"Fossilfuel 2" is a survival horror game set in a flooded underground base overrun by dinosaurs. As Jack Allen, players will navigate dynamic sandbox levels, battling dinosaurs with a wide range of weapons and solving puzzles. Gameplay incorporates scuba gear for underwater exploration, with the goal of draining water and creating safe zones.
The game offers a fun and engaging experience with a mix of survival horror and action elements, reminiscent of classic titles like Resident Evil and Dino Crisis.
It features a variety of dinosaurs and enemies, good graphics powered by Unreal Engine 5, and a decent level of atmosphere that keeps players on edge.
The game has good replay value with multiple endings, a horde mode, and a sandbox mode, making it enjoyable for fans of the genre.
The game suffers from performance issues, including stuttering and lag, even on high-end systems, which can hinder gameplay and immersion.
Controls and mechanics can feel clunky and unrefined, particularly during platforming sections, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences.
There are numerous bugs and glitches, including issues with the save system and enemy AI, which detract from the overall enjoyment of the game.
gameplay
34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
64%
12%
The gameplay of the game is a mixed bag, featuring fun mechanics and enjoyable gunplay reminiscent of Resident Evil, but marred by user-unfriendly controls and basic AI. While it offers good replay value, multiple endings, and interesting features like a credit system and various game modes, many mechanics feel generic and the combat can be repetitive and poorly paced. Overall, it provides a fun experience but lacks depth and polish in execution.
“Pros - fun to play, good replay value, rich taste of Resident Evil references, good gunplay, splitting ways (OMG, I love this), 4 endings, intense boss fight, bullets cause real effects on animal body parts that got shot, realistic blood, realistic bullet impact (don't let PETA know about this), limited saves (ink ribbon mechanic), rank-score system at the end game.”
“It ran well, the gameplay was fun, and the story and soundtrack were pretty awesome!”
“Fossil Fuel 2 brings several significant improvements compared to its predecessor: better graphics (powered by Unreal Engine 5), more creatures (both fictional mutants and real-life extinct animals that are surprisingly accurate), less redundant weapons, better level design, and even more gameplay variety.”
“I have no idea the reason for this, but apart from that, the gaming mechanics and controls aren't very user-friendly.”
“Very basic pursuer mechanic implemented with terrible AI and janky, repetitive, poorly paced, unrewarding combat.”
“However, despite this, most of the mechanics are pretty generic overall, comparable to most other survival shooters.”
story
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
50%
14%
The game's story is generally easy to follow and features a familiar plot involving genetic experimentation with dinosaurs, though some players found it forgettable. While the narrative includes engaging elements and a mix of humor, it can be completed in under four hours, leading to mixed feelings about its depth. Overall, the atmosphere and gameplay enhance the experience, making it enjoyable despite its conventional storyline.
“It ran well, the gameplay was fun, and the story and soundtrack were pretty awesome!”
“Going to play this game until I finish it because the storyline is also good!”
“- the story unfortunately was relatively forgettable.”
“In essence, it's the usual plot of man creating dinosaurs with genetics, things go wrong, and you go in to retrieve the data.”
“You don't need to play Fossilfuel 1 to get into the story.”
atmosphere
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
35%
15%
The atmosphere of the game is generally well-received, with many players appreciating the immersive sound design and cohesive level layouts that enhance the horror experience. However, some critiques highlight a lack of variety and depth, as certain sections feel repetitive and could benefit from more spooky moments. Overall, while the game successfully creates a compelling ambiance, it struggles to maintain that intensity throughout.
“The game starts off great with a good atmosphere and cohesive level design.”
“It has great atmosphere and sounds to really get you feelin the creeps.”
“And speaking of ambience, mood and atmosphere, it almost looks like this game was made just for me!”
“The game has 2 finals which can extend the replay value on the last chapter but feels a bit rushed overall since the atmosphere of the game lacks more spooky moments.”
“Although there were admirable attempts to set atmosphere, the majority of this game features running through lifeless repetitive corridors and unfortunately it quickly became repetitive.”
“The atmosphere feels better, but the game lacks more spooky moments, making it feel a bit rushed overall.”
graphics
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
50%
21%
The graphics in "Fossil Fuel 2" have received praise for their significant improvements over the predecessor, utilizing Unreal Engine 5 to deliver a visually appealing experience with a mix of fictional and accurately depicted extinct creatures. While the game maintains a retro feel, it features solid performance and good graphics, contributing to an engaging gameplay experience despite its relatively short completion time. Overall, players appreciate the modern visuals alongside the nostalgic mechanics.
“Fossil Fuel 2 brings several significant improvements compared to its predecessor: better graphics (powered by Unreal Engine 5), more creatures (both fictional mutants and real-life extinct animals that are surprisingly accurate), less redundant weapons, better level design, and even more gameplay variety.”
