Rogalia

About

Rogalia is a multiplayer open world role playing game. It was developed by Nanalli and was released on October 15, 2018. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Rogalia is the MMO-sandbox with fantasy open world, meal-based character leveling, fulldrop PvP, nice graphics and cozy atmosphere.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

64%

Audience ScoreBased on 173 reviews

graphics5 positive mentions

grinding31 negative mentions

Rogalia offers a deep and rewarding crafting system, allowing players to engage in various roles such as farming, combat, and building.
The game features a unique vitamin-based character progression system, making every choice meaningful and encouraging exploration.
The community is generally friendly and helpful, providing support to new players and enhancing the overall experience.

The game has a steep learning curve and can be overwhelming for newcomers, with a lack of clear tutorials and guidance.
There are significant balance issues in PvP, leading to frustrating experiences for players who are targeted by more powerful opponents.
The game suffers from technical issues, including lag and bugs, which can detract from the overall enjoyment and immersion.

grinding
31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect of Rogalia is a mixed bag; while some players appreciate the in-depth crafting and farming mechanics, many find the early game grind tedious and repetitive, often requiring significant time investment for minimal rewards. The game's grid-based farming system and high resource costs contribute to the frustration, although those who enjoy grinding and base building may find it rewarding in the long run. Overall, the experience can vary greatly depending on individual preferences for grind-heavy gameplay.
- “The game redefines the term 'dead content.' A long, tedious grind that is extremely boring is required for all starting players unless you choose to engage in microtransactions.”
- “There's too much grinding for too little of an outcome.”
- “I think the main problem is that the developer does not have enough knowledge and/or experience to develop the game further to make it actually enjoyable instead of having us spend hours grinding, only to make money by opening a new server instead of expanding what he already started.”
graphics
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
62%
14%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players finding them dated and reminiscent of older titles, while others appreciate the unique aesthetic and charm. Although not top-notch, many agree that the visuals are acceptable for a small development team, and there are ongoing updates aimed at improving the graphical quality. Overall, while the graphics may not be the main draw, they contribute to the game's nostalgic feel and immersive experience.
- “Not overtly complex or intrusive to get into, and I like the aesthetic a lot.”
- “Very interesting little game, graphics are sweet and there seem to be a lot of depth to the game.”
- “Beautiful attempt on graphics.”
- “It has the same ugly graphics as other games in the genre, but features a very detailed crafting system with a slow pace.”
- “At first, with some kind of outdated graphics, a very tiny tutorial, and an overwhelming list of things to understand before being able to enjoy it, the game can repel some players.”
- “Kind of expected something more out of the graphics too.”
gameplay
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
53%
14%
The gameplay is generally well-received, with players appreciating its addictive nature and diverse mechanics, particularly in farming and crafting. However, some users have noted significant bugs, especially in fishing, and criticized the battle mechanics. While the game is enjoyable solo, it is recommended to play with a team for a better experience, and many anticipate improvements in upcoming updates.
- “I love the mechanics; that alone has made me play over 50 hours.”
- “- If you don't mind solo gameplay and enjoy a semi-deep crafting system and base building, then this game might be for you.”
- “- Extremely addictive gameplay.”
- “Also very buggy gameplay (fishing especially).”
- “Only the battle mechanics are a bit bad in the game; other than that, the game is good in general. But if you don't have a team to play with, don't play.”
- “After dying and having my hunger reset to full again, I realized that this game isn't just a grind, but it's engineered to slow your progress in any way it can, with ridiculous mechanics that make no sense at all for a survival game.”
story
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for lacking depth and engagement, with players feeling that the MMO environment is marred by disruptive behaviors, such as blocking access to resources. While there are opportunities for customization and crafting, the absence of meaningful quests and a compelling narrative leaves players feeling isolated and unmotivated to explore beyond their personal plots. Overall, the game could benefit from a more structured and immersive storyline to enhance player experience.
- “The story is engaging and immersive, drawing players into a world filled with rich lore and intriguing characters.”
- “I love how the narrative unfolds as you progress, with each quest revealing more about the game's history and the world around you.”
- “The quests are well-written and offer meaningful choices that impact the story, making every decision feel significant.”
- “☐ story?”
- “Worst of all is that it's an MMO; it should be like Wurm where you can have your own group of friends or yourself and there's a quest or something to do.”
- “Once you have your plot and cave and all that, there's no real reason to leave it.”
humor
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with players finding the direct Russian translations and item descriptions particularly hilarious. The 21+ rating allows for a variety of comedic moments, including quirky activities like crafting cigarettes and humorous scenarios involving overeating and adult themes. Overall, the game successfully blends fun and humor, enhancing its appeal.
- “The game is considered to be 21+ which allows for some very funny moments.”
- “The item descriptions are hilarious.”
- “Has a UO type of feel to it so far, with some fun, humorous additions, such as crafting cigarettes, joints, overeating until you have to use the toilet or puke, and a hooker in the inn.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The music in the game is generally well-received, with players appreciating its quality and how it complements the RPG experience. However, there are some concerns about the lack of a more extensive soundtrack and curiosity about future audio elements, including character dialogue.
- “I really liked the cool RPG, the good music, and the detailed characters.”
- “Makes me wonder if there will be music in the future and what the sounds and dialogue of the characters will be like.”
- “Lack of soundtrack.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with players reporting numerous bugs and glitches, particularly during gameplay activities like fishing. Many users feel that the developers are neglecting community feedback regarding these issues, leading to a frustrating experience as new bugs continue to emerge without resolution.
- “Also very buggy gameplay, especially with fishing.”
- “I have pretty good patience and understanding, but the developers seem to be blatantly ignoring the entire community's opinions about the update and all of the glitches it has brought.”
- “This game is riddled with weird glitches and bugs that aren't being addressed, and new bugs are being introduced.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers appreciate the attention to detail in the game's design, contributing to a generally positive atmosphere that enhances the overall experience.
- “I can feel the effort put into the details, and the atmosphere is overall fantastic.”
- “The immersive environment truly enhances the gameplay experience.”
- “Every sound and visual element contributes to a captivating atmosphere.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization model of the game is criticized for forcing new players into a tedious grind, with microtransactions presented as the only viable alternative to alleviate the boredom.
- “This game redefines the term 'dead content.' A long, tedious grind that is extremely boring is required for all starting players unless you choose to engage in microtransactions.”
- “The monetization system feels exploitative, pushing players to spend money just to enjoy basic features of the game.”
- “It's frustrating that the game locks essential content behind paywalls, making it nearly impossible to progress without spending real money.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The optimization for the Steam release has been criticized, with users noting that it requires performance improvements and reporting poor performance on the Steam client version.
- “Could use some performance polishing for the Steam release.”
- “Poor performance on the Steam client version.”