Dr. Professor Scientist's Weapons Testing Facility
- March 7, 2022
- Cool Smithy Games
"Dr. Professor Scientist's Weapons Testing Facility" is a puzzle game where players choose their scientific discipline and build their dream weapon to survive enemy waves. With over 15 projectiles and 41 modifiers, players can create unique and powerful weapons to defeat their foes. The game now includes an extra puzzle game for additional challenges.
Reviews
Audience ScoreBased on 38 reviews
gameplay2 negative mentions
- The game offers a fun and addictive experience with tons of replayability and unique weapon combinations.
- It's a simple, casual game that is perfect for relaxing and killing time, making it a great value for its price.
- Players appreciate the variety of modifiers and the ability to create powerful builds, which adds depth to the gameplay.
- The game suffers from significant bugs and lag issues that can disrupt gameplay and lead to frustrating experiences.
- Many players feel that the RNG mechanics are overly punishing, making it difficult to progress and enjoy runs consistently.
- The game lacks polish in its UI and explanations, leaving players confused about mechanics and upgrades.
- gameplay3 mentions
- 33 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 67 % negative mentions
The gameplay features light gacha mechanics and a unique weapon system reminiscent of Noita, allowing players to create powerful builds through the accumulation of modifiers. While it aims to evoke certain familiar elements, the core gameplay loop diverges from traditional gacha experiences. Overall, it offers a fun and engaging experience with a focus on creativity and luck.
“Fun little game with some light gacha mechanics.”
“It's clearly meant to resemble that, but the actual gameplay loop is unrelated.”
“This game's weapon mechanic works a lot like the wands in Noita, where modifiers chronologically accumulate and crazy, overpowered builds can be created with some luck.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative