Quantum League

About

Quantum League is an upcoming online multiplayer game where players use strategic time manipulation to outsmart opponents in specially designed arenas. The free open beta, now ended, offered a taste of the game with 1v1 and 2v2 modes in the Quantum Arena and Overpass arenas. Excelling in this game requires not just agility and skill, but also the ability to tactically coordinate with past and future versions of your character. Wishlist the full game for its anticipated release.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,262 reviews

gameplay128 positive mentions

monetization17 negative mentions

Quantum League features a unique time loop mechanic that adds depth and strategy to the gameplay, making it unlike any other FPS.
The game is well-polished for an early access title, with smooth gunplay and enjoyable mechanics that keep players engaged.
The community is friendly and supportive, with active communication from the developers, which enhances the overall experience.

The player base is extremely low, leading to long matchmaking times and repetitive matches against the same opponents.
The health pack mechanic allows players to revive themselves, which can undermine the strategic elements of the game and lead to frustrating gameplay.
The game lacks sufficient content, including maps and game modes, which can make it feel repetitive after a short period of play.

gameplay
288 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
51%
4%
The gameplay of Quantum League is characterized by its innovative time loop mechanic, which encourages strategic thinking and allows players to interact with their past selves, creating a unique and engaging experience. While many players find the core mechanics fun and rewarding, the game suffers from a low player base, leading to long matchmaking times and a lack of competitive environment. Overall, the gameplay is praised for its originality and depth, but it is hindered by technical issues and the need for a more active community.
- “The unique mechanic of a time loop is absolutely excellent, and interacting with essentially a team of yourself is beyond cool.”
- “This game is an incredible mix of the best-feeling FPS gameplay and tactical, smart, fast-thinking strategy.”
- “The gameplay loop and minute-to-minute interactions are great.”
- “Quantum League has a few technical issues that make it unplayable even before the community and gameplay issues: I wanted to play with a friend so I set up a custom match 1v1 but three times we started the game but couldn't connect due to one of us getting an infinite loading and the other fully loading in just to see an icon of a WiFi symbol with a line through it.”
- “The gameplay is questionable, the weapons are uninspired, there is a hacker problem, and the player base is non-existent.”
- “The concept is interesting, but the gameplay is so boring.”
graphics
50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
58%
6%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the aesthetic quality, art style, and visual clarity, often comparing it to popular titles like Fortnite and Team Fortress 2. While some players appreciate the cartoonish visuals and smooth performance, others criticize the character models for being pixelated and lacking detail, suggesting that the graphics may not meet modern standards. Overall, the game's visuals are seen as stylized and appealing, though there is room for improvement in certain areas.
- “The aesthetic quality of the game, the detail, and the heart that went into it is all abundantly clear.”
- “This game is absolutely incredible; the skins look amazing as well as the graphics.”
- “The graphics are simple yet stylized and cool, and should run very well even on older setups due to it being quite well optimized.”
- “This game also has Fortnite-like graphics, but worse.”
- “The graphics are fairly low quality even by 5 years ago's standards.”
- “The art style is very uninspired and way too cartoonish/marketable, the characters are literally nothing with no effort put into them.”
monetization
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
21%
71%
The game's monetization strategy currently relies solely on a one-time purchase, which many reviewers feel is limiting its player base and overall success. Suggestions for improvement include adopting a free-to-play model with a battle pass or in-app purchases, as well as increasing advertising efforts to attract more players. While some players appreciate the absence of microtransactions, others believe that introducing them could enhance revenue without compromising the game's integrity.
- “Heres the best part: no microtransactions!”
- “Devs, please no greedy microtransactions; you have a diamond here, keep it shiny.”
- “The paywall is unnecessary, as a free game with a battle pass or in-app purchases would probably get a higher player count and generate therefore more income.”
- “First of all, microtransactions are in free-to-play games to make money off the game because you can't have money if it's free, but for a paid game to have the same prizes as a free-to-play game just for skins, this is kind of a joke.”
- “As of right now, there is no monetization model outside of buying the game.”
music
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
47%
33%
20%
The music in the game is generally described as fitting the cartoony vibe, with funky soundtracks that enhance the gameplay experience. However, some players find the theme music generic and repetitive, leading to mixed feelings about its overall quality. While many appreciate the sound effects and the music's alignment with the game's tone, there are notable criticisms regarding its memorability and potential for annoyance.
- “The soundtracks are quite funky and suit the game's cartoony vibes.”
- “The game feels great and is a pleasure to play, and the music is on-point.”
- “The music and sound effects are spot on and work well.”
- “And I won't talk about the Fortnite-like music in the background.”
- “Similarly, the theme music is appropriate for the tone of the game but is fairly generic and forgettable.”
- “The music is terrible, but I don't have any other complaints.”
story
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
33%
33%
The game's story is widely criticized, with some users stating it lacks depth and is comparable to playing a game like "Temple Run" for its narrative. Others suggest that a darker visual style could have enhanced the storytelling experience, while a few note that the tutorial's execution is confusing and detracts from the overall narrative.
- “Epic story.”
- “Like playing 'Temple Runners' for the story.”
- “Game story.”
- “This game has no story.”
- “It's like playing 'Temple Run' for the story.”
- “The tutorial is a bit of a mess; if you shoot targets before the quest pops up to shoot them, they will not count.”
