Skip to main content

Myth of Empires

72%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
grinding, optimization
72% User Score Based on 7,242 reviews

Platforms

PCPCWinWindowsCloCloudNGNNVIDIA GeForce NOW

About

"Myth of Empires" is a sandbox game that allows players to build their own empire, exploring diverse landscapes and ecologies with a realistic day/night cycle. With multiple civilizations like Greece, Persia, Rome, and Egypt, each with unique tech trees for weapons, buildings, and crafting stations, players can look forward to new adventures and challenges. The game features a new map, Dongzhou Island, in its v1.0 release.

Myth of Empires screenshot
Myth of Empires screenshot
Myth of Empires screenshot
Myth of Empires screenshot
Myth of Empires screenshot
Myth of Empires screenshot
Myth of Empires screenshot
Myth of Empires screenshot
Myth of Empires screenshot
Myth of Empires screenshot
Myth of Empires screenshot
+3

72%
Audience ScoreBased on 7,242 reviews
gameplay226 positive mentions
grinding586 negative mentions

  • The game offers a unique blend of survival mechanics and RPG elements, allowing for deep character progression and crafting.
  • The graphics are visually appealing, and the world is immersive with a variety of environments to explore.
  • The community aspect is strong, with opportunities for players to form guilds and collaborate on building and conquering.
  • The game suffers from significant lag and server issues, particularly for players outside of Asia, making combat and gameplay frustrating.
  • The user interface is cluttered and unintuitive, with many elements poorly translated, leading to confusion for players.
  • Progression can feel excessively grindy, requiring players to invest a lot of time to achieve meaningful advancement, which may deter casual players.
  • gameplay
    758 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of "Myth of Empires" is characterized by a mix of deep mechanics and engaging survival elements, offering a variety of crafting, building, and combat systems that can be rewarding for players who invest time. However, many users report clunky mechanics, frustrating combat, and a steep learning curve, with some aspects feeling unpolished or unintuitive. While the game has potential and a rich array of features, issues like server lag, bugs, and pay-to-win elements detract from the overall experience, leading to a mixed reception among players.

    • “Gameplay-wise, there is just so much depth to it. For different weapons and weapon types, there are different skill trees you can unlock. You can customize your character to master skills you prefer or grind out all the skills; you can really just pick how you want to play the game.”
    • “Despite its quirks, Myth of Empires shines as a long-term investment for players who enjoy immersive gameplay.”
    • “The pvp and base siege mechanics in this game are also top-notch.”
    • “This game is too clumsy and dull to play; the game mechanics need a lot of optimization, same with the graphics. There is too much delay on actions, might be server delays or something else. The game needs a more fluid combat system, where you can feel you are using your warrior for the stuff in the game!”
    • “The combat feels clunky, the building mechanics are frustrating due to pieces not snapping into place correctly, and the pacing of the game is very slow.”
    • “The gameplay is repetitive, and the mechanics feel clunky.”
  • grinding
    602 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game is heavily criticized, with many players finding it excessively tedious and time-consuming. While some appreciate the depth and complexity of the crafting and farming systems, the overwhelming amount of resource gathering and slow progression often leads to frustration, especially for solo players. Overall, the game is described as extremely grindy, making it more suitable for those who enjoy long-term commitment and cooperative play rather than casual gamers.

    • “This game is also great for casuals as you can hop in the quick seasonal PvP which has little to no farming, allowing you to focus on the fun aspects of the game if you're not into the grindy stuff.”
    • “The amount of time it takes to progress on a server just for a Chinese guild to come in and wipe out all your progress while you're farming materials for 30+ minutes is extremely demoralizing.”
    • “The reason I stopped playing altogether was because it was so grindy and hard to progress.”
    • “I often spent hours grinding, only to make minimal progress.”
  • graphics
    508 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the beautiful environments and detailed character models, while others criticize performance issues and subpar animations. Some users report that the graphics are impressive on high settings but require significant hardware power, leading to frame rate drops and lag. Overall, while the visuals are often highlighted as a strong point, they are not universally acclaimed, with some players finding them outdated or poorly optimized.

