Skip to main content

About

"Guardians of Orion" is a Sci-Fi Action RPG Looter Shooter that takes place in The New Solar System of Rigel, where Ion Crystals provide renewable energy. Players can explore the open world and battle against robots and dinosaurs in cooperative gameplay, utilizing an array of weapons, gear, and abilities. The game features unique skill trees, multiple perspectives, and an emphasis on survival and harvesting resources.

Guardians of Orion screenshot
Guardians of Orion screenshot
Guardians of Orion screenshot
Guardians of Orion screenshot
Guardians of Orion screenshot
Guardians of Orion screenshot
Guardians of Orion screenshot
Guardians of Orion screenshot
Guardians of Orion screenshot
Guardians of Orion screenshot
Guardians of Orion screenshot
+49

51%
Audience ScoreBased on 4,866 reviews
gameplay180 positive mentions
story32 negative mentions

  • The game offers a unique blend of gameplay with different perspectives (FPS, TPS, and top-down) and is fun to play with friends.
  • For the price of $0.99, it provides decent graphics and enjoyable mechanics, making it a good value for casual gaming.
  • The developers are actively working on updates and improvements, showing commitment to the game's future.
  • The game suffers from poor optimization, leading to lag and crashes, making it frustrating to play.
  • Many players have reported losing their progress and items due to resets, causing dissatisfaction within the community.
  • The game has a very low player base, making it difficult to find matches and diminishing the overall experience.
  • gameplay
    632 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting its simplicity and repetitiveness, often comparing it unfavorably to its predecessor, Orion: Prelude. While some appreciate the easy-to-learn mechanics and cooperative elements, others criticize the lack of depth, grindy progression, and numerous bugs that detract from the overall experience. Overall, the game offers a basic shooting experience with potential for improvement, but many feel it falls short of expectations, especially in terms of content and gameplay variety.

    • “Fun, challenging gameplay that is worth the price.”
    • “Good gameplay, good music, good graphics, good sandbox, good class system, good upgrading and progressing system, good emphasis on teamwork when playing co-op, good almost everything.”
    • “The gameplay is fun and offers 3 different view modes to play which are top down, third person over the shoulder and first person.”
    • “The gameplay overall is pretty broken and grindy.”
    • “The gameplay is not good at best, the architectures make no sense, lots of error messages...”
    • “The gameplay is repetitive, the sound effects are generic and you'll probably have heard them in various other media such as games and movies, the graphics are a really bad joke, even on the 'super high' preset the game looks worse than a lot of 10+ year old games.”
  • graphics
    564 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with some players praising the stunning visuals and improvements over its predecessor, while others criticize the optimization and performance issues, leading to a lackluster experience. Many users noted that while the graphics can be impressive, they are often marred by bugs, blurriness, and poor frame rates, especially on lower-end systems. Overall, the game showcases potential in its visual design but struggles with execution and consistency.

    • “This game has gorgeous graphics, animations, transitions.”
    • “Overall, Guardians of Orion is one of the most visually impressive games I have ever played, and I have nothing but praise for its impeccable graphical fidelity.”
    • “For $2 this is a steal, I almost feel bad for getting this game for this price because on a graphical level it's beautiful, it runs moderately well and it's a fun game with some new ideas.”
    • “This is a game from the end of 2015, the graphics are horrendous even on super high settings; it reminds me of Far Cry 1 or Halo 1.”
    • “The gameplay is repetitive, the sound effects are generic, and you'll probably have heard them in various other media such as games and movies; the graphics are a really bad joke, even on the 'super high' preset the game looks worse than a lot of 10+ year old games.”
    • “Extremely disappointed in this game; it looked like a really good FPS, but it turns out it's just a poorly made shooter. The price may be cheap, but it is not worth anyone's time. The animations are terrible and all the graphics are clunky. I have a rig that's more than enough for this game, but it doesn't run smoothly; I also feel the graphics seem to be lacking, and it also freezes frequently for me, making the game unplayable.”
  • story
    294 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is widely criticized for being either nonexistent or poorly executed, with many players noting a lack of meaningful narrative progression and repetitive mission structures. While some mention a convoluted backstory presented in a brief cutscene, the gameplay primarily revolves around monotonous fetch quests and combat without any substantial lore or character development. Overall, players express a strong desire for a more engaging and coherent story to enhance the gaming experience.