optimization
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
33%
33%
Overall, the game's optimization receives mixed feedback; while some players report excellent performance with high frame rates and smooth gameplay even on older systems, others express frustration with optimization issues that hinder their experience. The disparity suggests that while the game is well-optimized for many, it may not run smoothly for all players, particularly those with less capable hardware.
- “The graphics are simple yet stylized and cool and should run very well even on older setups due to it being quite well optimized.”
- “The game runs well at a near-constant 144 fps on ultra graphics with no stuttering.”
- “This game is also really well optimized; I have a Frankenstein rig and it was able to run it extremely well with no issues.”
- “It's a shooter with a great mechanic. I see a lot of potential, but I also see two problems: optimization and lack of players. Maybe if you lower the price by half or more, other people would be interested in buying it, but not just anyone can run the game.”
- “Around the 1.5 hours mark, I felt like I couldn't recommend it due to several frustrations with the game, optimization being a major one, while gameplay issues were somewhat minor.”
- “Optimization - 8”
replayability
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
38%
38%
Overall, the game's replayability is a mixed bag; while some users highlight its infinite replay value and polished mechanics that enhance enjoyment, others express concerns about limited options and the necessity of a large user base for a fulfilling experience.
- “Very fun game, and very replayable at that!”
- “Very few people will care to play something new that also asks for money, and offers very few options and has little replay value, especially if it depends on having a large user base to be enjoyable.”
- “With an already integrated ELO system, it adds to the already apparent replayability of the game.”
- “It is extremely polished and offers endless replayability.”
humor
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with players highlighting its unique and hilarious moments, particularly those arising from the time-loop mechanic. The quirky character names and absurd situations contribute to an overall comedic experience that sets it apart from typical shooters.
- “Crazy (and sometimes hilarious) things happen in this game as an outcome of the time-loop, which really sets it apart from other shooters.”
- “Extremely funny game.”
- “You will find great people and very good (and a bit funny) looking names!”
stability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is currently in early access and is plagued by numerous glitches and bugs, significantly impacting gameplay. Issues include unresponsive controls, malfunctioning weapons, and a particularly problematic ranked mode, making it feel too unstable for its price at this stage. Overall, while the game shows potential, its stability remains a major concern.
- “The game is still in early access, so it does have a few glitches and bugs.”
- “Yes, the game does have a lot of bugs and glitches scattered around.”
- “Also, many glitches occur; sometimes when the match starts, the weapon list doesn't disappear, and I can't move at all. The grenade launcher is very glitchy, and often the grenades don't explode or explode on you, which makes it unusable.”
emotional
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a mix of frustration and emotional investment in the game's mechanics, particularly regarding the rewind feature, which can create a sense of waiting and disappointment after intense moments. The feeling of near-victory, only to fall short, adds to the emotional weight of the experience, leaving some players feeling that the game lacks a deeper purpose despite its fun elements. Overall, the emotional highs and lows are significant, but the game’s design may leave players yearning for a more fulfilling experience.
- “The feeling when you kill all 3 loops and run to the point only to be literally a centimeter from the point is heartbreaking, and it seems to happen way more than you think. In my opinion, it would be a lot less heartbreaking if there wasn't the slowdown while you're screaming in your head, 'Nooo!'”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game engaging and strategic, with a variety of guns and movement options that enhance the experience. Despite initial impressions of slowness, many enjoy the challenge and see themselves investing hours into experimenting with different strategies and progressing through ranks.
- “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
- “The grind is satisfying and offers a real sense of progression.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “So the trailers make this game look slow and honestly somewhat tedious; this isn't the case.”
- “Personally, I have enjoyed it thoroughly and can see myself grinding through the ranks in the ranked game mode.”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
Character development in the game is perceived as lacking depth, with users noting that the character designs are cartoonish and reminiscent of other titles like Fortnite. While the gameplay mechanics, such as looping and re-syncing, offer engaging interactions, the overall character design and variety are considered standard and unremarkable.
- “The visuals and character designs of Quantum League are pretty cartoonish and reminded me indeed of games like Fortnite or Darwin Project.”
- “The maps are okay, the movement is standard-issue for modern shooters (includes sliding and bunny hopping), and there's nothing revolutionary about the character design or guns (one of everything, basically), but the looping and re-syncing (grabbing a health orb when dead will revive you) makes for amazing plays and counter-plays.”
- “The character development feels shallow and lacks depth, making it hard to connect with the characters.”
- “There is little to no progression in character abilities, which makes the gameplay feel repetitive and uninspired.”
- “The character designs are generic and fail to stand out, leaving players with a sense of disconnection from the game's world.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
100%
The atmosphere of the game is generally praised for its engaging and immersive qualities, with players appreciating the competitive concept and gameplay. However, some users feel that it could benefit from a more mature tone to enhance the overall experience.
- “Finally an awesome FPS game, great concept and gameplay... love the game atmosphere.”
- “Great competitive concept, but it should have a more mature atmosphere.”
- “Finally an awesome FPS game with a great concept and gameplay, but the atmosphere could use improvement.”