Skip to main content

Gunner, HEAT, PC!

Gunner, HEAT, PC! Game Cover
92%Game Brain Score
story, gameplay
optimization, grinding
92% User Score Based on 4,882 reviews

Platforms

PCWindows
Buy Nowfrom $21.23
Buy NowGet on Steam €24.99
Gunner, HEAT, PC! Game Cover

About

Gunner, HEAT, PC! is a single player tactical shooter game with warfare and historical themes. It was developed by Radian Simulations LLC and was released on September 6, 2022. It received very positive reviews from players.

Gunner, HEAT, PC! is a modern armored warfare game that blends simulation elements with accessible controls. It focuses on contemporary tanks and emphasizes realistic fire control, ballistics, and damage modeling while remaining playable without extensive technical knowledge. The game features single-player content such as campaigns and skirmish missions, as well as cooperative multiplayer. Combat…

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
Gunner, HEAT, PC! screenshot
+28
Skip User Reviews

92%
Audience ScoreBased on 4,882 reviews
story111 positive mentions
optimization50 negative mentions
  • Highly immersive with realistic tank controls, ballistics, crew voice acting, and damage modeling.
  • Good balance of realism and accessibility, easy to learn but challenging to master.
  • Wide variety of Cold War vehicles with detailed fire control systems and frequent developer updates adding content and improvements.
  • AI is often inconsistent, with friendly AI being ineffective and prone to getting stuck, while enemy AI can have unrealistic accuracy and situational awareness.
  • Campaign and missions lack dynamism and depth, leading to some repetition and limited long-term replayability.
  • Performance and optimization issues persist, with stuttering, long load times, and crashes reported even on strong PCs.
  • story
    824 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is minimal, featuring a barebones campaign that functions mainly as a random mission generator with little narrative or strategic depth. Missions often feel repetitive, scripted, and lack variety or meaningful player impact, with no cohesive storyline or immersive context connecting them. While the intense combat and simulation mechanics engage players, most reviews highlight the absence of a compelling story or dynamic campaign as a key shortfall.

    • “The missions are designed well, and often catch you out if you aren't careful and don't think about the mission like an actual battlefield with threats potentially waiting on your flanks or in cover.”
    • “The very small team of devs relatively consistently update the game with new missions, new tanks/helicopters/apcs/etc. as well as bug fixes and other improvements.”
    • “The missions so far are very cool and varied.”
    • “The campaign leaves something to be desired as it seems to be just an RNG of random missions you choose from, that cycle through over and over with no real impact on the world.”
    • “The missions (and the campaign for that matter) are boring and not really creative.”
    • “The mission are challenging and rewarding but the campaign is very stale, consisting of a small handful of mission types repeated frequently with little variety or narrative.”
  • gameplay
    421 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is praised for its realistic tank mechanics, satisfying simulation elements, and an engaging balance between accessibility and depth, offering a challenging yet rewarding experience. However, critics note issues with AI performance, limited mission variety, early access bugs, and repetitive gameplay loops that constrain long-term engagement. Overall, while still a work in progress, the game provides solid core mechanics and potential for growth, appealing mainly to fans of armored warfare sims seeking authenticity without overwhelming complexity.

    • “Great tank simulator, with easy to use controls but incredibly in-depth mechanics and strategic/tactical planning on both the section, platoon and company level.”
    • “From fire control systems and optics to penetration mechanics, the developers have spent a great deal of effort ensuring each vehicle stays reasonably true to the capabilities of its real life counterparts, and it shows in the gameplay; going against an M1IP in a rotting Soviet tank is as unforgiving as it sounds.”
    • “The game strikes a great balance between realism and enjoyable gameplay, making it accessible yet challenging.”
    • “So when the solution to situations like engaging an enemy only to have my allies sitting behind a hill picking their nose or mindlessly following a waypoint while getting destroyed one by one is me having to personally go to the map and stop it from happening, the gameplay becomes overwhelming and exhausting.”
    • “Despite the base mechanics being very much there and the massive potential I see in a true sim-lite, I can't recommend with the quality of the maps, missions, and AI being just poor across the board in the current state of the game.”
    • “At the moment there is no actual gameplay here other than drive to a waypoint, shoot some targets or die and watch your other assets do the same.”
  • graphics
    320 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's graphics provide detailed and realistic tank models with impressive visual effects like explosions, smoke, and ballistics, creating an immersive Cold War-era atmosphere. However, many users note that the visuals feel somewhat dated and comparable to older titles, with limited environmental detail and lack of destructible elements. Additionally, the game is graphically demanding with performance and optimization issues, especially on mid-range or older hardware, though continued updates show improvements over time.