“A mix between Resident Evil 2 mechanics with the faster and spooky dinosaurs of Turok, nice graphics and a funny story but took me less than 4 hours to complete it.”
“Despite the modern graphics, it remains faithful to a somewhat retro formula.”
“The graphics were fine, the performance was solid.”
“I wish computers were more like consoles built with features and ready to take on better graphics and ready to automatically update, but no, you have to do everything yourself and that's why consoles are better.”
optimization
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
25%
67%
The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with players experiencing significant stuttering and performance issues even on high-end hardware, such as a Core i9 and RTX 4080 Super. Many noted glitches, unrefined scenes, and inconsistent frame rates, particularly during platforming sections and boss fights, which detracted from the overall experience. While some improvements were observed in the latter half of the game, the overall performance management remains a concern, indicating a need for further refinement.
“The graphics were fine, the performance was solid.”
“The platforming section is made harder by the game stuttering if I turn around or jump too fast.”
“Cons - bad performance management (even though I use a Core i9 + 4080 Super) still got 60-70 fps at some parts, lots of unrefined scenes, lots of glitches, funny glitches, die during cut-scene, die in unexpected ways, destroyed objects come back to the same point and cause glitches. This game still needs more refinement.”
“The boss fights, so far, have sucked, the options menu asks me to apply settings even if nothing is changed and the performance is pretty poor in places when it really shouldn't be.”
replayability
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
30%
30%
The game offers a decent level of replayability, featuring multiple endings, various game modes like horde and sandbox, and a rank-score system that encourages players to revisit it. However, some players feel that the overall experience can feel rushed and lacks sufficient spooky moments, limiting the incentive to replay beyond the initial exploration of different endings and boss fights. Overall, it serves as a fun time-waster for casual gamers.
“Overall a fairly fun time-waster for a casual gamer, a decent degree of replayability and multiple game modes.”
“Good degree of replayability with its horde mode, primal mode, and sandbox mode.”
“Pros - fun to play, good replay value, rich taste of Resident Evil references, good gunplay, splitting ways (OMG, I love this), 4 endings, intense boss fight, bullets cause real effects on animal body parts that got shot, realistic blood, realistic bullet impact, limited saves (ink ribbon mechanic), rank-score system at the end game.”
“The game has 2 finals which can extend the replay value in the last chapter, but it feels a bit rushed overall since the atmosphere of the game lacks more spooky moments.”
“Only replay value is the fact you can get a couple of different end boss fights depending on your choice near the end, but otherwise not much (4 different endings of sorts from looking over the achievements).”
“Overall, a fairly fun time-waster for a casual gamer, but the replayability is limited despite having multiple game modes.”
stability
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game's stability is notably poor, with users reporting significant performance issues even on high-end hardware, frequent glitches, and a frustrating save system that can lead to being stuck. While some glitches are humorous, they detract from the overall experience, and many players feel the game lacks refinement and polish. Despite its compelling concept, the execution leaves much to be desired, resulting in a lackluster experience.
“There was a few glitches and bugs where I found myself being stuck and having to reload my save file, and I had a huge issue with a late game ladder just kicking me backwards instead of letting me go up it.”
“A compelling game ruined by an incredibly frustrating and buggy save game system.”
“Cons - bad performance management (even I use Core i9 + 4080 Super) still got 60-70 fps at some parts, lots of unrefined scenes, lots of glitches, funny glitches, die during cut-scene, die in an unexpected way, destroyed objects come back to the same point and cause glitches.”
humor
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized by a mix of intentional and unintentional comedic moments, such as funny glitches and unexpected deaths, which can elicit genuine laughter. However, some elements, like a cringe-worthy Russian accent and generic character designs, detract from the overall comedic experience. While there are amusing quips and a humorous storyline, the game's performance issues and lack of polish overshadow its comedic potential.
“A mix between Resident Evil 2 mechanics with the faster and spooky dinosaurs of Turok, nice graphics and a funny story.”
“There were some funny quips which gave me a giggle.”
“The squad leader drove our boat straight up into the megalodon's mouth, which was so funny; dying and the player can do nothing about it.”
music
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The music in the game has received high praise for its quality and integration, with users highlighting an impressive soundtrack and memorable easter egg songs, particularly the catchy "robo rex." Overall, the music enhances the gameplay experience and contributes positively to the game's atmosphere.
“It ran well, the gameplay was fun, and the story and soundtrack was pretty awesome!”
“Best easter egg song in a game ever, Robo Rex! Haha, ro ro Robo Rex!”
“The music when you first go into the silo is fantastic.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy in the game has been criticized for being overly aggressive, with ads being perceived as more threatening and disruptive than the actual gameplay elements. Players feel that the constant presence of ads detracts from the overall experience.