Rising Front

About

"Rising Front" is a groundbreaking WW1 shooter that combines FPS, RTS, and combat simulation for epic, large-scale battles with 1000+ units. Command AI troops, utilize artillery, and build defenses, all with realistic WW1 tactics and smooth performance. Experience dynamic combat with procedural cover and rag-doll physics in this immersive trenches recreation. Welcome to the front line.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

89%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,165 reviews

gameplay30 positive mentions

stability32 negative mentions

The game offers a unique blend of RTS and FPS gameplay, allowing players to command troops and participate in battles simultaneously.
It can handle large-scale battles with hundreds or thousands of units without significant performance issues.
The developer is actively updating the game and responding to community feedback, showing a commitment to improving the experience.

The game is currently lacking in content, with limited maps, units, and gameplay modes, making it feel repetitive after a short time.
There are numerous bugs and glitches, including issues with AI pathfinding and unit commands, which can detract from the overall experience.
The price point may be considered high for the current state of the game, leading some players to feel it is not worth the investment at this time.

gameplay
79 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
52%
10%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its solid foundation and potential for fun, particularly in building mechanics and sandbox elements. However, many critiques highlight issues such as repetitive gameplay, poor AI, and a lack of polish, leading to a frustrating experience. Overall, while there are promising mechanics and a vibrant community, the game is seen as needing significant improvements to enhance the overall gameplay experience.
- “Great game, lots of love, still I do have some issues and crashes, but great gameplay and a vibrant workshop community.”
- “This game already has a solid foundation with its mechanics, and I certainly believe that it will only get better as the graphics, UI, and mechanics are better fleshed out, alongside a growing workshop community.”
- “It is a great game despite being in early access; it has very good mechanics and fun gameplay. 100% recommended.”
- “Extremely rudimentary gameplay systems, horrible AI, building system is atrocious, combat sucks.”
- “The gameplay is pretty boring; you just shoot the bad AI (which the game advertises as being great and very intelligent), and that's pretty much it. Commanding the units does not feel nice, and you can't even select multiple armies at once.”
- “Game is not worth how much you pay for it; the gameplay gets boring after 5 minutes, and there are a variety of bugs that caused me to have to restart the game multiple times.”
graphics
65 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
28%
58%
14%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many users describing them as simplistic and lacking detail, which detracts from the overall experience. While some appreciate the charm and performance optimization of the graphics, others criticize them for being below expectations, especially given the game's price point. Overall, the consensus suggests that while the graphics may not be impressive, they do not significantly hinder gameplay, and there is potential for improvement in future updates.
- “Absolutely love this game, awesome graphics, the weapons feel smooth and the ragdoll animations are amazing.”
- “Simple yet charming graphics: the graphical style is simple but effective, with enough detail to give the 3D environments some character without overwhelming the player.”
- “Stunning graphics and VFX, enormous scale battles the likes of which I have never seen, weapon models are clear and reloads look good, has mod support day 1 of release, runs very smoothly and takes up virtually no space.”
- “The graphics are extremely simple, yet it does nothing to help the physics or performance.”
- “The graphics look like crap.”
- “This game looked really cool in the screenshots but it felt like shooting NPCs in Garry's Mod. The AI bots don't make any sound, not just that they don't talk, they don't even make walking sounds and the graphics were below what I expect from a Unity game.”
optimization
54 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
61%
13%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its performance on lower-end systems and others reporting significant lag and frame rate drops, especially during large battles. While some users noted improvements after updates, many expressed concerns about the game's overall optimization, particularly regarding AI behavior and graphical fidelity. Overall, the game shows potential but requires further optimization to enhance performance and stability across various hardware configurations.
- “The graphics are alright, the textures are simple and made that way to improve performance.”
- “The game runs smoothly for me and I have no issues, would recommend.”
- “Honestly, the game is really good, it is amazingly optimized and I barely experience any lag.”
- “This game actually runs like dog poo; fix the performance issues.”
- “It's not optimized well for low-end PCs.”
- “The optimization of this game is not good; I barely get 45 fps when the fight starts, and I have an RTX 3060 Ti that can run RDR2 on ultra above 60+ fps. I tried lowering the graphics settings to minimum, and it's still getting the same fps no matter what, so I know it's an optimization problem.”
stability
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
97%
The game's stability is a significant concern, with numerous users reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and freezes that disrupt gameplay. While some players find the game enjoyable despite these issues, many express frustration over the instability, particularly with spawning mechanics and AI behavior. Overall, the game is seen as unpolished and in need of substantial improvements before its full release.
- “One of the best sandbox games I have played in a long time, and it runs great!”
- “The game maintains a smooth performance even during intense gameplay.”
- “I've experienced very few bugs, making for a stable and enjoyable gaming experience.”
- “Two bugs I found that are fairly annoying to me: sometimes (has happened to me about 9-10 times so far) when spawning on a prone soldier, it glitches you and throws you under the map.”
- “If you die in a mounted turret or vehicle, the game freezes and you need to hit spectate.”
- “This game is way too broken and buggy as all hell even by early-access standards.”
story
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
65%
23%
