Skip to main content
Little Alchemist: Remastered Game Cover

About

Little Alchemist: Remastered is a single player action game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Collect cards, master magic

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

66%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,620 reviews
gameplay41 positive mentions
monetization32 negative mentions

  • The game brings back nostalgia and retains the charm of the original.
  • The card art and fight system are enjoyable, with fun mechanics for researching combos.
  • The developers are responsive and have made improvements based on player feedback.
  • The game becomes stale after a while due to long research times and limited energy.
  • PvP is unbalanced, often matching new players against those with maxed-out cards.
  • The game is heavily monetized, making it difficult to progress without spending real money.
  • gameplay
    90 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game is characterized by a mix of fun mechanics and unique card combinations, but it suffers from significant issues such as a restrictive energy system, heavy reliance on microtransactions, and a slow progression that can lead to repetitive experiences. While some players appreciate the charm and simplicity, many express frustration over the pay-to-win elements and the tedious nature of certain mechanics, particularly the research system. Overall, the gameplay is seen as enjoyable but marred by balance issues and a lack of engaging content over time.

    • “The gameplay is unique, balanced, and very entertaining!”
    • “Insanely fun gameplay, great concept, lovely art, big issues.”
    • “Great gameplay, great concept, and overall a great game.”
    • “For a 'free' game, it is heavily microtransactioned. There is an energy system that restricts how much you are allowed to play at a time, and the visual style of the game, along with the implementation of visual mechanics, such as the lack of animations when you play the cards, leaves much to be desired.”
    • “The research mechanic is so boring; it could have been a fun minigame or a set of goals to reach with each of the two cards to fuse them, but no...”
    • “Incredibly boring gameplay. I thought it would have some interesting mechanics and a huge variety of combos, but so many of the combos simply give the same outcome card, sometimes just with slightly different stats for no apparent reason.”
  • monetization
    60 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing the high prices of in-app purchases and labeling it a "cash grab." While the absence of ads is appreciated, players feel that the game lacks sufficient rewards for free-to-play users, leading to frustrating wait times and a pay-to-win atmosphere. Overall, the game is seen as overly focused on monetization, with suggestions for more balanced options to earn in-game currency through ads or daily rewards.

    • “The wait times feel fair, there's no ads and I love all the references I can spot.”
    • “One of the only games that truly has no ads and isn't pay to play.”
    • “F2P doesn't feel awful, and no ads.”
    • “Who pays $9 to $30 for every worthwhile in-app purchase?”
    • “Ridiculous price points for in-game purchases. The only pro I can give is no forced ads, but with the drop rates so bad, expect to dump hours before getting a half-decent card, by which time you'll have found another game.”
    • “Designed to tempt you into countless microtransactions.”
  • grinding
    54 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews consistently highlight that the game is excessively grindy, particularly for free-to-play users, who face significant challenges in obtaining cards and progressing without spending money. Many players express frustration over low drop rates and tedious mechanics, leading to a perception that the game is heavily pay-to-win. While some find the grind enjoyable and addictive, the overall sentiment leans towards the grinding experience being a major drawback.

    • “Not grinding, just casual play.”
    • “Good game, no grinding, just fun!”
    • “Pay to play unless you want to spend literal years grinding to get a good deck.”
    • “Extremely grindy and pay to win; if you buy the better cards, you win, simple as that.”
    • “Unfun and overly grindy.”
  • story
    45 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is criticized for being minimal and lacking depth, with players noting that it consists mainly of combat with limited dialogue and only two chapters available. Many reviewers express frustration over the energy system that restricts gameplay and the need to spend money to progress, as well as a desire for more story content and events to enhance the experience. Overall, while some find the gameplay enjoyable, the story aspect feels underdeveloped and in need of significant expansion.

    • “Game has a wonderful setup and great story.”
    • “It's fun with interesting combos but I wish there was more story.”
    • “Bring in more events and the main story line is too short; please try to make it longer and better, otherwise the game actually deserves a 5-star rating.”
    • “There's no storyline, just fighting with cards and a few lines of dialogue per area.”
    • “The game hard walls you after the main story and even before then it's incredibly difficult unless you pay.”
    • “It's an extremely short storyline and there really isn't much to the game besides wasting time.”
  • graphics
    39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game are generally described as cute and charming, with a playful art style that appeals to many players. However, there are mixed feelings about the overall visual experience, with some reviewers noting that while the graphics have improved, they still lack innovation and can feel unengaging. Additionally, the game's progression system and energy mechanics detract from the enjoyment of the visuals, leading to frustration among players.

