BLOCKADE

About

Blockade Classic! First Person Shooter in an editable procedural cubic world. A large arsenal of weapons, 4 teams at the same time and up to 32 players on one map. A large number of game modes!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

63%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,087 reviews

graphics13 positive mentions

story5 negative mentions

The game offers a nostalgic experience for players who enjoyed it in the past.
It's free to play, making it accessible to a wide audience.
The building mechanics and various game modes provide a fun and engaging gameplay experience.

The game is heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult for new players to compete.
There are numerous hackers and cheaters, which significantly detracts from the gameplay experience.
Server issues, including high latency and a lack of English-speaking players, make it frustrating to play.

gameplay
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
55%
23%
The gameplay of the game receives mixed reviews, with some players enjoying the mechanics and competitive aspects, while others criticize it for being slow, unbalanced, and plagued by issues like hackers and a toxic community. Many appreciate the variety of modes and the potential for fun, but frustrations with graphics, weapon balancing, and lack of innovation detract from the overall experience. Overall, while some find it enjoyable, others deem it frustrating and lacking in quality.
- “Riveting gameplay.”
- “I love the gameplay; it feels like I'm in the real thing.”
- “Gameplay is competitive but fun at the same time; you just need to adapt your playstyle. It's very enjoyable compared to all the other games currently played or have been released; this is by far better.”
- “Gameplay seems slow for a FPS.”
- “The community is toxic and even the gameplay isn't good at all!”
- “Gameplay of this game is bad; there is no sneaking, it's just hiding behind the wall and hoping no one sees you.”
graphics
38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
34%
50%
16%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many users describing them as low-quality or reminiscent of "Minecraft," while others praise them as decent or even impressive for the intended style. Some players express frustration over the lack of customization options and optimization issues, while a few highlight the graphics as a strong point of the game. Overall, the consensus leans towards the graphics being subpar, especially compared to modern standards.
- “Graphics are spot on, 4k resolution and RTX type of stuff.”
- “Absolutely amazing graphics.”
- “This game is incredible, the best graphics I have ever seen, and the best gameplay.”
- “Shitty community, 150 ping because no EU servers, pay-to-win, terrible online (literally 3-4 servers online), no graphics settings, you can't change resolution, optimization sucks (RTX 3050 120 fps in a pixelated Minecraft-like game), can't change weapons when reloading, can't cancel reloading, no spectate mode for you if you died as a zombie in zombie mode.”
- “P2W Russian game + Minecraft graphics with guns = no.”
- “Honestly, the graphics are pretty bad for today's standards, and I think the storyline was pretty subpar.”
story
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
71%
18%
The reviews indicate a significant divide regarding the game's story, with many users stating that it lacks a coherent narrative or story mode, labeling it as "no story" or "terrible." A few users mention that while there are daily missions that can be entertaining, they are repetitive and do not contribute to a meaningful storyline. Overall, the consensus leans towards the absence of a compelling story, with some acknowledging minor narrative elements that fail to impress.
- “The story had me crying at times.”
- “Daily missions and missions from the battle pass are actually really entertaining, even though they are quite repetitive.”
- “The storyline is engaging and keeps you invested throughout the game.”
- “✅ this game has no story”
- “✅ 0 (no story)”
- “☑️ no story”
grinding
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Players consistently express that the grinding required in the game is excessive, often likening it to needing a "second life" to progress. Many find the repetitive nature of grinding for resources and levels tedious, detracting from overall enjoyment.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Requires too much grinding to get even started with something.”
- “Grinding at higher levels is a bit too much.”
humor
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with players finding it entertaining and enjoyable, particularly for casual play. Many highlight the amusing interactions, especially with other players, and consider it a good choice for a lighthearted gaming experience, despite acknowledging its lack of balance and depth as a serious game. Overall, it serves as a fun escape rather than a competitive challenge.
- “Funny game, I was playing when I was a kid.”
- “Funny block game.”
- “Hella funny but unbalanced.”
stability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
86%
The game is widely criticized for its lack of stability, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and hitbox issues that detract from the overall experience. While some players find enjoyment in the gameplay, the persistent technical problems make it feel unpolished and frustrating.
- “Good game, has a ton of bugs and glitches and hackers; aside from that, it is good.”
- “Overall the game is buggy; nothing feels polished, and things don't appear when they are supposed to.”
- “The game is a very buggy mess, but at least you can get coins for free by playing.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The music in the game evokes strong feelings of nostalgia for many players, with some expressing emotional responses to the lobby music. However, there are also comments indicating that certain areas may lack engaging musical elements, described as "filling noises" rather than memorable tunes. Overall, the music is a mixed bag, with standout moments overshadowed by less impactful sound design.
- “This game gives me so much nostalgia; I wanted to play today and heard the lobby music and almost cried.”
- “Just filling noises; no music.”
- “Music and sound are lacking.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The monetization in the game is heavily criticized for its pervasive microtransactions, leading to a feeling of frustration among players. While upgrades are advertised, they are often misleading, and players are advised to avoid in-game purchases except for cosmetic items. However, those who invest time can progress without spending money, making it possible to enjoy the game without financial loss.
- “This is false, don't make any in-game purchases unless it is for cosmetics, consumables, or throwables if you choose this game.”
- “So if you put some time into the game, you can get good and if you don't like it and haven't made an in-game purchase, good for you, no money is lost!”
- “It feels like a blockpost that was thrown in a dishwasher; oh, don't get me started, it's literally microtransactions everywhere!”
- “This is false; don't make any in-game purchases unless it is for cosmetics, consumables, or throwables if you choose this game.”
- “So if you put some time into the game, you can get good, and if you don't like it and haven't made an in-game purchase, good for you, no money is lost!”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews; while some players report good performance, others criticize it as poor, particularly for those outside designated server regions, leading to issues like rubber banding. There is a consensus that improvements in both performance and graphics are needed.
- “Nice game with good performance.”
- “Optimization is absolute garbage.”
- “I think the next time there could be some improvements in performance and graphics.”
- “Server performance is poor if you live outside the allocated regions, and you will experience some rubber banding.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional impact of the game is significant, with players reporting intense feelings that led to tears and a strong desire to avoid playing it again due to its profound effect.
- “Powerful stuff, I cried.”
- “This game made me cry.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The game's replayability is mixed, with some users noting it is infinitely replayable or nearly so, while others rate its replay value as low, at 4 out of 10. This suggests that while there may be elements that encourage repeated play, overall, the game may lack sufficient variety or depth to keep players engaged long-term.
- “The game is infinitely replayable, offering new experiences with each playthrough.”
- “I find myself coming back to this game time and time again; the replayability is outstanding!”
- “Every run feels fresh and exciting, making it a game I can play endlessly.”
- “The replay value is quite low, I would rate it a 4 out of 10.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to go back and play it again.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices and consequences makes replaying feel pointless.”