Cosmos Invictus

About

Cosmos Invictus is an engaging sci-fi strategic collectible card game (CCG) that's full of tactical elements not found in traditional TCGs or other online CCGs. We call it a "strategic CCG" because you must carefully position your Mechs in formations to counter your enemy. The game offers customizable spaceships, Pilots and Events that can alter the course of battle. It is true, pure, ha…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

38%

Audience ScoreBased on 47 reviews

gameplay8 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game has unique mechanics, such as formations and a fuel system, which add depth to the strategy.
The graphics and presentation are above average, with good card art and a solid user interface.
There is a strong developer presence in the community, indicating potential for future updates and improvements.

The game is heavily criticized for its pay-to-win model, making it difficult for free-to-play users to compete.
Many players report frustrating design choices, such as a convoluted fuel mechanic and unclear card abilities.
Connectivity issues and bugs have been a common complaint, leading to a poor overall experience for some players.

gameplay
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
39%
17%
The gameplay of the game features a mix of interesting mechanics, such as ship customization and battle formations, but is marred by a pay-to-win model and a tedious fuel system that detracts from the overall experience. While some players appreciate the unique aspects and potential for fun, many find the core mechanics unengaging and reminiscent of other games like Hearthstone, leading to a lack of enjoyment. Overall, the gameplay shows promise but requires significant refinement to enhance player experience.
- “Very nice and unique mechanics - formations, refuel, ship customization.”
- “Having pilots available at all times during the match prevents players from losing due to mana curve, and adds a whole new dynamic mechanically.”
- “Cosmos Invictus is a pretty promising sci-fi CCG with above average production quality and a plethora of unique mechanics.”
- “The fuel mechanic in this game is probably the most tedious mechanic I've ever come across in a CCG.”
- “I just didn't enjoy the base game mechanics.”
- “The game mechanics are mostly taken from Hearthstone (which is not bad), but it just isn't much fun.”
story
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
38%
38%
The story in the game is generally well-received, featuring a cool narrative that enhances the card game experience, with players divided into two factions, each offering unique missions and abilities. While some players feel the story is not essential to gameplay, many appreciate the depth it adds, alongside a robust player community and various challenges that tie into the overall narrative. Overall, the story contributes positively to the game's appeal, despite some players prioritizing gameplay mechanics over narrative elements.
- “Overall recommended because there is a good story, unique elements, good & active player community and as a CCG it has depth, it is about trying multiple strategies with your deck and change as your cards change.”
- “There are plenty of missions to carry out which are involved in the overall narrative and there are lots of challenges that can be completed in PvE for chunks of credits.”
- “This is only barely enough to defeat the final battle in the tutorial, and attempting your first mission with this deck will see you lose repeatedly.”
- “We don't need a 'story', just tell me how to play.”
- “Players are divided into two factions at the start, which both have their own sets of cards, missions, and abilities.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization of the game is widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with users expressing frustration over its pay-to-win mechanics and deeming it unworthy of investment.
- “It's a terrible cash grab.”
- “This game is a worthless cash grab.”
- “Don't spend any time on this pay-to-win cash grab.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics are generally considered decent, featuring great artwork that enhances the multi-tiered twist on a classic genre, supported by an active developer community.
- “They were able to place a multi-tiered twist on a classic genre, with great artwork, and an extremely active developer community.”
- “The graphics are decent, I guess.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music in the game is well-received, complementing the overall presentation with a fitting soundtrack that enhances the experience alongside crisp UI, impressive card art, and satisfying sound effects.
- “The presentation is solid - crisp UI, awesome card art, fitting music, satisfying sound effects, and animations that don't just consist of your card slamming into the enemy's card.”
- “The soundtrack perfectly complements the gameplay, enhancing the overall experience and immersing you in the game's world.”
- “Each track is thoughtfully composed, adding depth and emotion to every moment of the game.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game, particularly the fuel mechanic, to be excessively tedious and frustrating, detracting from the overall enjoyment of the collectible card game.
- “The fuel mechanic in this game is probably the most tedious mechanic I've ever come across in a collectible card game.”