Skip to main content

Men of War II

Men of War II is a deeply strategic and intense title that makes every decision, whether big or small, mean something.
Men of War II Game Cover
68%Game Brain Score
gameplay, story
stability, music
65% User Score Based on 2,719 reviews
Critic Score 75%Based on 3 reviews

Platforms

LinuxPCWindows
Men of War II Game Cover

About

Men of War II is a single player and multiplayer tactical real-time strategy game with warfare and historical themes. It was developed by Best Way and was released on September 20, 2023. It received mostly positive reviews from both critics and players.

Men of War II's Frontline Hero Pack offers exclusive badges, avatars, and desktop wallpapers, along with instant unlocks of four collectible tank units for multiplayer matches. The pack includes the M4A3E8 "Sherman," Panther Ausf. A, and T-34-85 tanks, each with unique camouflage and impressive combat capabilities.

Skip User Reviews

65%
Audience ScoreBased on 2,719 reviews
gameplay123 positive mentions
stability38 negative mentions

  • The game features stunning graphics and detailed unit models, enhancing the overall visual experience.
  • The dynamic campaign mode offers a variety of missions and gameplay styles, providing a fresh take on the Men of War series.
  • The ability to build trenches and fortifications adds a new layer of strategy and depth to gameplay.
  • The game requires an always-online connection, even for single-player modes, which frustrates many players.
  • The AI behavior is inconsistent, often leading to frustrating gameplay experiences where units do not respond effectively to commands.
  • The user interface is cluttered and unintuitive, making it difficult for players to navigate and manage their units.
  • gameplay
    535 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of "Men of War II" has received mixed reviews, with players noting a blend of innovative mechanics and frustrating design choices. While some appreciate the tactical depth, new features like trench-building and direct control, others criticize the fast-paced, arcade-like feel that detracts from the series' traditional realism. Overall, the game offers a variety of gameplay modes and strategies, but many feel it lacks the polish and balance expected from a sequel, leading to a divided player experience.

    • “The gameplay is fun; I think it finds a good balance between hardcore simulation and gameplay.”
    • “Infantry, vehicles, and artillery all feel satisfying to command, with gameplay that rewards planning, positioning, and precise timing over reckless rushing.”
    • “Men of War II excels in its gameplay mechanics, offering a perfect blend of strategy and action.”
    • “Every part of the gameplay feels like a step backward.”
    • “Overall, the game is lackluster in gameplay and AI.”
    • “The gameplay feels hollow—there’s no strategy, no immersion, and no satisfaction.”
  • story
    487 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of "Men of War 2" has received mixed reviews, with players appreciating the variety of campaigns and missions that span historical events, but criticizing the execution and depth of the narrative. While some missions are described as engaging and well-crafted, others feel repetitive, poorly designed, or lacking in character development, leading to a sense of frustration among players. Additionally, the requirement for constant online connectivity has been a significant point of contention, detracting from the overall experience of the single-player campaign.

    • “The single-player campaign is robust, offering a series of well-crafted missions that are both challenging and narratively engaging.”
    • “The storylines are compelling, with characters that add depth and emotional weight to the overall experience.”
    • “The campaigns (despite the voice acting complaints) give you some flexibility to do neat stuff in what would otherwise be a very scripted, bland mission in other games.”
    • “The campaign also lacks characters you can really connect with, which makes the story feel somewhat generic.”
    • “On top of that, there's a completely uninspired single-player campaign with dull dialogues and boring missions.”
    • “The story narratives are lame as well, and again, the dialogue is really dumb.”
  • graphics
    304 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics in "Men of War II" have received mixed reviews, with many players praising the improved visuals and attention to detail compared to previous titles, while others criticize them for feeling outdated or cartoonish. Some users highlight the game's stunning environments and realistic effects, but many express disappointment over the overall graphical fidelity, especially when compared to competitors like "Gates of Hell." Overall, while the graphics are generally seen as a step up, they are not universally acclaimed and have sparked debate about their quality relative to modern gaming standards.

    • “The graphics are top-notch, offering photorealistic environments and meticulously designed units.”
    • “The graphics improvement and the use of air units in combat also has improved the game to be more immersive with multiple styles of gameplay.”
    • “Everything you loved about Men of War is here, but now on a new engine with stable multiplayer and stunning graphics.”
    • “The graphics feel like a step down from its previous games and it's the same old song that the last games beat to death.”
    • “The graphics are poor, the HUD is poor, troop movements are janky, the action is on the way to COH where it is intended to appease an Age of Empires player.”
    • “The graphics honestly are a pretty big letdown.”
  • optimization
    57 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues, particularly during large battles and on lower-end hardware, leading to frame rate drops and crashes. While some users with high-end systems experience smooth gameplay, others note that the game feels unfinished and unoptimized, with inconsistent performance across different modes and hardware configurations. Overall, while there are improvements in graphics and AI, the game still requires further optimization and polish to meet player expectations.