    • “The visuals are stunning, with highly detailed tanks and immersive environments that pull you right into the battlefield.”
    • “The graphics are excellent from accurate gunsights to the detail of targets brewing up in the distance.”
    • “The graphics are good especially the effects of a shell hitting a tank; the sparks are better than in most big games like War Thunder.”
    • “Graphics are bad, sounds even worse, controls are awful and AI is just horrible.”
    • “Overall this is a good game don't get me wrong but please use a better graphic engine and optimize the game, I can't believe my RTX 3080 struggles to run the game on medium settings.”
    • “The graphics are dated, maybe they would have looked okay in 2012 but they are not even close to Arma 3 and that has been around for 9 years.”
  • optimization
    237 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Optimization for this game is consistently reported as poor, with many users experiencing stuttering, low FPS, crashes, and heavy CPU usage even on high-end systems. While some improvements have been made over time, performance issues remain a significant drawback, especially on mid to low-end PCs, and users suggest that further optimization is crucial before full release. The developers are aware and working on these problems, but currently, the game demands robust hardware and can be frustrating due to its suboptimal performance.

    • “It is surprisingly well optimized for an early access game and should run on most computers.”
    • “Devs put effort into optimization; game install is under 9 GB and runs very nicely on a GTX 1660.”
    • “Overall I greatly enjoy this game; it is pretty well optimized since I can run it on my old laptop, and there is a ton of content.”
    • “Its been around 5 years since this game has been out and it's completely unplayable due to horrible optimization meaning that every mission has a chance of bricking your PC and every single time you want to do anything the game freezes; it just isn't good, it runs poorly, and it can't be played well.”
    • “The game's performance is pretty universally poor in my experience, generally hovering around 40fps when nothing is happening and dropping to brutal mid-teens and below if anything happens on screen like smoke, weapons fire, etc. Loading times are strangely long and crashes are not infrequent.”
    • “Optimization remains abysmal.”
  • music
    68 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's music receives high praise for its dynamic, immersive, and emotionally resonant soundtrack that adapts to in-game intensity, enhancing the gritty wartime atmosphere. The original score, particularly the standout track "1985," is lauded as exceptional and integral to the game's immersion, effectively conveying tension and urgency without overpowering gameplay. Coupled with authentic voice acting, the soundtrack is considered one of the strongest and most impactful aspects of the experience.

    • “The soundtrack in this game is amazing, from the menu music to the in-game tracks that transition from calm to intense combat. '1985' is my favorite menu song to listen to.”
    • “The music dynamically rises and falls, adding drums and changing tone in reaction to your current situation, enhancing immersion and adrenaline during firefights.”
    • “The soundtrack fits the game's setting perfectly, incorporating grim and solemn beats that escalate into stressful drumming during combat to create a sense of urgency without being heroic.”
    • “The soundtrack's limited to the extent of dynamic sounds keeping up with the action pace and there's also radio communication for voice acting.”
    • “No music, no story, just an armored force attacked your platoon.”
    • “Honestly, you guys did not have to go so hard on the soundtrack.”
  • grinding
    55 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is widely praised for eliminating grinding, offering immediate access to tanks and gameplay without tedious unlocks or microtransactions common in similar titles like War Thunder and World of Tanks. Players appreciate its balance of realism and fun, allowing casual and simulation fans to enjoy tank combat without long, repetitive progression or pay-to-win mechanics. This "no grinding" approach is seen as a major positive, making the game refreshing and accessible compared to grind-heavy competitors.

