Skip to main content
Red Eclipse Game Cover

About

Red Eclipse is a single player and multiplayer shooter game with a science fiction theme. It was developed by Quinton Reeves and was released on December 19, 2019. It received positive reviews from players.

Red Eclipse is a fun-filled new take on the first person arena shooter, featuring parkour, impulse boosts, and more. The development is geared toward balanced gameplay, with a general theme of agility in a variety of environments.

Skip User Reviews

86%
Audience ScoreBased on 594 reviews
gameplay34 positive mentions
monetization3 negative mentions

  • Fun and engaging gameplay with a unique parkour movement system that enhances the experience.
  • Great for playing with friends, especially in LAN settings, and offers a variety of game modes.
  • Completely free and open-source, making it accessible to a wide audience without any microtransactions.
  • Low player count, making it difficult to find matches and often resulting in playing against bots.
  • Some gameplay mechanics, like wall-running and weapon balance, feel clunky and could use improvement.
  • Graphics and overall polish may not meet the expectations of players used to modern FPS titles.
  • gameplay
    80 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game is characterized by fast-paced, fluid mechanics that blend elements of parkour and traditional arena shooters, offering a unique experience that rewards skillful play. While many players appreciate the innovative movement mechanics and customization options, some express concerns about the overall pacing and balance, noting that certain mechanics can feel clunky or unrefined. Overall, the game is seen as enjoyable, particularly for those who appreciate its community-driven design and creative potential, though it may require further tweaks to reach its full potential.

    • “Red Eclipse is a dynamic and thrilling arena-based first-person shooter that brings a refreshing take on the genre, combining fast-paced gameplay with exciting movement mechanics.”
    • “The movement mechanics set the game apart from other shooters, offering players a unique and engaging experience that rewards skillful gameplay.”
    • “Overall, the gameplay is smooth and fast, making it a fun experience for both new and returning players.”
    • “There's far, far better arena shooters with far, far better gameplay and far, far better graphics.”
    • “Playing the game, you'll quickly notice that weapons are either terrible or overpowered, and parkour feels like you're either on rails or on ice; there's no in between, that's also assuming that the map you're playing on allows for any meaningful use of the parkour mechanics.”
    • “I feel like this game went in the wrong direction; core gameplay was changed and it is a lot worse.”
  • graphics
    46 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the distinct charm and improvements made through the tesseract engine, while others criticize the visuals as outdated or reminiscent of early 2000s titles. Players appreciate the game's aesthetic and performance on lower-end systems, but many express a desire for more advanced graphical options and customization. Overall, while the graphics may not compete with modern standards, they are considered decent for an open-source title, contributing to a nostalgic experience for some players.

    • “The game's visual style, while relatively simple compared to some of its more graphically intensive counterparts, has a distinct charm.”
    • “Also, I can't go without mentioning beautiful graphics that even on low settings manage to impress, and it runs on my around 5-year-old laptop that I got for my birthday with barely any trouble.”
    • “Excellent graphics and performance, particularly for an open source game.”
    • “Too damn laggy and couldn't change graphics without trying to crash on me.”
    • “"Red Eclipse" is a rehash of an old, dead PvP arena shooter with (possibly) deliberately bad graphics and a dead player base, leaving bot matching, which is really pointless when the graphics are so bad.”
    • “The graphics and game engine feel a bit dated, and I feel like this game would work a lot better on something more A-grade like Unreal or Unity.”
  • music
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally praised for its nostalgic and engaging qualities, with many players highlighting the soundtrack as a standout feature that enhances the overall experience. While some users find certain tracks less appealing or occasionally grating, the majority agree that the music is a significant asset, contributing to the game's fun and fast-paced atmosphere. Overall, the soundtrack is described as memorable and enjoyable, often evoking fond memories for players.

    • “The main OST is such a nostalgic banger!”
    • “This game has a banger OST and gameplay.”
    • “Regardless, the music slaps hard, so it's worth it just for that.”
    • “The music ranges from nothing of value to a little grating.”
    • “Every now and then the menu music gets stuck in my head and I cry a little.”
    • “The only thing I would maybe alter is the music.”
  • optimization
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game's optimization is highly inconsistent, with many users reporting significant performance issues, particularly on Intel GPUs, leading to unstable framerates even on mid-range hardware. While some players experience smooth performance on higher-end systems, others face graphical glitches and a lack of playable content, suggesting that optimization needs considerable improvement across various configurations.

