Meridian: New World

The gameplay of the game has received mixed to negative feedback, with many users criticizing its clunky mechanics, poor AI, and lack of depth, leading to a monotonous experience. While some appreciate the nostalgic RTS elements and visuals, others find the gameplay uninspired and frustrating, often comparing it unfavorably to more polished titles like Starcraft II. Overall, the game struggles with fundamental mechanics and user interface issues, detracting from the potential enjoyment of its campaign and strategic elements.

The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the visual aesthetics and modern design, while others criticize the washed-out visuals that make it difficult to distinguish units and buildings. Many users acknowledge the effort put into the graphics, especially for a small development team, but feel that the overall gameplay and mechanics do not match the visual quality. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered decent to good, they are often overshadowed by gameplay issues and lack of innovation.

The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising its strong metal soundtrack that enhances the action and atmosphere, while others find it generic and lacking depth. Although the soundtrack is noted for its quality and ability to complement gameplay, there are criticisms regarding its limited variety and occasional absence during gameplay. Overall, while the music contributes positively to the experience for some, others feel it falls short of expectations.

The game's stability has been widely criticized, with numerous players reporting frequent crashes and startup errors despite following troubleshooting steps. Many users expressed frustration over the lack of necessary third-party libraries and the overall buggy experience, which detracted from their enjoyment and willingness to continue playing. While some noted that troubleshooting efforts yielded results, the persistent issues overshadowed any positive aspects.

Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and frustrating, with missions and objectives often lacking clarity and variety. After several hours of gameplay, many express a sense of monotony, particularly due to repetitive scenarios and the limited number of playable factions. While base building and troop command are seen as less tedious, the overall experience is marred by a lack of innovation and engaging content.

The game's optimization is widely criticized, with users reporting severe performance issues, including significant frame rate drops and poor controls. Many feel that the overall lack of polish detracts from the experience, overshadowing any potential the game may have had.

The atmosphere of the game is highly praised, with excellent voiceovers for dialogue and mission briefings significantly enhancing immersion. Coupled with great music, these elements create a compelling and engaging environment for players.

Players appreciate the increased replayability offered by multiplayer modes, but many express a desire for new games that capture the essence of their favorite titles, suggesting a balance between familiar gameplay and fresh experiences is sought.

The humor in the game is highlighted by a consistently funny campaign, with multiple users praising its comedic elements.

The monetization aspect of the game is not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but it suggests that the game is marketed as a more enjoyable alternative to Starcraft, potentially indicating a focus on attracting players through appealing gameplay rather than traditional monetization strategies.

Players express a strong emotional connection to the game, reminiscing about their childhood experiences with similar titles, particularly Command & Conquer. This nostalgia enhances their enjoyment, making them feel that the game is a worthwhile investment, especially in its early access phase.