    • “The artwork is playful.”
    • “I really like the cute charm from the art style and simple but fun gameplay.”
    • “Cute graphics and fun game mechanics keep me coming back.”
    • “The graphics haven't changed at all; the combinations aren't anything new, and the arena is still completely unbalanced.”
    • “A remaster only in name and visuals, sadly.”
    • “Like, really, the graphics need remastering now.”
  • stability
    31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with frequent reports of freezing during gameplay, particularly when accessing the shop or during battles. Many players experience lag and crashes, leading to frustration and loss of progress. While some acknowledge the developers' efforts to address these issues, the overall sentiment indicates that the game remains quite buggy and unstable, detracting from the overall experience.

    • “Game doesn't start, freezes on loading screen.”
    • “Great game and very nostalgic but I'm stuck at the beginning tutorial where I need to buy a pack of cards... the game freezes and I can't do anything about it.”
    • “Crashes and freezes much too consistently.”
  • humor
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is widely praised, with players enjoying the funny character combinations and clever card designs. Many reviews highlight the game's comedic elements, including amusing ads and humorous mechanics, contributing to an overall entertaining experience. Overall, the humor is a standout feature that enhances the gameplay.

    • “I loved the original Little Alchemist, but I ended up moving on from it. Seeing the remastered version has brought me back to just how great this game is. The combo mechanic is really fun, and some of them are quite humorous. Definitely give it a try!”
    • “Great game, tons of combos to unlock, great designs, and all the different cards are cool and funny.”
    • “Fun and interesting; the most funny game with a combination of characters.”
  • optimization
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some users reporting significant performance issues such as stuttering gameplay and slowdowns, while others note improvements in performance and environment. Overall, many feel that the game is hindered by poor optimization and excessive advertising, detracting from the overall experience.

    • “This correction would improve the playing experience and allow for better optimization in the decks of players.”
    • “Same experience as the previous one with improved performance and environment.”
    • “I see no difference at all, except for a larger file taking up space, more in-your-face advertising of 'packs', and much worse performance - just now it slowed down to a complete halt.”
    • “It went from a smooth game to this very stuttering gameplay.”
    • “A decent game, held back by poor performance and ridiculous timegates.”
  • music
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is noted for its enjoyable aesthetic, contributing positively to the overall experience, especially for long-time players. However, users report significant issues with the game's audio settings, including the inability to adjust music or sound levels, which detracts from the experience. Additionally, there are frequent bugs that cause the battle and menu music to disappear unexpectedly.

    • “I never got far in this game, but the aesthetic and music made for such an enjoyable experience when I was younger.”
    • “The quality of life in this game is abysmal; for example, you can't lower the music or sound.”
    • “There is an absurd amount of bugs regarding the UI, such as buttons not responding and the battle and menu song disappearing at random times.”
    • “Fusing a card with another card in your deck and prompting to 'autofill' just resets back to the default for every deck that had that card in it.”
  • replayability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users suggest enhancing replayability by allowing portal events to be replayed, indicating a desire for more opportunities to revisit and experience key game moments.

    • “The game offers a variety of choices that make each playthrough feel unique and engaging.”
    • “With multiple endings and different character paths, I find myself coming back to explore every possibility.”
    • “The random events and challenges keep the gameplay fresh, encouraging me to replay it time and again.”
    • “The game lacks meaningful choices, making replayability feel pointless.”
    • “Once you've completed the story, there's little incentive to play again.”
    • “The limited variety in gameplay mechanics means that replaying the game feels repetitive.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Little Alchemist: Remastered

3h Median play time
3h Average play time
3-3h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Games Like Little Alchemist: Remastered
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Little Alchemist: Remastered is a action game.

Little Alchemist: Remastered is available on Phone and Tablet.

On average players spend around 3 hours playing Little Alchemist: Remastered.

Little Alchemist: Remastered was developed by Monumental, LLC.

Little Alchemist: Remastered has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its monetization.

Little Alchemist: Remastered is a single player game.

Similar games include King God Castle, Legend of Solgard, Stormbound: PVP Card Battle, MARVEL SNAP Strategy Card Game, Puzzle Breakers: Champions War and others.