Prime World

About

Prime World offers exciting heroic battles, waged to prove the superiority of your clan. Collect unique talents and create an army of invincible heroes. Enter into mutual alliance with other clans, for profit and conquest. Raise your clan to the height of its power!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

47%

Audience ScoreBased on 831 reviews

gameplay25 positive mentions

grinding21 negative mentions

Unique talent system allows for deep customization of heroes.
Engaging mix of MOBA and city-building mechanics.
Visually appealing graphics and interesting character designs.

Severe matchmaking issues lead to unbalanced games and long queue times.
Overwhelming presence of Russian players makes communication difficult for non-Russian speakers.
Pay-to-win elements create frustration for free-to-play users trying to compete.

gameplay
91 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
62%
11%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it addictive and enjoyable, while others criticize it for being clunky and heavily reliant on pay-to-win mechanics. Many users appreciate the unique mechanics and diverse heroes, but express frustration over matchmaking issues, slow pacing, and a lack of community support. Overall, while there are interesting concepts and solid mechanics, the game's monetization strategies and balance problems detract from the overall experience.
- “This is a made-in-Russia gem, and let's not forget that they know how to make games highly accurate, without bugs, and full of addictive, dripping honey gameplay.”
- “Gameplay is great...the heroes are diverse and interesting in their own rights.”
- “Fun to play, and offers fresh mechanics to the generic world of MOBA.”
- “Gameplay is clunky as hell too.”
- “The gameplay wasn't entertaining enough to keep me interested for more than a few hours; once I learned what the differences were between this and League of Legends/Dota 2, I quickly started to dislike the game.”
- “To sum up what I said above, this game is highly unrewarding and lacks any form of strategy as you pick your character before you even get matched, and PvP doesn't feel interesting but rather locked or rails along with questionable mechanics that make little to no sense.”
graphics
48 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
42%
35%
23%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the visuals as decent to good, particularly in comparison to other MOBAs, while others criticize them as average or below par for current standards. Many users note that the graphics are visually appealing but are hampered by performance issues and a lack of customization options. Overall, while the graphics have their strengths, they are often overshadowed by gameplay and technical shortcomings.
- “Graphically, it's well polished and manages to put its own slant on the MOBA genre.”
- “The game is beautiful even on my old rig on low graphics.”
- “I love the graphics and the characters are unique.”
- “Graphics 5/10”
- “Sound and graphics are not great.”
- “Unplayable even on low graphic settings.”
story
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
73%
9%
The game's story is described as minimal and often overshadowed by its focus on PvP matches, with players expressing frustration over repetitive missions and matchmaking issues. While there are elements of quests and a castle-building mechanic that hint at a deeper narrative, many reviewers find the storyline laughable and lacking substance, making it difficult to progress without a reliable player base. Overall, the integration of missions and quests is seen as a potential strength, but the execution leaves much to be desired.
- “Nival (developer) had some great ideas for integrating things like a permanent player-built castle and single-player missions into its multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA).”
- “This is a strange blend of your typical kingdom-building game, with nice missions you see in Warcraft 3, as well as a MOBA style vs mode.”
- “The tutorial is very RPG-like and gets you into the story.”
- “The storyline is laughable and pointless.”
- “Well, I tried to play this game but in the first 2 minutes it asks you to fight the 'first strike' mission and it puts you in a queue that stops and does nothing.”
- “You can't progress with missions until you do a 5v5 one, and you never get into a game.”
grinding
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
4%
91%
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessive and tedious, often requiring significant time investment—sometimes over 100 hours—to achieve meaningful upgrades and unlocks. Many reviews highlight a lack of variety in champion builds, leading to repetitive grinding for legendary items and talents, which can feel punishing, especially in competitive settings. While some players enjoy the talent farming mechanic, others express frustration with the grind's impact on matchmaking and overall gameplay experience.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Just the upgrades took easily 100 hours of grinding in long queues as not everybody played other game modes (for example PvE).”
- “The grind element can be a bit tedious early on, when you're still trying to gear up, leading to some matches where you're just going to be out-scaled no matter what you do.”
- “It always was somehow pay-to-win and required lots of grinding.”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
83%
