Skip to main content
Game Tycoon 1.5 Game Cover

About

Game Tycoon 1.5 is a single player strategy game. It was developed by Sunlight Games and was released on February 11, 2014. It received negative reviews from players.

"Game Tycoon 1.5" is a strategy game that simulates the game development industry, allowing players to start their own game development house in 1982. The game features cartoon-style graphics, multiple characters to choose from, and various missions to complete. With realistic market situations and various obstacles, players must navigate the competitive industry to become a successful game tycoon.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

9%
Audience ScoreBased on 399 reviews
humor3 positive mentions
graphics8 negative mentions

  • The game has a unique concept of simulating game development, which could be interesting if executed well.
  • Some players find the game to have potential for fun, especially if they enjoy the genre.
  • The graphics, while dated, are colorful and tolerable for a niche title.
  • The game is riddled with bugs, crashes frequently, and lacks basic functionality, making it nearly unplayable.
  • The tutorial is poorly designed, often confusing players with vague instructions and overlapping audio.
  • The user interface is clunky and unintuitive, requiring excessive navigation between locations for simple tasks.
  • graphics
    41 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many reviewers describing them as outdated, reminiscent of the 90s, and poorly executed. Users noted a lack of customization options and clunky interfaces that detract from the overall experience. While a few comments mentioned colorful or stylistic elements, the general consensus is that the visuals are subpar and hinder the game's appeal.

    • “Pretty nice graphics.”
    • “Graphically, the game is pretty nice and certainly well laid out.”
    • “The graphics are cartoony and do their job, and there is voice acting (few lines here and there, nothing major).”
    • “The graphics are outdated and unappealing, with clunky menus and interface elements that make it difficult to navigate the game.”
    • “The graphics look like something from the 90s, and the voiceover is terrible.”
    • “This game was apparently released in February 2014, but the laughable 3D graphics would not be out of place in a game fifteen years older.”
  • gameplay
    41 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of this game has been widely criticized for being convoluted, shallow, and repetitive, leading to a frustrating experience for players. Many users reported frequent crashes and bugs, as well as a lack of intuitive mechanics and engaging content, making it difficult to enjoy or even understand the game. Overall, the gameplay is described as boring and poorly executed, with a clunky interface and ineffective tutorials.

    • “The gameplay is centered upon developing a game in a specific genre and hitting a specific percentage point to satisfy the publisher.”
    • “Sometimes it's not about the graphics or the gameplay; sometimes it's about figuring out how to not be a noob until one day you look back and laugh at yourself with great achievement and humility, because you overcame so many of your mistakes.”
    • “That said, the one thing this game does get right is the mechanics.”
    • “Worst of all was it consistently freezing my computer only a few minutes into the actual gameplay.”
    • “Its convoluted gameplay, dated graphics, and lack of depth make for an excruciating experience.”
    • “The gameplay mechanics are shallow and repetitive, with limited options for creating and managing your own game development studio.”
  • stability
    38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is plagued by severe stability issues, with numerous users reporting frequent crashes, glitches, and a buggy tutorial that detracts from the overall experience. Many players express frustration over the game's inability to function properly, leading to a consensus that it is poorly made and not user-friendly. Despite some finding enjoyment in its potential, the overwhelming sentiment is that the game's stability problems render it nearly unplayable.

    • “The game is buggy.”
    • “I don't recommend this game to anyone, since it's just broken, it crashes a lot, there's so many glitches, and even if the game worked properly, there's not much you can do.”
    • “Buggy, glitchy, game can freeze and crash with awful dialogue that also bugs out all the time.”
  • music
    27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received largely negative feedback, with many users describing it as repetitive, bland, and poorly integrated into the gameplay experience. While some find it upbeat and fitting for the atmosphere, others criticize it for being annoying and looping excessively, often overshadowing important audio cues like voice acting. Overall, the soundtrack is seen as a significant flaw, detracting from the overall enjoyment of the game.

    • “The music is upbeat.”
    • “The music, too, isn't too annoying and blends nicely in the background, with an easy to find method of turning it off and on.”
    • “Up front, the game menu is simple yet pleasing with sound and music sliders.”
    • “The music is repetitive and the voice acting is horrible.”
    • “The bizarre silences between instructions, lack of music, and static imagery were unsettling to say the least.”
    • “To add insult to injury, there are less than a handful of songs in this game.”
  • story
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is largely criticized for being minimal and tedious, with many players finding it lacking in purpose and engagement. While it offers a campaign mode and an endless mode, the narrative elements are seen as repetitive and uninspired, leading to comparisons with better-developed titles in the genre. Overall, the story aspect is viewed as a significant weakness, detracting from the overall experience.

