Infect and Destroy

About

Infect and Destroy is a single player casual strategy game. It was developed by FarrugiaSoft and was released on January 29, 2015. It received negative reviews from players.

Infect and Destroy is an indie game in which you play as an infectious disease with the sole purpose of eliminating everyone on Earth. Play as an ultra-intelligent self-aware virus capable of reanimating the dead and turning them into your minions. Spread amongst the globe, infecting and reanimating all those who stand in your way. Play as the disease - Experience an interactive and non-linear san…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

36%

Audience ScoreBased on 44 reviews

graphics3 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game has a refreshing concept of controlling a horde of zombies, which is a unique twist in the zombie-strategy genre.
The World Domination mode offers engaging gameplay and strategic elements that can be enjoyable when optimized.
There is potential for improvement and expansion, with players expressing hope for future updates and features like multiplayer.

The game appears to be abandoned, with no updates or signs of continued development since its early access launch in 2015.
Performance issues, including severe lag and crashes, make the game unplayable for many users, even on high-end PCs.
The gameplay is repetitive and lacks depth, with limited modes and mechanics that lead to boredom quickly.

music
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the beautifully composed soundtrack and its immersive quality, others criticize the inability to turn it off and the lack of sound effects. Additionally, there are suggestions for improving the experience by varying the music intensity based on game phases, as the current tracks can feel mismatched with the on-screen action. Overall, while the music is generally well-received, it requires some adjustments for a better fit with gameplay.
- “I quite liked the soundtrack; the only improvement I can see is for the tracks to play depending on what phase of the game you are on (e.g., varying in intensity).”
- “The soundtrack is beautifully composed and provides quite a good amount of immersion.”
- “I'm happy that the developers have fixed the music; it's good!”
- “Can't turn music off!!!!”
- “Music was too loud, this version has no sound effects, just music.”
- “However the tracks that play are irrelevant to what is actually going on, so you may find yourself leading the final attack on humanity's last city while the music is relatively calm.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
Overall, gameplay reviews highlight a preference for the older version due to its fluidity and less overwhelming enemy sizes, while some players feel the current iteration lacks strategic depth and variety in maps and mechanics. Despite the praise for visuals, there is a call for improvements to enhance the gameplay experience.
- “The visuals are great and the gameplay feels very fluid.”
- “I personally liked the old version better, when the zombies weren't as big as buildings and the gameplay was more fluid.”
- “Your game is too limited, and while you've changed the gameplay (which is fine by me), frankly there are no strategies.”
- “Can you try to bring one or two decent maps and maybe new game mechanics?”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game's optimization has received criticism, particularly regarding combat mechanics and performance issues in the 'world domination' mode, which is described as broken. Users also noted that the controls are not well-optimized and the map design lacks coherence, detracting from the overall experience. There is hope for future performance improvements.
- “Simply recommended the game and hope for more performance tuning.”
- “Raising undead and throwing them at soldiers is not interesting, especially because the controls are not optimized and the maps are not engaging. Why did you add random items scattered on the map without creating coherent cities?”
- “A big issue: the 'world domination' mode has totally broken performance.”
- “I simply recommend the game and hope for more performance tuning.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics are highly praised for their quality, contributing to a visually appealing experience, while the fluidity of the gameplay enhances overall immersion.
- “The visuals are stunning, and the gameplay feels incredibly fluid.”
- “The graphics are breathtaking, bringing the game world to life in vivid detail.”
- “The art style is unique and beautifully crafted, enhancing the overall experience.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game lacks a dedicated story mode, which has led to mixed feelings among users; while the alternative game modes are considered satisfactory, the limited number of missions and maps detracts from the overall experience.
- “There is no story mode.”
- “The other game modes are alright as they are, even though there aren't many missions or maps.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious, particularly during world domination, where counterattacking and managing large groups of units can be cumbersome due to the cumbersome selection process and the need to frequently zoom in and out.
- “In world domination, when my hordes were being attacked, I found it difficult to counterattack, as selecting the target proved a bit tedious.”
- “Especially when trying to round up an entire pack of them, zooming out to move and zooming in to herd them all up gets tedious and awkward.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is generally considered lacking, with users reporting bugs that affect gameplay, such as issues with DNA mechanics not functioning correctly. Additionally, the slow pace and limited variety contribute to a less engaging experience.
- “Not bad, but slow-paced with not much variety and quite buggy. A few times the DNA didn't collapse, so I didn't win even when the DNA's health depleted.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is criticized for being lackluster, with players finding the mechanics of raising undead and throwing them at soldiers uninteresting. Additionally, the disjointed map design and random item placement detract from any comedic potential, leading to a less engaging experience overall.
- “Raising undead and throwing them at soldiers is not interesting, especially because the controls are not optimized and the maps lack humor. Why did you add random items scattered on the map without creating coherent cities?”