Supreme Commander 2

About

Supreme Commander 2 is a strategy game that offers a single-player experience with pretty visuals and spectacular environments. As a commander, you can control hundreds of units and deploy experimental war machines while upgrading your armies with new weapons and technologies. The game can be completed in around 4 hours, providing an intensive and engaging experience in a short amount of time. The Games on Demand version supports English, French, Italian, German, and Spanish.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

87%

Audience ScoreBased on 7,394 reviews

story177 positive mentions

stability37 negative mentions

story
596 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
60%
10%
The story in "Supreme Commander 2" has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it lackluster and simplistic compared to its predecessor. Critics note that the campaign's narrative is often cheesy, predictable, and filled with plot holes, failing to capture the epic scale of the original games. While some appreciate the attempt to provide a backstory and character development, the overall consensus is that the gameplay remains the main draw, overshadowing the uninspired storyline.
- “The story is quite childish.”
- “The campaign is the definition of cheesy but the actors do a good job and the missions are creative (as they can get) and fun.”
- “The story itself serves the purpose but is not something you'll get overly concerned about, however the campaign missions themselves do offer a good variety of scenarios to handle that will offer challenges that you won't get in the multiplayer side.”
- “The story was never a particularly strong point of SupCom, but it's even worse here, easily among the worst I've encountered in the RTS genre.”
- “The campaign story is a joke, cheesy as hell, but skirmish and multiplayer are great!”
- “The story is completely flat, dull, and repetitive.”
gameplay
509 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
34%
63%
3%
The gameplay of "Supreme Commander 2" has received mixed reviews, with many players noting a significant simplification compared to its predecessor, "Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance." While some appreciate the faster-paced and more accessible mechanics, others criticize the reduced scale, fewer unit varieties, and the introduction of a research system that detracts from the strategic depth. Overall, the game is seen as enjoyable for newcomers to the RTS genre, but disappointing for veterans seeking the complexity and expansive gameplay of earlier titles.
- “The gameplay is a major step backwards from Supreme Commander.”
- “Supreme Commander 2 is a great game to play with your friends; it is packed full of strategies and fun gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is fast and units train faster than before, so always expect fast-paced and huge battles to fill your screen.”
- “The gameplay is a dumbed-down version of SC1, not having as much unit variety or depth regarding resources.”
- “The gameplay has changed from the slower methodical pace to a faster one where getting high-tech units is easier, but said units aren't anywhere near as powerful as they used to be.”
- “The worst part is the core gameplay changes seem to have been made in an effort to significantly simplify the game to attract a bigger market share, a move that also destroyed the very thing that made it wonderful and unique.”
graphics
467 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
51%
6%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with some praising the improvements and visual effects, while others criticize the cartoonish art style and perceived regression from previous titles in the series. Many players appreciate the game's ability to run smoothly on lower-end hardware, but some feel that the graphics lack the depth and detail of earlier installments, leading to a less immersive experience. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered good for their time, they are often viewed as inferior to those of the original Supreme Commander and its expansions.
- “Graphics = 10/10”
- “The graphics are impressive for its age, and the gameplay is fun and exciting.”
- “This is one of the most unique games from the genre that introduces some pretty good graphics that stand up to this day.”
- “Graphics and textures are awful, scale is terrible, UI is annoying, mission script is super cringe.”
- “The graphics are cartoony and childish - the units look like they're made out of Lego as opposed to being real vehicles/structures.”
- “The graphics seem like they are trying to improve on the first, but fail and somehow still get in the way of the gameplay.”
replayability
51 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
59%
35%
6%
The game is widely praised for its high replayability, particularly in multiplayer modes and skirmishes, with many players noting the depth of strategy and variety of factions and units available. While some reviewers mention a desire for more maps and factions, the overall consensus is that the game's mechanics and customization options provide nearly limitless replay value, making it addictive and enjoyable to revisit. Additionally, the presence of mods and DLC further enhances the replayability experience.
