Terra Firma 2

About

Terra Firma 2 is a single player strategy game. It was developed by Working as Intended and was released on October 27, 2025. It received very positive reviews from players.

Terra Firma 2 is a powerful simulation of natural forces, giving you the creative freedom to sculpt entire worlds to your liking. Use intuitive tools to alter terrain, adjust rainfall, change temperatures, and tweak tectonic activity. Your changes set the stage, but the simulation takes over—generating lifelike rivers, eroding mountains, growing forests, and populating ecosystems down to individ…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

93%

Audience ScoreBased on 73 reviews

gameplay2 negative mentions

The game offers a unique and satisfying simulation of erosion and terrain evolution, making it a great tool for geology enthusiasts.
It features an impressive sandbox mode that allows players to experiment with landscape creation and modification, with the added bonus of exporting to Minecraft.
The developer is active and responsive to community feedback, showing promise for future updates and improvements.

The game feels incomplete and lacks content, with some players noting that it resembles the demo version and has limited gameplay longevity.
Performance issues arise with larger maps, and the current tectonic simulation is considered weak and in need of improvement.
Many players feel the price is too high for the current state of the game, suggesting it would be better suited for a lower price point.

gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The gameplay is considered enjoyable initially, but many users feel it doesn't warrant the $20 price tag due to repetitive mechanics and a lack of variety in mission structure. While the river mechanics and overall concept are intriguing, the absence of dynamic elements like building spawns leads to a diminishing experience over time.
- “One idea is river mechanics.”
- “Fun for a bit, but I would get the game when it is on sale as the gameplay does not justify the $20 price tag.”
- “Overall, the concept is pretty cool, but as of right now, there aren't any buildings that spawn inside the zones, and the gameplay loop starts to become pretty similar after the first few missions.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The story aspect of the game is perceived as lacking depth and engagement, with players finding the civilization-building elements underwhelming and repetitive. While the concept has potential, the execution falls short, leading to a monotonous experience that fails to captivate beyond the initial missions. Users suggest that other games, like Worldbox, offer more dynamic and enjoyable gameplay.
- “It makes for a zen-like garden challenge to curate the world you want to see, or to reach the challenge goals in the campaign missions, which there are many.”
- “The final game looks the same as the demo; the erosion is almost non-existent even at maximum speed. I was positive about the game when I saw that you can have your own civilization in missions, but it turned out to be just a boring place to wait. For the price, I recommend Worldbox as there is much more to do.”
- “Overall, the concept is pretty cool, but as of right now, there aren't any buildings that spawn inside the zones, and the gameplay loop starts to become pretty similar after the first few missions.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is noted as lacking, with users suggesting that additional soundscapes could enhance the atmosphere of the various biomes. Despite this shortcoming, players still find enjoyment in the game as a proof of concept.
- “It could use some music and soundscapes to respect the many biomes and give them more life.”
- “The soundtrack feels repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “The music doesn't match the game's atmosphere, which detracts from the overall experience.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The graphics are enjoyable, particularly in recreating geographic areas, and there is potential for a strong community through map imports. However, there is a consensus that the game requires additional content and graphic refinement.
- “Trying to recreate geographic areas is fun, and when I explore importing maps, I think the community will be great!”
- “The graphics need more content and polishing.”
- “The visuals are outdated and lack detail.”
- “The art style feels inconsistent and detracts from the overall experience.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Overall, optimization is a mixed bag; while medium-sized worlds perform adequately on standard hardware, larger maps significantly impact performance, indicating a need for better optimization and resource management.
- “Some better tectonics and performance would be nice.”
- “Poor performance for larger maps.”
- “The very largest world/simulation settings do take a fairly hefty toll on performance, but the medium-size worlds run alright even without a top-of-the-line computer.”