Project N3T

About

Project N3T is a single player action game. It was developed by Myre36 and was released on October 5, 2023. It received neutral reviews from players.

You play as a test subject working for the company Quanti. You have been tasked with testing out a new device called the EMFR that functions as a very powerful magnet. Your mission is to complete a series of tests all designed around magnets. You'll be faced with platform challenges and other puzzles in this short single-player experience. Features: You'll be equipped with a very powerful magnet…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

50%

Audience ScoreBased on 16 reviews

gameplay7 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game features fun and experimental puzzle mechanics that show potential for creativity.
Some players enjoyed the humor and narrative elements, particularly the social anxiety joke.
The new magnet mechanics introduced in the game were appreciated for their uniqueness and potential.

The controls are janky and can revert or change unexpectedly, making gameplay frustrating.
The announcer's dialogue is often criticized for being annoying and unoriginal, detracting from the experience.
Many players found the puzzles to be repetitive and lacking in challenge, with some elements feeling poorly implemented.

gameplay
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
39%
44%
17%
The gameplay features experimental puzzle mechanics that are generally fun and engaging, particularly with innovative elements like magnet ball mazes. However, the presentation and pacing of these mechanics can be inconsistent, with abrupt introductions of complex elements that may hinder the overall experience. While some players appreciate the creativity, others find the announcer's dialogue detracts from the enjoyment, leading to mixed feelings about the gameplay's execution.
- “I love experimental puzzle mechanics.”
- “Along the way, new gameplay elements are introduced until you reach a finale where you must use your expertise of the gameplay elements to pass a difficult test.”
- “These are legitimate gameplay elements that have the potential to be fun and challenging.”
- “It wouldn't be polite for people expecting a polished or competent demonstration of gameplay mechanics.”
- “Yet even this aspect of the gameplay seems hampered by their presentation in this game.”
- “This momentum and direction, though, don't seem consistent or intuitive throughout the gameplay.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story received a low rating of 3/10, indicating that players found it lacking in depth and engagement. Many reviews suggest that the narrative is underdeveloped and fails to captivate or resonate with the audience. Overall, the storytelling aspect is seen as a significant weakness of the game.
- “The story feels disjointed and lacks a coherent narrative, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “Character development is shallow, and the plot twists are predictable and uninspired.”
- “The dialogue is often cringeworthy, detracting from any emotional impact the story could have had.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
100%
The graphics of the game have been criticized for lacking aesthetic competence, especially when compared to earlier titles like Portal 1, which achieved a more visually appealing experience despite having less advanced technology.
- “It wouldn't be polite for people looking for an aesthetically pleasing game.”
- “It wouldn't be polite for people looking for an aesthetically competent game.”
- “Portal 1 accomplished that feat over 15 years prior and with far less graphical capability.”