The reviews indicate a general consensus that the game lacks a compelling story, with many users expressing a desire for a dedicated story mode or narrative elements. While some appreciate the sandbox mechanics and mission tools, the absence of a dynamic enemy AI and engaging storyline detracts from the overall experience, leading to a recommendation for improvements in this area.
- “Great game would be better if it had a story mode but otherwise 10/10.”
- “What this game needs is multiplayer or a story mode and until it gets some more love I can't recommend buying this game.”
- “Fun game and the mods make it worth it if you're looking for a campaign; it's dry, no real story, just a sandbox battle sim that you get to fight in and plan overall recommend.”
- “No story, nothing new being added and it's hard to control.”
- “What this game needs is multiplayer or a story mode, and until it gets some more love, I can't recommend buying this game.”
grinding
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
63%
38%
Players consistently express that grinding in the game is excessively time-consuming, often likening it to needing a "second life" to manage the repetitive tasks. Many find the current system tedious, particularly in troop management, suggesting that improvements like the ability to select multiple units at once could alleviate some of the frustration.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Currently, it is so tedious to build!”
- “Having the ability to grab multiple units at once would make it less tedious to order troops.”
replayability
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
25%
38%
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players find it fun and engaging with various modes and scenarios that encourage repeated play, others criticize the lack of depth in battles and suggest that improvements are needed for a more enjoyable experience. The potential for replayability exists, particularly with sandbox features and diverse maps, but many feel it currently falls short of being truly compelling.
- “Also there are only 11 reviews with over 100 hours, which I think says a lot about its replayability.”
- “Very fun to play and tons of replayability!”
- “With semi-self operating AI, a variety of maps, a handful of different unit types, as well as the ability to create your own scenarios through sandbox mode, and a dozen built-in scenarios, Rising Front has a high level of replayability despite being extremely early in its development.”
- “Also, there are only 11 reviews with over 100 hours, which I think says a lot about its replayability.”
- “Suggestions to improve replayability and gameplay overall, in conjunction with more quality of life improvements and new content.”
- “With semi-self-operating AI, a variety of maps, a handful of different unit types, as well as the ability to create your own scenarios through sandbox mode, and a dozen built-in scenarios, Rising Front has a high level of replayability despite being extremely early in its development.”
humor
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is highlighted by its absurd updates, such as the Franco-Prussian War, and the comedic elements of gameplay, including hilarious ragdoll physics and amusing weapon mechanics. Players find the combination of chaotic combat and quirky AI interactions to be genuinely entertaining, contributing to an overall lighthearted experience. However, some users note that the game's unoptimized performance on certain platforms adds to its comedic charm.
- “I have to say though the random Franco-Prussian War update was funny.”
- “Hilarious ragdolls, nice weapons, and the AI is incredible for a solo developer.”
- “This game is hilariously unoptimized on Mac.”
monetization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
80%
The monetization of the game has been criticized for misleading advertisements that exaggerate its quality and capabilities, leading to disappointment among players. Additionally, the presence of microtransactions in a game that many feel should be free, especially given the availability of similar games on platforms like Roblox, has further fueled negative sentiment. Overall, players express frustration over the lack of transparency and the intrusive nature of ads.
- “Misleading advertisements”
- “But seeing as this game has been out for a year and games of similar quality usually found on Roblox for free (without microtransactions), there should be little hope of any grand improvements.”
- “The advertisements for this game vastly oversell what the AI can actually do (the AI is awful).”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The music aspect of the game has received mixed feedback; while some players appreciate the immersive experience created by the absence of traditional music during combat, others express a desire for background music or ambient sound effects to enhance the atmosphere. Overall, the game's sound design contributes to a realistic WW1 battle feel, despite some critiques regarding the lack of musical elements.
- “Mixing the combat with some BF1 soundtracks makes it feel really immersive; some of the best $17 I've spent. The dev has something really golden here.”
- “This is a great WW1 shooter. It may not have any music while in a fight or anything that tells you if you got a kill, but it actually makes it feel like you're in a battle in WW1 (not the actual WW1 battles though). Even if it's in early access, it's great.”
- “No WW1 music, which is usually copyright free.”
- “I wish the game had some sort of music in the background, and I find the building mechanics a bit janky.”
- “Either music or ambient sound effects such as wind, trees, birdsong, etc.”
atmosphere
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game's atmosphere is praised for its unique and enjoyable minimalist style, particularly during large battles, effectively evoking a World War I setting. However, some users note that the absence of voiceovers and limited content detracts from the overall atmospheric experience.
- “The things I love is how atmospheric it is.”
- “The minimalist style and the large battles really give off a unique and enjoyable atmosphere.”
- “It is almost there from an atmospheric front, but things like voiceovers are still absent from the game.”
- “Even with its still simplistic mechanics and its lack of viable content, it achieves a pretty WW1 atmosphere.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers highlight the emotional aspect of the game as being rooted in the developers' commitment to community support, which fosters a sense of wholesomeness and connection among players. This dedication enhances the overall experience, making players feel valued and appreciated.
- “I don't care about the outcome; I just think it's really wholesome of the developers to literally put the money they make back into the community.”