I Am Vegend: Zombiegeddon

About

Captain the Vegendary Heroes, survive the Zombiegeddon and take revenge upon the birds, the pigs, and the zombies! Enjoy this mind-blowing travesty of mobile game hits! - Enemies have joined forces to destroy all plants! They trample down young innocent seedlings, besiege the allotment and steal the seeds! Take charge of Vegendary Heroes special fertilisation squad and box the blighters mugs! To w…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

45%

Audience ScoreBased on 40 reviews

humor7 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game is easy to learn and has instant playability, making it accessible for casual gamers.
It features a funny concept with colorful and humorous enemies, providing some entertainment value.
Despite its flaws, some players find it enjoyable for a short gaming session, especially for fans of the tower defense genre.

The game is heavily criticized for being a blatant ripoff of Plants vs. Zombies and Angry Birds, lacking originality.
Gameplay can become repetitive and boring over time, with a poor economic model that makes upgrades feel unrewarding.
It is poorly suited for PC, feeling more like a mobile game with subpar graphics and controls that detract from the overall experience.

humor
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
88%
13%
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players appreciating its funny concept, colorful enemies, and instant playability. However, some critics find certain elements unfunny or overly simplistic, leading to mixed feelings about its comedic effectiveness. Overall, it is seen as a lighthearted and amusing casual game, with ratings averaging around 6 to 7 out of 10.
- “On the plus side are the fact that the game is easy to learn, has instant playability, and a funny concept.”
- “It's simple, it's funny, it's fun.”
- “It's a funny casual game that feels like a cross between Plants vs. Zombies and Angry Birds, but then cheaper.”
- “Another thing the developer thought would be clever, but in my opinion, it is unfunny and just dumb.”
monetization
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The game "I am vegend" notably lacks microtransactions, yet it exhibits design flaws typically associated with monetization strategies, such as frustrating gameplay elements intended to encourage spending. Reviewers criticize it as a poorly executed cash grab that feels predatory despite the absence of in-game purchases, highlighting how the game's structure still reflects the negative impact of microtransaction-driven design. Overall, while the lack of microtransactions is seen as a positive, the game suffers from design choices that suggest a focus on monetization.
- “It’s no coincidence that many games funded primarily through microtransactions give you a handful of easy levels at a time while showering you with power-ups and then throw in an extremely challenging one where you’re forced to use them all up and even buy additional ones.”
- “The fact that I am Vegend doesn’t contain any microtransactions and yet was clearly intended to throw this into sharp relief.”
- “Has no microtransactions, which is a good thing.”
- “Given the fact that there are no microtransactions in this title and yet it features all the hallmarks of compromised game design to facilitate them, I think it can serve as a perfect example of what microtransactions do in games even by their absence: they impact a game’s design insofar as that the game forces you to deal with purpose-built annoyances that you can pay to get rid of.”
- “It’s a bland mash-up of ideas executed with sub-par assets and clearly intended for predatory microtransactions.”
- “I Am Vegend is a mobile app that's been dumped on Steam as a lazy, nasty cash grab.”
story
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
29%
43%
The story is criticized for being a blatant copy of "Plants vs. Zombies," leading to a lack of originality. The game features three mission sets with a total of 45 missions, which can be completed in about 1.5 to 2 hours, introducing new monsters and enemies along the way. Despite its derivative narrative, players find the gameplay enjoyable, especially for a mobile port.
- “Fun enough game even though it's for mobile phones and is being sold on PC. It takes 1.5 hours to complete the currently available 3 mission sets containing 15 missions each. The first two mission sets unlock 3 unique monsters and introduce new enemies and games to play, while the final set introduces 1 unit and new enemies.”
- “Luckily, it took less than 2 hours to finish the story.”
- “The storyline is blatantly plagiarized from Plants vs. Zombies.”
- “Story is Plants vs. Zombies (sigh).”
- “Luckily, it took less than 2 hours to finish the 'story'.”
graphics
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The graphics of the game are described as basic and childish, with a humorous concept that may appeal to younger audiences. However, many reviewers criticize the overall quality, comparing it unfavorably to other games and suggesting that significant improvements are needed for it to be considered viable. Overall, while some find the graphics interesting, they do not elevate the gameplay experience.
- “Funny concept and graphics.”
- “The graphics are interesting, but it isn't worth playing on the PC, at least.”
- “The graphics are okay; the gameplay (although a little buggy) works fine.”
- “The graphics are well, very basic as you can see on screenshots.”
- “The art style is very childish, which if it's aimed towards children and not casual, then I'd be fine.”
- “Really bad mobile game, it's basically Plants vs. Zombies without planting the plants but instead aiming the shots; sounds, graphics, UI, everything is terrible!”
gameplay
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The gameplay is described as engaging but can become overly hectic, which may detract from the experience for some players. While it functions adequately despite some bugs, it suffers from repetitiveness and a lack of originality, leading to a feeling of incompleteness.
- “However, the one thing that made both of those games fun to play was the actual gameplay.”
- “Instant gameplay.”
- “While I can certainly see the appeal of this type of gameplay, it just becomes way too hectic eventually, which is clearly on purpose.”
- “The graphics are okay, the gameplay (although a little buggy) works okay and I might have recommended it if it did not rip everything from other games.”
- “Furthermore, there are some very poorly implemented aspects of this game that make for some repetitive and boring gameplay with little more than the feeling of something missing.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and unengaging, particularly when it comes to upgrading plants, which requires significant coin accumulation. Despite attempts to make the process more enjoyable, it ultimately feels like a chore rather than a rewarding experience.
- “If you want to upgrade every plant, that would mean a lot of coin grinding.”
- “It kind of feels like they tried to think of ways that could possibly make it interesting or enjoyable, but instead made it tedious and not even worth giving too much of a try.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game exhibits stability issues, with users reporting buggy controls and gameplay, which detracts from the overall experience. While the graphics are deemed acceptable, the presence of bugs may hinder recommendations for the game.
- “The graphics are okay, the gameplay (although a little buggy) works fine, and I might have recommended it if it didn't rip everything from other games.”
- “Controls are buggy.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The menu music is described as haunting and memorable, leaving a lasting impression on players long after they have finished the game.
- “The menu music will haunt me for years to come.”