Executive Assault

About

Executive Assault is a single player and multiplayer shooter game with warfare and science fiction themes. It was developed by Hesketh Studios Ltd and was released on July 17, 2015. It received positive reviews from players.

"Executive Assault" is a real-time strategy and first-person shooter game hybrid. Players can build and manage their own bases, while also controlling individual units in FPS combat. The game features intense PvP and AI combat, with a focus on strategic base building and tactical unit control. Overseeing every aspect of your company is crucial for success, from researching new technologies to commanding your soldiers in battle.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

85%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,187 reviews

gameplay111 positive mentions

graphics60 negative mentions

Unique blend of RTS and FPS gameplay that allows players to control units in first person.
Extensive tech tree and unit customization options provide depth and variety.
Fun and engaging, especially when played with friends.

Game is buggy and unpolished, with frequent crashes and performance issues.
AI is often unchallenging and can be easily manipulated.
Limited multiplayer community and lack of campaign mode reduce replayability.

gameplay
308 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
58%
6%
The gameplay of this game is a unique blend of RTS and FPS mechanics, featuring engaging base-building elements and a diverse research tree that keeps players invested for hours. While the game offers innovative concepts and fun multiplayer experiences, it suffers from unpolished mechanics, balance issues, and a lack of content, which can lead to repetitive gameplay. Overall, it is recommended for those who enjoy RTS games, especially when played with friends, but potential buyers should be aware of its current limitations and consider waiting for further updates.
- “The gameplay ramps up quickly and the simplistic power usage system works really well with the upgrade systems, pressing in the ideas of offense vs defense.”
- “The mechanics of this game are great and I feel as though there's a lot of replay value given the mix of FPS and RTS that really change the dynamics of the game.”
- “The gameplay is fantastic and there is so much to research.”
- “It's optimized poorly, its FPS mechanics are surface level at best and flawed.”
- “But after a while you should realize it's the same thing over and over and it's a cool concept with RTS and FPS but it feels like it compromises the gameplay for both in order to stick it in there.”
- “The controls are clunky, the game looks like it came out in 1999, it's slow, the 'strategy' is impenetrable, portions of the game remain buggy and broken, it's boring by yourself and impossible to play with anyone else, victory is long, boring and provides no sense of accomplishment.”
graphics
284 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
59%
21%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many players noting that they are outdated and reminiscent of early 2000s or even late 90s visuals. While some appreciate the indie charm and find the graphics acceptable given the game's low budget and single-developer background, others criticize them for being rudimentary and filled with glitches. Overall, the consensus is that while the graphics may not impress, the gameplay experience compensates for their shortcomings.
- “It's graphics are totally okay, especially the vehicle cockpits are beautifully made.”
- “They put such big graphics into this game it's like photoreal, bro.”
- “Nice enough graphics, not top of the line but for an indie game at this price there's really no room to complain.”
- “The graphics are terrible, the user interface could be best described as 'well enough', the AI is kind of buggy but does its job, I guess.”
- “There's simply too many glitches and graphical errors to call this a complete game in my opinion.”
- “Even though most of the visuals and graphics are a bit blocky, they do not get in the way of delivering effective gameplay.”
music
77 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
39%
4%
The music in the game has received widespread acclaim, with many players praising its epic soundtrack that enhances the overall gameplay experience. The inclusion of humorous elements like elevator music adds a unique charm, making moments of intense action feel more immersive. Overall, the soundtrack is considered one of the standout features, with some players even suggesting it's worth purchasing the game solely for the music.
- “The soundtrack is unexpectedly good and epic too!”
- “First off, the soundtrack is unreal. This game shouldn't have a soundtrack of this extreme, but it works so well in conveying the action that I don't even care; I really want this OST!”
- “Rushing into another CEO's building with your army of robots, destroying thick metal doors and ceiling-mounted turrets along the way, then going into an elevator to his command office, listening to the calming elevator music, and watching a giant robot outside destroying everything around him, finally shooting the enemy CEO and watching him ragdoll around has to be the best gaming experience I've had in a while.”
- “I don't want to ruin it for you, but for example when you ride the elevator up to brutally slaughter the enemy executive, some classy elevator music is playing.”
- “It doesn't help that the landscape is pretty bland to look at from a bird's eye view (though the soundtrack more than makes up for it).”
- “Please help: when I launch the game I can hear the music but it just displays a pink/purple screen.”
stability
72 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
3%
97%
The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with frequent reports of crashes, freezes, and various bugs affecting gameplay. Many players describe it as a "buggy unfinished mess," highlighting issues such as clunky controls, graphical glitches, and AI problems that detract from the overall experience. While some find enjoyment in the game's concept and potential, the overwhelming consensus is that it feels more like an early access title rather than a polished product.
- “However, although I love this game, it is very buggy, has stupid AI, and crashes on the beastiest of computers.”
- “The game constantly crashes, freezes, and even my CEO fell through the map making the game unplayable. The game is great and it is clearly a work in progress, but I feel you are still paying for an early access rather than a complete game, with so many new features. Even the updates can cause the game to break; the update we got yesterday caused the game to also run in 800x600 with menu items being so stretched they appear outside the viewable screen.”
- “If you want a fully completed game with no glitches of any kind, this is not for you.”
optimization
49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
59%
29%
The game's optimization is widely criticized, with many users reporting severe performance issues even on high-end machines, as well as poor graphical quality and a clunky user interface. While some players find it enjoyable despite these flaws, the consensus is that it requires significant optimization and polishing to enhance the overall experience. Overall, the game feels unfinished and lacks necessary updates to address these ongoing issues.
