Skip to main content

Kapital: Sparks of Revolution

Kapital: Sparks of Revolution Game Cover
65%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
story, grinding
65% User Score Based on 100 reviews

Platforms

LinuxPCMac OSWindows
Kapital: Sparks of Revolution Game Cover

About

Kapital: Sparks of Revolution is a single player survival strategy game with a business theme. It was developed by Lapovich Team and was released on April 28, 2022. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"Kapital: Sparks of Revolution" is a strategy simulation game where players manage a socialist revolution. They will need to build up their movement, balance resources, and make decisions that will determine the outcome of the revolution. The game features dynamic events, historical and fictional scenarios, and multiple ways to achieve victory. However, it is important to note that the game may have some complex mechanics and a steep learning curve.

Skip User Reviews

65%
Audience ScoreBased on 100 reviews
gameplay5 positive mentions
grinding4 negative mentions

  • The game features strong theming and an interesting concept centered around class struggle and city management.
  • Players appreciate the depth of gameplay and the challenge it presents, requiring strategic thinking to balance the needs of different social classes.
  • The art style and humor in the dialogue are well-received, adding charm to the overall experience.
  • The game suffers from significant bugs and balancing issues, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences and a lack of meaningful progression.
  • Many players find the mechanics repetitive and the gameplay shallow, especially when compared to more established city-building games like Anno 1800 and Frostpunk.
  • The constant influx of new residents and resource management challenges can feel overwhelming, often resulting in a sense of chaos rather than strategic fun.
  • gameplay
    29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game is characterized by strong thematic elements but suffers from weak execution, leading to a lack of compelling mechanics and player agency. While there are enjoyable interactions between different systems and a promising depth in mechanics, many players find the overall experience grindy and lacking in innovation, with some features feeling irrelevant or poorly integrated. Despite its potential and engaging sandbox elements, the game struggles with balance and pacing, leaving it feeling underdeveloped and not fully satisfying for long-term play.

    • “The different mechanics interact in a fun way and it feels like there is a lot of room for growth in terms of gameplay elements.”
    • “I am also impressed with the depth that the developer has put into the various mechanics of this game as you progress through the various elements and the tech tree.”
    • “It is a mixed set of gameplay that plays out very well and is quite engrossing.”
    • “There is no statistics to support player agency, migration cannot be stopped or managed effectively, resulting in boring, grindy gameplay that has no meaning other than to wait for the next unlock.”
    • “It probably should have been released as early access, since there is a lot of balancing and some campaign pacing/structure that still needs to be altered. The tutorial part of the campaign keeps the hardness of what gameplay should be, thus allowing failures right from the start, and there never seems to be any transition between what should be the tutorial part and then the full game.”
    • “The mechanics also aren't unique enough to warrant playing it for longer than an hour or two.”
  • story
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story in the game is centered around rebuilding a city from ruins while navigating complex class relations, which some players find conceptually engaging. However, many critiques highlight that the narrative feels linear and simplistic, often resembling a tutorial rather than a fully developed campaign. While the integration of gameplay mechanics with story elements is praised, the overall execution is seen as lacking depth, with some players expressing frustration over the repetitive nature of quests and dialogue.

    • “I think it's conceptually pretty cool - building a city back from ruins while managing delicate class relations and progressing through a linear sort of story.”
    • “The story plot seems really interesting!”
    • “My problems are based on I'm still learning the game, and the game has a specific point that devs ingeniously tied the game's central point into the story and gameplay; your decisions have consequences in a very organic way, you have to pick the needs of one class over another or sacrifice the needs of your people to improve the city.”
    • “No more grain shipments due to a story event that got sprung on you and which requires two in-game days to complete?”
    • “The campaign is just a glorified tutorial, with a cheesy story on top, having you play the same map as sandbox mode.”
    • “Your workers do everything one building at a time like in a mobile game, you can only have so many of certain buildings like a mobile game, basically they designed a really trashy mobile game and then in a last-ditch effort to make sales wrote a 'story' where a bunch of idiots argue in front of you.”
  • graphics
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the beautiful hand-drawn art style while others criticize it as outdated and average, lacking the depth expected in a city-building game. While the aesthetic appeal is noted as a highlight, many feel that the overall graphical presentation does not meet modern standards, leaving room for improvement.

