Skip to main content

About

"Aftermath" is a free, violence-packed shooter game that supports up to 2 players in a massive multiplayer setting, with both co-op and PvP modes. The game offers a harsh open world survival experience, where players can build bases, claim land, and store items. However, due to a dwindling population, the game's servers may not be online for much longer.

Romero's Aftermath screenshot
Romero's Aftermath screenshot
Romero's Aftermath screenshot
Romero's Aftermath screenshot
Romero's Aftermath screenshot
Romero's Aftermath screenshot
Romero's Aftermath screenshot
Romero's Aftermath screenshot
Romero's Aftermath screenshot
Romero's Aftermath screenshot
Romero's Aftermath screenshot
+15

41%
Audience ScoreBased on 4,103 reviews
gameplay40 positive mentions
graphics117 negative mentions

  • graphics
    362 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users describing them as outdated, poorly optimized, and reminiscent of early 2000s titles. While a few players noted decent visuals under optimal conditions, the majority criticized the low frame rates and lack of polish, leading to a consensus that the graphics significantly detract from the overall experience. Despite some appreciation for gameplay mechanics, the visual quality remains a major point of contention among players.

    • “The graphics are better than other post-apocalyptic games!”
    • “I downloaded it and played for a while and I had no lag at all and the graphics were awesome for a free-to-play zombie survival game.”
    • “Overall... I love the game =D the graphics are sweet gameplay is simply it has crafting (always a +) and a ton of sweet looking skins for armor and weapons (have to pay real money/get enough in-game money for them).”
    • “The graphics are complete garbage to be honest, the textures are equally garbage.”
    • “The graphics are awful and buggy, the map is too big, the map is boring as hell (you can't even open doors).”
    • “The graphics are the worst I've seen; it's free, so is doing a poo on a homeless man, you just don't do it.”
  • gameplay
    177 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its mechanics and fun factor, particularly in multiplayer settings, while others criticize it for being clunky, buggy, and lacking depth. Many users noted issues with graphics and optimization, as well as a frustrating crafting system and microtransaction model that detracts from the overall experience. Overall, while some find enjoyment in the gameplay, others feel it falls short compared to other titles in the genre.

    • “Best zombie survival game I've ever played; no other has been able to achieve such great mechanics.”
    • “I hope one day a new remake of this game will see the light because I enjoyed every minute of gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay is nice, and if you turn the graphics up to ultra, if your PC can handle it, then it's really nice.”
    • “Just by looking at the trailer, you can tell the game is just a Unity asset flip with poor textures and poor quality gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay is horrible: the zombies look like dolls, guns are super easy to find, spawn kill, and a stupid pay-to-win economy.”
    • “The gameplay is miserable.”
  • stability
    115 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous reports of severe bugs, glitches, and crashes that significantly hinder gameplay. Many players describe it as a "buggy mess," with issues ranging from erratic zombie behavior to frequent server disconnects and performance drops. While some acknowledge the game's potential, the overwhelming consensus is that it requires substantial improvements to its stability before it can be recommended.

    • “Overall, it plays, looks, sounds, and runs great.”
    • “The game runs great and is a lot of fun.”
    • “This game is a joke, it's buggy as hell, crashes a lot (I run Black Ops 3 on full with no problems), it is very poorly optimized, has awful animations, the cheapest servers in the world, the lag is horrible.”
    • “Do not install, this game is horribly buggy.”
    • “I'm not recommending this game yet because the game is full of bugs and crazy glitches.”
  • optimization
    96 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including lag, low frame rates, and crashes, even on high-end systems. While some users note improvements and potential for fun, the consensus is that significant optimization is still needed for a smoother gameplay experience. Overall, the game's current state is described as poorly optimized, making it challenging to enjoy without substantial updates.

    • “This is finally optimized and a lot of fun!”
    • “All in all this could be a great game once optimized.”
    • “Optimization is top tier just like DayZ.”
    • “This is, quite simply, an unoptimized mess.”
    • “The game's optimization is truly awful, but it's something that the devs can, and hopefully are going to, work on.”
    • “The performance of the game does not equate as it's terribly optimized.”
  • story
    43 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is largely criticized for being non-existent or poorly developed, with many players expressing frustration over the lack of quests, missions, and meaningful narrative elements. While some users appreciate the potential for engaging gameplay, they feel that the absence of a coherent storyline detracts from the overall experience, leaving it feeling unfinished and lacking depth. Overall, the consensus is that the game could benefit significantly from a more structured and immersive story.

    • “The story has many twists and turns while the combat is flawless.”
    • “- A story-driven world rich with NPCs and lore to get lost in.”
    • “Let me tell you a fun story with me and my friend that you cannot really encounter in other games, but games like these.”
    • “The story is non-existent.”
    • “Main features, like real storyline and gameplay are non-existent.”
    • “Whats the story? Is there a story or do we just start in a world? This whole place is a desert with some grass and trees, and the cities are just copy and pasted pictures. That's what you call lazy. The game right now is 100% bad; I recommend not getting this.”
  • monetization
    39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has been heavily criticized for its excessive reliance on microtransactions, which many players view as a blatant cash grab. Despite being free-to-play, the game requires significant in-game purchases to progress, leading to frustration among players who feel that the developers prioritize profit over quality and gameplay experience. Overall, the monetization strategy is seen as exploitative, with many users expressing disappointment over the lack of value for their money and the overwhelming presence of paywalls.