    • “The graphics are beautiful and the in-game mechanics are complex and deep.”
    • “Myth of Empires is a visually stunning game with a beautiful aesthetic and enjoyable in-game midi instruments.”
    • “The graphics look quite good in most aspects and are pleasing to the eye; there are some locations you look out and think that looks impressive.”
    • “Graphics are poor for a paid game.”
    • “The graphics and visuals are really terrible.”
    • “It's not that it isn't fun, it's just that it looks like a PS1 game on ultra settings and I couldn't get past how jarring and dated the graphics looked.”
  • optimization
    186 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues, including lag, stuttering, and crashes, particularly on servers. While some users noted improvements in recent updates and found the game to run smoothly on certain setups, the overall consensus is that the game requires substantial optimization work to enhance gameplay experience and stability. Early access status is acknowledged, with hopes for future improvements, but current performance remains a major concern for many players.

    • “The last update had optimizations that have the game running very well now.”
    • “Optimization is fantastic so far, I was getting great frames despite running everything maxed out.”
    • “Graphically optimized and beautifully looking game.”
    • “Now to performance, it's awful, no way around it, it runs like dogwater.”
    • “The game is very badly optimized in solo and unplayable if you host the server from your computer.”
    • “To add to the frustration, the game performance has deteriorated with each update, with lag becoming more pronounced.”
  • story
    174 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is largely criticized for being non-existent or poorly executed, with many players noting a lack of engaging narrative and confusing quest instructions. While there is a quest-based tutorial system intended to guide players, it often leads to frustration due to translation issues and repetitive tasks that overshadow any potential storyline. Overall, players feel that the game prioritizes grind over meaningful storytelling, making it difficult to enjoy the experience.

    • “Minecraft meets Ark with Conqueror's Blade elements and an actual action combat storyline set in 3rd century China.”
    • “There's a built-in economy driven by players, and your adventures are player-driven; the quests aren't something you have to do—freedom of play style and pace is there.”
    • “The game makes use of a quest-based tutorial system which helps and guides the player through the many aspects of the game.”
    • “The first starting quest already shows translation issues instructing you to go collect 'grass' which one would assume is on the ground within the abundant shin-length flowing grass when in reality it wants 'leaves' from a bush to make rope...”
    • “I played as long as I could waiting for a refund to see just how broken this game is and I have to say it's better if you spent your money on anything other than this. Solo gameplay isn't even worth it to experience any story as if there is any story hidden behind the grindiness of the game!”
    • “This is just so boring... there is a quest system to help alleviate that boredom, but even that is boring as hell. You'll get quests to craft xyz item or go collect xyz resource. I haven't seen any main quests deviate from that method.”
  • stability
    108 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and unresponsive controls that significantly hinder gameplay. Players frequently encounter issues such as NPCs getting stuck, combat not registering, and building mechanics being unreliable, leading to a frustrating experience. While some users acknowledge the game's potential and fun elements, the overwhelming consensus is that it is too buggy for a full release, making it difficult to recommend at this time.

    • “Compared to other EA survival games, it's bug-free and without lag, desync, and rubberbanding!”
    • “For being early access, it has hardly any bugs and runs great.”
    • “Runs great for early access.”
    • “Very buggy and lagging game, does not go to the server, then the picture glitches when returning to the previous menu, the background freezes and does not load, hits on monsters are not registered very crookedly.”
    • “Way too buggy to be considered a full release.”
    • “After 117 hours spent in it, I can say this game is extremely buggy and full of exploits.”
  • music
    60 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received largely negative feedback, with many players describing it as bland, forgettable, and poorly integrated into the gameplay experience. Critics note a lack of ambient sounds and a minimal presence of music, often resorting to external sources for a more immersive audio experience. While some acknowledge moments of decent music, the overall consensus is that significant improvements are needed to enhance the game's auditory atmosphere.

