Codename: Panzers - Cold War | Game Brain

About

Codename: Panzers - Cold War is a single player and multiplayer real-time strategy game with warfare and historical themes. It was developed by InnoGlow and was released on May 6, 2009. It received neutral reviews from critics and mostly positive reviews from players.

A major armed conflict is brewing between the Western powers and the Soviet bloc. The Red Army has been growing ever stronger since the end of World War II. With the growth of their army the Soviets realize that they hold the advantage, and are only waiting for the right moment to attack. That moment arrives with the Tempelhof Incident: the near-fatal collision of a US cargo plane and a Soviet fig…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

63%

Audience ScoreBased on 95 reviews

story4 positive mentions

optimization3 negative mentions

The game offers a unique setting in the early Cold War, featuring a variety of iconic vehicles and units that appeal to history enthusiasts.
Gameplay is engaging with a fun RTS style that includes a rock-paper-scissors mechanism and tactical decision-making.
Graphics and special effects are well-done for the game's age, contributing to an immersive experience despite some technical issues.

The game is plagued by frequent crashes and bugs, making it frustrating and often unplayable for many users.
AI pathfinding is poor, with units frequently getting stuck or failing to navigate effectively, leading to a lack of strategic depth.
The game lacks the variety and depth of its predecessors, with limited unit types and a storyline that feels rushed and poorly executed.

story
47 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
85%
6%
The story in "Codename Panzers: Cold War" has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it poorly executed and lacking depth compared to its predecessors. While the game features 18 interconnected missions, the narrative is often described as cringe-worthy and overly simplistic, focusing on a clichéd theme of American freedom versus the USSR. Additionally, the absence of voice-overs and poorly integrated cutscenes detract from the overall immersion, leaving players feeling that the story could have been significantly improved.
- “Set in an alternative timeline where things have been developed much earlier than our own, it still is a very good plot that brings about World War 3 and possibly nuclear armageddon.”
- “This is a pretty good game with a storyline fit for any freedom-loving person.”
- “The story is easy to follow, but could be a bit more motivating to play.”
- “The story in the first Panzers game was cringe and funny, the story in the second was lighthearted and alright, the story here is cringe and just plain bad.”
- “Then there's the story, which is so ridiculous that it becomes more painful to watch the longer you play.”
- “The ending of the plot doesn't make any sense, mostly because it's hastily wrapped up in a final cutscene that plays more like a quick-cut montage.”
graphics
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
71%
22%
7%
Overall, the graphics are generally praised for their quality, especially considering the game's age, with many noting impressive special effects and detailed visuals. However, some users mention performance issues at higher settings and criticize certain animations and effects as feeling unfinished. Despite these drawbacks, the graphics contribute positively to the gameplay experience, making it a visually appealing option for fans of the genre.
- “The graphics and special effects look great.”
- “The game's graphics and effects are really good for its age, with well-programmed AI (for example, if you want to shoot a repairing truck, it will try to go behind its allied tank to avoid hits).”
- “You should definitely give it a try; the graphics are awesome, and the gameplay is incredibly good.”
- “Everything seems so unfinished, starting from the unit animations, effects, sounds, and visuals - I could sadly write a long list about this.”
gameplay
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
56%
11%
33%
The gameplay is a mix of simple mechanics and strategic depth, appealing to fans of RTS games but potentially challenging for newcomers. While some find it fun and engaging, others describe it as barebones and lacking in complexity, with criticisms aimed at the voice acting and story. Overall, it offers a visually impressive experience with fast-paced action, though opinions on its value vary.
- “Simple premise, not many complicated mechanics, nothing not to love.”
- “You should definitely give it a try; the graphics are awesome, and the gameplay is incredibly good.”
- “Awesome RTS with Dawn of War 2 style, very good graphics, and fast-paced gameplay. Two factions, Soviets and Allies, go to a third world war in 1949.”
- “The gameplay is very barebones and boring.”
- “However, learning the gameplay required more time than those who have not already played RTS and strategy games would probably enjoy.”
- “As for gameplay, I'm coming off of the Company of Heroes franchise, so my expectations are rather high.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The game's optimization is notably lacking, with users reporting performance issues such as light stuttering and rare crashes, particularly on higher graphics settings. Additionally, there are audio glitches, such as previous mission audio overlapping with victory screens, indicating poor compatibility with modern systems.
- “First, let's talk performance.”
- “I will say it has some performance issues, so try not to set the graphics too high (they do look quite nice considering when it was made).”
- “I will say, it has some performance issues, so try not to go too high on graphics settings (they do look quite nice considering when it was made).”
- “Ran the game on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit with light stuttering every now and then and a very rare crash during quick loads.”
- “It is very poorly optimized for modern systems with stuttering and next mission audio playing over the previous mission's victory screen.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's music has received mixed feedback; while some appreciate the soundtrack's release, others criticize it for being monotone and lacking variety. Additionally, the absence of in-mission dialogue audio and poor voice acting detracts from the overall audio experience, suggesting a budget constraint in production.
- “Thank god they came out with the soundtrack.”
- “Speaking of cheap, the game was obviously made on a shoestring budget, as there's no audio for in-mission dialogue (a step backwards for the series), little music, and what voice acting they do use is absurdly bad.”
- “The music is a bit monotone but fits in.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the emotional aspect of the game deeply engaging, as it captivates their attention and prompts significant, gut-level decisions through various choices in upgrades and equipment. This immersive experience enhances their overall enjoyment and connection to the game.
- “The game completely absorbed my attention and evoked deep emotional responses, making every decision feel significant.”
- “I loved how the multiple choices in upgrades and equipment added layers to the emotional experience.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the Panzers series has received mixed reviews, with the first game being described as both cringe-worthy and funny, while the second installment offered a lighthearted tone. However, the latest entry is criticized for its poor execution of humor, with units excessively shouting for help and acknowledging commands in a way that feels forced and unamusing.
- “Meanwhile, your units are constantly shouting for help, acknowledging your commands, or just making noise—presumably because the developers thought that was funny.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is severely criticized, with users reporting frequent freezes and crashes that hinder gameplay, leading to frustration and dissatisfaction. Many players express regret over their purchase, citing issues with add-ons and difficulty obtaining refunds. Overall, the consensus is to avoid the game due to its unstable performance.
- “Cannot write a review as the game freezes up once loaded. Complete waste of money. Steam is refusing to refund as the game has been owned for more than 2 months. Fair enough you may think, but there are many add-ons to this and it is those that will not play at all. Avoid this game. Mind you, having said that, Windows 10 has a lot to answer for.”
- “The game constantly freezes for minutes at a time between games.”

