Bet On Soldier
- December 5, 2014
- Kylotonn
Get on Steam"Bet On Soldier" is a first-person shooter game where players bet on themselves or other soldiers to win battles. The game features a wide range of weapons, advanced AI, and a unique betting system that adds an extra layer of strategy to the combat. Players can earn money by completing missions and eliminating enemies, which they can use to upgrade their gear or place bigger bets.
PC
Windows
Reviews
- The game features a unique economy-based mechanic where players earn money for kills, which adds a strategic layer to gameplay.
- The gunplay is enjoyable, with a satisfying progression as players upgrade their weapons and armor throughout the game.
- The atmosphere and setting are intriguing, with a dystopian theme that mixes trench warfare with gladiatorial combat.
- The game suffers from significant difficulty spikes and unbalanced boss fights, making it frustrating for many players.
- Technical issues such as janky AI, bugs, and unskippable cutscenes detract from the overall experience.
- The story and voice acting are often criticized for being generic and poorly executed, which undermines the game's potential.
- story58 mentions
- 14 % positive mentions
- 76 % neutral mentions
- 10 % negative mentions
The game's story has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it to be a generic revenge plot that is poorly executed through lengthy cutscenes and weak voice acting. While some appreciate the original twists and choices that impact the narrative, others criticize the clumsy writing and clichéd character motivations, leading to an overall perception of a lackluster storyline. Despite these criticisms, a few players still find enjoyment in the game's setting and premise, suggesting that the story may appeal to those who prioritize gameplay over narrative depth.
“The story of this game is very original; it has turns and twists and it's really interesting. There are two choices later in the game which will impact how the story progresses. I won't be spoiling these choices, but none of them feel right.”
“The developers really tried to explain the backstory and motivation of your character, who is a soldier in a never-ending war where people can 'bet on' soldiers to win money.”
“Awesome game, great story, definitely worth the price.”
“The story is extremely stupid with clumsy writing and a really nonsensical cliffhanger ending.”
“The story of the protagonist is eye-rollingly cliché.”
“Most of the story progression happens between missions with a horrible narration.”
- gameplay28 mentions
- 36 % positive mentions
- 54 % neutral mentions
- 11 % negative mentions
The gameplay of this title features a "war = money" mechanic where players earn currency for kills, which is crucial in early levels but becomes less significant later on. While the combat mechanics and gunplay are generally smooth and enjoyable, the overall experience is marred by unbalanced miniboss encounters, simplistic run-and-gun gameplay, and occasional frustrating mechanics. Despite its budget origins and some interesting ideas, many players find the gameplay generic and underwhelming, with a mix of fun elements overshadowed by issues like excessive cutscenes and unclear mechanics.
“The gameplay loop, game smoothness, and overall gun feel is great.”
“Some basic gameplay mechanics focus on this 'war = money' premise: before every mission, you have to buy your equipment and guns, and even during the mission, you have to pay with in-game currency for armor repairs, ammo, and even savegames.”
“Mixing in exoskeletons (mechs) with regular FPS gameplay is quite nice.”
“What moron makes an arena-based shooter with item store mechanics in combat?”
“Some basic gameplay mechanics focus on this 'war = money' premise: before every mission, you have to buy your equipment and guns, and even during the mission, you have to pay with in-game currency for armor repairs, ammo, and even save games.”
“Next to that, there are too many cutscenes involved, which really break apart the fast-paced gameplay.”
- graphics12 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 25 % negative mentions
Overall, the graphics of the game are considered dated, reflecting its 2005 release, with many users noting that while they were impressive for their time, they now appear muddy and mediocre. Despite this, some players appreciate the nostalgic value and fun gameplay, suggesting that the visuals do not significantly detract from the overall experience. While modern standards may overshadow the graphics, they still hold a certain charm for those willing to overlook their age.
“I'm spoiled for graphics but still loved replaying it.”
“Graphics were pretty good for the time and overall the game is great entertainment for its price.”
“Though the gameplay is solid and the graphics are actually pretty good for the time period (comparable to games like Unreal 2, Doom 3, or Butcher Bay).”
“I can't fault the game graphics for being old, but the whole game is ugly and muddy looking.”
“Animations and graphics are dated, as to be expected since the game was released in 2005.”
“Mediocre graphics”
- music4 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 75 % negative mentions
The music in the game is characterized as minimalistic and haunting, though some players find it repetitive. While opinions vary, it is generally considered fairly good, despite criticisms of the overall quality of the game's other elements.
“The music is fairly good too!”
“The music is extremely repetitive, but also oddly haunting.”
“The music is rather minimalistic.”
“However, everything else, including the music, level design, and story, is quite subpar or below that.”
- optimization2 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The game's optimization is criticized for its janky and glitch-ridden performance, which significantly undermines the overall experience. Additionally, the reliance on battle performance for earning in-game currency to purchase upgrades adds a layer of frustration.
“It depends on your battle performance how much money you make, and from that, you can buy better weapons and armor.”
“Its janky and glitch-ridden performance seriously detracts from the overall experience.”
- stability2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with numerous bugs detracting from its overall experience. Despite its potential, players find it frustratingly unstable, hindering enjoyment.
“If the game weren't so damn buggy, it would actually be a decent game.”
“Bet on Soldier is a buggy mess that had great potential.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The monetization aspect of the game is noted for its absence of real money microtransactions, which was a positive feature for players in 2005, allowing them to enjoy the gameplay without financial pressure.
“The game feels like it's designed to push players towards spending real money on microtransactions, which is frustrating.”
“I can't enjoy the game without being bombarded by constant prompts to buy in-game currency.”
“It seems like every feature is locked behind a paywall, making it hard to progress without spending extra money.”
- atmosphere1 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The game is noted for its unique atmosphere, which sets it apart from others in the genre.
“This game has a unique atmosphere.”
- humor1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is characterized by a deadpan delivery that effectively elicits laughter, making it a standout feature for players.
“This is all told with a deadpan nonchalance that had me laughing out loud.”
“The witty dialogue and absurd situations kept me chuckling throughout the game.”
“I love how the humor is cleverly woven into the gameplay, making every moment enjoyable.”
