Skip to main content
Pixel Strike 3D Game Cover

About

Pixel Strike 3D is a single player and multiplayer role playing shooter game. It was developed by Vulcron and was released on May 29, 2020. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Pixel Strike 3D is a Multiplayer First-Person Shooter that features fast-paced gameplay and a wide variety of player customization. This is not your average pixelated gun game. It’s time to stop crafting and start shooting!

Skip User Reviews

72%
Audience ScoreBased on 6,336 reviews
gameplay60 positive mentions
stability47 negative mentions

  • The game offers a fun and nostalgic experience reminiscent of Pixel Gun 3D, making it enjoyable for players who loved that game.
  • It features a variety of game modes, including unique ones like Squid Game and Death Run, which add diversity to gameplay.
  • The graphics are decent for a free-to-play game, and it runs well on low-end PCs, making it accessible to a wider audience.
  • The game is plagued by hackers and cheaters, which significantly detracts from the overall experience and fairness of matches.
  • There are numerous bugs and glitches, including issues with the party system and matchmaking, making it frustrating to play with friends.
  • The weapon balance is poor, with many players feeling that certain guns are overpowered while others are nearly useless.
  • gameplay
    201 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its fast-paced mechanics and addictive nature, while others criticize its clunky controls, poor hit registration, and prevalence of hackers. Many users appreciate the variety of game modes and customization options, but express frustration over the lack of casual-friendly features and the overall balance of gameplay. Despite its potential, the game is often described as needing significant improvements to its mechanics and user experience.

    • “The gameplay is very fast-paced and very smooth.”
    • “With its engaging gameplay, diverse arsenal, and vibrant community, it's a must-play for any fan of retro shooters.”
    • “The mechanics work really well, and the gameplay is fun too.”
    • “Gameplay is bad for casual players, because it lacks various tips, instructions, and mechanics that make it casual-friendly. It also lacks basic mechanics like strafing, as holding both forward or backward and left or right doesn't work.”
    • “The gameplay is unrealistic and is as much luck-based as skill-based due to server issues.”
    • “The movement is clunky, the player gets no feedback in combat, the UI is actively painful to use, and the other gameplay elements are poor at best.”
  • graphics
    141 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many praising its vibrant pixel art style and solid performance, especially for a free-to-play title. While some players appreciate the unique aesthetic reminiscent of Minecraft and classic shooters, others criticize the blocky visuals and performance issues, particularly on lower-end hardware. Overall, the graphics are considered decent to good, with a strong emphasis on gameplay over high fidelity.

    • “The graphics are on point, the gameplay is good, such an underrated game in my opinion.”
    • “Great graphics, lots of customization, and a refreshing variety of game modes and maps.”
    • “The graphics themselves are amazing and are better than games like Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege and Metro: Exodus.”
    • “The graphics are worse than a Nintendo 64 game; the game has like no players and the players that are playing this are hackers.”
    • “Poor optimization and lag; even on the lowest graphics settings, the game still stutters and drops to about 4 fps randomly. It seems to lag every time someone is killed, spawns in, or when someone joins the server.”
    • “The blocky graphics are too much for my liking, and the mechanics overall have a long way to go. The game has potential, but as of the current state, I would not recommend it.”
  • story
    65 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews for "Pixel Strike 3D" indicate a significant absence of a traditional story mode, with many players expressing disappointment over the lack of narrative content compared to its predecessor, "Pixel Gun 3D." While some users appreciate the game's competitive gameplay, they lament the loss of immersive storytelling elements, with calls for the reintroduction of a campaign or story mode to enhance the experience. Overall, the consensus is that the game would benefit greatly from a more developed narrative.

