SugarMill

About

"SugarMill" is a village-building simulation game that challenges players with real-world elements such as food expiration, thirst management, and transportation of goods via horse-drawn carriages. It differentiates itself with its use of real-world measurements and attention to historical accuracy. The demo allows players to explore these unique features for 20 minutes.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

50%

Audience ScoreBased on 58 reviews

graphics6 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game has potential and offers a unique take on city-building mechanics, appealing to fans of the genre.
Graphics and music are generally well-received, contributing to an enjoyable atmosphere.
The developer is active in the community, responding to feedback and providing updates, which shows commitment to improving the game.

The game is plagued by numerous bugs and unfinished features, making it frustrating and often unplayable.
Many players feel the game lacks originality and depth, with mechanics that feel borrowed from other titles without adding anything new.
There are significant issues with game balance, such as population management and resource gathering, which detract from the overall experience.

graphics
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
63%
13%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising their quality and suitability for lower-end PCs, while others criticize them as basic and in need of improvement. Many users note that the visuals are not on par with other indie titles, and there are issues with scaling and texture quality. Overall, while the graphics are functional and contribute to gameplay, they require further refinement to meet higher standards.
- “Plus high quality graphics even on low settings, perfect for small gaming laptops.”
- “Graphics are superb and the accompanying music fits in very well with the theme of the game.”
- “Graphics are great.”
- “Graphically behind compared to other indie games.”
- “The graphics may look okay, but nothing is scaled properly.”
- “The graphic compartment is... not acceptable at all, sorry.”
gameplay
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
57%
21%
The gameplay has been criticized for its lack of originality, with many mechanics feeling derivative and uninspired, particularly the day-night cycle which is deemed unnecessary. However, some players appreciate the deep chain production system, which requires strategic planning and resource management, despite the current limited content and depth. Overall, while the core mechanics show promise, potential players should be aware of the game's current limitations.
- “Looks like a promising game... The gameplay itself is a deep chain production game. Basically, you need nails, so you will need to build and set up a working iron mine. Iron goes to storage, which will need more workers, and you will need to produce more food to feed those new people. Then, the next step in the nail production process is the smeltery. Workers from storage will need to bring iron (just in time ideally) into the smeltery, smelting ingots. After several steps, you finally have nails. I like this game!”
- “The gameplay itself is very intriguing so far.”
- “I bought the game today, and so far I am impressed with the mechanics.”
- “Mechanically dull as it brings absolutely nothing new; it only steals others' ideas and uses them like so many other clones and copies of others' work out there.”
- “So the day-night cycle is completely useless and a waste of resources for the company. Even if it is a small thing, that small amount of time could have been used to design an original mechanic instead.”
- “As it sits now, the amount of content available in the gameplay department is very limited, and every player interested in this game needs to weigh that fact heavily when considering purchasing this game.”
music
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
45%
27%
27%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews; while some players find it exceptional and well-suited to the game's theme, others describe it as uninspired and lacking in variety. Concerns have been raised about the volume controls and the inconsistency in soundtrack quality, but there is hope that the final product will improve upon the current offerings. Overall, the music is seen as a potential area for enhancement to better distinguish the game from its competitors.
- “The music in this game is exceptionally good; I love it.”
- “Graphics are superb and the accompanying music fits in very well with the theme of the game.”
- “I feel that being small provides a special ability to be flexible with music, and it can really set a game apart from the rest.”
- “One objective concern is the soundtrack itself.”
- “I feel if this is the music that is going to be used in the final project, it is a missed opportunity for the game to set itself apart from its peers.”
- “To be clear, I am not calling the music bad in itself, but rather it is not the best fit for this particular game.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The story aspect of the game is currently hindered by a buggy quest system that prevents players from progressing, particularly in the tutorial. However, recent updates have introduced quests that enhance gameplay and make it more enjoyable, suggesting potential for improvement as the game evolves.
- “It's now easier to place a mine, there are now quests in the game which make the game a bit more fun, prices now show up on the dock when hitting export, and the game is becoming more enjoyable.”
- “Extremely buggy, cannot get past the first quest of the tutorial.”
- “The quest system still needs a bit of tweaking though.”
- “The story feels disjointed and lacks depth, making it hard to stay engaged.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with players reporting numerous bugs that prevent them from progressing beyond the initial tutorial quest.
- “Extremely buggy, cannot get past the first quest of the tutorial.”
- “The game crashes frequently, making it nearly unplayable.”
- “I experienced constant lag and frame drops, which ruined the overall experience.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy has been criticized as a questionable early access cash grab, suggesting a lack of transparency and fairness in how the game seeks to generate revenue.
- “Another shady early access cash grab.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is highlighted by its quirky graphics, particularly the amusingly glowing beaches, which add a lighthearted touch to the overall experience. However, the tutorial is still a work in progress, suggesting that players may encounter some comedic moments as they navigate through it.
- “The tutorial is still in development, but the graphics are fantastic and give the beaches a funny glow.”
- “The humor in this game is top-notch, with witty dialogue that keeps you laughing throughout.”
- “I love how the game incorporates silly situations that catch you off guard and make you chuckle.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Users report that the game's optimization is lacking, with noticeable performance issues such as janky visuals and input delays that disrupt the overall experience.
- “It's hard to pinpoint the exact performance issues, but the game feels janky and bogged down at times. There's also a noticeable input delay when clicking, which can be quite disorienting.”
- “The optimization is lacking; the frame rate drops significantly during intense moments, making it difficult to enjoy the gameplay.”
- “I often experience stuttering and lag, which detracts from the overall experience. The game needs better optimization to run smoothly.”