Jeeboman

About

Jeeboman is a single player shooter game. It was developed by Futuretown and was released on April 5, 2016. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

A fast paced retro arcade shooter built ground up for room scale VR. Save the city from waves of invading robots and dish out destruction with a full arsenal of futuristic weaponry!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

72%

Audience ScoreBased on 72 reviews

gameplay8 positive mentions

music1 negative mentions

The game offers a fun and addictive experience with a variety of weapons and a unique teleportation mechanic.
It provides a surreal feeling of being a superhero in VR, with engaging gameplay that keeps players moving and strategizing.
Great value for the price, with many players finding it enjoyable and worth revisiting despite its limitations.

The game feels outdated and chaotic, with many players finding it overwhelming and lacking in depth.
Graphics and sound design are criticized for being subpar, leading to a less immersive experience.
Limited replay value and a lack of diverse environments make the game feel repetitive after a short time.

gameplay
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
39%
17%
The gameplay is centered around a limited field of view combined with a teleportation mechanic, which many players find enjoyable and tactically engaging. While the initial tutorial may be off-putting, the frantic and fun gameplay quickly captivates those who persevere. Comparisons to similar titles like Robo Recall highlight its effectiveness, despite some concerns about visuals.
- “The teleport mechanic is great and simply works well.”
- “Extremely enjoyable if you like frantic gameplay.”
- “And I very much appreciate the tactical choices introduced by the teleporting mechanic.”
- “Basically, the primary game mechanic that the designers chose to focus the gameplay on is limited field of view combined with frequent teleports.”
- “Robo Recall copied the gameplay almost exactly and made the graphics better.”
- “Don't let the visuals put you off - once I got to the gameplay, it won me over quickly.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
50%
17%
The graphics and animations have received criticism for their lackluster quality, with comparisons made to "Robo Recall," which is noted for superior visuals. However, some players suggest that the gameplay experience compensates for the visual shortcomings, ultimately making it enjoyable despite the graphics.
- “Robo Recall copied the gameplay almost exactly and made the graphics better.”
- “Don't let the visuals put you off - once I got to the gameplay, it won me over quickly.”
replayability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players find it enjoyable and worth revisiting, particularly for challenging difficulties, others note its short length and low replay value. However, it is generally regarded as a fun arcade shooter with decent replay potential for those who appreciate strategic gameplay.
- “It's a little on the short side, but it's fun to beat the harder difficulties, and the replay value is pretty high.”
- “If you're looking for a fun arcade shooter with just the right amount of strategy and pretty good replay value, give this one a shot.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game is often overshadowed by gunfire, making it difficult to appreciate, and when audible, it fails to deliver an exciting experience.
- “The music is too easily drowned out by the sounds of gunfire, and even when you can hear it, it isn't very exciting.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story in the game is criticized for being unclear and lacking depth, leaving players confused about their objectives and motivations. While players may not expect a complex narrative from a pedestal-shooter, the absence of any coherent plot detracts from the overall experience.
- “I don't really expect a deep plot from a pedestal-shooter game, but I have no idea what I'm shooting at or why.”