    • “The game may be free, but there are in-game purchases.”
    • “Not only did they claim that you wouldn't be able to buy guns, but that microtransactions were only supposed to be cosmetic.”
    • “Because the game was an absolute mess of microtransactions and bad design, they rebranded it numerous times to try to trick people into playing it again.”
    • “Gameplay wasn't awful and I will admit that I have had fun, but it was always clear that there was no future with this game when they put microtransactions before actual development.”
    • “The graphics are horrible, there is little to do, and many features are based on microtransactions.”
  • humor
    25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is often derived from its glitches and absurd situations, such as players panicking during zombie encounters or the bizarre interactions with other players, like trading valuable items for minimal resources. Many users find that playing with friends enhances the comedic experience, despite the game's numerous technical issues and bugs, which add an unintended layer of hilarity. Overall, while the game has its flaws, players appreciate the funny moments that arise from both gameplay and social interactions.

    • “The base building was a complete joke; it was the only thing that was fun and kept my friend and me entertained. If I remember correctly, we even crashed the server with what we did, but that was so long ago.”
    • “I enjoy playing it with friends; I really have funny moments.”
    • “One thing that surprised me a bit was their blatant attempt at the Valve case system, except instead of keys, they use USB sticks. It's pretty hilarious.”
  • grinding
    18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players overwhelmingly describe the grinding aspect of the game as tedious and time-consuming, often requiring significant investment without substantial rewards. Many feel that solo play leads to frustration, as the effort put into farming and gathering resources is frequently undermined by PvP encounters or game imbalances. While some appreciate the addictive nature of loot collection, the overall sentiment suggests that grinding can feel more like a chore than an engaging gameplay element.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “This isn't really a game; it's a grinding sim that glitches out every second and is extremely unbalanced.”
    • “I felt like I was constantly grinding and getting no payout.”
    • “No point in grinding for gear if you're just going to lose it to some sad hacker.”
  • music
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music aspect of the game has received largely negative feedback, with many users noting the absence of in-game music and ambient sounds, which detracts from the overall experience. While some appreciated the title music, the lack of engaging audio during gameplay has left players feeling disappointed and suggesting that the game would benefit from a more robust musical presence. Overall, the sound effects are also criticized as weak, further diminishing the game's atmosphere.

    • “They put in better music.”
    • “The funnest part about playing this game was the 30 minutes I spent watching music videos on YouTube while attempting to get to the actual gameplay after a failed download and several tries at registering.”
    • “No music in the game.”
    • “Another thing I would like to see changed is music...there is no music or ambient sounds.”
    • “The sound effects are also very weak and the main menu music is basically nonexistent.”
  • atmosphere
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of the game receives mixed reviews; while some players find it immersive and fitting for a zombie apocalypse, capturing a sense of danger and realism, others criticize it for lacking depth and quality, particularly in graphics. The lengthy travel times are noted as both a contributor to the immersive experience and a potential drawback. Overall, the game's atmosphere is seen as a key element, though opinions vary significantly on its effectiveness.

    • “Atmosphere in the game is impressive.”
    • “The atmosphere is perfect for a zombie game; you never feel safe!”
    • “It does however capture the mood and atmosphere of a zombie apocalypse really well.”
    • “This game has no atmosphere.”
    • “The atmosphere isn't like a post-apocalyptic game...”
    • “Look up H1Z1 if you want a zombie game with atmosphere or Contagion.”
  • emotional
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional responses to the game are mixed, with some players expressing deep disappointment and frustration over its cancellation and perceived neglect by developers, feeling let down after significant investment. Others report a range of emotions, from happiness at the game's potential to tears of frustration due to gameplay issues, highlighting a strong emotional connection to their experiences. Overall, the emotional aspect reflects a blend of investment, disappointment, and frustration among players.

    • “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
    • “This made me feel happy again, because it's a sign that Freereign Entertainment got back to this.”
    • “5 - I cried.”
  • replayability
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers enjoyable gameplay for a limited time, but lacks sufficient content to encourage long-term replayability, with players primarily motivated by the pursuit of unique skins. Many reviewers feel that significant updates and improvements are necessary to enhance its longevity and overall replay value.

    • “Fun gameplay for a couple of hours worth of fun, but there really isn't much else to keep you going. You will eventually play just so you can trade for some unique skins, which is achievable, but in terms of longevity and replayability, the game requires new things to be added.”
    • “Replayability: 6”
  • character development
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews indicate that character development lacks innovation, with players noting repetitive character designs and a stagnant cash shop system that fails to enhance the overall experience.

    • “The character development feels stagnant, with no real progression or depth.”
    • “There is a lack of variety in character designs, making them feel repetitive.”
    • “The cash shop offers the same character designs, which limits customization options.”

Buy Romero's Aftermath

6h Median play time
35h Average play time
4-15h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 35 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Romero's Aftermath

Infestation: Survivor Stories ImageInfestation: Survivor Stories ImageInfestation: Survivor Stories Image
This game contains adult content
Just Survive Image
This game contains adult content
Nether Image
Infestation: The New Z Image
Shattered Skies ImageShattered Skies ImageShattered Skies Image
Z1 Battle Royale ImageZ1 Battle Royale ImageZ1 Battle Royale Image
Nomad Image
Miscreated Image
New Frontier Image
SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now Image