Feudalism

About

Feudalism is a single player strategy game. It was developed by Imagimotion and was released on June 14, 2016. It received negative reviews from players.

Conquer Europe, become an Emperor. Build your family’s dynasty through seven centuries, from 800 A.D. to 1492 A.D., up until the inevitable collapse of the feudal system.

Genres & Tags

Strategy

Play Modes

Single-Player

+10

Skip User Reviews

38%

Audience ScoreBased on 34 reviews

atmosphere1 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

Ambitious concept combining multi-generational dynasty management with grand strategy over centuries in medieval Europe.
Deep strategic systems including tech research, diplomacy, resource management, and family legacy that reward long-term planning.
Low system requirements and cross-platform support, with ongoing developer engagement and patches promising future improvements.

Clunky, unintuitive, and buggy interface with poor tutorials and confusing mechanics hinder accessibility and immersion.
Unstable performance with frequent crashes, low resolution assets, and technical issues detract from the experience.
Inconsistent AI behavior, repetitive gameplay pacing, and lack of polish make the game feel unfinished and less enjoyable.

gameplay
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
55%
27%
The gameplay offers deep administrative and strategic tasks but often feels static and repetitive due to cumbersome interfaces and limited visual or narrative engagement. While the concept of managing a medieval kingdom is compelling, inconsistent mechanics and lack of immersion may hinder sustained player interest. Some praise its complexity and clear UI, likening it to solid grand strategy simulations, though overall the gameplay experience is mixed.
- “A solid and complex simulation, with simple and easy gameplay, a clear user interface, and a really interesting setting.”
- “Each turn presents a set of administrative tasks—allocating resources, maintaining stability, and expanding influence—which supports strategic decision-making.”
- “Each turn presents a set of administrative tasks—allocating resources, maintaining stability, and expanding influence—but the mechanics that support these tasks can feel static.”
- “Many turns pass without notable change, and the repetition of similar tasks—maintaining farms, raising troops, arranging marriages—can make the experience feel mechanical.”
- “Its mechanical depth is often buried beneath cumbersome interfaces and inconsistent AI, yet its underlying concept—the struggle to preserve a family’s name across the ages—remains compelling.”
graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The graphics are generally considered outdated and unappealing, with many users finding the visuals and interface to prioritize functionality over clarity, resulting in an overall lackluster and sometimes frustrating experience.
- “The visuals are serviceable but dated, and the interface often feels designed for functionality rather than clarity.”
- “Bad graphics & steering, nice idea but done like it’s 1980... I gave it a tack to Steam and demanded a refund.”
- “Bad graphics too, the ideas of 'tables' for a region is ridiculous.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is generally poor, with frequent bugs and hangs reported by users, leading to frustration. While some minor UI glitches are present, they are less severe, but overall the game is considered unstable and problematic.
- “This is really a buggy, horrible, abandoned mess.”
- “Buggy keeps hanging, I want my money back.”
- “UI is confusing, buggy, and abysmal.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users praise the atmosphere of the game for effectively conveying a strong sense of scale and immersion, particularly in its depiction of feudal settings.
- “Where Feudalism does succeed is in its sense of scale and atmosphere.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story in this game offers rich historical detail rooted in feudalism, but it sometimes struggles to maintain engagement during gameplay, balancing depth with pacing challenges.
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is criticized for poor optimization, leading to subpar performance and potential issues on various systems.
- “It's so poorly optimized.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game shows strong potential for high replayability, with ongoing developer support suggesting future improvements that could enhance the overall experience.
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music is a constant feature in the game with no option provided to turn it off, which some users may find limiting.