Skip to main content

Ultimate General: Gettysburg

Ultimate General: Gettysburg Game Cover
80%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
story, stability
80% User Score Based on 2,099 reviews

Platforms

Nintendo SwitchPlaystation 5Playstation 4XboxiPhoneWindowsPlayStationLinuxXbox Series X|SPCMac OSPhoneXbox OneiPadMobile Platform
Ultimate General: Gettysburg Game Cover

About

Ultimate General: Gettysburg is a single player and multiplayer real-time strategy game with fantasy, warfare and historical themes. It was developed by Game-Labs and was released on October 16, 2014. It received positive reviews from players.

Ultimate General: Gettysburg is a tactical battle simulator set during the American Civil War's Battle of Gettysburg. Control either Union or Confederate forces, using smart AI commanders and innovative control mechanics to achieve victory. Experience realistic morale, strategic freedom, and historically accurate maps in this highly-regarded strategy game, voted Best Strategy Game of 2014 by PCGamesN.

Skip User Reviews

80%
Audience ScoreBased on 2,099 reviews
gameplay103 positive mentions
stability25 negative mentions

  • Excellent historical representation of the Battle of Gettysburg with attention to detail.
  • Engaging gameplay that requires strategic thinking and tactical planning.
  • Dynamic AI that adapts to player actions, providing a challenging experience.
  • Clunky controls and UI that can be frustrating to navigate.
  • Units often behave unpredictably, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences.
  • Limited content with only one battle, which may not justify the price for some players.
  • gameplay
    336 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of "Ultimate General: Gettysburg" is characterized by its easy-to-learn mechanics that offer a blend of tactical depth and historical accuracy, making it engaging for players. However, many reviews highlight issues with broken mechanics, unresponsive controls, and a lack of clarity in gameplay elements, which can lead to frustration. While the game provides a fun and immersive experience, particularly in its strategic elements, it also suffers from limitations that may detract from its overall enjoyment.

    • “The control mechanics are a breath of fresh air too, making tactical decisions both fluid and intuitive.”
    • “It's your perfect and 100% accurate tabletop/tactical real-time strategy simulator set in the Civil War. The fluidity of the gameplay is flawless, allowing you to draw custom paths for the troops and select them by hand, making the tactical/planning aspect of the game perfect.”
    • “The gameplay is fast-paced but still tactical, providing a challenging yet rewarding experience that keeps you engaged.”
    • “The combat logic/mechanic makes no sense to me.”
    • “The gameplay is slow and bland.”
    • “I cannot recommend this game since it is plagued with extremely slow gameplay and unresponsive units - units also have a delay before they adhere to a command and less than 10% of the time cannon units actually respond to the commands and fire.”
  • graphics
    283 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the unique art style and overall aesthetic, while others criticize the visuals as simplistic or dated compared to modern standards. Many appreciate the clarity and detail of the maps, as well as the effective use of sprites, but some feel that the graphics do not significantly enhance the gameplay experience. Overall, while the graphics may not rival those of major titles like Total War, they are generally considered functional and fitting for the game's strategic focus.

    • “The graphics are surprisingly good, and the gameplay is challenging yet fun.”
    • “The graphics are top of the line.”
    • “The graphics and atmosphere of the game I do like a lot.”
    • “The graphics are about 2002 level.”
    • “The graphics are cartoonish.”
    • “The graphics and sound really aren't much better in this current version!”
  • replayability
    97 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's replayability is a mixed bag; while it focuses on a single battle, the variety of AI profiles, difficulty settings, and branching outcomes provide significant replay value for players seeking different strategies and challenges. Many users appreciate the attention to detail and the dynamic nature of the gameplay, which allows for unique experiences in each playthrough, though some feel the overall content is limited. Overall, it offers a surprising amount of replayability for a game centered on one historical event.