Skip Critic Reviews

60%Critics’ scoreBased on 2 critic reviews

Skip Game Offers

Buy Codename: Panzers - Cold War

2h Median play time

2h Average play time

2-2h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Codename: Panzers - Cold War

48%1.4kreviews

Blitzkrieg 3

2017

Tactical Real-time Strategy

86%2.3kreviews

Men of War

2009

Real-time Strategy

68%2.1kreviews

Sudden Strike 4

2017

Real-time Strategy

73%7.9kreviews

Iron Harvest

2020

Casual Real-time Strategy

76%378reviews

Faces of War

2014

Tactical Real-time Strategy

More games like Codename: Panzers - Cold War

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Codename: Panzers - Cold War is a real-time strategy game with warfare and historical themes.

Codename: Panzers - Cold War is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 2 hours playing Codename: Panzers - Cold War.

Codename: Panzers - Cold War was released on May 6, 2009.

Codename: Panzers - Cold War was developed by InnoGlow.

Codename: Panzers - Cold War has received neutral reviews from players and neutral reviews from critics. Most players liked this game for its story but disliked it for its optimization.

Codename: Panzers - Cold War is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Blitzkrieg 3, Men of War, Sudden Strike 4, Iron Harvest, Faces of War and others.

Codename: Panzers - Cold War

Platforms

About

Codename: Panzers - Cold War review