- “Executive Assault manages to avoid severe bugs, although there are some performance issues.”
- “It has some performance issues that persist even on a high-end gaming machine, but it offers quite a bit of customization options for the units and the FPS perspective is very neat and unique.”
- “Fps and RTS hybrid, both my favorite styles of games all wrapped up into one nice, neat, and fairly well-optimized package.”
- “It's optimized poorly; its FPS mechanics are surface level at best and flawed.”
- “Not worth buying for $10; it has severe performance issues, generally feels unfinished, and it does not seem to get any more updates.”
- “There are also massive optimization issues even for computers that far surpass the recommended specs like mine.”
humor
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's humor is characterized by quirky, light-hearted elements that elicit chuckles, such as amusing unit interactions, funny death statements, and unexpected bugs that add to the comedic experience. Players enjoy the satirical touches and entertaining gameplay, especially when playing with friends, making it a unique and enjoyable experience despite its minor flaws. Overall, the humor enhances the game's originality and charm, contributing significantly to its appeal.
- “Just naming your company and walking around your base is fun enough for the money with all the great humor and little touches that have been put into the game.”
- “Now, me and a friend die laughing at the charging suicidal bots, and the amazing ragdoll effects when the CEO dies.”
- “Funny little things like elevator music, martini-drinking pilots, and funny death statements from bots.”
story
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
82%
9%
The game lacks a traditional campaign or missions, focusing instead on skirmish setups and multiplayer gameplay, which some players find disappointing. While the premise involves players taking on the role of a CEO in a battle for dominance, the absence of a cohesive storyline or backstory is noted as a significant missed opportunity. Despite this, the gameplay offers engaging mechanics, such as customizable units and interior combat, which can provide enjoyment in multiplayer settings.
- “The premise regarding Executive Assault is that the player takes control of an executive businessman who is essentially the only human on the battlefield trying to take over the world.”
- “Although there is no backstory, at least not yet, you play as a CEO sitting inside your simple, but comfortable office at the top of your tower, fighting with or against up to three other CEOs on a decently sized map.”
- “You are able to enter the enemy's base buildings in FPS style or conduct your own assassin missions during the battle.”
- “Do not buy this game if you're expecting to play any kind of single player mission.”
- “Other cons: where's the storyline and campaign?”
- “The plot is non-existent, but what do you expect?”
replayability
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
50%
17%
The game's replayability is a mixed bag; while many players find it innovative and enjoyable with endless possibilities for unique matches, the lack of a matchmaking system and reliance on friends can significantly hinder the experience for some. Overall, those who appreciate the blend of FPS and RTS mechanics may find substantial replay value, but others might feel it falls short without a solid multiplayer framework.
- “Great replay value; no two matches are ever the same.”
- “I think it is an innovative and great concept for a game that I believe has endless replay value!”
- “The very unique aspect that you can control your units and experience the fight on a new dimension, as well as the many ways you can set up your base and infiltrate the enemy's base, adds a lot of replay value.”
- “Very poor replay value without friends to play with.”
- “Definitely a good purchase if you're into RTS games, though it may not be as replayable as you think, and remember to use the two-hour refund policy to make sure the game is right for you.”
- “No matchmaking system (if we had this, the game would have tremendous replay value).”
atmosphere
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its epic and intense battle scenes, complemented by a fitting sci-fi soundscape. Reviewers highlight the impressive scale and engaging premise, creating a captivating corporate future war environment that enhances the overall experience and contributes to the game's addictiveness.
- “The premise is amazing and the atmosphere is incredible.”
- “The scale and atmosphere are probably my favorite thing about the game.”
- “This game has an amazing atmosphere and is extremely addicting.”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized as a cash grab, with users expressing disappointment over the lack of updates and fixes, particularly regarding the broken energy system. Many reviewers feel that the game is unfinished and poorly polished, suggesting that the developer prioritized profit over quality.
- “This game had potential, but alas, instead of continuing to update it and fix the broken energy system, the developer has decided to make another cash grab game.”
- “Unfinished Unity asset cash grab.”
- “However, from using the Unity engine to complete the game, it's obvious that this is a cash grab from the developer for a very unpolished title.”
grinding
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and boring, with many expressing that it becomes monotonous after a few hours of multiplayer gameplay. The limited starting paths and the necessity to master technology paths before engaging in gameplay contribute to a lack of enjoyment and motivation to continue.
- “Very tedious and boring.”
- “Provides a fair few hours of multiplayer gameplay before becoming tedious.”
- “Unfortunately, this leads me to think that there is really only one starting path to choose from, and setting up your base with the essentials just seems tedious. This is why I'm not bothering to start a me vs AI game, because I feel I need to know exactly how to play the game and understand every technology path just so I won't die miserably. Even if I did, I still wouldn't be having fun with this game.”
character development
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The game features significant character development, particularly among the executive characters, allowing players to witness their growth and evolution throughout the story.
- “There is a lot of character development with each of the executive characters.”
- “The character development is impressive, allowing players to connect deeply with each character's journey.”
- “Each character undergoes significant growth, making their stories feel authentic and engaging.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews do not address the emotional aspect of the game, focusing instead on technical issues such as unresponsive aircraft controls and graphics quality. As a result, there is no significant emotional feedback to summarize.