MoW: Face Off XL

About

The Battlefield Card Game with a roguish community. Come join us and immerse yourself in an alt history Steampunk universe where the impossible is possible. Choose the faction that complements your play style, build a devious deck & battle your opponent across the deadly battlefield.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

71%

Audience ScoreBased on 96 reviews

graphics6 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game features a unique combination of card mechanics and tactical battlefield gameplay, providing a fresh experience for strategy game enthusiasts.
The graphics and sound design have been significantly improved in the XL version, enhancing the overall gameplay experience.
The developers are actively engaged with the community, frequently updating the game and addressing player feedback, which fosters a positive gaming environment.

The game has been abandoned by the developers, leading to server shutdowns and a lack of support, leaving players frustrated and without a complete experience.
Many players feel the game is a copy of Hearthstone, lacking originality in its mechanics and overall design, which diminishes its appeal.
There are significant bugs and performance issues, including frequent disconnections and slow matchmaking times, which hinder the gameplay experience.

graphics
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
50%
17%
The graphics in the game have received positive feedback for their smoothness and detailed 3D design, enhancing the overall gameplay experience. Many users appreciate the polished visuals and unique artwork, particularly in the card designs, while some note that the upgraded graphics significantly improve engagement. However, there are mentions of performance issues on lower-end PCs, which may hinder the experience for some players.
- “The graphics are quite well developed and I like that the board looks exactly like a real battlefield.”
- “Graphics - unexpectedly great for a card strategy game.”
- “The graphics with the new update are amazing, the sounds are amazing, and as always, the devs are amazing.”
- “Nah, looks poor at graphics, more fun I had in Hearthstone; it's a copy of this game, but military-themed.”
- “March of War: Face Off XL is pretty much just March of War: Face Off with updated PC graphics and a handful of 'quality of life' changes.”
- “The only real difference is this XL version has a modified engine which offers a bunch of graphical enhancements.”
gameplay
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The gameplay is characterized by strategic depth, requiring players to employ various tactics, reminiscent of chess in its emphasis on unit positioning. While some find the mechanics engaging and the animations impressive, others criticize the game for its simplicity and similarities to existing titles like Hearthstone, particularly in its card features. Additionally, performance issues such as low frame rates have been noted, which detracts from the overall experience.
- “This game truly involves strategic gameplay when it comes to using different strategies. For example, when I was playing with my friend, he had a large army of Germans attempting to rush my lines while I had tanks and mechanics pocket medicing them.”
- “The battlefield gameplay is really challenging - there are a lot of similarities with chess because the position of your units relative to each other can make a big difference.”
- “Spend some time learning the mechanics and you will get hooked.”
- “The main problem is, I think, the theme: it is good not to see another RPG card game free to play but something fresh, not exploited, but I find the game simple and with repeated mechanics.”
- “And before anyone starts to say 'but it's early access,' I get it, but when the game foundation and game mechanics are just taken from another game, I don't see how this game can even evolve into a real game.”
- “However, a big problem for this game is the FPS, which are awful during gameplay.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
Users express a desire for a more engaging story campaign, with some favoring a creative, pulp-style narrative over historical accuracy. While daily quests and rewards add some excitement, the integration of sci-fi elements feels forced and detracts from the overall experience.
- “I would like to see that story campaign you're promising!”
- “I'm not a historical purist; in fact, I think I would enjoy the game more if it had a pulp storyline about 'Oh no, the Nazis are training a dinosaur army, so I guess we'll have to use these cool mad scientist weapons and magic to beat the Fuhrer's Teutonic T-Rexes!'”
- “I was really disappointed with the story; it felt rushed and underdeveloped.”
- “The plot twists were predictable, and the characters lacked depth.”
- “I expected a rich narrative, but instead, I got a series of disjointed events.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that the grinding in this game is perceived as less challenging compared to the original, with some players finding it more akin to Hearthstone's RNG-driven mechanics. Those who enjoy a similar level of grinding with a focus on randomness may appreciate this approach.
- “Even the grinding against AI and players seems like a joke in comparison to the original game.”
- “If you like more RNG and the same amount of grinding as in Hearthstone, you will like this game.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is highlighted by witty quips on the cards, such as playful remarks about joining the army, which contribute to its overall charm. Despite some technical issues, players find the game to be both funny and engaging, making it a recommended experience.
- “Smooth graphics, funny little quips on the cards - 'Join the army, they said; it will be fun, they said.'”
- “Overall, despite the FPS problem, this is a very funny and interesting card game, and I truly recommend it to anyone.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
100%
The game's optimization is currently lacking, with users noting poor settings that hinder performance. However, developers express enthusiasm for future improvements aimed at enhancing the experience for a broader player base.
- “As a developer, I can't wait to dive into performance improvements that will allow more players to have the XL experience! :D”
- “The optimization in this game is impressive, making it run smoothly even on lower-end hardware.”
- “I love how the developers are constantly working on optimizing the game, ensuring a better experience for everyone.”
- “Poor optimization settings.”
- “As a developer, I can't wait to dive into performance improvements that will allow more players to have the XL experience.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Both games offer high replayability, though one user expresses a personal preference for "Faceoff."
- “Both games are very replayable, but I personally prefer Faceoff.”
- “The variety of choices and outcomes keeps me coming back for more.”
- “Each playthrough feels fresh due to the dynamic story elements.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Overall, users acknowledge that while the game is nearly flawless, it does experience some glitches that affect stability.
- “The game is plagued by constant crashes that ruin the experience.”
- “I frequently encounter glitches that disrupt gameplay and make it frustrating.”
- “The stability issues make it hard to enjoy the game, as it often freezes or crashes.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music and sound design in the game have received high praise, with users highlighting the brilliance of the battle sounds, unit sounds, and the alert music that enhances the overall gaming experience.
- “The battle sounds, unit sounds, and music create an immersive experience that truly enhances gameplay.”
- “The music sets the perfect tone for each battle, making every encounter feel epic and engaging.”
- “The alert sounds when a battle begins are brilliantly designed, adding to the overall excitement of the game.”