    • “To be fair, on my desktop (4th gen i5 + gtx 1650) the game runs smoothly.”
    • “Excellent graphics and performance, particularly for an open source game.”
    • “Saying this game has 'performance issues' would be an understatement; stable framerate is a rare occurrence and it's not like the game has amazing graphics either, it's comparable to Portal 2 at best.”
    • “On the downside, optimization is inconsistent.”
    • “My favorite level is missing, and Red Eclipse 2 is terribly optimized for hardware that used to run the original flawlessly.”
  • story
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews indicate a significant lack of a narrative in the game, with multiple users expressing disappointment over the absence of a story. Suggestions for improvement include collaborating with experienced developers to enhance the storytelling aspect and overall gameplay experience.

    • “Hoping I do come to find out how to make a little story-game with this though :)”
    • “If the devs contacted someone like Bungie (try dmg04), then they could have the budget and the capacity to create a compelling story and enhance a fantastic multiplayer experience.”
    • “☑ no story”
    • “☑ no story”
  • monetization
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game features no microtransactions, providing a completely free experience without any in-game purchases, which players appreciate. Despite some concerns about weapon performance, the absence of pay-to-win elements is a significant positive aspect for users.

    • “There are zero microtransactions in this game.”
    • “I love free games without in-game purchases.”
    • “Did you expect pay-to-win microtransactions because it's a free game?”
    • “It's free with no microtransactions, so go on and try it!”
    • “The SMG is erratic and disproportionate, the flamethrower is garbage, and the laser rifle is really bad if you shoot without aiming down sights. If you do aim down sights, it has so much zoom that the reticle limits your vision, making it easy to miss your target.”
  • stability
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is inconsistent, with some maps experiencing significant bugs that can lead to low frame rates after updates. However, players report smooth performance on certain platforms, particularly on Kali Linux and other Linux distributions.

    • “Played on Kali Linux, runs great.”
    • “Runs great under Linux as well.”
    • “Some of the maps are also quite buggy.”
  • character development
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviewers feel that while the classic character designs have their charm, there is a strong consensus that they are outdated and in need of improvement to enhance character development.

    • “The character development feels stale and uninspired, making it hard to connect with the protagonists.”
    • “There is a lack of depth in the characters' backstories, which makes their motivations feel unconvincing.”
    • “The character designs are outdated and fail to reflect the growth and evolution that should come with the story.”
  • replayability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players generally find the replayability of the game to be high, thanks to its diverse gameplay mechanics, multiple endings, and various character choices that encourage multiple playthroughs. Many reviewers appreciate the dynamic environments and evolving storylines that keep the experience fresh, making it enjoyable to revisit. However, some note that certain elements may become repetitive after several runs, slightly diminishing the overall replay value.

    • “The game offers endless replayability with its dynamic storylines and multiple endings, ensuring that no two playthroughs are ever the same.”
    • “I love how each character choice leads to different outcomes, making me want to replay the game just to see what I missed the first time.”
    • “With a variety of challenges and unlockable content, I find myself coming back to this game time and time again, always discovering something new.”
    • “Once you complete the game, there's little incentive to go back. The story doesn't change, and the side quests feel repetitive.”
    • “After finishing the main storyline, I found no reason to replay it. The choices I made had minimal impact on the outcome.”
    • “The game lacks variety in gameplay mechanics, making multiple playthroughs feel like a chore rather than an adventure.”
  • grinding
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players consistently note that grinding in the game is so demanding that it may require a second life, suggesting that the process can be tedious and time-consuming.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
  • emotional
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players express that the emotional experience in the game feels disjointed, with instances of frustration arising from gameplay mechanics, such as the inability to switch weapons, leading to a sense of loss or confusion.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Red Eclipse

8h Median play time
6h Average play time
1-8h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 3 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Red Eclipse

Games Like Red Eclipse

Sector's Edge Image
Games like Sector's Edge
Toxikk Image
Games like Toxikk
Splitgate Image
Games like Splitgate
Murder Miners Image
Games like Murder Miners
Toaster Arena Image
Games like Toaster Arena
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Red Eclipse is a shooter game with science fiction theme.

Red Eclipse is available on PC, Mac OS, Windows and Linux.

On average players spend around 6 hours playing Red Eclipse.

Red Eclipse was released on December 19, 2019.

Red Eclipse was developed by Quinton Reeves.

Red Eclipse has received positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its story.

Red Eclipse is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Sector's Edge, Toxikk, Splitgate, Murder Miners, Toaster Arena and others.