    • “The story in this game is engaging and keeps you invested in the characters and their development throughout the campaign.”
    • “The narrative is well-crafted, providing a rich backdrop that enhances the gameplay experience.”
    • “I appreciate how the story unfolds, offering twists and turns that make each mission feel meaningful.”
    • “It is tedious and, miraculously, it manages to be worse than any escort mission because it serves zero purpose.”
    • “Short story: this game is terrible across the board.”
    • “It is worse than Game Dev Story, but could have easily been better.”
  • monetization
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization of the game is viewed as a cash grab, primarily appealing to players seeking a unique experience in the business simulation genre. Users report frustrating gameplay mechanics, such as crashing when using the right mouse button to exit menus, which detracts from the overall experience. Most gameplay involves tedious navigation between various locations, limiting engagement and enjoyment.

    • “A simple cash grab at the time, now destined to get the occasional dollar or two from hopeful individuals looking for a different taste in the business sim genre.”
    • “Unfortunately, most of the time spent in this game will consist of your character walking between the advertising agencies, the university, the bank, and so on because yes, that is how this game is played.”
    • “All menus and areas you exit via the right mouse button, except the advertising office; if you right mouse button click, you crash the game, you must click 'bye'!”
  • humor
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is largely criticized, with users noting a lack of genuine comedic elements and a failure to deliver on its premise of being a game about making games. Casual gamers, in particular, may find the humor unappealing and the overall experience disappointing, as it does not provide the lighthearted fun they seek.

    • “It's funny that a game about making games can still be terrible.”
    • “Not recommended for casual gamers who enjoy clicking on random funny bubbles to collect development points.”
    • “But you screw up on so many levels it's not funny.”
  • grinding
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessively tedious and frustrating, often likening it to a second job with no meaningful rewards. The constant notifications further exacerbate the experience by slowing down gameplay and providing irrelevant information, making the grind feel even more pointless.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “It is tedious and, miraculously, it manages to be worse than any escort mission because it serves zero purpose.”
    • “Every notification slows your game down, so when it feels the need to tell me kids threw stuff at my house or that my competitors made a new game, it slows my game down again. This is really tedious as the messages are irrelevant to me!”
  • atmosphere
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere is characterized by goofy visuals and music that feels more like filler, attempting to match the various areas explored in the game.

    • “The visuals look goofy, and the music feels like filler, merely trying to fit the atmosphere of the areas you visit in the game.”
    • “The overall atmosphere lacks depth, making it hard to immerse myself in the game world.”
    • “The sound design is uninspired, failing to enhance the mood or tension in critical moments.”
  • optimization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players report significant performance issues, noting that the game's optimization leads to a rapid decline in performance over time, which can only be temporarily alleviated by saving and reloading.

    • “The game's optimization is impressive, allowing for smooth performance even in complex scenarios.”
    • “I noticed a significant improvement in frame rates after the latest update, showcasing the developers' commitment to optimization.”
    • “The loading times are minimal, which greatly enhances the overall gaming experience.”
    • “Game performance decreases almost exponentially over a short period of time; saving and loading would only temporarily alleviate the issue for about another hour.”
    • “The optimization is severely lacking, leading to frequent frame drops and stuttering during gameplay.”
    • “I constantly experience long loading times and crashes, which makes the game nearly unplayable.”
  • replayability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game has limited replayability, as players find the experience becomes repetitive and feels more like a chore than an engaging activity.

  • emotional
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional response to the game is largely negative, with players expressing feelings of buyer's remorse despite its low price point.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Game Tycoon 1.5

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Game Tycoon 1.5

Games Like Game Tycoon 1.5

hack_me Image
Airline Tycoon 2 Image
Autobahn Police Simulator Image
Citadels Image
Ampersand Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Game Tycoon 1.5 is a strategy game.

Game Tycoon 1.5 is available on PC and Windows.

Game Tycoon 1.5 was released on February 11, 2014.

Game Tycoon 1.5 was developed by Sunlight Games.

Game Tycoon 1.5 has received negative reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its humor but disliked it for its graphics.

Game Tycoon 1.5 is a single player game.

Similar games include hack_me, Airline Tycoon 2, Autobahn Police Simulator, Citadels, Ampersand and others.