    • “In general, I love the concept but it feels unfinished and unoptimized.”
    • “Overall performance for me on a midline PC is exceptional, no lag, no FPS drops, no issues.”
    • “The performance of this is amazing and that currently beats the contenders.”
    • “On weaker machines and handheld devices like the Steam Deck, performance issues are particularly pronounced, with reports of frequent crashes and CPU spikes that can disrupt play.”
    • “Literally played 10 minutes and knew all there was to it; the performance of this game, compared to Gates of Hell, is embarrassing, considering GOH looks much better in every way yet still runs 15x better.”
    • “The optimization is bad at times and single player has online lag... which makes no sense.”
  • stability
    44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant bugs, glitches, and performance issues, particularly in online modes and menu navigation. While some users appreciate the game's overall fun factor and visual appeal, the frequent crashes and sluggish controls detract from the experience. Despite ongoing updates aimed at addressing these issues, many players still find the game to be a buggy and frustrating experience.

    • “Game runs great at max settings, super sharp, no FPS drop.”
    • “So far, Mowii is much better than I expected having played the beta; it looks and runs great.”
    • “It looks and runs great in my opinion; the battles are intense, and it's great to play with friends.”
    • “The game is buggy and messy.”
    • “Buggy as hell, crashes randomly, and the game just doesn't feel good to play at all.”
    • “It feels so buggy, glitchy, laggy, and unresponsive that I almost stopped playing it.”
  • replayability
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game is praised for its high replayability, with various modes such as skirmishes, dynamic campaigns, and extensive multiplayer options that keep players engaged. New mechanics, like the tech tree and deck-building features, enhance the experience, while the challenging AI and diverse missions contribute to long-term enjoyment. However, some players express frustration over the requirement for online connectivity to access certain campaign modes, which may detract from the overall replay value.

    • “Mow2 is a step up from the previous version, first in terms of fixing tiny bugs and second in introducing new mechanics like the tech tree, which is really fun and adds replayability to the game.”
    • “The conquest mode offers a dynamic campaign that ensures endless replayability.”
    • “Its expansive multiplayer and modding support promise longevity and replayability, solidifying its place as a standout title in the RTS genre.”
    • “It's so insulting and completely kills every replay value.”
    • “Overall, the game is very sound and offers massive replayability for both solo and multiplayer campaigns, but I don't understand why we must be connected to play campaign modes.”
    • “I was hoping this game was going to take everything good about GOH's dynamic campaign and tack on even more features and replayability.”
  • music
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some praising its interesting sound design and new soundtrack, while others find it dull and repetitive compared to previous titles. Players appreciate the ability to adjust audio settings, although there are complaints about menu music not being properly controlled by the music slider. Overall, the soundtrack is noted for its quality, but opinions vary on its originality and volume levels.

    • “Interesting music and sound design.”
    • “New soundtrack is great.”
    • “I love the graphics, soundtrack and gameplay.”
    • “The music is also pretty dull.”
    • “The graphics feel like a step down from its previous games and it's the same old song that the last games beat to death.”
    • “But the music in the menu isn't controlled by the music slider, it's controlled by the master volume slider.”
  • monetization
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has been overwhelmingly criticized as a blatant cash grab, with many reviewers expressing disappointment over the lack of genuine development and innovation. Despite some acknowledging the effort put into the game, the consensus is that it relies heavily on recycled content and fails to deliver a quality experience, leading to feelings of betrayal among long-time fans of the series. Overall, the game's monetization strategy has left a negative impression, with many urging potential buyers to seek refunds.

    • “I appreciate that there are no microtransactions in the game, allowing me to enjoy the full experience without any interruptions.”
    • “The monetization model is fair and transparent, making it easy to understand what I’m paying for.”
    • “I love that the game offers a complete experience without pushing players to spend extra money on in-game purchases.”
    • “This is no more than a $40 cash grab, unsupported by the dev team; they are banking on the community to fix the game instead of them doing it themselves.”
    • “This game is a cash grab to the highest regard.”
    • “In my opinion, this is a lazy cash grab that tramples all over the legacy that Men of War had built over the years.”
  • humor
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is largely derived from the poor voice acting, which many players find hilariously bad and often out of place, leading to unexpected laughs during intense moments. Players also enjoy the comedic elements of gameplay, such as amusing AI behavior and the absurdity of certain game mechanics, though some feel the humor attempts can fall flat. Overall, the blend of unintentional comedy and quirky voice lines contributes to a lighthearted experience, despite mixed opinions on its effectiveness.