    • “This is a tank sim in the vein of Steel Beasts, not an arcade tank game like War Thunder or World of Tanks. There is no grinding to unlock what you want to play; it's all at your fingertips.”
    • “A fantastic 80s Cold War tank sim without the BS: no grinding, unlocks, or premium shells—just a fantastic tank game.”
    • “There is no grinding for hours to get the vehicle you want only to be met with insanely high in-game costs.”
    • “Tired of semi-realistic tank sims requiring decades of grinding to play the tanks you actually want - only to find that realism got sacrificed for "balance" and "game-play" reasons?”
    • “These two "free to play" games also have predatory "pay to progress" models if you don't wish to suffer months or years of grinding for experience points to "unlock" or "upgrade" your vehicles to a worthwhile state.”
    • “True this is not War Thunder which has an entire development team dedicated to making content for it but I'll say the team of GHPC have realized that the quantity over quality approach of War Thunder nowadays has really been grinding people gears along with the endless grind driving people insane.”
  • replayability
    49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Replayability is generally praised due to unique, customizable missions, dynamic campaigns with randomness, and a wide variety of scenarios often playable from multiple sides. While early access status means some content is limited and the campaign mode is still developing, frequent updates, mods, and customization options significantly enhance long-term replay value. Some users note a lack of mission dynamism and basic objectives as drawbacks, but overall the gameplay’s depth and active developer support contribute to a high replayability score.

    • “From the missions I have done so far, all of them played out differently which makes replayability really good.”
    • “The replayability is quite good on most of these missions, especially since they let you customize the mission once you've beaten it.”
    • “Comes with a huge range of scenarios - many of which can be played from both sides and/or at night gives the game a great deal of replayability.”
    • “Very fun gameplay, currently lacking content and replayability but it is still in early access after all.”
    • “There is a dynamic campaign, but it is still extremely barebones almost 2 years later and as such the game suffers in long term replayability.”
    • “Lacks replayability and the AI is scuffed, they either miss all their shots or you're pegged as soon as you start the mission.”
  • stability
    42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game’s stability is inconsistent, with frequent reports of bugs, freezes, occasional crashes, and AI glitches, especially during missions and instant play scenarios. While some players find it playable and enjoyable despite minor issues, others experience significant instability and poor optimization that hampers gameplay. Overall, its early access status means stability is still a major work in progress.

    • “It's very bug-free at the moment, very replayable with a wide mission set.”
    • “On Steam Deck you'll need to lower some graphics settings, as expected, but other than that it runs great.”
    • “It's perfect for middle-class PCs and runs great even though I have a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 1080.”
    • “It's been around 5 years since this game has been out and it's completely unplayable due to the horrible optimization, meaning that every mission has a chance of bricking your PC and every single time you want to do anything the game freezes. It just isn't good, it runs poorly, and it can't be played well.”
    • “I get to the main menu, click on anything, and the game instantly crashes to desktop or freezes.”
    • “Instant missions are buggy messes relying on finicky waypoints, 'gotcha' placements of enemies and a kill registration system that is so half-baked it's not even been put in the oven yet.”
  • atmosphere
    27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its gritty, tense, and immersive wartime feel, enhanced by realistic crew voice acting that dynamically reflects combat intensity. Players highlight the authentic sound design, suspenseful moments, and detailed visuals that collectively create a uniquely compelling armored warfare experience. This strong atmospheric focus effectively captures the chaos, panic, and strategic tension of tank combat, setting it apart from other sims.

    • “It’s atmosphere is very gritty and suspenseful as depending on your situation, your crew can be very calm or they can be heard panicking and shouting at each other if you are taking fire or an enemy tank is looking at you.”
    • “The game nails a gritty wartime atmosphere with mostly realistic TC callouts which also get more stressed as your situation gets more intense, and the soundtrack (though not the main focus) is incredibly good.”
    • “Detailed, unique, and an atmosphere I haven't found anywhere else (I will never forget my guys panicking going 'left left left!' and 'kill it!' when I was surrounded).”
    • “The game focuses so much on the atmosphere and voice lines, and yet there is not a single one related to your team.”
    • “Atmosphere is ok.”
    • “The atmosphere is... well, it's one thing to watch it.”
  • humor
    18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is highlighted by amusing easter egg missions, comical AI tank behaviors, and entertaining crew reactions, such as panicked screams. Players also enjoy playful in-game banter and lighthearted moments like jokes about tank rivalries. While some situations can be less funny, overall the humor adds charm and immersion to the experience.