    • “The combination of stunning graphics, amazing story, and mind-boggling gameplay makes the game perfect.”
    • “Pixel Strike 3D is filled with incredibly intricately planned characters and storylines; the world-building is very well done, every single character and detail is perfectly done, not a single detail omitted.”
    • “The well-established story arcs hit very hard; I felt (spoiler alert) xx shadowminer xx's death for weeks.”
    • “This game doesn't even have a story mode.”
    • “Good game, I miss the story mode; it's kind of lame without it.”
    • “A major con with the transfer to PC is no story.”
  • humor
    61 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with players finding it both intentionally and unintentionally funny, often describing their experiences as hilariously absurd. Many reviews highlight the game's comedic elements, such as funny character skins and amusing interactions with friends, making it a source of laughter despite its flaws. Overall, the game's humor contributes significantly to its appeal, encouraging players to enjoy it in a lighthearted manner.

    • “It's so hilariously bad that it's good.”
    • “But as we played together, I discovered that Captain Chicken Nugget was not only a skilled player but also a hilarious person. He would crack jokes and make absurd comments that had me laughing so hard I had tears in my eyes.”
    • “Very funny game with plenty of fun to be had.”
    • “The jokes fall flat and feel forced.”
    • “I expected more clever humor, but it was mostly cringeworthy.”
    • “The attempts at comedy just missed the mark entirely.”
  • stability
    49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is plagued by numerous bugs and glitches, leading to a frustrating experience for players. Common issues include freezing, unresponsive controls, and problems with loading and progression, which significantly detract from gameplay. While some players find enjoyment despite these flaws, the overall consensus is that the game requires substantial optimization and fixes to improve stability.

    • “The game runs great without any bugs.”
    • “I haven't encountered any issues; it's completely bug-free.”
    • “The stability of the game is impressive.”
    • “It's a buggy mess.”
    • “Game is very buggy and hardly works.”
    • “Horrible buggy game, waste of time.”
  • monetization
    39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users labeling it a "cash grab" filled with aggressive microtransactions and intrusive ads. Players express frustration over the pay-to-win mechanics and the prevalence of in-game purchases that detract from the overall experience, although some note that progression does not strictly require spending money. Overall, the monetization strategy is seen as exploitative, overshadowing the game's potential enjoyment.

    • “The in-app purchases aren't as invasive, and are purely for cosmetic purposes this time around (and even if you don't like that, you can make your own skin by paying a small fee using the in-game currency instead).”
    • “Frames are nice (even with no graphics card), smooth gameplay, and they don't push microtransactions down your throat.”
    • “It's also important to note that the progression in the game doesn't force microtransactions on you; it's not very hard to level up if you have any previous FPS experience, as aiming is still a core focus of the game, though movement is very important as well.”
    • “Just a lazy cash grab with microtransactions everywhere.”
    • “This game is a blatant cash grab.”
    • “We have your terribly predatory microtransactions and a tier system that fools a new player into thinking they're actually making progress until you very quickly get into lobbies where everyone is cracked snipers or have unlocked better guns which the level progression is tied to how good your equipment will be.”
  • music
    30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising the high-quality soundtracks and memorable compositions that enhance the gameplay experience, while others criticize it for being bland, repetitive, or overly loud compared to other audio elements. Additionally, there are complaints about music being ripped from other games and sound bugs affecting the overall enjoyment. Overall, the soundtrack is seen as a highlight by some, but a detractor for others.

    • “Main menu music very good.”
    • “In addition to the visual masterclass of design, I was also serenaded with a beautiful composition of high quality music.”
    • “It may not have a vibrant environment, but it does have a great, crazy soundtrack that just pops.”
    • “And sometimes the music is really bland and repetitive.”
    • “For co-op, the game music and the guy's cheesy voice clips are way too loud and higher than the players by default.”
    • “Music transitions when it's supposed to be intense are garbage.”
  • optimization
    28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues, including lag and stuttering, even on high-end systems. While some users noted improvements post-launch and found it runs well on lower-end PCs, others criticized it as poorly optimized, particularly for a game that appears to be a mobile port. Overall, the consensus suggests that while there are moments of solid performance, the game suffers from serious optimization flaws that detract from the overall experience.