    • “Moral of the story: you never know what life has in store for you, and if I had given up when all odds were against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
    • “I'm excited for story-driven content happening later, I'm excited for mecha, and I'm excited for the expanding of the overall universe with space travel and star systems and all of it.”
    • “What I want to see is the developers focusing more on lore, story, and unique features.”
    • “At first glance, there are quests, spaceships, and much more... but all that's actually there is the same mission over and over.”
    • “The story is over-complicated and feels like nothing is connected at all and it just happened.”
    • “What this game badly needs is more story.”
  • optimization
    246 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting poor performance, low frame rates, and high resource utilization even on capable hardware. While some updates have aimed to improve optimization, the consensus is that significant issues remain, making the game unplayable for many users. Overall, players express frustration over the lack of effective optimization, which detracts from the gameplay experience.

    • “The optimization is fantastic.”
    • “The most recent update improved both the visual quality and the performance.”
    • “It not only has been optimized (reducing the graphic strain that it had at first) but it's now faster and better organized, with new classes, more variety and it's become a really fun online coop game now.”
    • “The optimization is really bad. I landed in the forest with no enemies in sight and I was getting just above 60 fps on 1440p with an RTX 2080 and R7 3700X. My GPU was fully tilting at 97-99% utilization, however, the game was only using 2.4GB of VRAM. Really weird stuff.”
    • “I could stand the bad graphics for the era and pretend the game was from 2008 or something, but the horrible optimization put me off. I don't know how people could handle this game when it released.”
    • “Even after nearly one year in early access, the game is woefully unoptimized.”
  • music
    150 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising its epic quality and ability to enhance gameplay, particularly during boss battles, while others criticize it for being too loud or not fitting the game's theme. Many appreciate the soundtrack's nostalgic feel, likening it to popular titles like "Phantasy Star Online" and "Linkin Park," but some find it generic or repetitive. Overall, while the music is generally well-received, there are calls for more variety and better integration with the game's atmosphere.

    • “The music makes the game more relaxing at times, and it really fits the mood of the event at hand.”
    • “I love the music; it sounds epic and fits the game very well.”
    • “The soundtrack is great and really gets the blood pumping as you destroy waves of dinosaurs and robots.”
    • “This game is dead as hell, and on top of that even worse than the previous game, might get some entertainment for maybe 5 seconds in the main lobby which blasts you with absolute dogshit music.”
    • “Music is like some low grade wannabe cyberpunk music, and the loot boxes are well kinda greedy looking on the developer.”
    • “Tl:dr should've been a different perspective, very dull, bad enemy movesets, dumb AI, unbalanced both ways seemingly at random, music isn't great.”
  • stability
    150 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and performance issues that hinder gameplay. Many users experience frequent freezes, movement glitches, and problems with the tutorial and multiplayer modes, leading to a frustrating experience. While some players acknowledge that the game is in early access and may improve over time, the current state is deemed too unstable for a satisfying experience.

    • “The game runs great on an old i7 3.2 with a GTX 560m and 16 GB of RAM.”
    • “It runs great on my GTX 970, so no framerate issues.”
    • “Pros: runs awesome - no glitches for me so far and running max everything.”
    • “Game is officially dead, as of Jan 3, 2018, devs declared to not produce any more content. The game is in pre-alpha state and buggy, laggy, and barebones; it could have become something, though.”
    • “Extremely disappointed in this game. It looked like a really good FPS, but it turns out it's just a poorly made shooter. The price may be cheap, but it is not worth anyone's time. The animations are terrible, all the graphics are clunky, and it frequently freezes, making the game unplayable.”
    • “Not to mention the game is buggy as all hell, has had stolen assets, the developer trash talks his customers with insults and threats, the game doesn't have features it claims it does, in-game currency and progress has reset multiple times without warning; the list goes on and on.”
  • grinding
    108 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players finding it excessively tedious and repetitive. Users report that progression relies heavily on grinding for levels and equipment, often leading to boredom and frustration, especially when playing solo. While some enjoy the grind as part of the gameplay experience, the lack of variety and the need for constant farming have made it a significant drawback for many.

    • “The game was fun for a while but then when you realize it's just repetitive grinding after the first few hours, it's really boring.”
    • “This game makes grinding a nightmare.”
    • “If you want to play this remember that it'll get boring real quick because it's basically the same thing over and over again, grinding for levels and items your level and when you level up going to a higher difficulty and doing it again until you reach the highest level.”
  • monetization
    92 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as exploitative, with numerous players labeling it a "cash grab" due to excessive microtransactions and the necessity to purchase character classes and other features. Many reviewers express frustration over the game's unfinished state and the feeling that monetization takes precedence over gameplay quality, leading to a negative overall experience. Overall, the sentiment is that the game's monetization tactics detract significantly from its enjoyment and fairness.

