RTX 3060 Ti that can run RDR2 on ultra above 60+ fps. I tried lowering the graphics settings to minimum, and it's still getting the same fps no matter what, so I know it's an optimization problem.”
- “This game is hilariously unoptimized on Mac.”
stability
31 mentions
10 % positive mentions
-6 % neutral mentions
97 % negative mentions
The game's stability has been widely criticized, with numerous players reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and freezes that significantly hinder gameplay. While some users find the game enjoyable despite its issues, many express frustration over the lack of polish and the impact of these technical problems on their overall experience. Overall, the game is seen as unfinished and overly buggy, particularly for an early-access title.
- “One of the best sandbox games I have played in a long time, and it runs great!”
- “The game maintains a smooth performance even during intense gameplay.”
- “I appreciate how stable the game is; I rarely encounter any crashes or bugs.”
- “Two bugs I found that are fairly annoying to me: sometimes (has happened to me about 9-10 times so far) when spawning on a prone soldier, it glitches you and throws you under the map.”
- “If you die in a mounted turret or vehicle, the game freezes and you need to hit spectate.”
- “This game is way too broken and buggy as all hell, even by early-access standards.”
story
19 mentions
16 % positive mentions
58 % neutral mentions
26 % negative mentions
The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of depth, with many users noting that it feels more like a sandbox battle simulator than a narrative-driven experience. While there are mini missions and a small campaign, players express a desire for a more substantial story mode, as the current offerings are seen as dry and unengaging. Overall, the absence of a compelling narrative detracts from the game's potential, despite its enjoyable gameplay and modding options.
- “Great game would be better if it had a story mode but otherwise 10/10.”
- “My suggestions are just probably make a tutorial, or a story mode if possible.”
- “☐ one of the best stories ever told”
- “Fun game and the mods make it worth it; if you're looking for a campaign, it's dry with no real story, just a sandbox battle sim that you get to fight in and plan overall recommend.”
- “No story, nothing new being added, and it is hard to control.”
- “My suggestions are to probably make a tutorial or a story mode if possible.”
replayability
8 mentions
38 % positive mentions
25 % neutral mentions
38 % negative mentions
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players find it fun and engaging with various modes and scenarios, others criticize the lack of depth in battles and suggest that it feels more like a casual experience rather than a game that encourages long-term play. Improvements in gameplay mechanics and additional content could enhance its replay value, but currently, it seems to appeal more to those looking for short, light-hearted sessions rather than extensive replayability.
- “Also there are only 11 reviews with over 100 hours, which I think says a lot about its replayability.”
- “Very fun to play and tons of replayability!”
- “With semi-self operating AI, a variety of maps, a handful of different unit types, as well as the ability to create your own scenarios through sandbox mode, and a dozen built-in scenarios, Rising Front has a high level of replayability despite being extremely early in its development.”
- “Also, there are only 11 reviews with over 100 hours, which I think says a lot about its replayability.”
- “Suggestions to improve replayability and gameplay overall in conjunction with more quality of life improvements and new content.”
- “With semi-self-operating AI, a variety of maps, a handful of different unit types, as well as the ability to create your own scenarios through sandbox mode, and a dozen built-in scenarios, Rising Front has a high level of replayability despite being extremely early in its development.”
humor
6 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is highlighted by its hilarious ragdoll physics, amusing weapon interactions, and the entertaining AI, making for a comically chaotic experience. Players find the game's comedic elements, particularly in combat scenarios, to be a standout feature, despite some technical issues on certain platforms. Overall, the humor contributes significantly to the enjoyment of the gameplay.
- “Hilarious ragdolls, nice weapons, and the AI is incredible for a solo developer.”
- “This game is hilariously unoptimized on Mac.”
- “Haha, funny machine gun go brbrbrr.”
grinding
6 mentions
0 % positive mentions
50 % neutral mentions
50 % negative mentions
Players find the grinding aspect of the game excessively tedious, often feeling it requires an unrealistic time commitment. Suggestions for improvement include allowing players to manage multiple units simultaneously to alleviate some of the monotony.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Currently, it is so tedious to build!”
- “Having the ability to grab multiple units at once would make it less tedious to order troops.”
music
5 mentions
40 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
60 % negative mentions
The music aspect of the game has received mixed feedback; while some players appreciate the immersive experience created by the absence of traditional music during combat, others express a desire for background music or ambient sound effects to enhance the atmosphere. Overall, the game's sound design contributes to a realistic WW1 battle feel, despite some critiques regarding the lack of musical elements.
- “Mixing the combat with some BF1 soundtracks makes it feel really immersive. Some of the best $17 I've spent; the dev has something really golden here.”
- “This is a great WW1 shooter. It may not have any music while in a fight or anything that tells you if you got a kill, but it actually makes it feel like you're in a battle in WW1 (not the actual WW1 battles though). Even if it's in early access, it's great.”
- “I wish the game had some sort of music in the background, and I find the building mechanics a bit janky.”
- “This is a great WW1 shooter, but it may not have any music while in a fight or anything that tells you if you got a kill. It actually makes it feel like you're in a battle in WW1, even if it's in early access.”
- “Either music or ambient sound effects such as wind, trees, birdsong, etc.”
monetization
4 mentions
0 % positive mentions
25 % neutral mentions
75 % negative mentions
Reviews indicate dissatisfaction with the game's monetization model, particularly in comparison to free alternatives on platforms like Roblox. Players express frustration over intrusive ads and feel that the game's quality does not justify its monetization strategy, suggesting a lack of hope for significant improvements.
- “But seeing as this game has been out for a year and games of similar quality usually found on Roblox for free (without microtransactions), there should be little hope of any grand improvements.”
- “The advertisements for this game vastly oversell what the AI can actually do (the AI is awful).”
atmosphere
4 mentions
75 % positive mentions
-25 % neutral mentions
50 % negative mentions
The game's atmosphere is praised for its unique and enjoyable minimalist style, particularly during large battles, effectively capturing a World War I ambiance. However, some users note that the absence of voiceovers and limited content detracts from fully realizing its atmospheric potential.
- “The things I love is how atmospheric it is.”
- “The minimalist style and the large battles really give off a unique and enjoyable atmosphere.”
- “Even with its still simplistic mechanics and its lack of viable content, it achieves a pretty WW1 atmosphere.”
- “It is almost there from an atmospheric front, but things like voiceovers are still absent from the game.”
- “Even with its still simplistic mechanics and its lack of viable content, it achieves a pretty good WW1 atmosphere.”
emotional
1 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
Reviewers highlight the emotional aspect of the game as being rooted in the developers' commitment to community support, which fosters a sense of wholesomeness and connection among players. This dedication enhances the overall experience, making players feel valued and appreciated.
- “I don't care about the outcome; I just think it's really wholesome of the developers to literally put the money they make back into the community.”