One Way To Die

About

One Way To Die is a single player and multiplayer action game. It was developed by Tenth&Hess Games and was released on September 1, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

PLEASE WISHLIST About the Game Set logic aside to play the game where losing is actually winning and your character may be the dumbest person to ever live! After waking from a terrifying dream of your own untimely death, you attempt to make your way to the Finnigan Brothers' Fun Park for its last day then back home again in this all-new text-adventure from CoaguCo Industries. You must survive…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

56%

Audience ScoreBased on 222 reviews

humor45 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

The game features a dark sense of humor with absurd and hilarious death scenarios that can be entertaining.
It's free to play, making it accessible for anyone to try without financial commitment.
The developers are responsive and continue to update the game, showing care for the player experience.

The gameplay is heavily reliant on random chance, making choices feel meaningless and frustrating.
The writing can become repetitive and tedious, leading to boredom after a short playtime.
Many players report technical issues, such as broken achievements and a lack of engaging content.

humor
45 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in this game is polarizing, with some players appreciating its dark and absurd comedic elements, particularly in the creative death scenarios, while others criticize it as lazy and overly reliant on randomness. Many found the writing to be hit-or-miss, with some deaths eliciting genuine laughter, while others felt the humor fell flat or became tedious. Overall, the game offers a mix of hilarious and cringeworthy moments, appealing primarily to those who enjoy dark humor and absurdity.
- “Choose-your-own-death adventure with a dark sense of humor and more endings than I expected.”
- “The outcome of the story doesn't really change, all scenarios are pretty much the same, no matter how you got there; still, there's some hilarious writing, particularly in the death scenes.”
- “One way to die is pretty hilarious though in its extremely specific random deaths and the ridiculous amount of detail put into describing how you just died.”
story
45 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
66%
7%
The game's story is a choose-your-own-adventure narrative centered around a man's journey to an amusement park, featuring a variety of humorous and absurd death scenarios. While the writing is praised for its creativity and dark humor, many players find the randomness of outcomes frustrating, as choices often lead to similar results and do not significantly impact the overall narrative. Despite its engaging premise, the lack of a solid storyline and the repetitive nature of the gameplay can detract from the experience.
- “The main focus of the game, of course, is the story.”
- “The story itself was pretty neat, and I liked the variety of deaths in the game (and while some were extremely silly, it was still fun to read).”
- “The game is heavily focused on its rich descriptive narrative, while it is true that you will have to read a lot during your playthrough which may discourage a lot of people. This is a game that I liked and I would recommend, to progress onward on your story you are given decisions for which the consequences are not predictable, which gives the game a lot of replayability.”
- “The story has no logic, thus advancing farther doesn't give you any accomplishment.”
- “Probably one of the worst games I have ever played; it has no solid storyline and is based too much on luck.”
- “The outcome of the story doesn't really change; all scenarios are pretty much the same, no matter how you got there.”
graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
58%
25%
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized for being basic and unappealing, with many users noting a lack of visual detail and a messy interface. While some improvements have been made in recent updates, such as the addition of picture graphics, the overall aesthetic remains underwhelming and may deter potential players. The simplistic and text-heavy design contributes to a lack of engagement, making it feel more like a text-based experience than a visually driven game.
- “In the 2019 update, the music is better, picture graphics have been added and the gameplay has been tweaked.”
- “So I keep picking up random games just as silly as this, and as we sit together and play, I feel joy in knowing that I'm introducing the surprising amount of fun (and pain) indie games, that wear their simple mechanics and bare graphics proudly like some trendy new quirky armor, can actually be.”
- “The graphics aren't great... that will understandably be a turn off for a lot of gamers, and it's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost.”
- “Focusing on the technical aspects, there is very little in terms of visuals with the majority of the game; in fact, the bright white background began giving me a headache over time through the glare, and the audio is just as lackluster with the majority of the game being a looping track which quickly grew to annoy.”
- “At first glance, the graphics are messy and the interface isn't too clean, to be honest.”
music
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding the looping tracks repetitive and annoying, while others appreciate the improvements made in the 2019 update, noting that some pieces are enjoyable and relaxing. Overall, while the soundtrack may not enhance the game's humor, it is considered suitable for the gameplay experience.
- “In the 2019 update, the music is better, picture graphics have been added and the gameplay has been tweaked.”
- “The music is suitable and also nice to hear as it can be relaxing and also a game you can enjoy and spend a few minutes.”
- “I didn't quite hear the soundtrack, but what I did hear was quite good.”
- “The music is annoying.”
- “About the only consolation is that some of the music isn't half-bad; but considering that it doesn't add to the alleged 'humour' of the product one iota, it's a dubious blessing at best.”
- “One simple loop of music playing... same repeating text adventure will lead you to many deaths until you finally are able to get home safely and fall asleep...”
grinding
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
88%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious and repetitive, often feeling that it relies too heavily on luck and simple mechanics. Many express frustration with the time required to achieve completion, noting that the process can feel lazy and unengaging. Overall, the grinding for achievements detracts from the enjoyment of the game.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “But I tell you that playing even for that was a tedious task.”
- “Another grinding through simple repetitive 3-choice menus...”
- “The achievements themselves promote grinding, where your choice is irrelevant (I was killed off accidental suicide after starting the game).”
gameplay
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
The gameplay is described as potentially enjoyable, particularly in the context of indie games that embrace simple mechanics and graphics. While some players find joy in the chaotic and quirky nature of these games, there is a desire for more logical structure to enhance the overall experience.
- “Now this sort of thing could (and most likely would) actually be fun to play if there was some logic or gameplay involved.”
- “So I keep picking up random games just as silly as this, and as we sit together and play, I feel joy in knowing that I'm introducing the surprising amount of fun (and pain) indie games can actually be, with their simple mechanics and bare graphics proudly displayed.”
- “Spread them out, mix them up, and you should get a furiously gleeful death toll as well as helpfully pushing other players towards more satisfying and fun gameplay.”
- “Now this sort of thing could (and most likely would) actually be fun to play, if there was some logic or gameplay involved.”
- “It’s just gameplay.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game is criticized for having no replay value, indicating that players do not find incentives to revisit it after completing it.
- “There is no replay value.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to play it again.”
- “The lack of varied outcomes makes replaying feel pointless.”