    • “The AI and post-battle decision-making, based on the outcome of the skirmish/battle the player just fought, gives the game incredible replayability.”
    • “This game is incredibly fun and replayable, with the objectives you achieve in one mission changing what your objectives will be in the next.”
    • “The battle campaign is quite long, and there is tremendous replay value due to the effects of your battles having permanent effects (controlled terrain, casualties, etc.) carrying over to each mission, making the missions potentially quite ahistorical depending on your accomplishments.”
    • “Very entertaining on the first run through, not a lot of replay value.”
    • “The replayability is limited due to the fact that this is only the battle of Gettysburg, but it is really well done.”
    • “However.....the replayability is so limited that I can honestly say I am done with it after 5 hours!”
  • story
    48 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story revolves around the American Civil War, specifically the Battle of Gettysburg, presented through a series of missions that reflect different days of the battle. While players appreciate the dynamic campaign system that allows for varied outcomes based on previous mission results, many feel that the narrative lacks depth and cohesion, often leading to disjointed experiences between missions. Overall, the game offers replayability through its branching scenarios, but some players express a desire for a more engaging storyline and better integration of mission outcomes.

    • “The battle campaign is quite long, and there is tremendous replay value due to the effects of your battles having permanent effects (controlled terrain, casualties, etc.) carrying over to each mission, and so the missions can become quite ahistorical depending on what you have accomplished.”
    • “Very clever 'campaign' system - allowing variable AI and 'storylines' to create many new outcomes to the battle.”
    • “The story follows the American Civil War between the Union and the Confederates.”
    • “The 'campaign' is the Battle of Gettysburg, and each mission is basically a day of the battle.”
    • “There is no real story outside of you changing the outcome of the battle with how you play, and the soundtrack is almost nonexistent.”
  • optimization
    34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game's optimization is generally well-received, with players noting smooth performance and minimal bugs, particularly in the context of its complex tactical gameplay. However, some users have reported occasional FPS drops and minor issues, especially given its early access status, suggesting that further improvements could enhance the experience. The dynamic nature of the game, where performance impacts future scenarios, is praised, indicating a well-optimized engine that supports engaging gameplay.

    • “Positioning, flanking, and the high ground all contribute considerably to battle performance.”
    • “The best aspect of the campaign is the dynamic nature, where your performance in one battle affects the subsequent engagements.”
    • “The game rewards you for a good tactical performance, and the brilliant AI trains you very well in it.”
    • “Artillery is very confusing in their performance.”
    • “Despite the fact that you've quite obviously tactically dominated the field, the game will rate your performance as a defeat for not holding that specific hill that you've literally confined their entire morale-less army to, as they run around back and forth getting demolished, and oops, the timer ran out, you lose.”
    • “Even though it has some optimization problems mainly due to the fact that it is still in the pre-release phase, this game is definitely one of the very best battle simulators I have ever played.”
  • music
    32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with many players noting a lack of variety and presence during gameplay, particularly during battles. While the main menu theme is appreciated, players express a desire for more atmospheric and period-appropriate music to enhance immersion. Overall, the sound effects are praised, but the repetitive soundtrack detracts from the overall experience, suggesting that additional musical elements could significantly improve the game's ambiance.

    • “The music score and the sound effects are also very good!”
    • “The opening/title screen theme is nice, and the sound effects in gameplay are realistic.”
    • “Love the music :)”
    • “There's not much music, but the opening/title screen theme is nice, and the sound effects in gameplay are realistic.”
    • “Also, no music during battle, which is most of the game.”
    • “The graphics are decent, so is the sound, the music however is on a loop and distracts from the sound of the battle raging on your screen.”
  • stability
    29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The stability of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players reporting smooth performance and minimal issues, while others experience frequent crashes, bugs, and glitches that hinder gameplay. Many users note that while the game shows promise and is enjoyable, it still requires significant refinement and bug fixes, especially on certain platforms like macOS. Overall, the game is considered relatively stable for an early access title, but ongoing issues with controls and AI need to be addressed.