    • “Always online mode for a game that at the time of me writing this has less than 600 people playing it is hilarious.”
    • “Hiding a scout in some bushes and having fire at will turned off made for some hilarious gameplay against my friends.”
    • “Some lines are delivered well, but others made me laugh in the middle of intense firefights with how off-key they sounded.”
  • grinding
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and time-consuming, often requiring significant investment in micro and macro management without the satisfaction of meaningful rewards. While some appreciate the new XP system and quick match dynamics, many criticize the lack of quality of life improvements and the frustrating supply currency system that can lead to wasted time. Overall, the grinding experience is seen as a major drawback, detracting from the enjoyment of the game.

    • “There is no building bases, barracks, or other buildings; there is no farming resources - only hardcore micro and macro management on the battlefield.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “You get a handful of guys, no reinforcements, and the enemy gets hundreds of guys, and you have to pick them apart in a really slow and tedious way.”
    • “Its a lazy game with a new currency grinding system to try and desperately draw out the length of this uninspired 'sequel' worth $5 or free, not $45.”
    • “I think the game is easier to get into for new players to the mow franchise, but grinding supply is abysmal, with it sometimes not even paying out, so you waste 30 minutes to an hour in a match for nothing.”
  • atmosphere
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of the game is largely praised for its authentic soundscape, featuring realistic audio elements like gunfire and tank engines that enhance immersion. While the graphics and combat mechanics contribute positively to the overall experience, some players feel that certain visual aspects lack realism, detracting from the intended atmosphere. Overall, the game successfully captures a gripping wartime ambiance, though opinions vary on specific elements that may disrupt the immersion.

    • “The soundscape deserves special mention: the crack of distant gunfire, the roar of tank engines, and the screams of soldiers combine to create an atmosphere that’s both authentic and harrowing.”
    • “Authentic atmosphere with realistic locations and events.”
    • “However, the overall sound design and ambient effects enhance the immersion, providing a gripping wartime atmosphere.”
    • “Unfortunately, despite the new engine, the game feels very plasticky and doesn't have the atmospheric realism I was expecting; this is especially true for the vehicles.”
    • “I’m hoping these are placeholder lines because the tone just doesn’t match the atmosphere the game is trying to create.”
    • “This modern icon spread no historic atmosphere in my opinion.”
  • emotional
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews highlight a mix of emotional responses, with some players feeling manipulated by narrative choices, while others appreciate the compelling storylines and character depth that enhance the experience. However, frustrations arise from gameplay limitations that detract from immersion, leading to feelings of disappointment and heartbreak for long-time fans. Overall, the emotional impact is varied, with both positive and negative sentiments expressed.

    • “The storylines are compelling, with characters that add depth and emotional weight to the overall experience.”
    • “The fact I can't play the campaigns with realistic mode is heartbreaking as that was always how I played the rest of the franchise.”
    • “This feels more like a fan game than anything, and it's heartbreaking.”
  • character development
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The German campaign in Hell is praised for its strong character development, featuring protagonists with well-crafted backstories that enhance the overall narrative experience.

    • “The German campaign features protagonists with rich backstories and significant character development.”
    • “The character arcs are incredibly well-crafted, making each character's journey feel authentic and engaging.”
    • “I love how the game allows characters to evolve based on player choices, adding depth to their development.”
    • “The character development feels shallow and uninspired, leaving me disconnected from the protagonists.”
    • “I expected more depth in the characters, but they all seem one-dimensional and forgettable.”
    • “The lack of meaningful character arcs makes it hard to invest in the story or care about the outcomes.”
Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy Men of War II

10h Median play time
108h Average play time
3-40h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 28 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Men of War II

Games Like Men of War II

Call to Arms Image
Company of Heroes 3 Image
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront Image
Sudden Strike 4 Image
Blitzkrieg 3 Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Men of War II is a tactical real-time strategy game with warfare and historical themes.

Men of War II is available on PC, Windows and Linux.

On average players spend around 108 hours playing Men of War II.

Men of War II was released on September 20, 2023.

Men of War II was developed by Best Way.

Men of War II has received mostly positive reviews from both players and critics. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its stability.

Men of War II is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Call to Arms, Company of Heroes 3, Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront, Sudden Strike 4, Blitzkrieg 3 and others.