    • “There are some funny easter egg missions as well.”
    • “The hatred for the Abrams is also incredibly funny along with the constant coping about it not being the best tank in the game.”
    • “Crews are kinda hilarious when panicking, screaming their lungs out :D. In general, sounds work and do their job.”
  • monetization
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is praised for its fair and realistic monetization, offering a one-time purchase with no microtransactions, grind, or pay-to-win mechanics. Unlike many free-to-play tank games, it avoids predatory practices such as loot boxes, preorder bonuses, or gimmicks, focusing instead on genuine content updates and player experience. Players appreciate the developers' transparency and commitment to adding value without exploiting monetization schemes.

    • “No monetization gimmicks -- no preorder bonuses, no FOMO items, no Twitch drop BS.”
    • “All for a one-time purchase with no grind or microtransactions.”
    • “In a world of feature creep and increasing tendency to fall into a cycle of using microtransactions to fund fluff, which then serves to obtain more microtransactions, it's nice to be able to pay once for a game and know right away what you're getting.”
    • “Predatory monetization, unfair balance changes, terrible servers, pay-to-win mechanics... us online tankers saw it all, long before most other gamers experienced it.”
    • “Get this game if you are tired of the monetization scheme of free-to-play tank games, don't mind a more realistic approach (compared to other tank games like AW, WoT, WT), and understand what early access means.”
    • “I tried a couple of the multiplayer arena loot chest cash grabs, but they just didn't do it for me.”
  • emotional
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game delivers a surprisingly strong emotional impact through its immersive sound design, voice acting, and character interactions, making intense missions feel emotionally taxing and nostalgic. Despite mediocre graphics, the emotional depth and crew dynamics create a compelling and often touching experience.

    • “You get a loader named Steve, who panics when you forget to tell him which shell you want, and a driver who apparently graduated from the 'blindfolded go-kart academy.' Every mission feels like a test — not of skill, but of your willingness to embrace emotional damage.”
    • “Sound effects and audio — especially the voice acting — are absolutely top notch and help to give you a sense of the significant emotional event that the crew is currently processing.”
    • “You almost feel emotionally exhausted and gloomy after a super intense mission.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Gunner, HEAT, PC!

14h Median play time
67h Average play time
4-100h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 13 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Gunner, HEAT, PC!

Games Like Gunner, HEAT, PC!

Tank Squad Image
76%393reviews

Tank Squad

2025Tactical Shooter
PCWindows
Games like Tank Squad
Project Gunship Image
77%678reviews

Project Gunship

2022Tactical Shooter
PCWindows
Games like Project Gunship
Sea Power : Naval Combat in the Missile Age Image
90%4.7kreviews

Sea Power : Naval Combat in the Missile Age

2024Tactical Real-time Strategy
PCWindows
Games like Sea Power : Naval Combat in the Missile Age
WARNO Image
83%11.8kreviews

WARNO

2024Tactical Turn-based Strategy
PCWindows
Games like WARNO
Regiments Image
88%1.2kreviews

Regiments

2022Tactical Real-time Strategy
PCWindows
Games like Regiments
More games like Gunner, HEAT, PC!
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Gunner, HEAT, PC! is a tactical shooter game with warfare and historical themes.

Gunner, HEAT, PC! is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 67 hours playing Gunner, HEAT, PC!.

Gunner, HEAT, PC! was released on September 6, 2022.

Gunner, HEAT, PC! was developed by Radian Simulations LLC.

Gunner, HEAT, PC! has received very positive reviews from players. Most players liked Gunner, HEAT, PC! for its story but disliked it for its optimization.

Gunner, HEAT, PC! is a single player game.

Similar games include Tank Squad, Project Gunship, Sea Power : Naval Combat in the Missile Age, WARNO, Regiments and others.