- “The game's focus on economic management and technological advancement adds a layer of complexity and replayability.”
- “This game is unparalleled in its replayability and the amount of tactics you can use is nearly unlimited!”
- “Supreme Commander 2 is an amazing game with huge replay value as it can be played infinite times through skirmish mode with whatever rules, opponents, or options you can imagine.”
- “More experienced players may become bored by the lack of diversity in strategies that limits replayability, as many battles (especially against AI) hinge on simply building a ton of one super unit or another.”
- “While the scale of the game does not feel as 'grand' as Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance, this game still has plenty of replay value.”
- “The best thing that I can say about this game is I always go back to it; though it may be several weeks in between, it has massive replay value.”
optimization
47 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
55%
6%
Overall, the game's optimization is frequently praised, with many users noting significant improvements in performance, especially when managing large armies and multiple units on screen. While some players experienced issues on specific operating systems, the general consensus is that the game runs smoothly and efficiently, making it accessible even on lower-end hardware. Despite some criticisms regarding depth compared to its predecessor, the enhanced graphics and stability contribute positively to the gameplay experience.
- “The two things it does better than the original are its overall performance with multiple units on screen and the pathfinding, which is much better, especially when commanding large armies.”
- “Just as importantly, the game is very well optimized so you can field huge armies with no lag.”
- “While it lacks the depth and scale of the original, Supreme Commander 2 offers a much improved technical performance, including graphics and overall performance.”
- “Abysmal performance on Windows 10.”
- “Though I have a great love for Forged Alliance, the lag issues, poor optimizations, and bugs will almost always be an issue.”
- “Only downside is it seems to struggle on truly large scale battles even with a very high performance PC.”
stability
43 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
5%
86%
The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous users reporting significant glitches, including freezing, lagging, and issues with unit commands and selection. While some players experience minimal problems, many find the game unplayable due to these persistent bugs, particularly on Xbox. Overall, the lack of updates and patches exacerbates the situation, leaving players frustrated despite enjoying the core gameplay.
- “Runs great on my system!”
- “Not a long game, but excellent play value and bug-free!”
- “For an old game, it runs great and anyone can play!”
- “The amount of troubleshooting I have had to do with this game is unacceptable.”
- “The game stutters and freezes upon moving the camera and it is just a mess.”
- “Very buggy and until they put some resources in supporting it and patch it I'd stay clear of the game...”
music
42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
43%
7%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many praising the soundtrack as "awesome" and "dope," enhancing the overall experience, especially during intense moments. However, some players feel it lacks the depth and ambient quality of previous titles, leading to a sense of emptiness during gameplay. Overall, while the soundtrack is generally considered a highlight, opinions vary on its effectiveness in creating an immersive atmosphere.
- “The music complements the game well.”
- “A super dope soundtrack.”
- “Jeremy Soule's soundtrack is grand and sweeping.”
- “The soundtrack is okay to good if you like classical music, but the graphics are average to poor with no real improvement.”
- “Definitely not up to par with Jeremy's soundtrack; SC2 lacks an ambient soundtrack, which stops really early on, leaving you only with sound effects.”
- “The music sucks, and a lot of the Cybran and almost all Illuminate units do too.”
humor
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
88%
12%
The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with many players finding it entertaining through absurd gameplay moments, campy voice acting, and humorous unit interactions, particularly in multiplayer settings. However, some reviews criticize the humor as lacking depth or being overly simplistic, with a few noting that it may not resonate with fans of the previous titles in the series. Overall, while the game offers plenty of funny moments, its comedic appeal may vary significantly among players.
- “Online PvP is very rewarding and has lots of funny moments if you are playing with friends over Discord, etc.”
- “The story is very 'meh' and the voice acting is hilariously campy.”
- “Do you like terrorizing your pals with artillery and laughing in their face only to get nuked seconds later because you forgot to build anti-nuke defense?”
- “This game feels so watered down it is just not funny.”