Reviews indicate that the game's monetization strategy is heavily criticized, with players labeling it as a blatant cash grab that prioritizes profit over gameplay quality. The introduction of features like clans and the equipment/talents system is seen as a way to exploit players financially, detracting from the overall experience. Many feel that the developers are unresponsive to concerns, further exacerbating frustrations with the game's monetization practices.
- “The developers have been transparent about the monetization model, which revolves around enhancing power and performance, reflecting their talent and quality in the game.”
- “I appreciate that the monetization system is designed to be fair, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend money.”
- “The in-game purchases are well-balanced, providing options that enhance the experience without making it pay-to-win.”
- “Honestly, this game seems to really just be one big cash grab anymore, to be honest.”
- “The equipment/talents system is very interesting, but sadly it is just another cash grab.”
- “Beyond the obvious cash grab monetization setup, the gameplay itself is terrible.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The game's music has received positive feedback, with players enjoying its quality and atmosphere, often finding it engaging enough to listen to even in the menu. However, some reviewers feel that while the music is great, it does not compensate for the game's lack of pace and excitement compared to other titles in the genre.
- “I like the game's music, and I kind of like its system so far too.”
- “It's a pretty game; the music is great.”
- “The gameplay is just the same old song and dance, in a different key.”
- “The game itself lacks pace and music; in other MOBA games, you do not feel like falling asleep after 10 minutes have passed.”
- “You can just sit at the menu and listen to the music.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is a significant issue, with users reporting frequent glitches, screen freezes, and tutorial problems that hinder gameplay. Many players express frustration over these bugs, which detract from the overall experience and suggest that substantial improvements are needed for a smoother performance.
- “The tutorial glitches out for Steam users, leaving them unable to play the game.”
- “There is a glitch with the screen where everything freezes and the health bars go everywhere, preventing me from enjoying the game and seeing the action.”
- “The game used through Nival's official site/server freezes up and you get dropped from battles.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Reviews indicate that the humor in the game is largely ineffective, with some players finding it unfunny and a waste of time. Additionally, there is a sense of irony in the game's removal from the store, as it has led to complaints about its pay-to-win mechanics rather than any comedic value.
- “Whatever the case, it's not funny and I won't be wasting any more of my time.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
150%
The game boasts high replayability, rated 8.5/10, due to its diverse characters and classes, which offer unique talent builds that significantly alter gameplay. Each playthrough feels fresh as players can experiment with different builds, ensuring a varied experience every time.
- “The talent builds you get at the start for each hero are playable.”
- “Replayability 8.5/10 - the game's different characters and classes vary so much that every time it's something different. Each person brings a unique build to the table, making the experience constantly changing and diverse.”
- “The talent builds you start with for each hero are playable, but they don't offer enough variety to keep me coming back.”
- “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to replay the game since the outcomes don't change significantly.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices in gameplay makes replaying feel more like a chore than an enjoyable experience.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
The atmosphere of the game is praised for its well-designed maps and engaging gameplay style, creating a relaxed environment that facilitates learning class mechanics before tackling more challenging content. Players appreciate the absence of overwhelming area-of-effect skills, contributing to a more enjoyable experience.
- “The atmosphere in the game is incredibly immersive, with a beautifully crafted map that enhances the overall experience.”
- “The PvE challenge maps create a more relaxed atmosphere, allowing players to learn how to use their class effectively before diving into more intense gameplay.”
- “The game's atmosphere is complemented by its nice style of gameplay, making it easy to learn and enjoy.”
- “The atmosphere feels lifeless and uninspired, making it hard to get immersed in the game.”
- “Despite the game's potential, the atmosphere is dull and fails to evoke any real emotion.”
- “The environments lack detail and variety, resulting in a monotonous atmosphere that quickly becomes tiresome.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players have noted that the game's optimization is tied to system performance, with warnings issued for low performance that can lead to disconnections. Additionally, matchmaking is influenced by player performance metrics, specifically wins, which may affect overall gameplay experience.
- “A simple in-game example of a warning would be: 'You have been disconnected due to your system's low performance.'”
- “Right now, the game is set to match you up based on your performance, specifically your wins.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express that the emotional aspect of the game is heavily influenced by negative interactions, such as trolling, cursing, and poor teamwork, leading to feelings of anger and frustration.