    • “The graphics hold up overall, and performance is solid.”
    • “Great game with good optimizations, and no game-breaking weapons.”
    • “This game is very well optimized; I can see the other team's name tags while playing, and that makes me feel safer.”
    • “Conclusion: it's not a bad game, and I will still consider it from the first minute I played, but it’s so poorly optimized, and all they do is add more skins simply to make more money, without focusing on the details of why their game has fewer and fewer players across all platforms.”
    • “Very badly optimized; all my friends and I cannot even legitimately join a game as a group.”
    • “Poor optimization and lag; even on the lowest graphics settings, the game still stutters and drops to about 4 fps randomly. It seems to lag every time someone is killed, spawns in, or when someone joins the server.”
  • grinding
    24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews indicate that grinding in the game is excessively time-consuming and often feels tedious, with many players expressing that it requires an unrealistic commitment, likening it to needing "a second life." While some appreciate the addictive gameplay and the potential for progression, the grind for upgrades and weapons is frequently criticized for being overly demanding and sometimes leading to a pay-to-win scenario. Overall, the grinding aspect is a significant point of contention, with many players finding it detracts from the overall enjoyment of the game.

    • “A bit grindy sometimes.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “Guns are pay-to-win, since grinding takes far too long.”
    • “Playing this game for more than ten minutes at a time is like grinding my ass with sandpaper.”
  • emotional
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional responses to the game vary widely, with some players expressing deep frustration and disappointment, feeling emotionally drained and questioning their experiences, while others highlight the game's ability to evoke strong feelings through its moving narrative and character development. Many reviewers appreciate the emotional depth and immersive storytelling, describing it as a powerful journey that resonates long after gameplay, contrasting sharply with those who found it lacking in substance and emotional engagement. Overall, the game elicits a strong emotional reaction, whether positive or negative, from its players.

    • “I can’t tell you much about some of part 2’s best aspects, but not because I don’t want to – I’m bursting to talk with anyone about all the moving, uplifting, and heart-wrenching moments that have been replaying in my mind for days since I first beat this adventure.”
    • “It delivers a layered, emotionally shattering story on top of stealth and action gameplay that improves the first game’s mechanics while integrating a bit more of Uncharted’s greater mobility and action.”
    • “It has without a doubt, left me feeling wholesome towards this game and I will forever treasure such masterpieces within my library of games.”
  • replayability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players generally find the replayability of the game to be high, with many citing multiple paths, varied character choices, and dynamic outcomes that encourage repeated playthroughs. The inclusion of unlockable content and challenges further enhances the game's longevity, making it appealing for those who enjoy exploring different strategies and experiences. Overall, the game offers a compelling reason to return for additional sessions.

    • “The replay value is incredible, with so many different choices and paths to explore.”
    • “Every playthrough feels fresh and unique, thanks to the diverse character options and storylines.”
    • “I love how the game encourages multiple runs, each revealing new secrets and challenges.”
    • “The replay value is almost nonexistent; once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to go back.”
    • “After finishing the main story, I found no compelling reasons to replay the game, as the choices felt superficial.”
    • “The lack of meaningful variations in gameplay makes replaying feel like a chore rather than an enjoyable experience.”
  • atmosphere
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is heavily influenced by titles like Hexen and Doom, featuring diverse weapons and immersive maps that enhance the experience. Players find it fun and atmospheric, particularly during ship battles, although some aspects may limit broader recommendations.

    • “Moreover, the influence of Hexen and Doom is evident in the game's diverse arsenal of weapons and its atmospheric maps.”
    • “The game is super fun, super atmospheric, and when you can at least fight people and get in ship battles and have a fair fight, it's super fun.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Pixel Strike 3D

3h Median play time
3h Average play time
2-4h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 10 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Pixel Strike 3D

Games Like Pixel Strike 3D

WARMODE Image
BLOCKADE 3D Image
Rogue Company Image
Combat Master: Season 5 Image
KUBOOM Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Pixel Strike 3D is a role playing shooter game.

Pixel Strike 3D is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 3 hours playing Pixel Strike 3D.

Pixel Strike 3D was released on May 29, 2020.

Pixel Strike 3D was developed by Vulcron.

Pixel Strike 3D has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its stability.

Pixel Strike 3D is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include WARMODE, BLOCKADE 3D, Rogue Company, Combat Master: Season 5, KUBOOM and others.