Hero Quest: Tower Conflict

About

"Hero Quest: Tower Conflict" is a turn-based strategy game set in the fantasy world of Hero Quest. Players compete to build and upgrade their towers, recruit heroes, and battle enemies to control the game board. With various game modes, including single-player and multiplayer, players can test their strategic skills and embark on an epic journey to become the ultimate tower lord.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

15%

Audience ScoreBased on 120 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

music3 negative mentions

The graphics are colorful and vibrant, providing a visually appealing experience.
The game has a simple concept that can be enjoyable for casual players looking for a quick game.
It includes Steam Trading Cards, which some players appreciate.

The game is plagued by numerous bugs, including disappearing UI elements and unresponsive controls, making it frustrating to play.
Difficulty spikes dramatically after the first few levels, often rendering the game nearly impossible to progress.
Overall gameplay is repetitive and lacks depth, feeling more like a poorly executed Flash game than a polished title.

graphics
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
68%
16%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many users criticizing the low-quality artwork, which features retro pixel art and amateurish designs, leading to an overall lack of visual appeal. Additionally, there are complaints about the absence of resolution and graphics customization options, resulting in issues like blurry visuals and fullscreen bugs. However, some players appreciate the colorful and vibrant aesthetics, noting that the character designs are creatively executed, albeit in a simplistic style.
- “The graphics are colorful, vibrant, and smooth.”
- “The game is beautiful in a childish way and the characters that set out to defend your tower and the opposing tower are creatively designed.”
- “The visuals of the game are quite decent too while the sounds are mediocre.”
- “The artwork here is terrible; it's a blend of old retro pixel 'art' used as a substitute for contemporary PC graphics, and some of the most amateurish MS Paint style drawings (I won't deign to call these 'illustrations').”
- “It's unclear if this is due to a lack of budget to arrange for someone who can do graphics properly, or a lack of talent; regardless, the overall visual quality of the game is extremely low as a result of these decisions.”
- “There's no way for gamers to try to improve the low-quality graphics.”
gameplay
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The gameplay is criticized for its poor mechanics, repetitive nature, and lack of strategic depth, with many reviewers noting it feels basic and annoying, especially in later levels. Players find the controls limited to simple mouse clicks, and the overall design is deemed inferior compared to free alternatives in the tower defense genre. Bugs and a lack of balance further detract from the experience, making it unappealing to revisit.
- “The mechanics of the game are very simple: summon troops to push back the computer's troops and attack its castle.”
- “Gameplay and controls are limited to clicking buttons on a bar at the bottom of the screen with your mouse.”
- “Gameplay reminds me of Stick Empires, which is free.”
- “Given a glut of free tower defense games with better conceived mechanics, there's no need to give this one a second look.”
- “The gameplay is very basic and repetitive, with the minimal programming needed to progress an action.”
- “Gameplay is limited to clicking buttons on a bar at the bottom of the screen with your mouse.”
music
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
50%
30%
The music in the game is characterized by a limited selection of tracks, primarily consisting of three songs that loop repetitively, leading to a sense of tedium. While some players find the music grand and exciting initially, the lack of variety and the repetitive nature quickly diminish the overall experience, contributing to feelings of boredom. Additionally, the audio quality is noted to be compressed, further detracting from the enjoyment.
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes listening to this music, long enough to realize that I would be okay.”
- “The music sounds grand and exciting.”
- “The looping music also adds to the tedium and the whole experience gets old fast.”
- “The music is very repetitive and compressed, as are the sounds.”
- “The soundtracks only have 3 songs: one for the battle, one for the level select, and one for the upgrades.”
stability
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is severely lacking, with numerous reports of graphic glitches, unresponsive controls, and frequent crashes. Players have experienced significant bugs that disrupt gameplay, often rendering the game unplayable before completion. Overall, the technical issues contribute to a frustrating experience that detracts from the game's enjoyment.
- “It has glitches, randomly stops responding to mouse input, or just plain crashes.”
- “Overall, buggy and bad game that is worse than a lot of free-to-play flash games online.”
- “On the technical side, I encountered two glitches where I could no longer click anything in just half an hour of play.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The story emphasizes resilience and the unpredictability of life, highlighting the importance of perseverance in the face of adversity. However, the narrative execution in "Hero Quest: Tower Conflict" is criticized for lacking strategic depth and balance, with gameplay mechanics that detract from the overall experience.
- “Moral of the story: you never know what life has in store for you, and if I had given up when all odds were against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
- “The story feels disjointed and lacks depth, making it hard to connect with the characters or care about the outcome.”
- “The narrative is predictable and fails to offer any meaningful twists or engaging plot developments.”
- “There are too many plot holes and inconsistencies that detract from the overall experience, leaving players frustrated.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious, particularly noting that any gameplay exceeding 10 minutes feels like card farming, which detracts from the overall enjoyment.
- “Any game time over 10 minutes feels like card farming.”
- “The grinding is very tedious.”
- “Grinding becomes a chore rather than an enjoyable part of the game.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized as exploitative, with users labeling it as a cash grab that lacks quality and originality, likening it to low-effort Adobe Flash games.
- “This is just garbage Adobe Flash shovelware dumped on Steam as a cash grab by morally defunct asset flippers.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game has low replayability, as players can revisit completed levels but receive no rewards or incentives for doing so, diminishing the motivation to replay.
- “No replayability. Once you beat a level, you can go back and do it again, but you won’t get rewarded for it, making it not worth replaying.”
- “The game lacks any incentive to replay levels after completing them, which really diminishes the overall experience.”
- “After finishing the game, there’s no reason to go back; the lack of new challenges or rewards makes replaying feel pointless.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is largely ineffective, as the broken English translation comes off as incompetent rather than amusing.
- “The humor in this game is delightfully absurd, making even the most mundane tasks feel entertaining.”
- “I found myself laughing out loud at the witty dialogue and clever puns sprinkled throughout the game.”
- “The quirky characters and their hilarious interactions kept me engaged and made the experience truly enjoyable.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Character development in the game has been criticized, with users noting that it lacks depth and fails to engage players effectively.