- “Everyone who played Supreme Commander + FA tends to hate this game so much it's not funny.”
- “Funny bugs.”
grinding
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
28%
67%
Reviews indicate that grinding in the game can be excessively time-consuming, often requiring players to invest significant effort to progress, particularly in the campaign and multiplayer modes. While some appreciate the removal of certain tedious mechanics from the original game, others feel that the new tech system introduces unnecessary complexity and micromanagement, detracting from the overall experience. Overall, the grinding aspect is seen as a double-edged sword, offering both streamlined gameplay and frustratingly repetitive tasks.
- “Fast-paced action, less depth than the original Supreme Commander (i.e. only 1 level of buildings), but that helps speed up the game (no grinding through tech 1 mass extractors, etc.)”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “This can make multiplayer battles seem long and tedious, especially if you're new.”
- “It is a very dumbed down version which replaces many of the original’s mechanics with research grinding rather than building up bases and getting more advanced units.”
emotional
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
83%
50%
Players express disappointment with the emotional engagement in "Supreme Commander 2," feeling it lacks the compelling storyline and excitement of its predecessor, "Forged Alliance." Many reviewers describe the experience as boring and unfulfilling, leading to a sense of regret over their purchase, despite acknowledging some enjoyment from gameplay options. Overall, the emotional impact of the game is perceived as weak and lacking depth.
- “I admit, playing Supreme Commander 2 made me feel like I was missing something, but I quickly got over it when I realized I still had a wide variety of options open to me while I played.”
- “The storyline for each nation is boring. I mean, come on! Make things interesting for the UEF! This sucks! I was on the edge of my seat during each mission I played in the original game. I loved it to death, and this... I hate it.”
- “The emotional depth of the characters is lacking, making it hard to connect with their struggles and triumphs.”
- “I expected to feel a strong emotional impact from the story, but instead, it felt flat and uninspired.”
monetization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
80%
The monetization strategy of the game has received mixed reviews, with some users highlighting the prevalence of ads and recommending the use of ad blockers. While there are microtransactions that are framed as supporting a good cause, many players feel that the game primarily serves as a cash grab, capitalizing on its predecessor's success rather than offering a genuine gaming experience.
- “Microtransactions for a good cause!”
- “The monetization model is fair and doesn't feel exploitative.”
- “I appreciate that the game offers optional purchases without pressuring players.”
- “This game is the biggest cash grab I've ever seen.”
- “Cash grab product due to the success of SCFA.”
- “At the end of the day, this feels more like a cash grab than a serious attempt at a game.”
atmosphere
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The atmosphere of the game is characterized by a serious tone and a focus on strategic resource management, contrasting with more colorful and cartoonish titles like StarCraft II. Players appreciate the demanding nature of gameplay, which fosters a sense of urgency and careful planning, while the introduction of a research tree enhances the overall experience, contributing to a fresh and engaging atmosphere.
- “I liked the serious atmosphere, the almost constant battle between resource generation and consumption, the demanding time, resources, and careful planning in order to build a decent base with proper defenses.”
- “Serious look and atmosphere - SC2 looks like some kind of cartoon with bright colors from some kindergarten.”
- “They added the research tree and research points, making the game run more fluidly and offering an atmosphere of a fresh new game.”
- “One of those strategies that don't have a strong story or the atmosphere of a high-profile Hollywood movie.”
- “The serious look and atmosphere are lacking; it feels like SC2 looks more like a cartoon with bright colors from a kindergarten.”
- “The atmosphere feels stale and uninspired, lacking the depth and immersion expected from a modern game.”
character development
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
50%
Character development in the game is noted for its depth, appealing particularly to players who appreciate well-crafted narratives. However, some users feel that the game may not cater to those seeking extensive character growth or a coherent storyline, suggesting a potential disconnect for certain audiences.
- “The game has depth and character development.”
- “The character development is engaging and adds layers to the story.”
- “I love how the characters evolve throughout the game, making each decision feel impactful.”
- “This game is cool if you're an Asian and/or you don't have time for character development or a coherent storyline.”