    • “What I liked the most are the graphics.”
    • “The art style is by far the best thing about the game.”
    • “+ beautiful hand-drawn graphics.”
    • “The graphics are nostalgic but nothing special.”
    • “Tedious and boring strategy game with outdated graphics and no tutorial at all.”
    • “Plays and feels like a mobile game more than a PC game... the animations, the graphics, it's all very average.”
  • grinding
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious and lacking meaningful engagement, with ineffective management of migration contributing to a monotonous experience. While some appreciate not having to replace buildings, the late-game grind often feels boring and unfulfilling, leading to frustration. Overall, the lack of player agency and outdated graphics further detract from the enjoyment of the gameplay.

    • “There are no statistics to support player agency; migration cannot be stopped or managed effectively, resulting in boring, grindy gameplay that has no meaning other than to wait for the next unlock.”
    • “Tedious and boring strategy game with outdated graphics and no tutorial at all.”
    • “This might get better in a later stage of the game, but after a little while, all this downtime gets very tedious and - unfortunately - boring.”
  • humor
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is praised for its excellent and genuinely funny narration and dialogue, showcasing a strong sense of humor that enhances the overall experience. Players appreciate the witty lines and clever humor embedded in character interactions, contributing to the game's charm.

    • “Excellent and genuinely funny narration/dialogue.”
    • “It looks beautiful, runs well (even on macOS) and if you actually read the dialogue you can tell there is a great sense of humor behind it ('the whole town was completely destroyed... quick, we must repair the palace!').”
    • “One of the strengths of the game is the great sense of humor that can be found between the lines of the dialogue that the recurring characters throw at you.”
  • stability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, users report that while the game is enjoyable, it suffers from significant bugs, particularly in the late game, even on high-spec computers. However, early gameplay is more stable with helpful hints and only minor glitches.

    • “It is fun; however, it is very buggy.”
    • “It gets buggy late game. My computer is high spec.”
    • “There are only a few minor glitches and bugs.”
  • replayability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game's replayability is considered lacking, with users expressing dissatisfaction regarding its depth and enjoyment in city building. In contrast, other games in the genre are noted for offering more complexity and replay value.

    • “Both games become more complex and provide greater depth and replayability.”
    • “The variety of choices and outcomes keeps me coming back for more.”
    • “Each playthrough feels fresh due to the dynamic story elements and character interactions.”
    • “But as far as replayability, it is lacking.”
    • “Not an enjoyable city-building experience and has no replayability.”
    • “Both games are more complex and provide more depth and replayability.”
  • atmosphere
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of the game is characterized by a gritty and authentic depiction of early 20th-century crises and political turmoil, reflecting the challenges of an indie city builder. While it has its flaws, the game's setting effectively immerses players in a tumultuous historical context.

    • “A raw, albeit imperfect, indie city builder that captures the unique atmosphere of crisis and political ferment in the early 20th century.”
    • “A raw, not without its problems, but honest indie city builder that offers the special atmosphere of the crisis and political ferment of the early 20th century.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Kapital: Sparks of Revolution

20h Median play time
20h Average play time
20-20h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Kapital: Sparks of Revolution

Games Like Kapital: Sparks of Revolution

Endzone: A World Apart Image
Atomic Society Image
Patron Image
Cliff Empire Image
Rise to Ruins ImageRise to Ruins ImageRise to Ruins Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Kapital: Sparks of Revolution is a survival strategy game with business theme.

Kapital: Sparks of Revolution is available on PC, Mac OS, Windows and Linux.

On average players spend around 20 hours playing Kapital: Sparks of Revolution.

Kapital: Sparks of Revolution was released on April 28, 2022.

Kapital: Sparks of Revolution was developed by Lapovich Team.

Kapital: Sparks of Revolution has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its story.

Kapital: Sparks of Revolution is a single player game.

Similar games include Endzone: A World Apart, Atomic Society, Patron, Cliff Empire, Rise to Ruins and others.