ANAREA Battle Royale

About

ANAREA Battle Royale is a multiplayer survival survival game. It was developed by AXC GAMES and was released on August 14, 2020. It received neutral reviews from players.

"ANAREA Battle Royale" is a fast-paced, arcady Third Person Shooter game by AXC Games. It features small-scale maps designed for skilled and aggressive gameplay, with no bloom or lengthy loot phases. The game offers training mode and several modes like solo, duos, and squads. The goal is to show accuracy and combat mechanics to reach the royal victory.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

52%

Audience ScoreBased on 669 reviews

gameplay22 positive mentions

graphics8 negative mentions

The game has potential and offers nostalgic gameplay reminiscent of H1Z1.
The shooting mechanics are satisfying and the movement feels good.
The developers are actively working on updates and improvements.

The game is plagued by constant crashes and server issues, making it nearly unplayable.
Default keybindings are confusing and not user-friendly, leading to a frustrating experience.
The game feels unfinished and lacks essential features, leading many players to feel scammed.

gameplay
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
39%
11%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting significant bugs and crashes, particularly in its alpha state. While some appreciate the core mechanics, gunplay, and movement, others criticize the clunky controls and lack of feedback during combat. Overall, there is a consensus that the game has potential but requires further refinement and updates to improve the overall experience.
- “Been playing this game since alpha release. It was very buggy at the start, but after a massive update, I have not crashed once. The gunfights are so much fun, with a feel similar to H1Z1 but a little cleaner. Movement is good, and I can't wait for the upcoming duos and squads.”
- “The raw shooting mechanics make hitting shots so satisfying, and the best aimer prevails. Overall, the mechanics for the game are great, and I have really enjoyed my time playing.”
- “Gameplay-wise, the game is fun and has loads of potential. For such a small dev team, I thought it was going to be a scam, but honestly, the gameplay is there; it just needs some polishing.”
- “Trash royal, I can't even. The controls are horrible, the gameplay feels clunky as hell. I know it's an alpha, but it just looks like a cash grab. I'll happily try it once it goes free-to-play or has more to offer.”
- “The gameplay is clunky and laggy, as others say, so nothing surprising here considering the game is in early access.”
- “Horrible mechanics, gunplay, walking feels janky; it's just utter trash.”
graphics
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
54%
33%
The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users describing them as subpar, reminiscent of older consoles like the PlayStation 2 or 3. While some reviewers noted potential in the art style and mentioned that the game could improve with updates, the consensus is that the current graphical quality is disappointing and detracts from the overall experience. Additionally, frequent crashes and performance issues further exacerbate the graphical shortcomings, leading to a frustrating gameplay experience.
- “The art style is not ultra realistic but it’s well done.”
- “The game has a lot of potential and the graphics are really good (except the player model).”
- “Love the graphics and love the gun skill, very reminiscent of early H1Z1.”
- “The graphics are especially horrible, and I am not picky at all when it comes to graphics since they sometimes have nice charm (especially in older games), but these graphics are just bad, plain and simple.”
- “Graphics are very bad; I could do way better in UE4 for lower-end GPUs (I have a 4GB GPU, which should be more than enough for low to medium settings). It looks like PlayStation 3 graphics or closer to PlayStation 2.”
- “The graphics are terrible and even then it turns your computer into a ticking time bomb.”
stability
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
96%
The game's stability has been a significant concern among players, with many reporting frequent crashes, bugs, and glitches, particularly in its alpha state. While some users acknowledge improvements following updates, others express frustration over persistent issues that hinder gameplay. Overall, the consensus is that while the game shows potential, it remains unstable and unpolished, making it difficult to recommend for purchase at this stage.
- “It runs great for being in alpha.”
- “The game is impressively stable, especially considering its early development stage.”
- “I've experienced very few crashes, which is remarkable for an alpha release.”
- “Game is garbage... super buggy.. even in an alpha state, the game is still trash.. if you bought it, just refund it.. would not recommend buying, it's a waste. H1Z1 is 100x better than this game.. I understand it's in alpha but damn it's so terrible. So many games are pretty good in alpha state but this one I don't see them turning it around and making it a top-tier battle royale.”
- “The game crashes frequently, freezes up, displays errors, kicks players from lobbies, and so on.”
- “After every single round, the game either crashes or completely freezes at the loading screen, and you have to control + alt + delete and end the task manually. Very annoying.”
monetization
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
92%
The monetization of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with many users expressing frustration over the lack of updates and poor gameplay quality since its launch. Players feel that the developers prioritized profit over game development, leading to a negative perception of the game's value and sustainability. Overall, the sentiment is that the game is not worth purchasing, with many suggesting it should have been free-to-play with optional in-game purchases.
- “The monetization model is fair and allows players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend money.”
- “I appreciate that the game offers cosmetic items for purchase, but doesn't lock essential content behind a paywall.”
- “The in-game purchases are optional and don't affect gameplay, which makes for a more enjoyable experience.”
- “Horrible cash grab.”
- “This game was a cash grab scam, do not buy it.”
- “Total cash grab because a few streamers mentioned it recently and it got traction.”
optimization
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
46%
23%
Overall, the game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with many players highlighting significant performance issues, including crashes and server disconnects. While some users report decent frame rates, the consensus is that the game requires substantial improvements in optimization and stability to meet player expectations. Developers are acknowledged for their commitment to addressing these issues through updates, but many feel that prioritizing performance over cosmetic features is essential for the game's success.
- “The optimization is pretty good, in FPS-wise, at least for me.”
- “Keep in mind that they are going for weekly updates, so soon enough it will be smooth and a lot better performance-wise.”
- “Very good start, just needs some optimization.”
- “Bad optimization ... disconnect from the server .... 40 fps with 32GB RAM i5 6790x 5.”
- “In my opinion, for the same price, other games are better optimized and prepared for launch day.”
- “Servers need to be optimized better; bugs keep causing it to crash. Yes, it's alpha and yes, it's new, but I feel this should have been done prior to release. A lot of people pushed you to release it; we know, but it would have been better to wait longer for the release and have good servers than crappy servers on release.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express frustration with the game's current state, indicating that its alpha release lacks sufficient content and polish to warrant replayability. The sentiment suggests that until the game is more fully developed, players may not find it engaging enough to revisit.
- “What a joke! They release games once they're playable.”
- “I get that it's an alpha and wanted to be part of that process, but for $17 it needs to be a much more playable alpha, for goodness' sake.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express frustration with the grinding aspect of the game, suggesting that the current alpha state requires extensive effort to progress, which may lead to negative reviews. There is a sentiment that the developers should have opted for a more controlled alpha access to better manage player expectations and feedback.
- “The game is still in alpha; everyone should be grinding it so that when the new updates come, I don't criticize you too harshly.”
- “They should have sold it through their website and given closed alpha access; instead, they're farming bad reviews on Steam now.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The game is praised for its impressive atmosphere, which many believe could elevate it within the battle royale genre. Despite being in alpha, players note that the movement, shooting, and looting mechanics are reminiscent of H1Z1, contributing to an engaging overall experience.
- “The game has an awesome atmosphere that can make it really big in the battle royale genre.”
- “The atmosphere in this game is incredible, enhancing the overall experience.”
- “The immersive atmosphere draws you in and keeps you engaged throughout the gameplay.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is highlighted by a sarcastic tone, with users expressing amusement at the ongoing sales despite perceived shortcomings. This suggests a blend of irony and playful criticism in the game's reception.