Cannons Lasers Rockets

About

Cannons Lasers Rockets is a fast-paced, bright and colorful space arcade equally enjoyable for hardcore and casual gamers. For victory you need only three tools - cannons, lasers and rockets! Discover a spaceship MOBA game with 2D combat in 3D environment, wide variety of play styles, and fun gameplay for casual and pro gamers alike. Cannons Lasers Rockets has both light-hearted gameplay and deep …

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

21%

Audience ScoreBased on 346 reviews

emotional1 positive mentions

gameplay4 negative mentions

The game has an innovative concept and potential for fun gameplay.
Some players found the graphics appealing and the idea of a space battle MOBA interesting.
It's free to play, which allows players to try it without financial commitment.

The game is largely unplayable due to persistent login issues and server problems.
Many players report severe bugs, lag, and a lack of online players, making it difficult to find matches.
The tutorial is poorly designed and does not adequately teach players how to play, leading to confusion.

gameplay
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
70%
17%
The gameplay has been widely criticized for its slow pace, clunky controls, and lack of intuitive mechanics, making it feel tedious and unengaging. Many players noted that the graphics are subpar and the overall experience resembles a low-quality browser game, with significant issues such as lag and bugs further detracting from enjoyment. While the concept shows potential, the execution leaves much to be desired, leading to a frustrating experience for most users.
- “Gameplay involves playing as 3-dimensional spaceships on a 2-dimensional plane (yeah...2D in space) and engaging in a spaceship battle with the main goal of destroying the enemy base.”
- “The idea is interesting, the gameplay has a ton of potential to be fun, the graphics are decent, but it's just not playable right now.”
- “This game shows some really awesome ideas and gameplay but the servers are really laggy!”
- “Windowed game, slow and tedious gameplay (which is the opposite of what the trailer's impression of the game was), microtransactions, tutorial is slow and badly explained, clunky controls.”
- “This game's graphics are awful, the gameplay is really primitive and it feels like a cheap browser game I could find on Newgrounds in 5 minutes.”
- “The gameplay is very 'sticky', I always crashed into everything, the aiming is very abrupt, and it's so difficult to shoot...”
graphics
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
62%
24%
The graphics in this game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users describing them as poor, lacking detail, and reminiscent of low-quality browser games. Reviewers also criticized the absence of graphics settings, leading to performance issues and a frustrating experience. While some noted that the graphics could be decent under certain conditions, the overall consensus is that they are inadequate and contribute to a lackluster gameplay experience.
- “Ok this game won't work or people just don't like to play, I've played the tutorial; beautiful graphics for sure!”
- “Graphics: overall, look kinda nice.”
- “-better graphics”
- “Poor graphics and fps, uninteresting enemies that are impossible to kill, everything costs actual money, really slow, terrible servers, really buggy, barely any textures, and just awful.”
- “This game's graphics are awful, the gameplay is really primitive and it feels like a cheap browser game I could find on Newgrounds in 5 minutes.”
- “There's no graphics settings outside of enabling vsync and a crippling glitch that makes the graphics not even appear if running the game windowed (which is the default and has to be done with Windows keyboard commands because, again, no graphics settings).”
stability
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is widely criticized for its severe stability issues, with users reporting frequent bugs, lag, and crashes that render it nearly unplayable. Many reviewers express disappointment in its performance, citing poor optimization and a lack of polish, particularly in online multiplayer modes. Overall, the consensus is that the game is currently too unstable to recommend, despite its potential.
- “This game has potential but at least for now (mid-2015) the game is too buggy to run on a Mac.”
- “Currently it seems fairly buggy and 'in progress'; it's a cool concept but until they can get the multiplayer working it isn't really good. I don't recommend the game in its current state but when it's much more finished I might change my mind.”
- “It is a buggy mess!”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and slow, often leading to frustration with long wait times for others to join and clunky controls. While some appreciate the focus on in-game experience for upgrades rather than traditional grinding, the overall sentiment leans towards a negative experience due to poorly explained tutorials and the presence of microtransactions.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “For those lucky enough to get it to work, they will probably grow old and start to see their grandchildren grow up as they tediously wait for people to join in at the waiting for players screen.”
- “Windowed game, slow and tedious gameplay (which is the opposite of what the trailer's impression of the game was), microtransactions, the tutorial is slow and badly explained, clunky controls.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story aspect of the game is hindered by technical issues, with players experiencing difficulties in progressing past the tutorial mission due to server disconnections and login problems. This has led to frustration and a lack of engagement with the narrative.
- “Stuck at 'hangar connected', or won't start mission, if it ever gets over the login phase.”
- “In the end, I had to shut down the game because it says 'disconnected from server', and this was the tutorial mission.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game suffers from significant optimization issues, with users reporting poor performance, bugs, and a lack of polish. Despite being in alpha/early access, the tutorial and server connectivity are also criticized, contributing to an overall frustrating experience.
- “The game is definitely not optimized, and newer technologies get bogged down by the clutter.”
- “The only explanation is that the game is horribly unoptimized and buggy.”
- “It needs more polish and better optimization.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization aspect of the game is heavily criticized for its pervasive microtransactions, which detract from the overall experience and contribute to slow and tedious gameplay. Players feel that the game's promotional materials misrepresent its quality, and the presence of in-game purchases raises concerns about its value.
- “Microtransactions everywhere.”
- “Windowed game, slow and tedious gameplay (which is the opposite of what the trailer's impression of the game was), microtransactions, tutorial is slow and badly explained, clunky controls.”
- “A game with in-game purchases should throw up a red flag.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews suggest that the emotional impact of the game may not be fully realized at launch, indicating that players might benefit from waiting a year for a more polished experience that could enhance its emotional depth.