Skip to main content

Battle of Empires: 1914-1918

62%Game Brain Score
story, gameplay
stability, monetization
62% User Score Based on 2,020 reviews

Platforms

Mac OSMac OSPCPCWindowsWindowsLinuxLinux

About

"Battle of Empires: 1914-1918" is a real-time strategy game set in World War I. Players can choose to lead either the Entente or the Central Powers, commanding massive armies and engaging in large-scale battles. The game features historical accuracy, detailed graphics, and a variety of units and weapons from the era. Multiplayer mode allows for up to 8 players to compete against each other.

Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 screenshot
+22

62%
Audience ScoreBased on 2,020 reviews
story78 positive mentions
stability68 negative mentions

  • story
    542 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is characterized by a mix of ambitious mission designs that range from engaging to frustrating, with a notable emphasis on stealth elements that some players find tedious. While the historical context and variety of campaigns are appreciated, many missions suffer from bugs, poor scripting, and a lack of coherence, leading to a disjointed narrative experience. Overall, the game offers a unique take on World War I, but its execution leaves much to be desired, particularly in mission quality and voice acting.

    • “The mission variety is very good, with the classic men of war stealth missions, defense missions in all kinds of terrain where you have to frantically patch holes in your lines after devastating artillery, large scale offensives involving hundreds of men on the map at a single time, and even unique missions where you forage for food and supplies while dodging Germans to guiding French airmen in their escape from a German prison fortress.”
    • “Each mission introduction gives deep insight into what you're supposed to be doing and you can very easily find yourself getting sucked in by the authenticity of the mission briefing.”
    • “You can tell the developers truly love this era in time, as each mission is fleshed out with neat things like horse-drawn artillery and sleds, units that change appearance as the war progresses (pickelhaubes to stalhelms, etc).”
    • “Unfortunately, the mission design feels subpar compared to all the other Men of War games.”
    • “Half the missions are broken and don't work right and the game is pretty much abandoned.”
    • “The missions are linear which stifles room for creativity in your strategy (pointless invisible walls often block the flanks).”
  • gameplay
    204 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of "Battle of Empires: 1914-1918" diverges significantly from the "Men of War" series, emphasizing artillery over vehicles and presenting a more challenging experience due to squishier infantry and the importance of cover. While the game offers a unique World War I setting and strategic depth, it suffers from awkward mechanics, a confusing UI, and numerous bugs that detract from the overall experience. Despite these issues, players who enjoy RTS games may find fun in adapting to its mechanics, especially with the potential for extensive single-player content if they invest time into learning the game.

    • “Overall, Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 is a good buy; the unique gameplay of WWI is quite fun and can get quite hectic at times.”
    • “The gameplay is solid, the content is of good quality, and this game is just as fun and challenging as Men of War.”
    • “Gameplay feels like Men of War; however, they do a great job with it and make it fit WWI perfectly.”
    • “The tutorial doesn't explain the controls (or mechanics) adequately, which is a disaster as the controls are a total mess and the UI has 40 buttons.”
    • “Terribly made game, filled to the brim with bugs and awful mechanics that detract from gameplay.”
    • “The AI and missions are so flawed, as well as the mechanics (such as calling in artillery or using other actions) it feels like this is a complete knockoff of the Men of War series and does not compare slightly to it.”
  • graphics
    104 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game are generally considered dated and lacking polish, with many users noting that they fall short compared to newer titles in the genre. While some players appreciate the aesthetic and find the visuals acceptable, others criticize the animations and effects as crude, leading to an overall mixed reception. Despite these shortcomings, a few reviews highlight that the graphics effectively convey the historical context of World War I, and some players find them enjoyable within the game's tactical framework.

    • “The graphics have been developed to show the beauty and horrors of 'the great war'.”
    • “Great campaign, fun, great graphics, and historical accuracy.”
    • “Nicely polished graphics and the game runs very well.”
    • “Before you purchase this game, keep in mind that it is quite old, and the graphics are not up to date.”
    • “The animations and effects are crude, and the graphics are dated.”
    • “Graphics and voice acting are extremely poor and the gameplay is nowhere near as fun as it looks.”
  • stability
    70 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and unresponsive controls that significantly hinder gameplay. Many players describe it as a "buggy mess," with issues affecting both single-player and multiplayer modes, leading to frustration and refunds. However, some users still find enjoyment in the game despite its flaws, suggesting that it may improve with future updates.

    • “Boe WW1 is a good game, has no issues, and is pretty much bug-free.”
    • “Tons of glitches and bugs combined with sloppy voice overs and broken missions make this game unable to play.”
    • “It is so buggy I am convinced it is impossible to successfully complete.”
    • “The 3 campaigns (2 of which have a high chance to randomly crash) are only available when purchased for a total of $26.97, meaning this buggy mess of a mod (and yes that's all it is) is $46.96.”
  • monetization
    22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with many reviewers expressing disappointment over the limited content in the base game and the necessity to purchase additional DLC to access promised features. Players feel that the approach undermines the overall experience, likening it to a fragmented game designed solely for profit rather than player satisfaction. Overall, the sentiment is that the monetization model detracts significantly from the game's value and enjoyment.

    • “The publisher claims this is to give people more choice in putting together the game they want in a more budget-friendly way, but the base game is so limited on actual content that the approach comes off as a full game that was broken into parts as a sort of cash grab.”
    • “I really wanted to like this game, but the off-putting voice acting, terrible rifle sounds, and of course the cash grab through having to buy the campaigns is just way too much for me.”
    • “But the DLC... such a cash grab. I cannot recommend this simply because you need to buy so much to get a complete game.”
  • music
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has been criticized for being basic and monotonous, failing to enhance the atmosphere and often overshadowing important voice acting. Reviewers noted that the in-game volume controls are inadequate, making it difficult to hear tutorial instructions over the loud music. Overall, the music is seen as a significant area needing improvement to better complement the game's experience.