    • “It has microtransactions so you can unlock things faster, but it's not necessary.”
    • “Better graphics, easy to earn cosmetic microtransactions for free, friendly community.”
    • “This game appears to be purely for microtransactions not to win that I can tell at this point but probably just fashion and that cool.”
    • “What started off as a fun 99 cent 4 person arcade game that was fun to play with friends for the lolz has turned into a severely broken and half-baked Frankenstein of a game riddled with inflated price tags, microtransactions, and broken promises.”
    • “Currently it feels like everyone jumped ship and turned this game into a cash grab.”
    • “Eventually this game will be free-to-play, but since we have to buy the game, the inclusion of in-game purchases feels unfair.”
  • replayability
    38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's replayability is a mixed bag; while some players find it enjoyable with various gameplay elements and co-op options that enhance replay value, others criticize the lack of content and progression systems, deeming it less likely to offer long-term engagement. Titles like "Guardians of Orion" are highlighted for their high replayability due to diverse character options and frequent updates, but overall, many suggest waiting for further development before fully committing.

    • “There's a lot of gameplay elements in this game that add up to make a thoroughly enjoyable and replayable experience.”
    • “Guardians of Orion offers a lot of playability with all the different guardians to max out.”
    • “Outstanding game, great replayability!”
    • “As far as I can tell, any and all sense of progression in this game is now unavailable because of this, seeing as you can now only do offline/couch co-op singular games with no leveling system (though I might be wrong on that, this game runs like actual trash so it's hard to tell) to give the game any sense of replay value.”
    • “That being said, small team or not, replayability isn't 'likely' at all; the amount of content given is little to none at best.”
    • “Sure, if you want something mindless and know that it's abandonware; but there are complete games on Steam that have far more replayability and far more active support that you can get for $2-5; so why not get one of those games and support those developers instead of these creeps?”
  • humor
    30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is largely appreciated, with players finding the quirky animations, unexpected bugs, and absurd scenarios—like battling dinosaurs and robots—hilariously entertaining, especially in multiplayer settings. While some elements may frustrate players, such as the game's bugs and lack of narrative coherence, these aspects often contribute to the overall comedic experience. Dialogs and voice lines from previous installments add to the humor, making for a fun and lighthearted gameplay atmosphere.

    • “The game is a little buggy, but the bugs are funny!”
    • “No story or basis why for some reason dinosaurs and robots want to kill you (personally find it hilarious).”
    • “Killed several robots with a flamethrower while laughing like an insane madman.”
  • emotional
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviewers express disappointment with the current emotional engagement of the game, describing it as repetitive and lacking depth. They desire a more immersive experience characterized by thrilling combat, heartfelt visuals, and well-developed mechanics, suggesting that the game needs further development to achieve this emotional impact.

    • “I want an unforgettable experience, thrilling combat, heartfelt visuals, and interesting, thought-out game mechanics.”
  • character development
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in the game is noted for its blend of World of Warcraft-inspired loot and design, though it suffers from inconsistent character designs and visibility issues. Despite these shortcomings, players still find the game enjoyable and recommend it for its unique gameplay experience.

    • “Despite the cheap UI, laggy servers, inconsistent character designs, and hard-to-spot enemies, I still recommend it as a game worth trying.”
    • “This game is the perfect mix of a simple World of Warcraft-like loot and character design, with the gameplay of Nazi Zombies.”
  • atmosphere
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is significantly undermined by a confusing hub map that detracts from immersion, as players find themselves frustrated by navigation challenges and a lack of engaging characters.

    • “Any atmosphere it tries to create is ruined when you spend 10 minutes trying to navigate the mess that is the hub map to get to some person you can't possibly care about.”

Buy Guardians of Orion

4h Median play time
8h Average play time
2-8h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 12 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Guardians of Orion

ORION: Prelude Image
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Image
Second Extinction Image
This game contains adult content
Fragmented Image
Nether Image
Minimum ImageMinimum ImageMinimum Image
PAYDAY 3 Image
GRAV Image
Dungeon Defenders II Image
Project Genom Image