    • “The music sounds amazing though.”
    • “Throw in a dynamic day-night cycle and a soundtrack that's practically a sonic tour de force, and you've got a game that doesn't just entertain; it pulls you into its very soul.”
    • “Really in-depth crafting and fun taming, building is a bit janky sometimes but it can be worked around, combat is ok nothing special and the music is absolutely bumping.”
    • “The music sounded like it belongs in a 2001 game rather than modern-day.”
    • “Music, if you can call it that, is laughably bad.”
    • “Seriously, with 600 hours of gameplay, I've probably heard about 1 hour's worth of music.”
  • monetization
    34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with many users feeling that it employs aggressive microtransactions and pay-to-win mechanics, despite being a paid title. Reviewers liken its monetization practices to those of free-to-play mobile games, suggesting that the focus is more on profit than on delivering a meaningful gaming experience. Overall, players express frustration over the game's reliance on in-game purchases and the lack of genuine content, leading to a perception of the game as a scam.

    • “It is a very online multiplayer geared game with a bunch of microtransactions.”
    • “Pay-to-win monetization systems in a paid game; you can argue it's pay to progress, but that's the same thing, just a relabel from greedy corporations.”
    • “The longer I’ve played, the more the game feels like a cash grab rather than a genuine gaming experience.”
    • “Pay to win monetization systems in a paid game; you can argue it's pay to progress, but that's the same thing, just a relabel from greedy corporations.”
    • “This is a game you pay for but also has a similar monetization system as free-to-play games.”
  • humor
    26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with players finding the buggy translations and quirky mechanics, such as the absurdity of a horse cart with a torture post, to be hilariously entertaining. Many reviews highlight the game's comedic moments, especially when played with friends, and the amusing interactions with NPCs and animals, despite some frustrations with gameplay mechanics. Overall, the humor adds a lighthearted charm to the experience, making it enjoyable even amidst its flaws.

    • “Hilariously terrible.”
    • “Funny and adventurous!”
    • “Lmao bro the comments are hilarious!!”
  • atmosphere
    22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its beauty and immersive qualities, with players noting its stunning graphics and realistic mechanics that enhance the experience. Many appreciate the dynamic environmental elements, such as night scenes and storms, which contribute to an intense and engaging atmosphere. However, some users feel that the limited variety of atmospheric music and language barriers can detract from the overall immersion.

    • “I get lost looking at the scenery and love the atmosphere at night and when a storm starts, it can get really intense and I think that's wonderful.”
    • “Great game, has one of the best realism mechanics a survival/MMO has had in a while, graphics are very beautiful and just the whole atmosphere feels alive.”
    • “It combines some of the best aspects from other mainstream games and contains incredible atmosphere.”
    • “The voices are in Chinese, which isn't a major issue, but it kind of takes me out of the atmosphere when a bunch of peasants start yelling at me in Chinese and I don't understand anything.”
    • “I get lost looking at the scenery and love the atmosphere at night; when a storm starts, it can get really intense, and I think that's wonderful.”
  • emotional
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players express mixed emotions about the game, initially enjoying its fun elements but feeling frustrated and "abused" by certain mechanics, particularly the coin system and rear mechanic. This emotional shift suggests that while the game has engaging aspects, it can also lead to dissatisfaction and annoyance as players progress.

  • replayability
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players highlight the game's exceptional replayability, attributing it to frequent updates that keep the experience fresh and engaging over the years. The combination of strong graphics, performance, and content further enhances its addictive nature.

    • “Great game, have been playing it for years now and the constant updates make it incredibly replayable and very addictive!”
    • “Graphic value, game performance, content value, replay value, audio system, and Steam all contribute to an amazing experience.”
    • “The replayability of this game is outstanding, offering endless fun and new experiences with each playthrough.”
  • character development
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in the game is praised for its depth and complexity, contributing to an overall enjoyable experience. The stunning graphics and character design further enhance this aspect, although concerns about the game's future under Snail Games' management have been raised.

    • “Great graphics, good in-depth character development.”
    • “The game itself is enjoyable; character development is pretty deep.”
    • “The map and character design is absolutely stunning.”

Buy Myth of Empires

23h Median play time
130h Average play time
5-126h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 96 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Myth of Empires

Conan Exiles Image
This game contains adult content
Soulmask Image
The Front Image
Citadel: Forged with Fire Image
Dark and Light Image
Life is Feudal: Your Own Image
This game contains adult content
V Rising Image
Gloria Victis Image
Once Human Image
No One Survived Image