    • “The music should complement the atmosphere.”
    • “- need work on atmospheric setting - sounds, music, effects”
    • “There are in-game options to select, although I could not get the music to go lower than the tutorial captain's voice - so he was hard to hear.”
    • “The voice acting is out of place, and the music is basic.”
    • “For the first 10 hours, I overlooked the atrocious voice acting and the incredibly monotonous music which lacked emotion, out of the sheer excitement this game brought me.”
    • “Need to fix in-game volume, music is loud and can't be turned off.”
  • humor
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is primarily derived from its janky mechanics and intentionally poor voice acting, which many players find amusing. While the game has its flaws, the comedic elements, including absurd scenarios and exaggerated character interactions, contribute to a uniquely entertaining experience. Overall, players recommend it for its blend of humor and unexpected moments, despite some challenges in gameplay.

    • “Hilarious voice acting in a hilariously bad game.”
    • “Nothing like driving an old MKIV tank around, and suddenly it blows up because a German looked at it funny.”
    • “Recommend for certain, glorious heroic deaths and hilarious not-so-heroic deaths around every corner.”
  • optimization
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game's optimization is a mixed bag; while many players report good performance and enjoyable graphics, there are notable issues such as bugs and an unoptimized interface that detract from the experience. Some users have experienced crashes, particularly in multiplayer, but others have had no performance issues on various systems. Despite these drawbacks, the game shows potential and is still recommended for its quality and fun gameplay.

    • “With that said, the graphics are enjoyable and the game is well optimized.”
    • “I do recommend this game for the good performance and quality.”
    • “No performance issues running on a Windows 8.1 laptop (mine has 4GB RAM, 500GB HDD, Intel HD & Radeon 3670M 2GB hybrid graphics with the settings all maxed out).”
    • “As it stands, it's a bit painful to see it has the potential to be the next Company of Heroes, but it falls short due to technicalities like bugs and a not optimized interface.”
    • “As for the multiplayer, I've only been able to play one game (because I'm a Mac user, please don't judge *sad face*). It was an enjoyable experience for me (mainly because my teammate, who mind you was a fellow noob, cooperated with me and helped out as much as he could) until I ended up crashing out, maybe due to the performance setting on my game, but nonetheless it was fun and I want to do more of it.”
    • “No performance issues running on a Windows 8.1 laptop (mine has 4GB RAM / 500GB HDD / Intel HD & Radeon 3670M 2GB (hybrid) graphics with the settings all maxed out).”
  • atmosphere
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game effectively captures the atmosphere of World War I, offering engaging scenarios and tactical challenges across a diverse range of historical factions and battles. While many players praise its immersive environment and intense combat, some criticize aspects like voice acting and sound design, suggesting that improvements are needed to enhance the overall atmospheric experience. Despite these shortcomings, it remains a standout title in the Men of War series for its authentic WWI setting.

    • “Does a great job of evoking the atmosphere of the Great War, fun scenarios, tactical challenges, and a wide breadth of historical factions and battles.”
    • “Authentic WWI atmosphere.”
    • “Great game, intense combat AI, great atmosphere for a WWI RTS.”
    • “Not after practically reskinning a free mod you can download right now for Men of War: Assault Squad, not after being a little of what I think is Slavic bias and putting way more tone into the Russian Empire campaign, not getting accents on the ball for a fitting atmosphere, and certainly not after cheating out many buyers for the base game in its pre-release stage under the premise that they would get it in full when it's done... just no.”
    • “If you can forgive the voice acting and graphically outdated engine, then this is a top RTS set in WW1 that oozes atmosphere and tactics.”
  • replayability
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews on replayability are mixed, with some players praising the high replay value due to multiple playable nations, various game modes, and mod support, while others criticize the campaign mode for lacking replayability. Overall, the presence of multiplayer options and modding capabilities contributes positively to the game's replayability, despite some dissatisfaction with the campaign experience.

    • “I would rate Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 10/10 for the replayability and the ability for mod support!”
    • “Various game modes in multiplayer ensure good replayability.”
    • “The only reason I wanted the game was it would be extremely replayable with a skirmish mode plus the German and French campaign.”
    • “There's absolutely zero replay value.”
    • “And on top of that, the campaign has no replayability.”
    • “However, I still find joy in it, especially since most nations are playable.”
  • grinding
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be generally tedious, particularly during stealth missions, which often require frequent restarts due to minor mistakes. While the game can be enjoyable at times, the repetitive nature of certain tasks detracts from the overall experience, especially in a real-time strategy context.

    • “The game can be fun at times, but in general, the experience feels tedious.”
    • “Then there are the stealth missions, the tedious nature of which causes you to click restart or load save at the smallest of mistakes.”
    • “It's tedious, even for a Men of War style game.”

Buy Battle of Empires: 1914-1918

4h Median play time
4h Average play time
4-5h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 12 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Battle of Empires: 1914-1918

Call to Arms Image
Company of Heroes 2 Image
This game contains adult content
Company of Heroes 3 Image
This game contains adult content
Gates of Hell Image
Blitzkrieg 3 Image
Men of War II Image
WARNO Image
Iron Harvest Image
Men of War: Assault Squad ImageMen of War: Assault Squad ImageMen of War: Assault Squad Image
Freeman: Guerrilla Warfare Image