    • “The game runs great with no flaws and has good speed.”
    • “It runs great on Linux and Steam machines too.”
    • “Remember, it's early access; the game is not complete and not bug-free, but it seems it will turn into a fine game when completed.”
    • “The game is really buggy, and I had repeated crashes, which is odd for a computer that runs The Witcher 3 at 60fps at 3200x1800.”
    • “I want to like this game, but it constantly freezes on macOS.”
    • “Game freezes up every time I try to play it.”
  • atmosphere
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of the game is widely praised for its immersive sound effects and detailed graphics, creating a captivating environment that enhances gameplay. Reviewers highlight the atmospheric soundtrack, which includes elements like drums and musket fire, contributing to the overall experience. Overall, the game's atmosphere is considered a strong point, providing a rich backdrop for both casual and experienced players.

    • “I somehow love the atmosphere and the sound effects.”
    • “Fantastic game with clever, non-cheating AI, great atmosphere, and a good challenge for even experienced strategy aficionados.”
    • “Very atmospheric; there is a background track of drums and musket fire on top of which is added cannons, muskets, and bugles for fighting units.”
    • “Graphics: 5, Story: - , Controls: 4, Gameplay: 5, Soundtrack: - , Atmosphere: 5”
    • “The graphics and atmosphere of the game I do like a lot.”
  • grinding
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be a mixed experience; while some enjoy the fun elements, many describe it as slow and tedious, particularly due to the mechanics involved in managing artillery units and the overall lack of engaging gameplay. The repetitive nature of tasks, such as card farming, contributes to a sense of boredom for some users.

    • “With one of the worst sets of dry, boring, and tedious mechanics.”
    • “For me, it is tedious to have to check my artillery units to ensure they are actually in line of sight and firing.”
    • “Out of line of sight was shaded red, which made it difficult and tedious for the artillery units to discern the shading, requiring me to click on enemy units just to see if they are in line of sight.”
  • humor
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is appreciated in solo play, with players finding it amusing despite the repetitive nature of the gameplay. However, some reviews express frustration with the lack of multiplayer and the game's similarities to past titles, leading to a mixed reception regarding its comedic value. Overall, while there are moments of humor, the gameplay experience may overshadow the laughs for some players.

    • “Also, just to say this game is great, funny, and also difficult to play, and every match is different from another.”
    • “The similarities made me laugh at the professional reviews that called this game unique and creative - it's basically those two past games, but with updated graphics and a slightly different combat system.”
    • “Funny enough, I was actually trying to find a way to convert the 'smg' game so I could play it on Windows 7; that all stopped when I came across this game.”
  • emotional
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the emotional aspect of the game to be deeply impactful, particularly in multiplayer battles where personal stakes feel high. The historical context enhances this emotional connection, as players grapple with the weight of their decisions and the fates of their troops, often leading to moments of reflection and even sorrow over the losses incurred. Overall, the heartfelt design and attention to detail contribute to a poignant gaming experience.

    • “It made me feel as though this truly was my battle.”
    • “Clearly this game is heartfelt; the developers gave it their best, and it's worth your time.”
    • “Shed a tear for all those poor men you will inevitably send to their deaths due to your inexperience with mastering drawing lines.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Ultimate General: Gettysburg

21h Median play time
39h Average play time
8-28h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 9 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Ultimate General: Gettysburg

Games Like Ultimate General: Gettysburg

Ultimate General: Civil War Image
Field of Glory II Image
Grand Tactician: The Civil War (1861-1865) Image
Ultimate Admiral: Age of Sail Image
The Great War: Western Front Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Ultimate General: Gettysburg is a real-time strategy game with fantasy, warfare and historical themes.

Ultimate General: Gettysburg is available on Nintendo Switch, PlayStation 5, PlayStation 4, iPhone and others.

On average players spend around 39 hours playing Ultimate General: Gettysburg.

Ultimate General: Gettysburg was released on October 16, 2014.

Ultimate General: Gettysburg was developed by Game-Labs.

Ultimate General: Gettysburg has received positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its story.

Ultimate General: Gettysburg is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Ultimate General: Civil War, Field of Glory II, Grand Tactician: The Civil War (1861-1865), Ultimate Admiral: Age of Sail, The Great War: Western Front and others.